American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History
In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rural history 1992-10, Vol.3 (2), p.219-242 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 242 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 219 |
container_title | Rural history |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Lapping, Mark B. |
description | In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0956793300003101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61317138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0956793300003101</cupid><sourcerecordid>1308758603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi1UpG5pf0BvliqhHhrqiWM76W21LSwIwRbKpRfLm0zAkDhb24u6_75OFyFEVXwZ6Z3nnQ8PIe-BHQAD9fmSVUKqinOWHk_SDplAoYqMSSFfkcmYzsb8a_ImhNsRUrmYEDft0dvaOHqx9qaji844Z931J_oV77EbVj26SBdDZ-sNNa6h8QbpLGkJtnFDh_avcogNjvbLaCJ-oVNHj11Ev_KYBHuPdG5DHPzmLdltTRfw3UPcI1eH337M5tnp-dHxbHqa1ZznMWuUBFMsJbQ5qxHzRpZKcSyWIsW8aqXJW1jmooKKcWOwlMK0khUCuGmgYHyP7G_rrvzwa40h6t6GGru0HQ7roCVwUMDLBH58EQTGRVlCIaqEfniG3g5r79IaGjgrlSgl44mCLVX7IQSPrV552xu_SaX0eCr9z6mSJ9t60ifh70eD8XdaKq6Elkff9by4-AlscaZPEs8feph-6W1zjU9G-W-XP3_KowA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308758603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Lapping, Mark B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lapping, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><description>In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0956793300003101</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RUHIEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Federal Government ; Government Policy ; Rural Areas ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Rural history, 1992-10, Vol.3 (2), p.219-242</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0956793300003101/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27846,27901,27902,33752,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lapping, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><title>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</title><title>Rural history</title><addtitle>Rural History</addtitle><description>In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.</description><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Government Policy</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0956-7933</issn><issn>1474-0656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi1UpG5pf0BvliqhHhrqiWM76W21LSwIwRbKpRfLm0zAkDhb24u6_75OFyFEVXwZ6Z3nnQ8PIe-BHQAD9fmSVUKqinOWHk_SDplAoYqMSSFfkcmYzsb8a_ImhNsRUrmYEDft0dvaOHqx9qaji844Z931J_oV77EbVj26SBdDZ-sNNa6h8QbpLGkJtnFDh_avcogNjvbLaCJ-oVNHj11Ev_KYBHuPdG5DHPzmLdltTRfw3UPcI1eH337M5tnp-dHxbHqa1ZznMWuUBFMsJbQ5qxHzRpZKcSyWIsW8aqXJW1jmooKKcWOwlMK0khUCuGmgYHyP7G_rrvzwa40h6t6GGru0HQ7roCVwUMDLBH58EQTGRVlCIaqEfniG3g5r79IaGjgrlSgl44mCLVX7IQSPrV552xu_SaX0eCr9z6mSJ9t60ifh70eD8XdaKq6Elkff9by4-AlscaZPEs8feph-6W1zjU9G-W-XP3_KowA</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>Lapping, Mark B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</title><author>Lapping, Mark B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Government Policy</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lapping, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rural history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lapping, Mark B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</atitle><jtitle>Rural history</jtitle><addtitle>Rural History</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>219-242</pages><issn>0956-7933</issn><eissn>1474-0656</eissn><coden>RUHIEI</coden><abstract>In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0956793300003101</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-7933 |
ispartof | Rural history, 1992-10, Vol.3 (2), p.219-242 |
issn | 0956-7933 1474-0656 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61317138 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Federal Government Government Policy Rural Areas United States of America |
title | American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20Rural%20Planning,%20Development%20Policy%20and%20the%20Centrality%20of%20the%20Federal%20State:%20An%20Interpretative%20History&rft.jtitle=Rural%20history&rft.au=Lapping,%20Mark%20B.&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=219-242&rft.issn=0956-7933&rft.eissn=1474-0656&rft.coden=RUHIEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0956793300003101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308758603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308758603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0956793300003101&rfr_iscdi=true |