Agrarianism in American society
Sociological studies indicate that adherence to the tenets of agrarianism is still widespread in American society. But efforts to identify the structural roots of agrarianism have been only partially successful in that only a small portion of the variation in support of agrarianism can be explained...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Rural sociology 1992-04, Vol.57 (1), p.48-64 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 64 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 48 |
| container_title | Rural sociology |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Dalecki, M.G Coughenour, C.M |
| description | Sociological studies indicate that adherence to the tenets of agrarianism is still widespread in American society. But efforts to identify the structural roots of agrarianism have been only partially successful in that only a small portion of the variation in support of agrarianism can be explained thereby. The multidimensionality of agrarian beliefs and the linkages with underlying values prevalent in American society are explored with data drawn from a national sample of adults. Results indicate that tenets of the agrarian creed are widely endorsed by the American public as a whole. Moreover, beliefs are organized in the form of attitudinal (factor) dimensions corresponding to four of the five tenets of agrarianism identified by Flinn and Johnson (1974): family farm, agrarian fundamentalism, yeomanship (independence), and farm life style. The analysis of scale scores for the first three dimensions indicates that each expresses a different social ethic that is revealed in the unique configuration of American values to which it is significantly related. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00456.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61317740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ446345</ericid><sourcerecordid>3802639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5466-3de84f260a30f9ff8a67e0b3a0357937eb53400879dc05d3acfe09de9ee35723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV-LEzEUxYMoWFe_gbBlFd9mvMnNn8YXKWVt1cUFdxfBl5CmyZI6nVmTFttvb4YpfRBEvC8JnF_OvTmXkAsKNS31dl1TwXUFE6Q11ZrV2yUAF7LePyKjk_SYjABQVkApe0qe5byGUkLIETmf3iebom1j3oxjO55ufIrOtuPcuei3h-fkSbBN9i-O5xm5_XB5O1tUV9fzj7PpVeUEl7LClZ_wwCRYhKBDmFipPCzRAgqlUfmlQA4wUXrlQKzQuuBBr7z2vgAMz8ibwfYhdT93Pm_NJmbnm8a2vttlIylSpTj8E0SFTEnBC3jxB7judqktfzAlKNQCWd_21V8hpkFTqZgq1LuBcqnLOflgHlLc2HQwFEy_BrM2fdamz7p3Z-a4BrMvj18fW9jsbBOSbV3MJ4cyqpZUFOzlgPXxn9TLT5xL5L38fpB_xcYf_qO_-Xp3c11uxaEaHGLe-v3JwaYfRipUwnz7MjdzOgP8vvhsFoU_H_hgO2PvU5n57oYBRaBKCFocfwNAM7ob</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290916727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agrarianism in American society</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Dalecki, M.G ; Coughenour, C.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Dalecki, M.G ; Coughenour, C.M</creatorcontrib><description>Sociological studies indicate that adherence to the tenets of agrarianism is still widespread in American society. But efforts to identify the structural roots of agrarianism have been only partially successful in that only a small portion of the variation in support of agrarianism can be explained thereby. The multidimensionality of agrarian beliefs and the linkages with underlying values prevalent in American society are explored with data drawn from a national sample of adults. Results indicate that tenets of the agrarian creed are widely endorsed by the American public as a whole. Moreover, beliefs are organized in the form of attitudinal (factor) dimensions corresponding to four of the five tenets of agrarianism identified by Flinn and Johnson (1974): family farm, agrarian fundamentalism, yeomanship (independence), and farm life style. The analysis of scale scores for the first three dimensions indicates that each expresses a different social ethic that is revealed in the unique configuration of American values to which it is significantly related.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-0112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-0831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00456.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RUSOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agrarian society ; Agricultural Workers ; Agriculture ; attitudes and opinions ; Beliefs ; family farms ; Farmers ; National Surveys ; Public Opinion ; Rural and urban sociology ; Rural Areas ; Rural sociology ; Social Values ; society ; Sociology ; surveys ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Values</subject><ispartof>Rural sociology, 1992-04, Vol.57 (1), p.48-64</ispartof><rights>1992 Rural Sociological Society</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Rural Sociological Society Spring 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5466-3de84f260a30f9ff8a67e0b3a0357937eb53400879dc05d3acfe09de9ee35723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5466-3de84f260a30f9ff8a67e0b3a0357937eb53400879dc05d3acfe09de9ee35723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924,33773,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ446345$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6549615$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dalecki, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coughenour, C.M</creatorcontrib><title>Agrarianism in American society</title><title>Rural sociology</title><description>Sociological studies indicate that adherence to the tenets of agrarianism is still widespread in American society. But efforts to identify the structural roots of agrarianism have been only partially successful in that only a small portion of the variation in support of agrarianism can be explained thereby. The multidimensionality of agrarian beliefs and the linkages with underlying values prevalent in American society are explored with data drawn from a national sample of adults. Results indicate that tenets of the agrarian creed are widely endorsed by the American public as a whole. Moreover, beliefs are organized in the form of attitudinal (factor) dimensions corresponding to four of the five tenets of agrarianism identified by Flinn and Johnson (1974): family farm, agrarian fundamentalism, yeomanship (independence), and farm life style. The analysis of scale scores for the first three dimensions indicates that each expresses a different social ethic that is revealed in the unique configuration of American values to which it is significantly related.