The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict
Morality politics theory predicts that gay rights policy will reflect the influence of religious groups, party competition, and partisanship while interest group theory suggests that these policies will correspond with interest group resources, elite values, and past policy actions. Using multiple r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of politics 1996-05, Vol.58 (2), p.332-349 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 349 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 332 |
| container_title | The Journal of politics |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Haider-Markel, Donald P. Meier, Kenneth J. |
| description | Morality politics theory predicts that gay rights policy will reflect the influence of religious groups, party competition, and partisanship while interest group theory suggests that these policies will correspond with interest group resources, elite values, and past policy actions. Using multiple regression on a 50-state data set and a county-level data set for gay rights initiatives in Oregon and Colorado, we found gay and lesbian politics are no different from those for other policy issues. When gay and lesbian rights are not salient, the pattern of politics resembles that of interest group politics. If individuals opposed to gay and lesbian rights are able to expand the scope of the conflict, the pattern of politics conforms to morality politics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2960229 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61446085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2960229</cupid><jstor_id>2960229</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2960229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c2e286ad0bcc9afea0d9437d754ee13f51bdf841dba50f4fdd3a424703b6df943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1LwzAUAPAgCs4p_gMeggfFQzVfTVtvMuYUB4rOc0nzsWV0zUw6cP-9KRsOdtFcQl5-eS_JA-Aco1tCUXZHCo4IKQ5ADzOeJyRF-SHooRhLaI75MTgJYY7i4AXrgZfJTMM3V9vWygCdgSOxhqJRcKxDZUUD3-101oZ7OPxexrBtprCNJz6kW-qOd4uBa0xtZXsKjoyogz7bzn3w-TicDJ6S8evoefAwTiSjuE0k0STnQqFKykIYLZAqGM1UljKtMTUprpTJGVaVSJFhRikqGGEZohVXJtI-uNrkXXr3tdKhLRc2SF3XotFuFUqOGeMoT_8BCaMc0z9hWmTxL9MOXu7BuVv5Jr62JJgVnGHU3e96g6R3IXhtyqW3C-HXJUZl16Ny26MoLzZyHlrnf9lu-2abSCwqb9VU78rtp_oBz7GXiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214964104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Haider-Markel, Donald P. ; Meier, Kenneth J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haider-Markel, Donald P. ; Meier, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><description>Morality politics theory predicts that gay rights policy will reflect the influence of religious groups, party competition, and partisanship while interest group theory suggests that these policies will correspond with interest group resources, elite values, and past policy actions. Using multiple regression on a 50-state data set and a county-level data set for gay rights initiatives in Oregon and Colorado, we found gay and lesbian politics are no different from those for other policy issues. When gay and lesbian rights are not salient, the pattern of politics resembles that of interest group politics. If individuals opposed to gay and lesbian rights are able to expand the scope of the conflict, the pattern of politics conforms to morality politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2960229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Civil Rights ; Colorado ; Conflict ; Gay and lesbian studies ; Gay rights ; Gays ; Gays & lesbians ; Gays and lesbians ; Government and politics ; Homosexuality ; Interest Groups ; Legal status, laws, etc ; Lesbianism ; LGBTQ rights movements ; Morality ; Oregon ; Political conflict ; Political elections ; Political ethics ; Political interest groups ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Political science ; Politics ; Referendum ; Social research ; State politics ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 1996-05, Vol.58 (2), p.332-349</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 1996</rights><rights>Copyright 1996 University of Texas Press</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. May 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c2e286ad0bcc9afea0d9437d754ee13f51bdf841dba50f4fdd3a424703b6df943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c2e286ad0bcc9afea0d9437d754ee13f51bdf841dba50f4fdd3a424703b6df943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2960229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2960229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haider-Markel, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><description>Morality politics theory predicts that gay rights policy will reflect the influence of religious groups, party competition, and partisanship while interest group theory suggests that these policies will correspond with interest group resources, elite values, and past policy actions. Using multiple regression on a 50-state data set and a county-level data set for gay rights initiatives in Oregon and Colorado, we found gay and lesbian politics are no different from those for other policy issues. When gay and lesbian rights are not salient, the pattern of politics resembles that of interest group politics. If individuals opposed to gay and lesbian rights are able to expand the scope of the conflict, the pattern of politics conforms to morality politics.