Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe

Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe

This paper describes the nature of the relationship between two settlement types in Zimbabwe. It explores the links between the often neglected and underestimated farm and the ever-popular town in north-western Zimbabwe. Two interactive channels and their associated sub-channels are identified and a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and urbanization 1998-04, Vol.10 (1), p.23-34
1. Verfasser: Kamete, Amin Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Family Farms
Rural Areas
Rural Urban Differences
Social Interaction
Towns
Zimbabwe
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Environment and urbanization
container_volume 10
creator Kamete, Amin Y.
description This paper describes the nature of the relationship between two settlement types in Zimbabwe. It explores the links between the often neglected and underestimated farm and the ever-popular town in north-western Zimbabwe. Two interactive channels and their associated sub-channels are identified and analyzed. The nature of these interactions shows that the links between the two settlement types are by no means simple and cannot be narrowed down to the traditional rural-urban divide. The paper concludes by discussing the question of benefits and intervention in the light of the identified livelihood channels.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/095624789801000111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61447729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_095624789801000111</sage_id><sourcerecordid>61447729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2c01e4572eb95df117979ea01a9a3f39abcb54f160e73a66472c6f272951e8863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PAyEQBmBiNLFW_4AnTt7WMgsLizfT-NHExItevBCWQqWyUGFr4793m3oz8TSX553MvAhdArkGEGJGZMNrJlrZEiCEAMARmoBgvCKUwDGa7EG1F6forJT1SCijZILkIg42h2Q-fFzh4L9s8O8pLcsNdjr3WMclLr0OAQ9pF7GP-M33ne529hydOB2KvfidU_R6f_cyf6yenh8W89unylDgQ1UbApY1oradbJZuvFYKaTUBLTV1VOrOdA1zwIkVVHPORG24q0UtG7Bty-kUXR32bnL63NoyqN4XY0PQ0aZtURwYEyMfYX2AJqdSsnVqk32v87cCovYtqb8tjaHZIVT0yqp12uY4PvNf4gdVcmX5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61447729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kamete, Amin Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamete, Amin Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes the nature of the relationship between two settlement types in Zimbabwe. It explores the links between the often neglected and underestimated farm and the ever-popular town in north-western Zimbabwe. Two interactive channels and their associated sub-channels are identified and analyzed. The nature of these interactions shows that the links between the two settlement types are by no means simple and cannot be narrowed down to the traditional rural-urban divide. The paper concludes by discussing the question of benefits and intervention in the light of the identified livelihood channels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-2478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-0301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/095624789801000111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Family Farms ; Rural Areas ; Rural Urban Differences ; Social Interaction ; Towns ; Zimbabwe</subject><ispartof>Environment and urbanization, 1998-04, Vol.10 (1), p.23-34</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2c01e4572eb95df117979ea01a9a3f39abcb54f160e73a66472c6f272951e8863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/095624789801000111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095624789801000111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamete, Amin Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe</title><title>Environment and urbanization</title><description>This paper describes the nature of the relationship between two settlement types in Zimbabwe. It explores the links between the often neglected and underestimated farm and the ever-popular town in north-western Zimbabwe. Two interactive channels and their associated sub-channels are identified and analyzed. The nature of these interactions shows that the links between the two settlement types are by no means simple and cannot be narrowed down to the traditional rural-urban divide. The paper concludes by discussing the question of benefits and intervention in the light of the identified livelihood channels.</description><subject>Family Farms</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural Urban Differences</subject><subject>Social Interaction</subject><subject>Towns</subject><subject>Zimbabwe</subject><issn>0956-2478</issn><issn>1746-0301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1PAyEQBmBiNLFW_4AnTt7WMgsLizfT-NHExItevBCWQqWyUGFr4793m3oz8TSX553MvAhdArkGEGJGZMNrJlrZEiCEAMARmoBgvCKUwDGa7EG1F6forJT1SCijZILkIg42h2Q-fFzh4L9s8O8pLcsNdjr3WMclLr0OAQ9pF7GP-M33ne529hydOB2KvfidU_R6f_cyf6yenh8W89unylDgQ1UbApY1oradbJZuvFYKaTUBLTV1VOrOdA1zwIkVVHPORG24q0UtG7Bty-kUXR32bnL63NoyqN4XY0PQ0aZtURwYEyMfYX2AJqdSsnVqk32v87cCovYtqb8tjaHZIVT0yqp12uY4PvNf4gdVcmX5</recordid><startdate>19980401</startdate><enddate>19980401</enddate><creator>Kamete, Amin Y.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980401</creationdate><title>Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe</title><author>Kamete, Amin Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-2c01e4572eb95df117979ea01a9a3f39abcb54f160e73a66472c6f272951e8863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Family Farms</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural Urban Differences</topic><topic>Social Interaction</topic><topic>Towns</topic><topic>Zimbabwe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamete, Amin Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment and urbanization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamete, Amin Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe</atitle><jtitle>Environment and urbanization</jtitle><date>1998-04-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>23-34</pages><issn>0956-2478</issn><eissn>1746-0301</eissn><abstract>This paper describes the nature of the relationship between two settlement types in Zimbabwe. It explores the links between the often neglected and underestimated farm and the ever-popular town in north-western Zimbabwe. Two interactive channels and their associated sub-channels are identified and analyzed. The nature of these interactions shows that the links between the two settlement types are by no means simple and cannot be narrowed down to the traditional rural-urban divide. The paper concludes by discussing the question of benefits and intervention in the light of the identified livelihood channels.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/095624789801000111</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-2478
ispartof Environment and urbanization, 1998-04, Vol.10 (1), p.23-34
issn 0956-2478
1746-0301
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61447729
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Family Farms
Rural Areas
Rural Urban Differences
Social Interaction
Towns
Zimbabwe
title Interlocking livelihoods: farm and small town in Zimbabwe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A41%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interlocking%20livelihoods:%20farm%20and%20small%20town%20in%20Zimbabwe&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20urbanization&rft.au=Kamete,%20Amin%20Y.&rft.date=1998-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=23-34&rft.issn=0956-2478&rft.eissn=1746-0301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/095624789801000111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61447729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61447729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_095624789801000111&rfr_iscdi=true