The response of peasant farmers to price incentives: The use and misuse of profit functions
The article is set in the context of evaluating the debate between the free-marketeers [Schultz et al] and the institutionalists [Myrdal et al]. It surveys the literature on the application of profit functions to agricultural production in LDCs. In particular it provides a critical review of the lit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of development studies 1989-01, Vol.25 (2), p.169-182 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | The Journal of development studies |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Junankar, P.N. |
description | The article is set in the context of evaluating the debate between the free-marketeers [Schultz et al] and the institutionalists [Myrdal et al]. It surveys the literature on the application of profit functions to agricultural production in LDCs. In particular it provides a critical review of the literature which focuses on the inadequacy of economic theory, the problems of econometric specification, data limitations, and the contradictory nature of the econometric results. Overall, it is argued that the profit function is inappropriate on theoretical grounds and that most of the economic applications do not support the model. The article concludes with suggestions for future work which should take account of the role of class, power, and interlinkages in an historical context. Social and institutional factors, it is argued, are important in determining the behaviour of peasant farmers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00220388908422105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61540702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61540702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-24a42ab43491d67999bad8498f3e6f31e51b76a2f19be5e21c5df5bcc634fd8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoNY8Fr7A9wFBHEz9Zwkk0nEjRStQsFNu-piyGROcMrc5JrMWPrvzXC7UvxYZZHneXk5L2MvEc4RDLwFEAKkMRaMEgKhfcJ22CnZWFTwlO22_2YDnrHnpdwBgGptt2O319-IZyqHFAvxFPiBXHFx4cHlPeXCl8QPefLEp-gpLtMPKu_4Jq2Vd3Hk-6msj2pOYarmGv0y1bwX7CS4udDZ43vKbj59vL743Fx9vfxy8eGq8crg0gjllHCDksriqDtr7eBGo6wJknSQSC0OnXYioB2oJYG-HUM7eK-lCqMZ5Sl7fcytBb6vVJa-dvI0zy5SWkuvsVXQgfgPUKDsQP8TlNoqMLqr4Ju_ggiyNSiEwYq--gW9S2uO9TA9yjqP0Ra3inikfE6lZAp9vf7e5Yca1W9L978tXZ33R2eKIeW9u095HvvFPcwph-yin2rjP-s_AX0lrIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300286912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The response of peasant farmers to price incentives: The use and misuse of profit functions</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Junankar, P.N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Junankar, P.N.</creatorcontrib><description>The article is set in the context of evaluating the debate between the free-marketeers [Schultz et al] and the institutionalists [Myrdal et al]. It surveys the literature on the application of profit functions to agricultural production in LDCs. In particular it provides a critical review of the literature which focuses on the inadequacy of economic theory, the problems of econometric specification, data limitations, and the contradictory nature of the econometric results. Overall, it is argued that the profit function is inappropriate on theoretical grounds and that most of the economic applications do not support the model. The article concludes with suggestions for future work which should take account of the role of class, power, and interlinkages in an historical context. Social and institutional factors, it is argued, are important in determining the behaviour of peasant farmers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00220388908422105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agricultural prices ; Agricultural Production ; Agricultural profit ; Developing Countries ; Developing Nations ; Farming ; Market Economy ; Peasantry ; Peasants ; Prices</subject><ispartof>The Journal of development studies, 1989-01, Vol.25 (2), p.169-182</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-24a42ab43491d67999bad8498f3e6f31e51b76a2f19be5e21c5df5bcc634fd8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-24a42ab43491d67999bad8498f3e6f31e51b76a2f19be5e21c5df5bcc634fd8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904,33754</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Junankar, P.N.</creatorcontrib><title>The response of peasant farmers to price incentives: The use and misuse of profit functions</title><title>The Journal of development studies</title><description>The article is set in the context of evaluating the debate between the free-marketeers [Schultz et al] and the institutionalists [Myrdal et al]. It surveys the literature on the application of profit functions to agricultural production in LDCs. In particular it provides a critical review of the literature which focuses on the inadequacy of economic theory, the problems of econometric specification, data limitations, and the contradictory nature of the econometric results. Overall, it is argued that the profit function is inappropriate on theoretical grounds and that most of the economic applications do not support the model. The article concludes with suggestions for future work which should take account of the role of class, power, and interlinkages in an historical context. Social and institutional factors, it is argued, are important in determining the behaviour of peasant farmers.