The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision

This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques expe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crime and delinquency 2004-04, Vol.50 (2), p.235-271
Hauptverfasser: Harris, Patricia M., Gingerich, Raymond, Whittaker, Tiffany A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title Crime and delinquency
container_volume 50
creator Harris, Patricia M.
Gingerich, Raymond
Whittaker, Tiffany A.
description This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0011128703258939
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61521460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ798046</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0011128703258939</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57035546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKw0AUhgdRsFb3LlwEF-6ic83MLKXWGwUXVnAXJsmJTkmTOtMU3PVB9OX6JE6NKBSkZ3Pg_N-5I3RM8DkhUl5gTAihSmJGhdJM76AeEYLGTMnnXdRby_Fa30cH3k9wMKZJD7HxK0Sr5cewLCGf2wXU4P1q-Rk1ZXRlQ9BBPbemih7bGbiF9bapD9FeaSoPRz--j56uh-PBbTx6uLkbXI7inFM8j5XICiwLQnWRYc6lNCbDSU5ExjOqdGkkKEZLyjgrcKGBsQKUIiphBjDPM9ZHZ13dmWveWvDzdGp9DlVlamhanyZEUMITvBUU4SpC8GQryKRKJGE6gKcb4KRpXR22TWnoSQkWLEC4g3LXeO-gTGfOTo17TwlO109JN58SUk66FHA2_8WH91Ir_D1f3MnevMBfy3_LfQFqkJRV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221421053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Harris, Patricia M. ; Gingerich, Raymond ; Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Patricia M. ; Gingerich, Raymond ; Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-387X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0011128703258939</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRDLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Behavior Problems ; Case management ; Classification ; Client Relations ; Comparative Analysis ; Crime ; Criminals ; Criminology ; Discipline ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Evaluation Methods ; Leniency ; Management ; Motivation ; Offenders ; Outcomes of Treatment ; Parole &amp; probation ; Prevention ; Prisoner rehabilitation ; Probation ; Probation officers ; Recidivism ; Supervision ; Supervisors ; USA</subject><ispartof>Crime and delinquency, 2004-04, Vol.50 (2), p.235-271</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011128703258939$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0011128703258939$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,30987,33761,33762,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ798046$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingerich, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><title>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</title><title>Crime and delinquency</title><description>This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Case management</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Client Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Leniency</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Outcomes of Treatment</subject><subject>Parole &amp; probation</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prisoner rehabilitation</subject><subject>Probation</subject><subject>Probation officers</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0011-1287</issn><issn>1552-387X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKw0AUhgdRsFb3LlwEF-6ic83MLKXWGwUXVnAXJsmJTkmTOtMU3PVB9OX6JE6NKBSkZ3Pg_N-5I3RM8DkhUl5gTAihSmJGhdJM76AeEYLGTMnnXdRby_Fa30cH3k9wMKZJD7HxK0Sr5cewLCGf2wXU4P1q-Rk1ZXRlQ9BBPbemih7bGbiF9bapD9FeaSoPRz--j56uh-PBbTx6uLkbXI7inFM8j5XICiwLQnWRYc6lNCbDSU5ExjOqdGkkKEZLyjgrcKGBsQKUIiphBjDPM9ZHZ13dmWveWvDzdGp9DlVlamhanyZEUMITvBUU4SpC8GQryKRKJGE6gKcb4KRpXR22TWnoSQkWLEC4g3LXeO-gTGfOTo17TwlO109JN58SUk66FHA2_8WH91Ir_D1f3MnevMBfy3_LfQFqkJRV</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Harris, Patricia M.</creator><creator>Gingerich, Raymond</creator><creator>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</title><author>Harris, Patricia M. ; Gingerich, Raymond ; Whittaker, Tiffany A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-85bd07d129db04477aab06c15b4b289fa7e832f2343d0d9e33de881863ae04cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Case management</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Client Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Leniency</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Outcomes of Treatment</topic><topic>Parole &amp; probation</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prisoner rehabilitation</topic><topic>Probation</topic><topic>Probation officers</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingerich, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Patricia M.</au><au>Gingerich, Raymond</au><au>Whittaker, Tiffany A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ798046</ericid><atitle>The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision</atitle><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>235-271</pages><issn>0011-1287</issn><eissn>1552-387X</eissn><coden>CRDLAL</coden><abstract>This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers’ understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context—and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0011128703258939</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-1287
ispartof Crime and delinquency, 2004-04, Vol.50 (2), p.235-271
issn 0011-1287
1552-387X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61521460
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adults
Behavior Problems
Case management
Classification
Client Relations
Comparative Analysis
Crime
Criminals
Criminology
Discipline
Effectiveness
Evaluation
Evaluation Methods
Leniency
Management
Motivation
Offenders
Outcomes of Treatment
Parole & probation
Prevention
Prisoner rehabilitation
Probation
Probation officers
Recidivism
Supervision
Supervisors
USA
title The “Effectiveness” of Differential Supervision
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A36%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CEffectiveness%E2%80%9D%20of%20Differential%20Supervision&rft.jtitle=Crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Harris,%20Patricia%20M.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=235-271&rft.issn=0011-1287&rft.eissn=1552-387X&rft.coden=CRDLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0011128703258939&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57035546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221421053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ798046&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0011128703258939&rfr_iscdi=true