Feedback from Participants and Leaders in an Intervention Program: The 1997–1998 Opening Doors Process Evaluation
Parents, students, and program leaders involved in an in-school drug prevention program called Opening Doors were assessed for their perceptions of the efficacy of the program. In general, the feedback indicated a very high program satisfaction level from respondents with parents indicating the high...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of drug education 2001-01, Vol.31 (2), p.185-206 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 206 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 185 |
| container_title | Journal of drug education |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Rye, B. J. Humpartzoomian, Richard Steep, Barbara |
| description | Parents, students, and program leaders involved in an in-school drug prevention program called Opening Doors were assessed for their perceptions of the efficacy of the program. In general, the feedback indicated a very high program satisfaction level from respondents with parents indicating the highest level satisfaction (92%). Areas for improvement ranged from: parent attendance, invitation process, increased support from schools, and increasing awareness of scheduling and time involvement by leaders and school administration based on program leader feedback as well as invitation process and program duration from the parents (e.g., 37% thought the program was too short). Student satisfaction may be predicted from the perceived impact of the program on significant relationships (e.g., with peers and family) as well as affective reactions to the program (e.g., enjoyment of the program). Finally, a school-level analysis indicated that the application of the Opening Doors Program in different schools was provided uniformly. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2190/DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61526274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ634282</ericid><sage_id>10.2190_DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1883903853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e8c66b0a7fb7b6e0ff9a2ad63022bdc617ad6daa3ebaed2225df0c520215151a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCE4CQJVB3Af_Eic1uaNNSNKIFDYhddOPcDCmJM9hJJXa8A2_Ik-BoRlCxAHlxdXW-c3StQ8gjzp4LbtiL01XxLinef1LJq_N1kSw_vl3eIQuuUp6kXJm7ZMFYmidC5uaAHIZwzRgTWpn75IDzVOfGpAsSzhDrCuwX2vihp1fgx9a2W3BjoOBqukKo0QfaurjSCzeiv0E3toOjV37YeOhf0vVnpNyY_Of3H3FoerlF17oNPR2G6IyYxRBocQPdBLPzAbnXQBfw4X4ekQ9nxfrkdbK6PL84Wa4Sm0oxJqhtllUM8qbKqwxZ0xgQUGeSCVHVNuN5XGoAiRVgLYRQdcOsEkxwFR_II3K8y9364euEYSz7NljsOnA4TKHMuBKZyNP_girPhZBGRfDpX-D1MHkXP1FyraVhUisZKbmjrB9C8NiUW9_24L-VnJVzdeVcXTlXV87VlXN10fVknz1VPdZ_PPuuIvBsD0Cw0DUenG3DrWzNdcYi9niHoW_tb7V4k8lUaBFltpMDbPDW-f-47Bc_FLvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883903853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feedback from Participants and Leaders in an Intervention Program: The 1997–1998 Opening Doors Process Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Rye, B. J. ; Humpartzoomian, Richard ; Steep, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Rye, B. J. ; Humpartzoomian, Richard ; Steep, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Parents, students, and program leaders involved in an in-school drug prevention program called Opening Doors were assessed for their perceptions of the efficacy of the program. In general, the feedback indicated a very high program satisfaction level from respondents with parents indicating the highest level satisfaction (92%). Areas for improvement ranged from: parent attendance, invitation process, increased support from schools, and increasing awareness of scheduling and time involvement by leaders and school administration based on program leader feedback as well as invitation process and program duration from the parents (e.g., 37% thought the program was too short). Student satisfaction may be predicted from the perceived impact of the program on significant relationships (e.g., with peers and family) as well as affective reactions to the program (e.g., enjoyment of the program). Finally, a school-level analysis indicated that the application of the Opening Doors Program in different schools was provided uniformly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-4159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2190/DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11487994</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDGEBT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Addictive behaviors ; Adolescent ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Canada ; Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Drug Abuse ; Drug Addiction ; Drug Education ; Drug prevention ; Educational Programs ; Efficacy ; Evaluation ; Family Relations ; Feedback ; Foreign Countries ; Formative Evaluation ; Health Promotion ; Health Promotion - organization & administration ; High Schools ; Humans ; Intervention ; Leaders ; Leadership ; Medical sciences ; Ontario ; Parents & parenting ; Parents - psychology ; Participant Satisfaction ; Peer Group ; Prevention ; Prevention and actions ; Prevention programs ; Preventive programmes ; Process evaluation ; Program Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; School Administration ; School Health Services - organization & administration ; Schools ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; Student Satisfaction ; Students ; Students - psychology ; Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Journal of drug education, 2001-01, Vol.31 (2), p.185-206</ispartof><rights>2001 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e8c66b0a7fb7b6e0ff9a2ad63022bdc617ad6daa3ebaed2225df0c520215151a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2190/DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,30998,30999,33774,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ634282$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1081860$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11487994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rye, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humpartzoomian, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steep, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>Feedback from Participants and Leaders in an Intervention Program: The 1997–1998 Opening Doors Process Evaluation</title><title>Journal of drug education</title><addtitle>J Drug Educ</addtitle><description>Parents, students, and program leaders involved in an in-school drug prevention program called Opening Doors were assessed for their perceptions of the efficacy of the program. In general, the feedback indicated a very high program satisfaction level from respondents with parents indicating the highest level satisfaction (92%). Areas for improvement ranged from: parent attendance, invitation process, increased support from schools, and increasing awareness of scheduling and time involvement by leaders and school administration based on program leader feedback as well as invitation process and program duration from the parents (e.g., 37% thought the program was too short). Student satisfaction may be predicted from the perceived impact of the program on significant relationships (e.g., with peers and family) as well as affective reactions to the program (e.g., enjoyment of the program). Finally, a school-level analysis indicated that the application of the Opening Doors Program in different schools was provided uniformly.