Response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards"
A response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards" (1998 [see abstract 9813457]) notes that Krieg's assertion that communities with higher commercial/industrial tax bases are more likely to experience greater industrial con...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.) N.J.), 1998-03, Vol.13 (1), p.21-23 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 23 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Gould, Kenneth A. |
| description | A response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards" (1998 [see abstract 9813457]) notes that Krieg's assertion that communities with higher commercial/industrial tax bases are more likely to experience greater industrial control over the political economy, &, therefore, more apt to be selected as environmental hazard sites, is valid. However, his claim that it is unclear whether poor communities accept hazards for economic reasons or because they are less politically capable fails to recognize the mutual reinforcement of those factors. Economic desperation creates structural conditions that encourage industrial power & forces communities to view potential hazards as benefits. Because the introduction of environmental hazards reduces property values & discourages "cleaner" investors, lower-class community standing can be seen as both a precondition for, & the result of, toxic waste production. 5 References. J. Lindroth |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1022199729521 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61568733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>684921</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>684921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j136t-4e63b6b9cce2cf6b80e21a0cb40870aa56e7f6523e2196961efbc4bc9f7ccf7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzEtLw0AYheFBFKzVtQs3Qxe6Sp1LMpfuSkmtWhA04jJMJl80Jc3EmdTbrzdSVy8cHg5C55RMKWH8ej4bwqjWkumE0QM0oonkkVSCHqIRUSqOlJb0GJ2EsCGEEiL5CNWPEDrXBsC9w6mvLb6b4ntfw-tVwJPsDXD26fDSWAjYVThzXwN5MaGHGc48tGXAdYv7wT11Hkz5h9L2o_au3ULbmwavzI_xZZicoqPKNAHO_jtGz8s0W6yi9cPN7WK-jjaUiz6KQfBCFNpaYLYShSLAqCG2iImSxJhEgKxEwvgwa6EFhaqwcWF1Ja2tZMnH6HL_23n3voPQ59s6WGga04LbhVzQRCjJ-QAv9nATeufzztdb479zoWLNKP8FSktjLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61568733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards"</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Gould, Kenneth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gould, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><description>A response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards" (1998 [see abstract 9813457]) notes that Krieg's assertion that communities with higher commercial/industrial tax bases are more likely to experience greater industrial control over the political economy, &, therefore, more apt to be selected as environmental hazard sites, is valid. However, his claim that it is unclear whether poor communities accept hazards for economic reasons or because they are less politically capable fails to recognize the mutual reinforcement of those factors. Economic desperation creates structural conditions that encourage industrial power & forces communities to view potential hazards as benefits. Because the introduction of environmental hazards reduces property values & discourages "cleaner" investors, lower-class community standing can be seen as both a precondition for, & the result of, toxic waste production. 5 References. J. Lindroth</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1022199729521</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOFOET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Eastern Sociological Society</publisher><subject>Boston, Massachusetts ; Communities ; Community structure ; Economic costs ; Environmental hazards ; Environmental justice ; Environmental sociology ; Green economics ; Hazardous waste ; Hazards ; Health hazards ; Low Income Areas ; Racism ; Social Inequality ; Social Justice ; Toxic Substances ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.), 1998-03, Vol.13 (1), p.21-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 Plenum Publishing Corporation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/684921$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/684921$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gould, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards"</title><title>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</title><description>A response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards" (1998 [see abstract 9813457]) notes that Krieg's assertion that communities with higher commercial/industrial tax bases are more likely to experience greater industrial control over the political economy, &, therefore, more apt to be selected as environmental hazard sites, is valid. However, his claim that it is unclear whether poor communities accept hazards for economic reasons or because they are less politically capable fails to recognize the mutual reinforcement of those factors. Economic desperation creates structural conditions that encourage industrial power & forces communities to view potential hazards as benefits. Because the introduction of environmental hazards reduces property values & discourages "cleaner" investors, lower-class community standing can be seen as both a precondition for, & the result of, toxic waste production. 5 References. J. Lindroth</description><subject>Boston, Massachusetts</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Environmental sociology</subject><subject>Green economics</subject><subject>Hazardous waste</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Low Income Areas</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Social Inequality</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Toxic Substances</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0884-8971</issn><issn>1573-7861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotzEtLw0AYheFBFKzVtQs3Qxe6Sp1LMpfuSkmtWhA04jJMJl80Jc3EmdTbrzdSVy8cHg5C55RMKWH8ej4bwqjWkumE0QM0oonkkVSCHqIRUSqOlJb0GJ2EsCGEEiL5CNWPEDrXBsC9w6mvLb6b4ntfw-tVwJPsDXD26fDSWAjYVThzXwN5MaGHGc48tGXAdYv7wT11Hkz5h9L2o_au3ULbmwavzI_xZZicoqPKNAHO_jtGz8s0W6yi9cPN7WK-jjaUiz6KQfBCFNpaYLYShSLAqCG2iImSxJhEgKxEwvgwa6EFhaqwcWF1Ja2tZMnH6HL_23n3voPQ59s6WGga04LbhVzQRCjJ-QAv9nATeufzztdb479zoWLNKP8FSktjLQ</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Gould, Kenneth A.</creator><general>Eastern Sociological Society</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards"</title><author>Gould, Kenneth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j136t-4e63b6b9cce2cf6b80e21a0cb40870aa56e7f6523e2196961efbc4bc9f7ccf7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Boston, Massachusetts</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Environmental sociology</topic><topic>Green economics</topic><topic>Hazardous waste</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Low Income Areas</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Social Inequality</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Toxic Substances</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gould, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gould, Kenneth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards"</atitle><jtitle>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</jtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>21-23</pages><issn>0884-8971</issn><eissn>1573-7861</eissn><coden>SOFOET</coden><abstract>A response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards" (1998 [see abstract 9813457]) notes that Krieg's assertion that communities with higher commercial/industrial tax bases are more likely to experience greater industrial control over the political economy, &, therefore, more apt to be selected as environmental hazard sites, is valid. However, his claim that it is unclear whether poor communities accept hazards for economic reasons or because they are less politically capable fails to recognize the mutual reinforcement of those factors. Economic desperation creates structural conditions that encourage industrial power & forces communities to view potential hazards as benefits. Because the introduction of environmental hazards reduces property values & discourages "cleaner" investors, lower-class community standing can be seen as both a precondition for, & the result of, toxic waste production. 5 References. J. Lindroth</abstract><pub>Eastern Sociological Society</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1022199729521</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0884-8971 |
| ispartof | Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.), 1998-03, Vol.13 (1), p.21-23 |
| issn | 0884-8971 1573-7861 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61568733 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Boston, Massachusetts Communities Community structure Economic costs Environmental hazards Environmental justice Environmental sociology Green economics Hazardous waste Hazards Health hazards Low Income Areas Racism Social Inequality Social Justice Toxic Substances Wastes |
| title | Response to Eric J. Krieg's "The Two Faces of Toxic Waste: Trends in the Spread of Environmental Hazards" |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A20%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Eric%20J.%20Krieg's%20%22The%20Two%20Faces%20of%20Toxic%20Waste:%20Trends%20in%20the%20Spread%20of%20Environmental%20Hazards%22&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20forum%20(Randolph,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Gould,%20Kenneth%20A.&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=21-23&rft.issn=0884-8971&rft.eissn=1573-7861&rft.coden=SOFOET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1022199729521&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E684921%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61568733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=684921&rfr_iscdi=true |