Structures of Mutual Obligation
‘Mutual obligation’ is a deft political slogan. Morally, it evokes deep-seated intuitions about ‘fair reciprocity’ and the ‘duty of fair play’. It seems an easy slide from those intuitions to ‘mutual obligation’ policies demanding work-for-the-dole. That slide is illegitimate, however. There are man...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of social policy 2002-10, Vol.31 (4), p.579-596 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ‘Mutual obligation’ is a deft political slogan. Morally, it evokes deep-seated
intuitions about ‘fair reciprocity’ and the ‘duty of fair play’. It seems an
easy slide from those intuitions to ‘mutual obligation’ policies demanding
work-for-the-dole. That slide is illegitimate, however. There are many different
ways to structure mutual obligation. Workfare policies, such as the
Howard government's ‘Mutual Obligation Initiative’ in Australia, pick out
only one among many alternative regimes that would answer equally
well to our root intuitions about ‘fair reciprocity’. Other ways of structuring
mutual obligations within social welfare policy are both more standard
and more desirable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0047-2794 1469-7823 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S004727940200675X |