Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia

Examination of evidence from the ancient Near East spanning a period of more than a thousand years indicates the existence of conceptions of relatively precise boundaries, territories, and perhaps also nations. Of course, the bounded territorial relation constitutive of certain ancient collectivitie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient 1997, Vol.40 (1), p.1-29
1. Verfasser: Grosby, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient
container_volume 40
creator Grosby, Steven
description Examination of evidence from the ancient Near East spanning a period of more than a thousand years indicates the existence of conceptions of relatively precise boundaries, territories, and perhaps also nations. Of course, the bounded territorial relation constitutive of certain ancient collectivities was not based, in part, on a conception of citizenship derived from birth in the land as in many instances of the modern national state. Nonetheless, one is justified in recognizing in antiquity instances of a consciousness of a bounded, trans-local territorial relation and thus, perhaps nationality. The evidence for the existence of various conceptions of such relations constitutive of respectively various collectivities in the ancient Near East is by no means limited to the complicated example of the nation of ancient Israel. There are a number of other examples among which are Edom, ancient Aram, and ancient Armenia. There is merit in considering the examples of Edom, Aram, and Armenia together, specifically in elucidating the problem of both the nature of our evidence and the categories, especially nationality, which we employ in examining that evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/1568520972600829
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61434050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3632306</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3632306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-ca283bbf2c9e147eda6dfbfbc5a2f6a01efbf6afb2c1a7a288db62838cf57ae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuP0zAUhS0EEmVgz4JFJBArMlzb8SPLTjV0gGpYUNbWjWMLlzQZbFei_x6XjCo0EmJl-Z7vHN0HIS8pXFIq-XsqpBYMWsUkgGbtI7I4lepT7TFZADBWN20rnpJnKe0AgDIOC7K-mmLvYnpXbV2MIU_xWOHYV7eYwzTiEPKxCmOVv7tqOdrgxlzdOozVNab8B1zGvRsDPidPPA7Jvbh_L8i3D9fb1U29-bL-uFpu6q6hPNcWmeZd55ltHW2U61H2vvOdFci8RKCu_CT6jlmKqsC672SxaOuFQsf5BXk7597F6efBpWz2IVk3DDi66ZCMpA1vQMB_Qd4Cb7RuCvj6AbibDrGMngzl0HChtBKFgpmycUopOm_uYthjPBoK5nQA8_AAxfLmPhiTxcFHLAtMZ1-ZDRg_Jb-asV0q2z_LXPJyIFnkepZDyu7XWcb4w0jFlTCfPm_N-katvq70ldkU_nLmuxiG4a9Z_tXmb6sGqfU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304357875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Grosby, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Grosby, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Examination of evidence from the ancient Near East spanning a period of more than a thousand years indicates the existence of conceptions of relatively precise boundaries, territories, and perhaps also nations. Of course, the bounded territorial relation constitutive of certain ancient collectivities was not based, in part, on a conception of citizenship derived from birth in the land as in many instances of the modern national state. Nonetheless, one is justified in recognizing in antiquity instances of a consciousness of a bounded, trans-local territorial relation and thus, perhaps nationality. The evidence for the existence of various conceptions of such relations constitutive of respectively various collectivities in the ancient Near East is by no means limited to the complicated example of the nation of ancient Israel. There are a number of other examples among which are Edom, ancient Aram, and ancient Armenia. There is merit in considering the examples of Edom, Aram, and Armenia together, specifically in elucidating the problem of both the nature of our evidence and the categories, especially nationality, which we employ in examining that evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/1568520972600829</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESOFS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Ancient civilizations of the near east ; Ancient history ; Antiquity ; Armenia ; Art and archaeology ; Borders ; Citizenship ; Collectivities ; Far East ; Generalities ; Identity ; Kingdoms ; Mesopotamia and Near East ; Middle East ; Minor Asia and Hittites ; National Identity ; Nationality ; Referents ; Social history ; Stelae ; Sumer ; Terminology ; Territorial jurisdictions ; Territoriality ; Territories ; Territory ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient, 1997, Vol.40 (1), p.1-29</ispartof><rights>1997 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 1997 E. J. Brill</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-ca283bbf2c9e147eda6dfbfbc5a2f6a01efbf6afb2c1a7a288db62838cf57ae33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3632306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3632306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2880235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grosby, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia</title><title>Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient</title><addtitle>JESH</addtitle><description>Examination of evidence from the ancient Near East spanning a period of more than a thousand years indicates the existence of conceptions of relatively precise boundaries, territories, and perhaps also nations. Of course, the bounded territorial relation constitutive of certain ancient collectivities was not based, in part, on a conception of citizenship derived from birth in the land as in many instances of the modern national state. Nonetheless, one is justified in recognizing in antiquity instances of a consciousness of a bounded, trans-local territorial relation and thus, perhaps nationality. The evidence for the existence of various conceptions of such relations constitutive of respectively various collectivities in the ancient Near East is by no means limited to the complicated example of the nation of ancient Israel. There are a number of other examples among which are Edom, ancient Aram, and ancient Armenia. There is merit in considering the examples of Edom, Aram, and Armenia together, specifically in elucidating the problem of both the nature of our evidence and the categories, especially nationality, which we employ in examining that evidence.