</description><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Drug Abuse</subject><subject>Drug Addiction</subject><subject>Drug Education</subject><subject>Drug prevention</subject><subject>Educational Programs</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization & administration</subject><subject>High Schools</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Participant Satisfaction</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Preventive programmes</subject><subject>Process evaluation</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>School Administration</subject><subject>School Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>Student Satisfaction</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</subject><issn>0047-2379</issn><issn>1541-4159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCE4CQJVB3Af_Eic1uaNNSNKIFDYhddOPcDCmJM9hJJXa8A2_Ik-BoRlCxAHlxdXW-c3StQ8gjzp4LbtiL01XxLinef1LJq_N1kSw_vl3eIQuuUp6kXJm7ZMFYmidC5uaAHIZwzRgTWpn75IDzVOfGpAsSzhDrCuwX2vihp1fgx9a2W3BjoOBqukKo0QfaurjSCzeiv0E3toOjV37YeOhf0vVnpNyY_Of3H3FoerlF17oNPR2G6IyYxRBocQPdBLPzAbnXQBfw4X4ekQ9nxfrkdbK6PL84Wa4Sm0oxJqhtllUM8qbKqwxZ0xgQUGeSCVHVNuN5XGoAiRVgLYRQdcOsEkxwFR_II3K8y9364euEYSz7NljsOnA4TKHMuBKZyNP_girPhZBGRfDpX-D1MHkXP1FyraVhUisZKbmjrB9C8NiUW9_24L-VnJVzdeVcXTlXV87VlXN10fVknz1VPdZ_PPuuIvBsD0Cw0DUenG3DrWzNdcYi9niHoW_tb7V4k8lUaBFltpMDbPDW-f-47Bc_FLvQ</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Rye, B. J.</creator><creator>Humpartzoomian, Richard</creator><creator>Steep, Barbara</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Baywood</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Feedback from Participants and Leaders in an Intervention Program: The 1997–1998 Opening Doors Process Evaluation</title><author>Rye, B. J. ; Humpartzoomian, Richard ; Steep, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e8c66b0a7fb7b6e0ff9a2ad63022bdc617ad6daa3ebaed2225df0c520215151a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Drug Abuse</topic><topic>Drug Addiction</topic><topic>Drug Education</topic><topic>Drug prevention</topic><topic>Educational Programs</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization & administration</topic><topic>High Schools</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Participant Satisfaction</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Preventive programmes</topic><topic>Process evaluation</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>School Administration</topic><topic>School Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>Student Satisfaction</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rye, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humpartzoomian, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steep, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of drug education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rye, B. J.</au><au>Humpartzoomian, Richard</au><au>Steep, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ634282</ericid><atitle>Feedback from Participants and Leaders in an Intervention Program: The 1997–1998 Opening Doors Process Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of drug education</jtitle><addtitle>J Drug Educ</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>185-206</pages><issn>0047-2379</issn><eissn>1541-4159</eissn><coden>JDGEBT</coden><abstract>Parents, students, and program leaders involved in an in-school drug prevention program called Opening Doors were assessed for their perceptions of the efficacy of the program. In general, the feedback indicated a very high program satisfaction level from respondents with parents indicating the highest level satisfaction (92%). Areas for improvement ranged from: parent attendance, invitation process, increased support from schools, and increasing awareness of scheduling and time involvement by leaders and school administration based on program leader feedback as well as invitation process and program duration from the parents (e.g., 37% thought the program was too short). Student satisfaction may be predicted from the perceived impact of the program on significant relationships (e.g., with peers and family) as well as affective reactions to the program (e.g., enjoyment of the program). Finally, a school-level analysis indicated that the application of the Opening Doors Program in different schools was provided uniformly.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>11487994</pmid><doi>10.2190/DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2379 |
| ispartof | Journal of drug education, 2001-01, Vol.31 (2), p.185-206 |
| issn | 0047-2379 1541-4159 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61526274 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Addictive behaviors Adolescent Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Canada Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data Drug Abuse Drug Addiction Drug Education Drug prevention Educational Programs Efficacy Evaluation Family Relations Feedback Foreign Countries Formative Evaluation Health Promotion Health Promotion - organization & administration High Schools Humans Intervention Leaders Leadership Medical sciences Ontario Parents & parenting Parents - psychology Participant Satisfaction Peer Group Prevention Prevention and actions Prevention programs Preventive programmes Process evaluation Program Evaluation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine School Administration School Health Services - organization & administration Schools Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) Student Satisfaction Students Students - psychology Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control |
| title | Feedback from Participants and Leaders in an Intervention Program: The 1997–1998 Opening Doors Process Evaluation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A54%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feedback%20from%20Participants%20and%20Leaders%20in%20an%20Intervention%20Program:%20The%201997%E2%80%931998%20Opening%20Doors%20Process%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20drug%20education&rft.au=Rye,%20B.%20J.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=185-206&rft.issn=0047-2379&rft.eissn=1541-4159&rft.coden=JDGEBT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2190/DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1883903853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883903853&rft_id=info:pmid/11487994&rft_ericid=EJ634282&rft_sage_id=10.2190_DLEQ-ERX5-BGTE-AVNA&rfr_iscdi=true |