The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]

Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current anthropology 1996-06, Vol.37 (3), p.429-450
Hauptverfasser: Chun, Allen, Clammer, John, Ebrey, Patricia, Faure, David, Feuchtwang, Stephan, Huang, Ying-Kuei, Sangren, P. Steven, Yang, Mayfair
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 450
container_issue 3
container_start_page 429
container_title Current anthropology
container_volume 37
creator Chun, Allen
Clammer, John
Ebrey, Patricia
Faure, David
Feuchtwang, Stephan
Huang, Ying-Kuei
Sangren, P. Steven
Yang, Mayfair
description Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/204504
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61509223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2744542</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2744542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2a8696f22985816df600eaff95f1be8999402167e4927af4c71e038286d20a063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UFLwzAUB_AgCs6pn8BDTt6qL2mSNt7GcCoOBJ1eRErcXtaOLqlNBs5Pb8tEj57-PN6PB38eIacMLhjk6pKDkCD2yIDJNEtkmvN9MgBgLEm71SE5CmEFAFqybEC-ZiXSaeXQLDF5qeq6Szr266bGT1o5-uQ3sUQTIraOjsvKmSs6olPvlnTifXQ-Ys86Q0culq1vfO2XW-otva9cKKuGvhq36E-u0cVA--ERm3r7dkwOrKkDnvzkkDxPrmfj22T6cHM3Hk2TeQoiJtzkSivLuc5lztTCKgA01mpp2TvmWmsBnKkMheaZsWKeMYSudK4WHAyodEjOd3eb1n9sMMRiXYU5dlUd-k0oFJOgOU__hWmuheKS_8F560No0RZNW61Nuy0YFP0Pit0POni2g6sQffureCaEFDz9Br11gKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38946252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Chun, Allen ; Clammer, John ; Ebrey, Patricia ; Faure, David ; Feuchtwang, Stephan ; Huang, Ying-Kuei ; Sangren, P. Steven ; Yang, Mayfair</creator><creatorcontrib>Chun, Allen ; Clammer, John ; Ebrey, Patricia ; Faure, David ; Feuchtwang, Stephan ; Huang, Ying-Kuei ; Sangren, P. Steven ; Yang, Mayfair</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/204504</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Ancestor worship ; Ancestors ; China ; Chinese culture ; Clans ; Confucianism ; Cultural anthropology ; Descent ; Family names ; Kinship ; Lineage ; Peoples Republic of China ; Religious rituals ; Rituals ; Theoretical Problems ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 1996-06, Vol.37 (3), p.429-450</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2a8696f22985816df600eaff95f1be8999402167e4927af4c71e038286d20a063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2744542$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2744542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,33780,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chun, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clammer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuchtwang, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying-Kuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangren, P. Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Mayfair</creatorcontrib><title>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description><![CDATA[Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Ancestor worship</subject><subject>Ancestors</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Clans</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Descent</subject><subject>Family names</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Lineage</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UFLwzAUB_AgCs6pn8BDTt6qL2mSNt7GcCoOBJ1eRErcXtaOLqlNBs5Pb8tEj57-PN6PB38eIacMLhjk6pKDkCD2yIDJNEtkmvN9MgBgLEm71SE5CmEFAFqybEC-ZiXSaeXQLDF5qeq6Szr266bGT1o5-uQ3sUQTIraOjsvKmSs6olPvlnTifXQ-Ys86Q0culq1vfO2XW-otva9cKKuGvhq36E-u0cVA--ERm3r7dkwOrKkDnvzkkDxPrmfj22T6cHM3Hk2TeQoiJtzkSivLuc5lztTCKgA01mpp2TvmWmsBnKkMheaZsWKeMYSudK4WHAyodEjOd3eb1n9sMMRiXYU5dlUd-k0oFJOgOU__hWmuheKS_8F560No0RZNW61Nuy0YFP0Pit0POni2g6sQffureCaEFDz9Br11gKI</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>Chun, Allen</creator><creator>Clammer, John</creator><creator>Ebrey, Patricia</creator><creator>Faure, David</creator><creator>Feuchtwang, Stephan</creator><creator>Huang, Ying-Kuei</creator><creator>Sangren, P. Steven</creator><creator>Yang, Mayfair</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</title><author>Chun, Allen ; Clammer, John ; Ebrey, Patricia ; Faure, David ; Feuchtwang, Stephan ; Huang, Ying-Kuei ; Sangren, P. Steven ; Yang, Mayfair</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2a8696f22985816df600eaff95f1be8999402167e4927af4c71e038286d20a063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Ancestor worship</topic><topic>Ancestors</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Clans</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Descent</topic><topic>Family names</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Lineage</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chun, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clammer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuchtwang, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying-Kuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangren, P. Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Mayfair</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chun, Allen</au><au>Clammer, John</au><au>Ebrey, Patricia</au><au>Faure, David</au><au>Feuchtwang, Stephan</au><au>Huang, Ying-Kuei</au><au>Sangren, P. Steven</au><au>Yang, Mayfair</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>429-450</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/204504</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3204
ispartof Current anthropology, 1996-06, Vol.37 (3), p.429-450
issn 0011-3204
1537-5382
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61509223
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Ancestor worship
Ancestors
China
Chinese culture
Clans
Confucianism
Cultural anthropology
Descent
Family names
Kinship
Lineage
Peoples Republic of China
Religious rituals
Rituals
Theoretical Problems
Villages
title The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T15%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Lineage-Village%20Complex%20in%20Southeastern%20China:%20A%20Long%20Footnote%20in%20the%20Anthropology%20of%20Kinship%20%5Band%20Comments%20and%20Reply%5D&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Chun,%20Allen&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=429-450&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/204504&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2744542%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38946252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2744542&rfr_iscdi=true