</description><subject>Agrarian society</subject><subject>Agricultural Workers</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>attitudes and opinions</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>family farms</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Rural and urban sociology</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural sociology</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0036-0112</issn><issn>1549-0831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV-LEzEUxYMoWFe_gbBlFd9mvMnNn8YXKWVt1cUFdxfBl5CmyZI6nVmTFttvb4YpfRBEvC8JnF_OvTmXkAsKNS31dl1TwXUFE6Q11ZrV2yUAF7LePyKjk_SYjABQVkApe0qe5byGUkLIETmf3iebom1j3oxjO55ufIrOtuPcuei3h-fkSbBN9i-O5xm5_XB5O1tUV9fzj7PpVeUEl7LClZ_wwCRYhKBDmFipPCzRAgqlUfmlQA4wUXrlQKzQuuBBr7z2vgAMz8ibwfYhdT93Pm_NJmbnm8a2vttlIylSpTj8E0SFTEnBC3jxB7judqktfzAlKNQCWd_21V8hpkFTqZgq1LuBcqnLOflgHlLc2HQwFEy_BrM2fdamz7p3Z-a4BrMvj18fW9jsbBOSbV3MJ4cyqpZUFOzlgPXxn9TLT5xL5L38fpB_xcYf_qO_-Xp3c11uxaEaHGLe-v3JwaYfRipUwnz7MjdzOgP8vvhsFoU_H_hgO2PvU5n57oYBRaBKCFocfwNAM7ob</recordid><startdate>19920401</startdate><enddate>19920401</enddate><creator>Dalecki, M.G</creator><creator>Coughenour, C.M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Rural Sociological Society</general><general>Rural Sociological Society, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AGQHT</scope><scope>APEJR</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P7</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920401</creationdate><title>Agrarianism in American society</title><author>Dalecki, M.G ; Coughenour, C.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5466-3de84f260a30f9ff8a67e0b3a0357937eb53400879dc05d3acfe09de9ee35723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Agrarian society</topic><topic>Agricultural Workers</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>attitudes and opinions</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>family farms</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Rural and urban sociology</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural sociology</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dalecki, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coughenour, C.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 7</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dalecki, M.G</au><au>Coughenour, C.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ446345</ericid><atitle>Agrarianism in American society</atitle><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle><date>1992-04-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>48-64</pages><issn>0036-0112</issn><eissn>1549-0831</eissn><coden>RUSOAJ</coden><abstract>Sociological studies indicate that adherence to the tenets of agrarianism is still widespread in American society. But efforts to identify the structural roots of agrarianism have been only partially successful in that only a small portion of the variation in support of agrarianism can be explained thereby. The multidimensionality of agrarian beliefs and the linkages with underlying values prevalent in American society are explored with data drawn from a national sample of adults. Results indicate that tenets of the agrarian creed are widely endorsed by the American public as a whole. Moreover, beliefs are organized in the form of attitudinal (factor) dimensions corresponding to four of the five tenets of agrarianism identified by Flinn and Johnson (1974): family farm, agrarian fundamentalism, yeomanship (independence), and farm life style. The analysis of scale scores for the first three dimensions indicates that each expresses a different social ethic that is revealed in the unique configuration of American values to which it is significantly related.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00456.x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-0112 |
| ispartof | Rural sociology, 1992-04, Vol.57 (1), p.48-64 |
| issn | 0036-0112 1549-0831 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61317740 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Agrarian society Agricultural Workers Agriculture attitudes and opinions Beliefs family farms Farmers National Surveys Public Opinion Rural and urban sociology Rural Areas Rural sociology Social Values society Sociology surveys U.S.A United States of America Values |
| title | Agrarianism in American society |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agrarianism%20in%20American%20society&rft.jtitle=Rural%20sociology&rft.au=Dalecki,%20M.G&rft.date=1992-04-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=48-64&rft.issn=0036-0112&rft.eissn=1549-0831&rft.coden=RUSOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00456.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3802639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290916727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ446345&rfr_iscdi=true |