Retention in substance dependence treatment: the relevance of in-treatment factors
In addition to “fixed” patient demographic and background variables, treatment process constructs play an important role in the prediction of treatment retention in substance dependence treatment. The objective of this paper is to analyze the predictive role of repeated measures of treatment readine...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of substance abuse treatment 2001-06, Vol.20 (4), p.253-261 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 261 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 253 |
| container_title | Journal of substance abuse treatment |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H Schippers, Gerard M De Jong, Cor A.J Schrijvers, Guus J.P |
| description | In addition to “fixed” patient demographic and background variables, treatment process constructs play an important role in the prediction of treatment retention in substance dependence treatment. The objective of this paper is to analyze the predictive role of repeated measures of treatment readiness and behavioral intention, and of patients' perception of the therapeutic alliance, while controlling for fixed patient-oriented variables. Ninety-three patients, both alcohol and drug dependents, enrolled in this study, which was conducted in an inpatient treatment setting. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after admission (
t=0) and approximately 2 weeks later (
t=1). Using these measures, 35% of variance of a length of stay in treatment of up to 30 days could be explained. Fixed patient-oriented variables accounted for 21% of variance. Of the cognitive factors, helping alliance was the most important, accounting for an additional 8% of variance. The implications of these results are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00160-X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61475734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074054720100160X</els_id><sourcerecordid>78543377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82e3ee7f169fc985b24da3d5ba5b3ae613c26ae37cb91730dfe8a16d4ae38b593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_glK8EL2oJk2btN6IDL9gIEyF3YU0OcWOrplJOvDfm25jgjdeJZw873vCg9ApwdcEE3bzhnmK4yzlySUmVziMcDzbQ0OScxqzNKf7aLhDBujIuTnGOElwfogGhDCeMFoM0XQKHlpfmzaq28h1pfOyVRBpWEKrob96C9IvAnQb-U-ILDSwWjOmCpl49xxVUnlj3TE6qGTj4GR7jtDH48P7-DmevD69jO8nsUoZ83GeAAXgFWFFpYo8K5NUS6qzUmYllcAIVQmTQLkqC8Ip1hXkkjCdhlleZgUdoYtN79Karw6cF4vaKWga2YLpnGAk5RmnaQDP_4Bz09k2_E0koZkyRkiAsg2krHHOQiWWtl5I-y0IFr1xsTYuep0CE7E2LmYhd7Yt78oF6N_UVnEA7jYABBerGqxwqu7F6tqC8kKb-p8VP6zOkQc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217336611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention in substance dependence treatment: the relevance of in-treatment factors</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H ; Schippers, Gerard M ; De Jong, Cor A.J ; Schrijvers, Guus J.P</creator><creatorcontrib>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H ; Schippers, Gerard M ; De Jong, Cor A.J ; Schrijvers, Guus J.P</creatorcontrib><description>In addition to “fixed” patient demographic and background variables, treatment process constructs play an important role in the prediction of treatment retention in substance dependence treatment. The objective of this paper is to analyze the predictive role of repeated measures of treatment readiness and behavioral intention, and of patients' perception of the therapeutic alliance, while controlling for fixed patient-oriented variables. Ninety-three patients, both alcohol and drug dependents, enrolled in this study, which was conducted in an inpatient treatment setting. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after admission (
t=0) and approximately 2 weeks later (
t=1). Using these measures, 35% of variance of a length of stay in treatment of up to 30 days could be explained. Fixed patient-oriented variables accounted for 21% of variance. Of the cognitive factors, helping alliance was the most important, accounting for an additional 8% of variance. The implications of these results are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-5472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6483</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00160-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11672639</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSATEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Adult ; Attrition ; Behavioral intention ; Clinical outcomes ; Drug Addiction ; Environmental Factors ; Female ; Helping alliance ; Humans ; Intentionality ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Netherlands ; Noncompliance ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Dropouts - psychology ; Patients ; Perceptions ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Regression Analysis ; Substance abuse treatment ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers ; Substance dependence ; Substance-Related Disorders - therapy ; Treatment Compliance ; Treatment motivation ; Treatment Outcomes</subject><ispartof>Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2001-06, Vol.20 (4), p.253-261</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jun 2001</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82e3ee7f169fc985b24da3d5ba5b3ae613c26ae37cb91730dfe8a16d4ae38b593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82e3ee7f169fc985b24da3d5ba5b3ae613c26ae37cb91730dfe8a16d4ae38b593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074054720100160X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,33752,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11672639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schippers, Gerard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jong, Cor A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrijvers, Guus J.P</creatorcontrib><title>Retention in substance dependence treatment: the relevance of in-treatment factors</title><title>Journal of substance abuse treatment</title><addtitle>J Subst Abuse Treat</addtitle><description>In addition to “fixed” patient demographic and background variables, treatment process constructs play an important role in the prediction of treatment retention in substance dependence treatment. The objective of this paper is to analyze the predictive role of repeated measures of treatment readiness and behavioral intention, and of patients' perception of the therapeutic alliance, while controlling for fixed patient-oriented variables. Ninety-three patients, both alcohol and drug dependents, enrolled in this study, which was conducted in an inpatient treatment setting. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after admission (
