Employment Discrimination and the ADA: A Study of the Administrative Complaint Process
This article presents findings from the first in-depth study of bow the employment discrimination charge process, mandated under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is working. After briefly summarizing quantitative findings related to the nationwide experience of ADA complainants,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatric rehabilitation journal 1997-10, Vol.21 (2), p.111-121 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 121 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 111 |
| container_title | Psychiatric rehabilitation journal |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Moss, Kathryn Johnsen, Matthew C |
| description | This article presents findings from the first in-depth study of bow the employment discrimination charge process, mandated under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is working. After briefly summarizing quantitative findings related to the nationwide experience of ADA complainants, the article provides a mostly qualitative examination of bow the charge process works within five U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offices. It points out that many charges filed with the EEOC under the ADA are given extensive and well-thought-out investigations. It explores numerous problems that have taken their toll on charge processing: understaffing, insufficient investigative time, inadequate travel and training funds, and several recently discontinued administrative policies of the EEOC. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0095330 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61450244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61450244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-b3bc65537bc152e9074dd9f041f651650bbd691ec009d21db4ea1030b1ea89f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V1LwzAUBuAiCs4p-BMKighSzUmatPWubPMDBgp-4F1I05R1dE1NWmH_3iNTRBGvEsKTF95zguAQyDkQllwsCMk4Y2QrGAHnWcSAim2842sEPH3ZDfa8XxICjIp0FDzPVl1j1yvT9uG09trVq7pVfW3bULVl2C9MmE_zyzAPH_qhXIe22ryVyGrfO6RvJpxYTFE1Ztw7q433-8FOpRpvDj7PcfB0NXuc3ETzu-vbST6PFEtpHxWs0IJzlhQaODUZSeKyzCoSQyU4CE6KohQZGI2lSgplERuFLUkBRqVZRdk4ONnkds6-Dsb3coUlTNOo1tjBSwExJzSOEZ7-CyERIFIqBEF69Isu7eBarCGBxQnlOLnsO1A7670zlexwdsqtJRD5sQn5tQmkZxuqOiU7v9bK9bVujNeDczh4_LmUFCSVAID6-G_9k70DP9GVKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347253269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Employment Discrimination and the ADA: A Study of the Administrative Complaint Process</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Moss, Kathryn ; Johnsen, Matthew C</creator><contributor>Rutman, Irvin D ; Anthony, William A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moss, Kathryn ; Johnsen, Matthew C ; Rutman, Irvin D ; Anthony, William A</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents findings from the first in-depth study of bow the employment discrimination charge process, mandated under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is working. After briefly summarizing quantitative findings related to the nationwide experience of ADA complainants, the article provides a mostly qualitative examination of bow the charge process works within five U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offices. It points out that many charges filed with the EEOC under the ADA are given extensive and well-thought-out investigations. It explores numerous problems that have taken their toll on charge processing: understaffing, insufficient investigative time, inadequate travel and training funds, and several recently discontinued administrative policies of the EEOC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-158X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-3126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0095330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Association of Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services and Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Services, Boston University</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Civil Service ; Employment Discrimination ; Equal Employment ; Government Agencies ; Human ; Mental Disorders ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Psychiatric rehabilitation journal, 1997-10, Vol.21 (2), p.111-121</ispartof><rights>1997 Trustees of Boston University and IAPSRS</rights><rights>1997 American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-b3bc65537bc152e9074dd9f041f651650bbd691ec009d21db4ea1030b1ea89f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,33758</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Rutman, Irvin D</contributor><contributor>Anthony, William A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moss, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><title>Employment Discrimination and the ADA: A Study of the Administrative Complaint Process</title><title>Psychiatric rehabilitation journal</title><description>This article presents findings from the first in-depth study of bow the employment discrimination charge process, mandated under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is working. After briefly summarizing quantitative findings related to the nationwide experience of ADA complainants, the article provides a mostly qualitative examination of bow the charge process works within five U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offices. It points out that many charges filed with the EEOC under the ADA are given extensive and well-thought-out investigations. It explores numerous problems that have taken their toll on charge processing: understaffing, insufficient investigative time, inadequate travel and training funds, and several recently discontinued administrative policies of the EEOC.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Civil Service</subject><subject>Employment Discrimination</subject><subject>Equal Employment</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>1095-158X</issn><issn>1559-3126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V1LwzAUBuAiCs4p-BMKighSzUmatPWubPMDBgp-4F1I05R1dE1NWmH_3iNTRBGvEsKTF95zguAQyDkQllwsCMk4Y2QrGAHnWcSAim2842sEPH3ZDfa8XxICjIp0FDzPVl1j1yvT9uG09trVq7pVfW3bULVl2C9MmE_zyzAPH_qhXIe22ryVyGrfO6RvJpxYTFE1Ztw7q433-8FOpRpvDj7PcfB0NXuc3ETzu-vbST6PFEtpHxWs0IJzlhQaODUZSeKyzCoSQyU4CE6KohQZGI2lSgplERuFLUkBRqVZRdk4ONnkds6-Dsb3coUlTNOo1tjBSwExJzSOEZ7-CyERIFIqBEF69Isu7eBarCGBxQnlOLnsO1A7670zlexwdsqtJRD5sQn5tQmkZxuqOiU7v9bK9bVujNeDczh4_LmUFCSVAID6-G_9k70DP9GVKA</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Moss, Kathryn</creator><creator>Johnsen, Matthew C</creator><general>International Association of Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services and Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Services, Boston University</general><general>Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Employment Discrimination and the ADA: A Study of the Administrative Complaint Process</title><author>Moss, Kathryn ; Johnsen, Matthew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-b3bc65537bc152e9074dd9f041f651650bbd691ec009d21db4ea1030b1ea89f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Civil Service</topic><topic>Employment Discrimination</topic><topic>Equal Employment</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moss, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Psychiatric rehabilitation journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moss, Kathryn</au><au>Johnsen, Matthew C</au><au>Rutman, Irvin D</au><au>Anthony, William A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Employment Discrimination and the ADA: A Study of the Administrative Complaint Process</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatric rehabilitation journal</jtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>111-121</pages><issn>1095-158X</issn><eissn>1559-3126</eissn><abstract>This article presents findings from the first in-depth study of bow the employment discrimination charge process, mandated under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is working. After briefly summarizing quantitative findings related to the nationwide experience of ADA complainants, the article provides a mostly qualitative examination of bow the charge process works within five U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offices. It points out that many charges filed with the EEOC under the ADA are given extensive and well-thought-out investigations. It explores numerous problems that have taken their toll on charge processing: understaffing, insufficient investigative time, inadequate travel and training funds, and several recently discontinued administrative policies of the EEOC.</abstract><pub>International Association of Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services and Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Services, Boston University</pub><doi>10.1037/h0095330</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1095-158X |
| ispartof | Psychiatric rehabilitation journal, 1997-10, Vol.21 (2), p.111-121 |
| issn | 1095-158X 1559-3126 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61450244 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Advocacy Civil Service Employment Discrimination Equal Employment Government Agencies Human Mental Disorders United States of America |
| title | Employment Discrimination and the ADA: A Study of the Administrative Complaint Process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A51%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Employment%20Discrimination%20and%20the%20ADA:%20A%20Study%20of%20the%20Administrative%20Complaint%20Process&rft.jtitle=Psychiatric%20rehabilitation%20journal&rft.au=Moss,%20Kathryn&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=111-121&rft.issn=1095-158X&rft.eissn=1559-3126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0095330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61450244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347253269&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |