American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History

In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rural history 1992-10, Vol.3 (2), p.219-242
1. Verfasser: Lapping, Mark B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 242
container_issue 2
container_start_page 219
container_title Rural history
container_volume 3
creator Lapping, Mark B.
description In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0956793300003101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61317138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0956793300003101</cupid><sourcerecordid>1308758603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi1UpG5pf0BvliqhHhrqiWM76W21LSwIwRbKpRfLm0zAkDhb24u6_75OFyFEVXwZ6Z3nnQ8PIe-BHQAD9fmSVUKqinOWHk_SDplAoYqMSSFfkcmYzsb8a_ImhNsRUrmYEDft0dvaOHqx9qaji844Z931J_oV77EbVj26SBdDZ-sNNa6h8QbpLGkJtnFDh_avcogNjvbLaCJ-oVNHj11Ev_KYBHuPdG5DHPzmLdltTRfw3UPcI1eH337M5tnp-dHxbHqa1ZznMWuUBFMsJbQ5qxHzRpZKcSyWIsW8aqXJW1jmooKKcWOwlMK0khUCuGmgYHyP7G_rrvzwa40h6t6GGru0HQ7roCVwUMDLBH58EQTGRVlCIaqEfniG3g5r79IaGjgrlSgl44mCLVX7IQSPrV552xu_SaX0eCr9z6mSJ9t60ifh70eD8XdaKq6Elkff9by4-AlscaZPEs8feph-6W1zjU9G-W-XP3_KowA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308758603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Lapping, Mark B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lapping, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><description>In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0956793300003101</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RUHIEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Federal Government ; Government Policy ; Rural Areas ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Rural history, 1992-10, Vol.3 (2), p.219-242</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0956793300003101/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27846,27901,27902,33752,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lapping, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><title>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</title><title>Rural history</title><addtitle>Rural History</addtitle><description>In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.</description><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Government Policy</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0956-7933</issn><issn>1474-0656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi1UpG5pf0BvliqhHhrqiWM76W21LSwIwRbKpRfLm0zAkDhb24u6_75OFyFEVXwZ6Z3nnQ8PIe-BHQAD9fmSVUKqinOWHk_SDplAoYqMSSFfkcmYzsb8a_ImhNsRUrmYEDft0dvaOHqx9qaji844Z931J_oV77EbVj26SBdDZ-sNNa6h8QbpLGkJtnFDh_avcogNjvbLaCJ-oVNHj11Ev_KYBHuPdG5DHPzmLdltTRfw3UPcI1eH337M5tnp-dHxbHqa1ZznMWuUBFMsJbQ5qxHzRpZKcSyWIsW8aqXJW1jmooKKcWOwlMK0khUCuGmgYHyP7G_rrvzwa40h6t6GGru0HQ7roCVwUMDLBH58EQTGRVlCIaqEfniG3g5r79IaGjgrlSgl44mCLVX7IQSPrV552xu_SaX0eCr9z6mSJ9t60ifh70eD8XdaKq6Elkff9by4-AlscaZPEs8feph-6W1zjU9G-W-XP3_KowA</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>Lapping, Mark B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</title><author>Lapping, Mark B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d761a4b61f20cee2d68773e4b587729f6a2f1b2591903aae865af604513ad1403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Government Policy</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lapping, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rural history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lapping, Mark B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History</atitle><jtitle>Rural history</jtitle><addtitle>Rural History</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>219-242</pages><issn>0956-7933</issn><eissn>1474-0656</eissn><coden>RUHIEI</coden><abstract>In just over two hundred years, the United States has been transformed from a very largely rural and wilderness nation into an urban one. Rural Americans have gone from being the first majority to the last minority, to paraphrase historian John Shover (Shover,1976). All through this time policies directly and indirectly oriented to rural areas and rural people have been enunciated by the federal government. Rarely was the coordination of policy sought or achieved, however. Also, for generations the easy assumption was made that agricultural policy constituted rural policy. Further, a form of rural fundamentalism, closely related to a neo-Jeffersonian social outlook, reinforced a false sense of ‘rugged individualism’ as the essence of personal and collective success. Such gross oversimplifications have tended to mask some of the truly substantive problems of poor housing, race and gender inequities, unemployment, illiteracy, poor health, and malnutrition faced by rural and small town populations.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0956793300003101</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7933
ispartof Rural history, 1992-10, Vol.3 (2), p.219-242
issn 0956-7933
1474-0656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61317138
source Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Federal Government
Government Policy
Rural Areas
United States of America
title American Rural Planning, Development Policy and the Centrality of the Federal State: An Interpretative History
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20Rural%20Planning,%20Development%20Policy%20and%20the%20Centrality%20of%20the%20Federal%20State:%20An%20Interpretative%20History&rft.jtitle=Rural%20history&rft.au=Lapping,%20Mark%20B.&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=219-242&rft.issn=0956-7933&rft.eissn=1474-0656&rft.coden=RUHIEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0956793300003101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308758603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308758603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0956793300003101&rfr_iscdi=true