t=0) and approximately 2 weeks later (
t=1). Using these measures, 35% of variance of a length of stay in treatment of up to 30 days could be explained. Fixed patient-oriented variables accounted for 21% of variance. Of the cognitive factors, helping alliance was the most important, accounting for an additional 8% of variance. The implications of these results are discussed.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attrition</subject><subject>Behavioral intention</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Drug Addiction</subject><subject>Environmental Factors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Helping alliance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intentionality</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Noncompliance</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Dropouts - psychology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers</subject><subject>Substance dependence</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Compliance</subject><subject>Treatment motivation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcomes</subject><issn>0740-5472</issn><issn>1873-6483</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_glK8EL2oJk2btN6IDL9gIEyF3YU0OcWOrplJOvDfm25jgjdeJZw873vCg9ApwdcEE3bzhnmK4yzlySUmVziMcDzbQ0OScxqzNKf7aLhDBujIuTnGOElwfogGhDCeMFoM0XQKHlpfmzaq28h1pfOyVRBpWEKrob96C9IvAnQb-U-ILDSwWjOmCpl49xxVUnlj3TE6qGTj4GR7jtDH48P7-DmevD69jO8nsUoZ83GeAAXgFWFFpYo8K5NUS6qzUmYllcAIVQmTQLkqC8Ip1hXkkjCdhlleZgUdoYtN79Karw6cF4vaKWga2YLpnGAk5RmnaQDP_4Bz09k2_E0koZkyRkiAsg2krHHOQiWWtl5I-y0IFr1xsTYuep0CE7E2LmYhd7Yt78oF6N_UVnEA7jYABBerGqxwqu7F6tqC8kKb-p8VP6zOkQc</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H</creator><creator>Schippers, Gerard M</creator><creator>De Jong, Cor A.J</creator><creator>Schrijvers, Guus J.P</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Retention in substance dependence treatment: the relevance of in-treatment factors</title><author>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H ; Schippers, Gerard M ; De Jong, Cor A.J ; Schrijvers, Guus J.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-82e3ee7f169fc985b24da3d5ba5b3ae613c26ae37cb91730dfe8a16d4ae38b593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attrition</topic><topic>Behavioral intention</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Drug Addiction</topic><topic>Environmental Factors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Helping alliance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intentionality</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Noncompliance</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Dropouts - psychology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers</topic><topic>Substance dependence</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Compliance</topic><topic>Treatment motivation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcomes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schippers, Gerard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jong, Cor A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrijvers, Guus J.P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of substance abuse treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H</au><au>Schippers, Gerard M</au><au>De Jong, Cor A.J</au><au>Schrijvers, Guus J.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention in substance dependence treatment: the relevance of in-treatment factors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of substance abuse treatment</jtitle><addtitle>J Subst Abuse Treat</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>253-261</pages><issn>0740-5472</issn><eissn>1873-6483</eissn><coden>JSATEG</coden><abstract>In addition to “fixed” patient demographic and background variables, treatment process constructs play an important role in the prediction of treatment retention in substance dependence treatment. The objective of this paper is to analyze the predictive role of repeated measures of treatment readiness and behavioral intention, and of patients' perception of the therapeutic alliance, while controlling for fixed patient-oriented variables. Ninety-three patients, both alcohol and drug dependents, enrolled in this study, which was conducted in an inpatient treatment setting. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after admission (
t=0) and approximately 2 weeks later (
t=1). Using these measures, 35% of variance of a length of stay in treatment of up to 30 days could be explained. Fixed patient-oriented variables accounted for 21% of variance. Of the cognitive factors, helping alliance was the most important, accounting for an additional 8% of variance. The implications of these results are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11672639</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00160-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0740-5472 |
| ispartof | Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2001-06, Vol.20 (4), p.253-261 |
| issn | 0740-5472 1873-6483 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61475734 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Addictions Adult Attrition Behavioral intention Clinical outcomes Drug Addiction Environmental Factors Female Helping alliance Humans Intentionality Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Motivation Netherlands Noncompliance Patient Compliance - psychology Patient Discharge Patient Dropouts - psychology Patients Perceptions Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Regression Analysis Substance abuse treatment Substance Abuse Treatment Centers Substance dependence Substance-Related Disorders - therapy Treatment Compliance Treatment motivation Treatment Outcomes |
| title | Retention in substance dependence treatment: the relevance of in-treatment factors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A39%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20in%20substance%20dependence%20treatment:%20the%20relevance%20of%20in-treatment%20factors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20substance%20abuse%20treatment&rft.au=De%20Weert-Van%20Oene,%20Gerdien%20H&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=253-261&rft.issn=0740-5472&rft.eissn=1873-6483&rft.coden=JSATEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00160-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78543377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217336611&rft_id=info:pmid/11672639&rft_els_id=S074054720100160X&rfr_iscdi=true |