Marital dissatisfaction following the death of a child: the influence of genetic factors at cause in the death
The death of a child is commonly reported to lead to discord within the marital dyad. The hypothesis of this study is that, to the extent that this is so, dissatisfactions among bereaved parents are elicited by the perceived threat of similar reproductive failure in the future. Consequently, it was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marriage and family 1991-08, Vol.53 (3), p.799-804 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 804 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 799 |
container_title | Journal of marriage and family |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Littlefield, C.H Silverman, I |
description | The death of a child is commonly reported to lead to discord within the marital dyad. The hypothesis of this study is that, to the extent that this is so, dissatisfactions among bereaved parents are elicited by the perceived threat of similar reproductive failure in the future. Consequently, it was expected (a) that marital dissatisfaction would be predicted by the probability (both actual and perceived) that genetic factors in the spouse caused the death, and (b) that this effect would be greater in females than in males because of females' greater parental investment in each child. Responses to a bereavement questionnaire that was complete by 74 married couples revealed that when marital satisfaction was viewed as a function of the actual cause of death (accident, illness, or congenital), the hypotheses were not supported. However, when parents' perceptions of the cause of their child's death were examined, it was found that for females, but not males, the attribution of the death to genetic factors in the spouse was negatively correlated with marital satisfaction, both overall and with respect to specific behaviors within the marriage. Although genetic causation was no more likely to be attributed to one sex than the other, the level of between-spouse agreement regarding responsibility for genetic causation was significantly greater when attributions were made to males rather than to females. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/352752 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61427818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ435523</ericid><jstor_id>352752</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>352752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-77ecd5f93e3cec552afe5560602bb86fd325371c9dae97d8058f9e25da19ac193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhkNR6LHaX1BoUPBuNZlsNpveSalfVLzQXodpdnJODttNm2QR_717PMUDQudmYObhnY-XsVMp3oES5r3SYDQcsZU0rWyUUeYZWwkB0EDb6mP2opStWAKsWLHpG-ZYceRDLAVrLAF9jWniIY1j-hWnNa8b4gNh3fAUOHK_ieNw8bcapzDONHnaddY0UY2e7wRSLhwr9ziXHXWQeMmeBxwLvXrMJ-zm49XPy8_N9fdPXy4_XDdeSaiNMeQHHawi5clrDRhI6050Am5v-y4MCrQy0tsByZqhF7oPlkAPKC16adUJe7vXvc_pYaZS3V0snsYRJ0pzcZ1swfSyX8DX_4HbNOdp2c2BtEYb1coFevMUJMF2HbS9EIeZPqdSMgV3n-Md5t9OCrdzxu2dWcCzPUg5-n_Q1ddWLZeqw7RtWR75tMj5ngqYHK5zLO7mBwipxGK7kdCrP4L0nCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219757341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marital dissatisfaction following the death of a child: the influence of genetic factors at cause in the death</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Littlefield, C.H ; Silverman, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Littlefield, C.H ; Silverman, I</creatorcontrib><description>The death of a child is commonly reported to lead to discord within the marital dyad. The hypothesis of this study is that, to the extent that this is so, dissatisfactions among bereaved parents are elicited by the perceived threat of similar reproductive failure in the future. Consequently, it was expected (a) that marital dissatisfaction would be predicted by the probability (both actual and perceived) that genetic factors in the spouse caused the death, and (b) that this effect would be greater in females than in males because of females' greater parental investment in each child. Responses to a bereavement questionnaire that was complete by 74 married couples revealed that when marital satisfaction was viewed as a function of the actual cause of death (accident, illness, or congenital), the hypotheses were not supported. However, when parents' perceptions of the cause of their child's death were examined, it was found that for females, but not males, the attribution of the death to genetic factors in the spouse was negatively correlated with marital satisfaction, both overall and with respect to specific behaviors within the marriage. Although genetic causation was no more likely to be attributed to one sex than the other, the level of between-spouse agreement regarding responsibility for genetic causation was significantly greater when attributions were made to males rather than to females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/352752</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis, Minn: National Council on Family Relations</publisher><subject>Attribution ; Bereavement ; Canada ; Causes of death ; Child Mortality ; Children ; Children & youth ; Death ; Death & dying ; death and dying ; divorce ; Evolutionary genetics ; Foreign Countries ; gender differences ; genetic factors ; Genetics ; Grief ; Husbands ; Marital Relations ; Marital Satisfaction ; marital separation ; Marriage ; Medical genetics ; Of General Interest ; Parents ; Sex Differences ; Social research ; Spouses ; toronto, canada ; Toronto, Ontario ; Wives</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 1991-08, Vol.53 (3), p.799-804</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Family Relations Aug 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-77ecd5f93e3cec552afe5560602bb86fd325371c9dae97d8058f9e25da19ac193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/352752$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/352752$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27344,27869,27924,27925,33774,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ435523$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Littlefield, C.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, I</creatorcontrib><title>Marital dissatisfaction following the death of a child: the influence of genetic factors at cause in the death</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><description>The death of a child is commonly reported to lead to discord within the marital dyad. The hypothesis of this study is that, to the extent that this is so, dissatisfactions among bereaved parents are elicited by the perceived threat of similar reproductive failure in the future. Consequently, it was expected (a) that marital dissatisfaction would be predicted by the probability (both actual and perceived) that genetic factors in the spouse caused the death, and (b) that this effect would be greater in females than in males because of females' greater parental investment in each child. Responses to a bereavement questionnaire that was complete by 74 married couples revealed that when marital satisfaction was viewed as a function of the actual cause of death (accident, illness, or congenital), the hypotheses were not supported. However, when parents' perceptions of the cause of their child's death were examined, it was found that for females, but not males, the attribution of the death to genetic factors in the spouse was negatively correlated with marital satisfaction, both overall and with respect to specific behaviors within the marriage. Although genetic causation was no more likely to be attributed to one sex than the other, the level of between-spouse agreement regarding responsibility for genetic causation was significantly greater when attributions were made to males rather than to females.