Social Movement Spillover
Social movements are not distinct and self-contained; rather, they grow from and give birth to other movements, work in coalition with other movements, and influence each other indirectly through their effects on the larger cultural and political environment. Building on both political process and c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 1994-05, Vol.41 (2), p.277-298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 298 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 277 |
container_title | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Meyer, David S. Whittier, Nancy |
description | Social movements are not distinct and self-contained; rather, they grow from and give birth to other movements, work in coalition with other movements, and influence each other indirectly through their effects on the larger cultural and political environment. Building on both political process and collective identity perspectives, this paper uses a case study of the women's movement's impact on U.S. peace movement activity in the 1980s to develop a theory of movement-movement influence. We argue that this influence is shown by: 1) the adoption of feminist ideological frames by the peace movement; 2) the spread of the women's movement's tactical innovations into peace protest; 3) increased presence of women in leadership positions in both the institutionally-oriented and direct action wings of the movement; and 4) the adoption of organizational structures that built on feminist processes designed to avoid hierarchy. Drawing data from both movements at local and national levels, we suggest four mechanisms of transmission between the movements: 1) organizational coalitions; 2) overlapping social movement communities; 3) shared personnel; and 4) broader changes in the external environment. Social movement spillover effects have implications for our understanding of both the continuity and impact of social protest movements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/sp.1994.41.2.03x0438v |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61355703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3096934</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3096934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-4668663fb176ffeff025c9381ba4c2c6d51b3555b2dcaae6b2cdaa99438aeab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gA9CUfEtcWdnL8mjFG9Q8aF9XzbbDaSkTdxNi_57N7ReEKTzMMPAdw4zHEIugKYgmLgNbQp5zlMOKUspvlOO2eaADEAgJllsh2RAKapEqRyOyUkICxoLFBuQ82ljK1OPXpqNW7pVN5q2VV3HxZ-So9LUwZ3t5pDMHu5n46dk8vr4PL6bJBazvEu4lJmUWBagZFm6sqRM2BwzKAy3zMq5gAKFEAWbW2OcLJidGxPPxcw4U-CQ3GxtW9-8rV3o9LIK1tW1WblmHbSEqFYU94JCScWQ7Qcxk4xnoCJ4-QdcNGu_is9qBjJnon9sSK7-gwApCKkQe0psKeubELwrdeurpfEfGqjuQ9Kh1X1ImoNm-iukqLveuZtgTV16s7JV-Bajimci_cEWoWv8b2-GVGmkucyR4ycR-Ztu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301567336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Movement Spillover</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Meyer, David S. ; Whittier, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S. ; Whittier, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>Social movements are not distinct and self-contained; rather, they grow from and give birth to other movements, work in coalition with other movements, and influence each other indirectly through their effects on the larger cultural and political environment. Building on both political process and collective identity perspectives, this paper uses a case study of the women's movement's impact on U.S. peace movement activity in the 1980s to develop a theory of movement-movement influence. We argue that this influence is shown by: 1) the adoption of feminist ideological frames by the peace movement; 2) the spread of the women's movement's tactical innovations into peace protest; 3) increased presence of women in leadership positions in both the institutionally-oriented and direct action wings of the movement; and 4) the adoption of organizational structures that built on feminist processes designed to avoid hierarchy. Drawing data from both movements at local and national levels, we suggest four mechanisms of transmission between the movements: 1) organizational coalitions; 2) overlapping social movement communities; 3) shared personnel; and 4) broader changes in the external environment. Social movement spillover effects have implications for our understanding of both the continuity and impact of social protest movements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/sp.1994.41.2.03x0438v</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOPRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Abolition of slavery ; Case studies ; Civil rights ; Civil rights movements ; Collective action ; Competition ; Feminism ; Grass roots movement ; Group identity ; Influences ; Military tactics ; New Left ; Peace movements ; Political activism ; Political campaigns ; Political movements ; Political protests ; Political sociology ; Social activism ; Social conditions & trends ; Social Movement Organizations ; Social Movements ; Social movements. Revolutions ; Social research ; Sociology ; U.S.A ; USA ; Women's movement ; Women's movements ; Womens rights movements</subject><ispartof>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 1994-05, Vol.41 (2), p.277-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press May 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-4668663fb176ffeff025c9381ba4c2c6d51b3555b2dcaae6b2cdaa99438aeab3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3096934$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3096934$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27848,27903,27904,30979,33753,33754,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3717330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittier, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Social Movement Spillover</title><title>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><description>Social movements are not distinct and self-contained; rather, they grow from and give birth to other movements, work in coalition with other movements, and influence each other indirectly through their effects on the larger cultural and political environment. Building on both political process and collective identity perspectives, this paper uses a case study of the women's movement's impact on U.S. peace movement activity in the 1980s to develop a theory of movement-movement influence. We argue that this influence is shown by: 1) the adoption of feminist ideological frames by the peace movement; 2) the spread of the women's movement's tactical innovations into peace protest; 3) increased presence of women in leadership positions in both the institutionally-oriented and direct action wings of the movement; and 4) the adoption of organizational structures that built on feminist processes designed to avoid hierarchy. Drawing data from both movements at local and national levels, we suggest four mechanisms of transmission between the movements: 1) organizational coalitions; 2) overlapping social movement communities; 3) shared personnel; and 4) broader changes in the external environment. Social movement spillover effects have implications for our understanding of both the continuity and impact of social protest movements.