Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches
Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interpersonal violence 1996-03, Vol.11 (1), p.19-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Journal of interpersonal violence |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | KAUFMAN, KEITH L. HILLIKER, DANIEL R. LATHROP, PATTY DALEIDEN, ERIC L. RUDY, LESLIE |
description | Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/088626096011001002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61396014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ527246</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_088626096011001002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>9317001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1192ae3f1533d93db4a9d2f68b03a3725ec25f96d68ac5cffd4824c20a94b96b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AXFRXOiqTm5eTZcyjC-UWajrkOYhHTrtmExB_70pFQUFhQt3cb9zLucgdAz4AqAoZlhKQQQuBQbAOA3ZQRPgnOSCg9xFkwHIE8H30UGMK5wgLuUEZY_urddNtvTetdaFeJ49dLaP2XLjgm5tfYj2vG6iO_rcU_R8tXia3-T3y-vb-eV9bigT2xygJNpRD5xSW1JbMV1a4oWsMNW0INwZwn0prJDacOO9ZZIwQ7AuWVWKik7R2ei7Cd1r7-JWretoXNPo1nV9VALokI79C_JCYAocJ_D0B7jq-tCmEIqAkJTTQiSIjJAJXYzBebUJ9VqHdwVYDdWq39Um0ckocqE2X4LFHScFYYPnbDxH_eK-n_5h-AEP337N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216835376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>KAUFMAN, KEITH L. ; HILLIKER, DANIEL R. ; LATHROP, PATTY ; DALEIDEN, ERIC L. ; RUDY, LESLIE</creator><creatorcontrib>KAUFMAN, KEITH L. ; HILLIKER, DANIEL R. ; LATHROP, PATTY ; DALEIDEN, ERIC L. ; RUDY, LESLIE</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-2605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/088626096011001002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIVIEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Approaches ; Child Abuse ; Child Molesters ; Child Sexual Abuse ; Comparison ; Correctional Rehabilitation ; Criminals ; Dating Violence ; Interviews ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Modus Operandi ; Offenders ; Pedophilia ; Perceptions ; Questionnaires ; Rape ; Sex crimes ; Sex Offenders ; Sexual Abuse ; Sexual Assault ; Sexuality ; Social research ; Structured interviews ; Victims ; Victims of Crime ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of interpersonal violence, 1996-03, Vol.11 (1), p.19-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1192ae3f1533d93db4a9d2f68b03a3725ec25f96d68ac5cffd4824c20a94b96b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/088626096011001002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/088626096011001002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ527246$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LATHROP, PATTY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDY, LESLIE</creatorcontrib><title>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches</title><title>Journal of interpersonal violence</title><description>Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Approaches</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child Molesters</subject><subject>Child Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Correctional Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Dating Violence</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Modus Operandi</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Pedophilia</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex Offenders</subject><subject>Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Sexual Assault</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Structured interviews</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Victims of Crime</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0886-2605</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AXFRXOiqTm5eTZcyjC-UWajrkOYhHTrtmExB_70pFQUFhQt3cb9zLucgdAz4AqAoZlhKQQQuBQbAOA3ZQRPgnOSCg9xFkwHIE8H30UGMK5wgLuUEZY_urddNtvTetdaFeJ49dLaP2XLjgm5tfYj2vG6iO_rcU_R8tXia3-T3y-vb-eV9bigT2xygJNpRD5xSW1JbMV1a4oWsMNW0INwZwn0prJDacOO9ZZIwQ7AuWVWKik7R2ei7Cd1r7-JWretoXNPo1nV9VALokI79C_JCYAocJ_D0B7jq-tCmEIqAkJTTQiSIjJAJXYzBebUJ9VqHdwVYDdWq39Um0ckocqE2X4LFHScFYYPnbDxH_eK-n_5h-AEP337N</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</creator><creator>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</creator><creator>LATHROP, PATTY</creator><creator>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</creator><creator>RUDY, LESLIE</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi</title><author>KAUFMAN, KEITH L. ; HILLIKER, DANIEL R. ; LATHROP, PATTY ; DALEIDEN, ERIC L. ; RUDY, LESLIE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1192ae3f1533d93db4a9d2f68b03a3725ec25f96d68ac5cffd4824c20a94b96b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Approaches</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child Molesters</topic><topic>Child Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Correctional Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Dating Violence</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Modus Operandi</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Pedophilia</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex Offenders</topic><topic>Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Sexual Assault</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Structured interviews</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Victims of Crime</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LATHROP, PATTY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDY, LESLIE</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KAUFMAN, KEITH L.</au><au>HILLIKER, DANIEL R.</au><au>LATHROP, PATTY</au><au>DALEIDEN, ERIC L.</au><au>RUDY, LESLIE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ527246</ericid><atitle>Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>19-34</pages><issn>0886-2605</issn><eissn>1552-6518</eissn><coden>JIVIEI</coden><abstract>Clinical practice has long supported the use of structured interviews with both perpetrators and victims of sexual offenses. However, empirical studies have not examined the differential utility of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires for obtaining information about sex offenders' modus operandi. This investigation compared the ability of these two assessment approaches to provide details regarding sexual offenders' modus operandi from the perspective of victims, incarcerated offenders, and offenders in outpatient treatment. Study findings indicated that structured interviews and questionnaires yielded consistent information for most items across participant groups. For modus operandi items that were not consistently reported, more information was obtained via the questionnaire format. However, in one instance, the interview format obtained significantly more information about incarcerated offenders' use of threats and coercion to gain victim co operation in sexual activity. Implications for child sexual abuse prevention, offender and victim treatment, and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/088626096011001002</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-2605 |
ispartof | Journal of interpersonal violence, 1996-03, Vol.11 (1), p.19-34 |
issn | 0886-2605 1552-6518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61396014 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adults Approaches Child Abuse Child Molesters Child Sexual Abuse Comparison Correctional Rehabilitation Criminals Dating Violence Interviews Methodology (Data Collection) Modus Operandi Offenders Pedophilia Perceptions Questionnaires Rape Sex crimes Sex Offenders Sexual Abuse Sexual Assault Sexuality Social research Structured interviews Victims Victims of Crime Violence |
title | Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: A Comparison of Structured Interview and Questionnaire Approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sexual%20Offenders'%20Modus%20Operandi:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Structured%20Interview%20and%20Questionnaire%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interpersonal%20violence&rft.au=KAUFMAN,%20KEITH%20L.&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=19-34&rft.issn=0886-2605&rft.eissn=1552-6518&rft.coden=JIVIEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/088626096011001002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E9317001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216835376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ527246&rft_sage_id=10.1177_088626096011001002&rfr_iscdi=true |