</description><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Bereavement</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Causes of death</subject><subject>Child Mortality</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death & dying</subject><subject>death and dying</subject><subject>divorce</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>genetic factors</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Marital Relations</subject><subject>Marital Satisfaction</subject><subject>marital separation</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Medical genetics</subject><subject>Of General Interest</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>toronto, canada</subject><subject>Toronto, Ontario</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhkNR6LHaX1BoUPBuNZlsNpveSalfVLzQXodpdnJODttNm2QR_717PMUDQudmYObhnY-XsVMp3oES5r3SYDQcsZU0rWyUUeYZWwkB0EDb6mP2opStWAKsWLHpG-ZYceRDLAVrLAF9jWniIY1j-hWnNa8b4gNh3fAUOHK_ieNw8bcapzDONHnaddY0UY2e7wRSLhwr9ziXHXWQeMmeBxwLvXrMJ-zm49XPy8_N9fdPXy4_XDdeSaiNMeQHHawi5clrDRhI6050Am5v-y4MCrQy0tsByZqhF7oPlkAPKC16adUJe7vXvc_pYaZS3V0snsYRJ0pzcZ1swfSyX8DX_4HbNOdp2c2BtEYb1coFevMUJMF2HbS9EIeZPqdSMgV3n-Md5t9OCrdzxu2dWcCzPUg5-n_Q1ddWLZeqw7RtWR75tMj5ngqYHK5zLO7mBwipxGK7kdCrP4L0nCg</recordid><startdate>19910801</startdate><enddate>19910801</enddate><creator>Littlefield, C.H</creator><creator>Silverman, I</creator><general>National Council on Family Relations</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910801</creationdate><title>Marital dissatisfaction following the death of a child: the influence of genetic factors at cause in the death</title><author>Littlefield, C.H ; Silverman, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-77ecd5f93e3cec552afe5560602bb86fd325371c9dae97d8058f9e25da19ac193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Bereavement</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Causes of death</topic><topic>Child Mortality</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death & dying</topic><topic>death and dying</topic><topic>divorce</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>genetic factors</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Marital Relations</topic><topic>Marital Satisfaction</topic><topic>marital separation</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Medical genetics</topic><topic>Of General Interest</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>toronto, canada</topic><topic>Toronto, Ontario</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Littlefield, C.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, I</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Littlefield, C.H</au><au>Silverman, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ435523</ericid><atitle>Marital dissatisfaction following the death of a child: the influence of genetic factors at cause in the death</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><date>1991-08-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>799</spage><epage>804</epage><pages>799-804</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><coden>JMFAA6</coden><abstract>The death of a child is commonly reported to lead to discord within the marital dyad. The hypothesis of this study is that, to the extent that this is so, dissatisfactions among bereaved parents are elicited by the perceived threat of similar reproductive failure in the future. Consequently, it was expected (a) that marital dissatisfaction would be predicted by the probability (both actual and perceived) that genetic factors in the spouse caused the death, and (b) that this effect would be greater in females than in males because of females' greater parental investment in each child. Responses to a bereavement questionnaire that was complete by 74 married couples revealed that when marital satisfaction was viewed as a function of the actual cause of death (accident, illness, or congenital), the hypotheses were not supported. However, when parents' perceptions of the cause of their child's death were examined, it was found that for females, but not males, the attribution of the death to genetic factors in the spouse was negatively correlated with marital satisfaction, both overall and with respect to specific behaviors within the marriage. Although genetic causation was no more likely to be attributed to one sex than the other, the level of between-spouse agreement regarding responsibility for genetic causation was significantly greater when attributions were made to males rather than to females.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis, Minn</cop><pub>National Council on Family Relations</pub><doi>10.2307/352752</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2445 |
ispartof | Journal of marriage and family, 1991-08, Vol.53 (3), p.799-804 |
issn | 0022-2445 1741-3737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61427818 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Attribution Bereavement Canada Causes of death Child Mortality Children Children & youth Death Death & dying death and dying divorce Evolutionary genetics Foreign Countries gender differences genetic factors Genetics Grief Husbands Marital Relations Marital Satisfaction marital separation Marriage Medical genetics Of General Interest Parents Sex Differences Social research Spouses toronto, canada Toronto, Ontario Wives |
title | Marital dissatisfaction following the death of a child: the influence of genetic factors at cause in the death |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A41%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marital%20dissatisfaction%20following%20the%20death%20of%20a%20child:%20the%20influence%20of%20genetic%20factors%20at%20cause%20in%20the%20death&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Littlefield,%20C.H&rft.date=1991-08-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=799&rft.epage=804&rft.pages=799-804&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft.coden=JMFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/352752&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E352752%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219757341&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ435523&rft_jstor_id=352752&rfr_iscdi=true |