</description><subject>Civil Rights</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Gay and lesbian studies</subject><subject>Gay rights</subject><subject>Gays</subject><subject>Gays & lesbians</subject><subject>Gays and lesbians</subject><subject>Government and politics</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Interest Groups</subject><subject>Legal status, laws, etc</subject><subject>Lesbianism</subject><subject>LGBTQ rights movements</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>Political interest groups</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Referendum</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>State politics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1LwzAUAPAgCs4p_gMeggfFQzVfTVtvMuYUB4rOc0nzsWV0zUw6cP-9KRsOdtFcQl5-eS_JA-Aco1tCUXZHCo4IKQ5ADzOeJyRF-SHooRhLaI75MTgJYY7i4AXrgZfJTMM3V9vWygCdgSOxhqJRcKxDZUUD3-101oZ7OPxexrBtprCNJz6kW-qOd4uBa0xtZXsKjoyogz7bzn3w-TicDJ6S8evoefAwTiSjuE0k0STnQqFKykIYLZAqGM1UljKtMTUprpTJGVaVSJFhRikqGGEZohVXJtI-uNrkXXr3tdKhLRc2SF3XotFuFUqOGeMoT_8BCaMc0z9hWmTxL9MOXu7BuVv5Jr62JJgVnGHU3e96g6R3IXhtyqW3C-HXJUZl16Ny26MoLzZyHlrnf9lu-2abSCwqb9VU78rtp_oBz7GXiQ</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>Haider-Markel, Donald P.</creator><creator>Meier, Kenneth J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Texas Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict</title><author>Haider-Markel, Donald P. ; Meier, Kenneth J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c2e286ad0bcc9afea0d9437d754ee13f51bdf841dba50f4fdd3a424703b6df943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Civil Rights</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Gay and lesbian studies</topic><topic>Gay rights</topic><topic>Gays</topic><topic>Gays & lesbians</topic><topic>Gays and lesbians</topic><topic>Government and politics</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Interest Groups</topic><topic>Legal status, laws, etc</topic><topic>Lesbianism</topic><topic>LGBTQ rights movements</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>Political interest groups</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Referendum</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>State politics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haider-Markel, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haider-Markel, Donald P.</au><au>Meier, Kenneth J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>332-349</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>Morality politics theory predicts that gay rights policy will reflect the influence of religious groups, party competition, and partisanship while interest group theory suggests that these policies will correspond with interest group resources, elite values, and past policy actions. Using multiple regression on a 50-state data set and a county-level data set for gay rights initiatives in Oregon and Colorado, we found gay and lesbian politics are no different from those for other policy issues. When gay and lesbian rights are not salient, the pattern of politics resembles that of interest group politics. If individuals opposed to gay and lesbian rights are able to expand the scope of the conflict, the pattern of politics conforms to morality politics.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2960229</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3816 |
| ispartof | The Journal of politics, 1996-05, Vol.58 (2), p.332-349 |
| issn | 0022-3816 1468-2508 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61446085 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Civil Rights Colorado Conflict Gay and lesbian studies Gay rights Gays Gays & lesbians Gays and lesbians Government and politics Homosexuality Interest Groups Legal status, laws, etc Lesbianism LGBTQ rights movements Morality Oregon Political conflict Political elections Political ethics Political interest groups Political parties Political partisanship Political science Politics Referendum Social research State politics United States |
| title | The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T03%3A16%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Politics%20of%20Gay%20and%20Lesbian%20Rights:%20Expanding%20the%20Scope%20of%20the%20Conflict&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=Haider-Markel,%20Donald%20P.&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=332-349&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2960229&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2960229%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214964104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_2960229&rft_jstor_id=2960229&rfr_iscdi=true |