</description><subject>Agricultural prices</subject><subject>Agricultural Production</subject><subject>Agricultural profit</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Developing Nations</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Market Economy</subject><subject>Peasantry</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Prices</subject><issn>0022-0388</issn><issn>1743-9140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoNY8Fr7A9wFBHEz9Zwkk0nEjRStQsFNu-piyGROcMrc5JrMWPrvzXC7UvxYZZHneXk5L2MvEc4RDLwFEAKkMRaMEgKhfcJ22CnZWFTwlO22_2YDnrHnpdwBgGptt2O319-IZyqHFAvxFPiBXHFx4cHlPeXCl8QPefLEp-gpLtMPKu_4Jq2Vd3Hk-6msj2pOYarmGv0y1bwX7CS4udDZ43vKbj59vL743Fx9vfxy8eGq8crg0gjllHCDksriqDtr7eBGo6wJknSQSC0OnXYioB2oJYG-HUM7eK-lCqMZ5Sl7fcytBb6vVJa-dvI0zy5SWkuvsVXQgfgPUKDsQP8TlNoqMLqr4Ju_ggiyNSiEwYq--gW9S2uO9TA9yjqP0Ra3inikfE6lZAp9vf7e5Yca1W9L978tXZ33R2eKIeW9u095HvvFPcwph-yin2rjP-s_AX0lrIg</recordid><startdate>19890101</startdate><enddate>19890101</enddate><creator>Junankar, P.N.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>F. Cass</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890101</creationdate><title>The response of peasant farmers to price incentives: The use and misuse of profit functions</title><author>Junankar, P.N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-24a42ab43491d67999bad8498f3e6f31e51b76a2f19be5e21c5df5bcc634fd8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Agricultural prices</topic><topic>Agricultural Production</topic><topic>Agricultural profit</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Developing Nations</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Market Economy</topic><topic>Peasantry</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Prices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Junankar, P.N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of development studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Junankar, P.N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The response of peasant farmers to price incentives: The use and misuse of profit functions</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of development studies</jtitle><date>1989-01-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>169-182</pages><issn>0022-0388</issn><eissn>1743-9140</eissn><abstract>The article is set in the context of evaluating the debate between the free-marketeers [Schultz et al] and the institutionalists [Myrdal et al]. It surveys the literature on the application of profit functions to agricultural production in LDCs. In particular it provides a critical review of the literature which focuses on the inadequacy of economic theory, the problems of econometric specification, data limitations, and the contradictory nature of the econometric results. Overall, it is argued that the profit function is inappropriate on theoretical grounds and that most of the economic applications do not support the model. The article concludes with suggestions for future work which should take account of the role of class, power, and interlinkages in an historical context. Social and institutional factors, it is argued, are important in determining the behaviour of peasant farmers.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00220388908422105</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0388 |
ispartof | The Journal of development studies, 1989-01, Vol.25 (2), p.169-182 |
issn | 0022-0388 1743-9140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61540702 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Agricultural prices Agricultural Production Agricultural profit Developing Countries Developing Nations Farming Market Economy Peasantry Peasants Prices |
title | The response of peasant farmers to price incentives: The use and misuse of profit functions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A13%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20response%20of%20peasant%20farmers%20to%20price%20incentives:%20The%20use%20and%20misuse%20of%20profit%20functions&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20development%20studies&rft.au=Junankar,%20P.N.&rft.date=1989-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=169-182&rft.issn=0022-0388&rft.eissn=1743-9140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00220388908422105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61540702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300286912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |