The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision
This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques expe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crime and delinquency 2004-04, Vol.50 (2), p.235-271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | Crime and delinquency |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Harris, Patricia M. Gingerich, Raymond Whittaker, Tiffany A. |
description | This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0011128703258939 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61521460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ798046</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0011128703258939</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57035546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKw0AUhgdRsFb3LlwEF-6ic83MLKXWGwUXVnAXJsmJTkmTOtMU3PVB9OX6JE6NKBSkZ3Pg_N-5I3RM8DkhUl5gTAihSmJGhdJM76AeEYLGTMnnXdRby_Fa30cH3k9wMKZJD7HxK0Sr5cewLCGf2wXU4P1q-Rk1ZXRlQ9BBPbemih7bGbiF9bapD9FeaSoPRz--j56uh-PBbTx6uLkbXI7inFM8j5XICiwLQnWRYc6lNCbDSU5ExjOqdGkkKEZLyjgrcKGBsQKUIiphBjDPM9ZHZ13dmWveWvDzdGp9DlVlamhanyZEUMITvBUU4SpC8GQryKRKJGE6gKcb4KRpXR22TWnoSQkWLEC4g3LXeO-gTGfOTo17TwlO109JN58SUk66FHA2_8WH91Ir_D1f3MnevMBfy3_LfQFqkJRV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221421053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Harris, Patricia M. ; Gingerich, Raymond ; Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Patricia M. ; Gingerich, Raymond ; Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-387X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0011128703258939</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRDLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Behavior Problems ; Case management ; Classification ; Client Relations ; Comparative Analysis ; Crime ; Criminals ; Criminology ; Discipline ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Evaluation Methods ; Leniency ; Management ; Motivation ; Offenders ; Outcomes of Treatment ; Parole & probation ; Prevention ; Prisoner rehabilitation ; Probation ; Probation officers ; Recidivism ; Supervision ; Supervisors ; USA</subject><ispartof>Crime and delinquency, 2004-04, Vol.50 (2), p.235-271</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011128703258939$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0011128703258939$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,30987,33761,33762,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ798046$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingerich, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><title>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</title><title>Crime and delinquency</title><description>This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Case management</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Client Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Leniency</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Outcomes of Treatment</subject><subject>Parole & probation</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prisoner rehabilitation</subject><subject>Probation</subject><subject>Probation officers</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0011-1287</issn><issn>1552-387X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKw0AUhgdRsFb3LlwEF-6ic83MLKXWGwUXVnAXJsmJTkmTOtMU3PVB9OX6JE6NKBSkZ3Pg_N-5I3RM8DkhUl5gTAihSmJGhdJM76AeEYLGTMnnXdRby_Fa30cH3k9wMKZJD7HxK0Sr5cewLCGf2wXU4P1q-Rk1ZXRlQ9BBPbemih7bGbiF9bapD9FeaSoPRz--j56uh-PBbTx6uLkbXI7inFM8j5XICiwLQnWRYc6lNCbDSU5ExjOqdGkkKEZLyjgrcKGBsQKUIiphBjDPM9ZHZ13dmWveWvDzdGp9DlVlamhanyZEUMITvBUU4SpC8GQryKRKJGE6gKcb4KRpXR22TWnoSQkWLEC4g3LXeO-gTGfOTo17TwlO109JN58SUk66FHA2_8WH91Ir_D1f3MnevMBfy3_LfQFqkJRV</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Harris, Patricia M.</creator><creator>Gingerich, Raymond</creator><creator>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</title><author>Harris, Patricia M. ; Gingerich, Raymond ; Whittaker, Tiffany A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Case management</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Client Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Leniency</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Outcomes of Treatment</topic><topic>Parole & probation</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prisoner rehabilitation</topic><topic>Probation</topic><topic>Probation officers</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingerich, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Patricia M.</au><au>Gingerich, Raymond</au><au>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ798046</ericid><atitle>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</atitle><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>235-271</pages><issn>0011-1287</issn><eissn>1552-387X</eissn><coden>CRDLAL</coden><abstract>This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0011128703258939</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-1287 |
ispartof | Crime and delinquency, 2004-04, Vol.50 (2), p.235-271 |
issn | 0011-1287 1552-387X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61521460 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adults Behavior Problems Case management Classification Client Relations Comparative Analysis Crime Criminals Criminology Discipline Effectiveness Evaluation Evaluation Methods Leniency Management Motivation Offenders Outcomes of Treatment Parole & probation Prevention Prisoner rehabilitation Probation Probation officers Recidivism Supervision Supervisors USA |
title | The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A36%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CEffectiveness%E2%80%9D%20of%20Differential%20Supervision&rft.jtitle=Crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Harris,%20Patricia%20M.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=235-271&rft.issn=0011-1287&rft.eissn=1552-387X&rft.coden=CRDLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0011128703258939&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57035546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221421053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ798046&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0011128703258939&rfr_iscdi=true |