Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches

Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interpersonal violence 1996-03, Vol.11 (1), p.19-34
Hauptverfasser: KAUFMAN, KEITH L., HILLIKER, DANIEL R., LATHROP, PATTY, DALEIDEN, ERIC L., RUDY, LESLIE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of interpersonal violence
container_volume 11
creator KAUFMAN, KEITH L.
HILLIKER, DANIEL R.
LATHROP, PATTY
DALEIDEN, ERIC L.
RUDY, LESLIE
description Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/088626096011001002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61396014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ527246</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_088626096011001002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>9317001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1192ae3f1533d93db4a9d2f68b03a3725ec25f96d68ac5cffd4824c20a94b96b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AXFRXOiqTm5eTZcyjC-UWajrkOYhHTrtmExB_70pFQUFhQt3cb9zLucgdAz4AqAoZlhKQQQuBQbAOA3ZQRPgnOSCg9xFkwHIE8H30UGMK5wgLuUEZY_urddNtvTetdaFeJ49dLaP2XLjgm5tfYj2vG6iO_rcU_R8tXia3-T3y-vb-eV9bigT2xygJNpRD5xSW1JbMV1a4oWsMNW0INwZwn0prJDacOO9ZZIwQ7AuWVWKik7R2ei7Cd1r7-JWretoXNPo1nV9VALokI79C_JCYAocJ_D0B7jq-tCmEIqAkJTTQiSIjJAJXYzBebUJ9VqHdwVYDdWq39Um0ckocqE2X4LFHScFYYPnbDxH_eK-n_5h-AEP337N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216835376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>KAUFMAN, KEITH L. ; HILLIKER, DANIEL R. ; LATHROP, PATTY ; DALEIDEN, ERIC L. ; RUDY, LESLIE</creator><creatorcontrib>KAUFMAN, KEITH L. ; HILLIKER, DANIEL R. ; LATHROP, PATTY ; DALEIDEN, ERIC L. ; RUDY, LESLIE</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-2605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/088626096011001002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIVIEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Approaches ; Child Abuse ; Child Molesters ; Child Sexual Abuse ; Comparison ; Correctional Rehabilitation ; Criminals ; Dating Violence ; Interviews ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Modus Operandi ; Offenders ; Pedophilia ; Perceptions ; Questionnaires ; Rape ; Sex crimes ; Sex Offenders ; Sexual Abuse ; Sexual Assault ; Sexuality ; Social research ; Structured interviews ; Victims ; Victims of Crime ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of interpersonal violence, 1996-03, Vol.11 (1), p.19-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1192ae3f1533d93db4a9d2f68b03a3725ec25f96d68ac5cffd4824c20a94b96b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/088626096011001002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/088626096011001002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ527246$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LATHROP, PATTY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDY, LESLIE</creatorcontrib><title>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches</title><title>Journal of interpersonal violence</title><description>Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Approaches</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child Molesters</subject><subject>Child Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Correctional Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Dating Violence</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Modus Operandi</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Pedophilia</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex Offenders</subject><subject>Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Sexual Assault</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Structured interviews</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Victims of Crime</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0886-2605</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AXFRXOiqTm5eTZcyjC-UWajrkOYhHTrtmExB_70pFQUFhQt3cb9zLucgdAz4AqAoZlhKQQQuBQbAOA3ZQRPgnOSCg9xFkwHIE8H30UGMK5wgLuUEZY_urddNtvTetdaFeJ49dLaP2XLjgm5tfYj2vG6iO_rcU_R8tXia3-T3y-vb-eV9bigT2xygJNpRD5xSW1JbMV1a4oWsMNW0INwZwn0prJDacOO9ZZIwQ7AuWVWKik7R2ei7Cd1r7-JWretoXNPo1nV9VALokI79C_JCYAocJ_D0B7jq-tCmEIqAkJTTQiSIjJAJXYzBebUJ9VqHdwVYDdWq39Um0ckocqE2X4LFHScFYYPnbDxH_eK-n_5h-AEP337N</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</creator><creator>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</creator><creator>LATHROP, PATTY</creator><creator>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</creator><creator>RUDY, LESLIE</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi</title><author>KAUFMAN, KEITH L. ; HILLIKER, DANIEL R. ; LATHROP, PATTY ; DALEIDEN, ERIC L. ; RUDY, LESLIE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1192ae3f1533d93db4a9d2f68b03a3725ec25f96d68ac5cffd4824c20a94b96b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Approaches</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child Molesters</topic><topic>Child Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Correctional Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Dating Violence</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Modus Operandi</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Pedophilia</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex Offenders</topic><topic>Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Sexual Assault</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Structured interviews</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Victims of Crime</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LATHROP, PATTY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDY, LESLIE</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</au><au>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</au><au>LATHROP, PATTY</au><au>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</au><au>RUDY, LESLIE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ527246</ericid><atitle>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>19-34</pages><issn>0886-2605</issn><eissn>1552-6518</eissn><coden>JIVIEI</coden><abstract>Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/088626096011001002</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-2605
ispartof Journal of interpersonal violence, 1996-03, Vol.11 (1), p.19-34
issn 0886-2605
1552-6518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61396014
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adults
Approaches
Child Abuse
Child Molesters
Child Sexual Abuse
Comparison
Correctional Rehabilitation
Criminals
Dating Violence
Interviews
Methodology (Data Collection)
Modus Operandi
Offenders
Pedophilia
Perceptions
Questionnaires
Rape
Sex crimes
Sex Offenders
Sexual Abuse
Sexual Assault
Sexuality
Social research
Structured interviews
Victims
Victims of Crime
Violence
title Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sexual%20Offenders'%20Modus%20Operandi:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Structured%20Interview%20and%20Questionnaire%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interpersonal%20violence&rft.au=KAUFMAN,%20KEITH%20L.&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=19-34&rft.issn=0886-2605&rft.eissn=1552-6518&rft.coden=JIVIEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/088626096011001002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E9317001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216835376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ527246&rft_sage_id=10.1177_088626096011001002&rfr_iscdi=true