</description><subject>Abolition of slavery</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil rights movements</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Military tactics</subject><subject>New Left</subject><subject>Peace movements</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political movements</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social conditions & trends</subject><subject>Social Movement Organizations</subject><subject>Social Movements</subject><subject>Social movements. Revolutions</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Women's movement</subject><subject>Women's movements</subject><subject>Womens rights movements</subject><issn>0037-7791</issn><issn>1533-8533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gA9CUfEtcWdnL8mjFG9Q8aF9XzbbDaSkTdxNi_57N7ReEKTzMMPAdw4zHEIugKYgmLgNbQp5zlMOKUspvlOO2eaADEAgJllsh2RAKapEqRyOyUkICxoLFBuQ82ljK1OPXpqNW7pVN5q2VV3HxZ-So9LUwZ3t5pDMHu5n46dk8vr4PL6bJBazvEu4lJmUWBagZFm6sqRM2BwzKAy3zMq5gAKFEAWbW2OcLJidGxPPxcw4U-CQ3GxtW9-8rV3o9LIK1tW1WblmHbSEqFYU94JCScWQ7Qcxk4xnoCJ4-QdcNGu_is9qBjJnon9sSK7-gwApCKkQe0psKeubELwrdeurpfEfGqjuQ9Kh1X1ImoNm-iukqLveuZtgTV16s7JV-Bajimci_cEWoWv8b2-GVGmkucyR4ycR-Ztu</recordid><startdate>19940501</startdate><enddate>19940501</enddate><creator>Meyer, David S.</creator><creator>Whittier, Nancy</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Society for the Study of Social Problems</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940501</creationdate><title>Social Movement Spillover</title><author>Meyer, David S. ; Whittier, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-4668663fb176ffeff025c9381ba4c2c6d51b3555b2dcaae6b2cdaa99438aeab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Abolition of slavery</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil rights movements</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Military tactics</topic><topic>New Left</topic><topic>Peace movements</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political movements</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social conditions & trends</topic><topic>Social Movement Organizations</topic><topic>Social Movements</topic><topic>Social movements. Revolutions</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Women's movement</topic><topic>Women's movements</topic><topic>Womens rights movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittier, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, David S.</au><au>Whittier, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Movement Spillover</atitle><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1994-05-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>277-298</pages><issn>0037-7791</issn><eissn>1533-8533</eissn><coden>SOPRAG</coden><abstract>Social movements are not distinct and self-contained; rather, they grow from and give birth to other movements, work in coalition with other movements, and influence each other indirectly through their effects on the larger cultural and political environment. Building on both political process and collective identity perspectives, this paper uses a case study of the women's movement's impact on U.S. peace movement activity in the 1980s to develop a theory of movement-movement influence. We argue that this influence is shown by: 1) the adoption of feminist ideological frames by the peace movement; 2) the spread of the women's movement's tactical innovations into peace protest; 3) increased presence of women in leadership positions in both the institutionally-oriented and direct action wings of the movement; and 4) the adoption of organizational structures that built on feminist processes designed to avoid hierarchy. Drawing data from both movements at local and national levels, we suggest four mechanisms of transmission between the movements: 1) organizational coalitions; 2) overlapping social movement communities; 3) shared personnel; and 4) broader changes in the external environment. Social movement spillover effects have implications for our understanding of both the continuity and impact of social protest movements.</abstract><cop>Berkeley, CA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/sp.1994.41.2.03x0438v</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-7791 |
ispartof | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 1994-05, Vol.41 (2), p.277-298 |
issn | 0037-7791 1533-8533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61355703 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Abolition of slavery Case studies Civil rights Civil rights movements Collective action Competition Feminism Grass roots movement Group identity Influences Military tactics New Left Peace movements Political activism Political campaigns Political movements Political protests Political sociology Social activism Social conditions & trends Social Movement Organizations Social Movements Social movements. Revolutions Social research Sociology U.S.A USA Women's movement Women's movements Womens rights movements |
title | Social Movement Spillover |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A20%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Movement%20Spillover&rft.jtitle=Social%20problems%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Meyer,%20David%20S.&rft.date=1994-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=277-298&rft.issn=0037-7791&rft.eissn=1533-8533&rft.coden=SOPRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/sp.1994.41.2.03x0438v&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3096934%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301567336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3096934&rfr_iscdi=true |