</description><subject>Ancient civilizations of the near east</subject><subject>Ancient history</subject><subject>Antiquity</subject><subject>Armenia</subject><subject>Art and archaeology</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Collectivities</subject><subject>Far East</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Kingdoms</subject><subject>Mesopotamia and Near East</subject><subject>Middle East</subject><subject>Minor Asia and Hittites</subject><subject>National Identity</subject><subject>Nationality</subject><subject>Referents</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Stelae</subject><subject>Sumer</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Territorial jurisdictions</subject><subject>Territoriality</subject><subject>Territories</subject><subject>Territory</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>0022-4995</issn><issn>1568-5209</issn><issn>0022-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuP0zAUhS0EEmVgz4JFJBArMlzb8SPLTjV0gGpYUNbWjWMLlzQZbFei_x6XjCo0EmJl-Z7vHN0HIS8pXFIq-XsqpBYMWsUkgGbtI7I4lepT7TFZADBWN20rnpJnKe0AgDIOC7K-mmLvYnpXbV2MIU_xWOHYV7eYwzTiEPKxCmOVv7tqOdrgxlzdOozVNab8B1zGvRsDPidPPA7Jvbh_L8i3D9fb1U29-bL-uFpu6q6hPNcWmeZd55ltHW2U61H2vvOdFci8RKCu_CT6jlmKqsC672SxaOuFQsf5BXk7597F6efBpWz2IVk3DDi66ZCMpA1vQMB_Qd4Cb7RuCvj6AbibDrGMngzl0HChtBKFgpmycUopOm_uYthjPBoK5nQA8_AAxfLmPhiTxcFHLAtMZ1-ZDRg_Jb-asV0q2z_LXPJyIFnkepZDyu7XWcb4w0jFlTCfPm_N-katvq70ldkU_nLmuxiG4a9Z_tXmb6sGqfU</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Grosby, Steven</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>E. J. Brill</general><general>Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>~PK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia</title><author>Grosby, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-ca283bbf2c9e147eda6dfbfbc5a2f6a01efbf6afb2c1a7a288db62838cf57ae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Ancient civilizations of the near east</topic><topic>Ancient history</topic><topic>Antiquity</topic><topic>Armenia</topic><topic>Art and archaeology</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Collectivities</topic><topic>Far East</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Kingdoms</topic><topic>Mesopotamia and Near East</topic><topic>Middle East</topic><topic>Minor Asia and Hittites</topic><topic>National Identity</topic><topic>Nationality</topic><topic>Referents</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Stelae</topic><topic>Sumer</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Territorial jurisdictions</topic><topic>Territoriality</topic><topic>Territories</topic><topic>Territory</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grosby, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>ProQuest_PAO Collection 2(与CASHL共建)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Historical Studies Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grosby, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient</jtitle><addtitle>JESH</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>1-29</pages><issn>0022-4995</issn><eissn>1568-5209</eissn><eissn>0022-4995</eissn><coden>JESOFS</coden><abstract>Examination of evidence from the ancient Near East spanning a period of more than a thousand years indicates the existence of conceptions of relatively precise boundaries, territories, and perhaps also nations. Of course, the bounded territorial relation constitutive of certain ancient collectivities was not based, in part, on a conception of citizenship derived from birth in the land as in many instances of the modern national state. Nonetheless, one is justified in recognizing in antiquity instances of a consciousness of a bounded, trans-local territorial relation and thus, perhaps nationality. The evidence for the existence of various conceptions of such relations constitutive of respectively various collectivities in the ancient Near East is by no means limited to the complicated example of the nation of ancient Israel. There are a number of other examples among which are Edom, ancient Aram, and ancient Armenia. There is merit in considering the examples of Edom, Aram, and Armenia together, specifically in elucidating the problem of both the nature of our evidence and the categories, especially nationality, which we employ in examining that evidence.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/1568520972600829</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4995
ispartof Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient, 1997, Vol.40 (1), p.1-29
issn 0022-4995
1568-5209
0022-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61434050
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Ancient civilizations of the near east
Ancient history
Antiquity
Armenia
Art and archaeology
Borders
Citizenship
Collectivities
Far East
Generalities
Identity
Kingdoms
Mesopotamia and Near East
Middle East
Minor Asia and Hittites
National Identity
Nationality
Referents
Social history
Stelae
Sumer
Terminology
Territorial jurisdictions
Territoriality
Territories
Territory
Treaties
title Borders, Territory and Nationality in the Ancient Near East and Armenia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A59%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Borders,%20Territory%20and%20Nationality%20in%20the%20Ancient%20Near%20East%20and%20Armenia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20economic%20and%20social%20history%20of%20the%20Orient&rft.au=Grosby,%20Steven&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=1-29&rft.issn=0022-4995&rft.eissn=1568-5209&rft.coden=JESOFS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/1568520972600829&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3632306%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304357875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3632306&rfr_iscdi=true