The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]
Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current anthropology 1996-06, Vol.37 (3), p.429-450 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 450 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | Current anthropology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Chun, Allen Clammer, John Ebrey, Patricia Faure, David Feuchtwang, Stephan Huang, Ying-Kuei Sangren, P. Steven Yang, Mayfair |
description | Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/204504 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61509223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2744542</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2744542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2a8696f22985816df600eaff95f1be8999402167e4927af4c71e038286d20a063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UFLwzAUB_AgCs6pn8BDTt6qL2mSNt7GcCoOBJ1eRErcXtaOLqlNBs5Pb8tEj57-PN6PB38eIacMLhjk6pKDkCD2yIDJNEtkmvN9MgBgLEm71SE5CmEFAFqybEC-ZiXSaeXQLDF5qeq6Szr266bGT1o5-uQ3sUQTIraOjsvKmSs6olPvlnTifXQ-Ys86Q0culq1vfO2XW-otva9cKKuGvhq36E-u0cVA--ERm3r7dkwOrKkDnvzkkDxPrmfj22T6cHM3Hk2TeQoiJtzkSivLuc5lztTCKgA01mpp2TvmWmsBnKkMheaZsWKeMYSudK4WHAyodEjOd3eb1n9sMMRiXYU5dlUd-k0oFJOgOU__hWmuheKS_8F560No0RZNW61Nuy0YFP0Pit0POni2g6sQffureCaEFDz9Br11gKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38946252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Chun, Allen ; Clammer, John ; Ebrey, Patricia ; Faure, David ; Feuchtwang, Stephan ; Huang, Ying-Kuei ; Sangren, P. Steven ; Yang, Mayfair</creator><creatorcontrib>Chun, Allen ; Clammer, John ; Ebrey, Patricia ; Faure, David ; Feuchtwang, Stephan ; Huang, Ying-Kuei ; Sangren, P. Steven ; Yang, Mayfair</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/204504</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Ancestor worship ; Ancestors ; China ; Chinese culture ; Clans ; Confucianism ; Cultural anthropology ; Descent ; Family names ; Kinship ; Lineage ; Peoples Republic of China ; Religious rituals ; Rituals ; Theoretical Problems ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 1996-06, Vol.37 (3), p.429-450</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2a8696f22985816df600eaff95f1be8999402167e4927af4c71e038286d20a063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2744542$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2744542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,33780,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chun, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clammer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuchtwang, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying-Kuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangren, P. Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Mayfair</creatorcontrib><title>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description><![CDATA[Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></description><subject>Ancestor worship</subject><subject>Ancestors</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Clans</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Descent</subject><subject>Family names</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Lineage</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UFLwzAUB_AgCs6pn8BDTt6qL2mSNt7GcCoOBJ1eRErcXtaOLqlNBs5Pb8tEj57-PN6PB38eIacMLhjk6pKDkCD2yIDJNEtkmvN9MgBgLEm71SE5CmEFAFqybEC-ZiXSaeXQLDF5qeq6Szr266bGT1o5-uQ3sUQTIraOjsvKmSs6olPvlnTifXQ-Ys86Q0culq1vfO2XW-otva9cKKuGvhq36E-u0cVA--ERm3r7dkwOrKkDnvzkkDxPrmfj22T6cHM3Hk2TeQoiJtzkSivLuc5lztTCKgA01mpp2TvmWmsBnKkMheaZsWKeMYSudK4WHAyodEjOd3eb1n9sMMRiXYU5dlUd-k0oFJOgOU__hWmuheKS_8F560No0RZNW61Nuy0YFP0Pit0POni2g6sQffureCaEFDz9Br11gKI</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>Chun, Allen</creator><creator>Clammer, John</creator><creator>Ebrey, Patricia</creator><creator>Faure, David</creator><creator>Feuchtwang, Stephan</creator><creator>Huang, Ying-Kuei</creator><creator>Sangren, P. Steven</creator><creator>Yang, Mayfair</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</title><author>Chun, Allen ; Clammer, John ; Ebrey, Patricia ; Faure, David ; Feuchtwang, Stephan ; Huang, Ying-Kuei ; Sangren, P. Steven ; Yang, Mayfair</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2a8696f22985816df600eaff95f1be8999402167e4927af4c71e038286d20a063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Ancestor worship</topic><topic>Ancestors</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Clans</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Descent</topic><topic>Family names</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Lineage</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chun, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clammer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrey, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuchtwang, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying-Kuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangren, P. Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Mayfair</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chun, Allen</au><au>Clammer, John</au><au>Ebrey, Patricia</au><au>Faure, David</au><au>Feuchtwang, Stephan</au><au>Huang, Ying-Kuei</au><au>Sangren, P. Steven</au><au>Yang, Mayfair</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply]</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>429-450</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Evaluates the current literature on descent & lineage organization in China & its significance for anthropological discussions of kinship theory. Despite increasing anthropological skepticism over the applicability of lineage theory & the corresponding decline of interest in unilineal descent, the existence of lineage organization has been an unchallenged fact for anthropologists & historians of China, in turn offering explicit support for lineage theory. Recent historical research has shed light on the diversity of Chinese kin organization over time & space, for the most part without questioning the model itself. While the existence of lineages in China is not contested, it is argued that the historical conditions of their evolution squarely contradict the theoretical principles on which lineage theory has been constructed. Comments are offered by: John Clammer, Patricia Ebrey, David Faure, Stephan Feuchtwang, Ying-Kuei Huang, P. Steven Sangren, & Mayfair Yang. In his Reply, Chun reiterates that his intent was not to develop an alternative model of Chinese kinship & social organization, but only to explore the possibilities of something different. The cultural construction of concepts such as kinship & lineage, family, etc, is emphasized. 88 References. Adapted from the source document.]]></abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/204504</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-3204 |
ispartof | Current anthropology, 1996-06, Vol.37 (3), p.429-450 |
issn | 0011-3204 1537-5382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61509223 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Ancestor worship Ancestors China Chinese culture Clans Confucianism Cultural anthropology Descent Family names Kinship Lineage Peoples Republic of China Religious rituals Rituals Theoretical Problems Villages |
title | The Lineage-Village Complex in Southeastern China: A Long Footnote in the Anthropology of Kinship [and Comments and Reply] |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T15%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Lineage-Village%20Complex%20in%20Southeastern%20China:%20A%20Long%20Footnote%20in%20the%20Anthropology%20of%20Kinship%20%5Band%20Comments%20and%20Reply%5D&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Chun,%20Allen&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=429-450&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/204504&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2744542%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38946252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2744542&rfr_iscdi=true |