Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference
The axiomatic models of intertemporal choice assume that an individual's rate of time discount is constant. Yet a great deal of anecdotal and hypothetical evidence suggests that the discount rate is instead hyperbolic. Likewise, animal studies have also supported the hyperbolic discount rate. V...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rationality and society 1992-04, Vol.4 (2), p.199-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Rationality and society |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | HOLCOMB, JAMES H. NELSON, PAUL S. |
description | The axiomatic models of intertemporal choice assume that an individual's rate of time discount is constant. Yet a great deal of anecdotal and hypothetical evidence suggests that the discount rate is instead hyperbolic. Likewise, animal studies have also supported the hyperbolic discount rate. Very little empirical evidence exists using human subjects making salient choices. Using experimental economic methodology, support is found for the stationarity component of the discount rate assumption but not for the linearity component. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1043463192004002006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61295202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1043463192004002006</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1300219453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f454e72becd953b0a5931fbf2812060c80fdee439f02742f689afb67c74750373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsH78Ai8BwVt09js5llK1UNBDPYfNZlZT02zdTUT_vVvqQUS8zAwzzzvMvIRcULimVOsbCoILxWnJAARAiuqATKhQNNdcFoepTkS-Q47JSYxrAJCCyQnR094PLxiy-ccWQ7vBfjBdtvT-NTNDtuib9r1txtRapVn2GNBhwN7iGTlypot4_p1PydPtfDW7z5cPd4vZdJlbzmHInZACNavRNqXkNRhZcupqxwrKQIEtwDWIgpcOmBbMqaI0rlbaaqElcM1PydV-7zb4txHjUG3aaLHrTI9-jJWirJQMWAIvf4FrP4Y-3VZRniyhpZA8UXxP2eBjTN9U2_S0CZ8VhWpnZfWHlUkFe1U0z_hj7z-SL7wbcTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300219453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>HOLCOMB, JAMES H. ; NELSON, PAUL S.</creator><creatorcontrib>HOLCOMB, JAMES H. ; NELSON, PAUL S.</creatorcontrib><description>The axiomatic models of intertemporal choice assume that an individual's rate of time discount is constant. Yet a great deal of anecdotal and hypothetical evidence suggests that the discount rate is instead hyperbolic. Likewise, animal studies have also supported the hyperbolic discount rate. Very little empirical evidence exists using human subjects making salient choices. Using experimental economic methodology, support is found for the stationarity component of the discount rate assumption but not for the linearity component.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-4631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1043463192004002006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RTSOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>College Students ; Preferences ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Rationality and society, 1992-04, Vol.4 (2), p.199-220</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f454e72becd953b0a5931fbf2812060c80fdee439f02742f689afb67c74750373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f454e72becd953b0a5931fbf2812060c80fdee439f02742f689afb67c74750373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1043463192004002006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463192004002006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21802,27852,27907,27908,33758,43604,43605</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOLCOMB, JAMES H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NELSON, PAUL S.</creatorcontrib><title>Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference</title><title>Rationality and society</title><description>The axiomatic models of intertemporal choice assume that an individual's rate of time discount is constant. Yet a great deal of anecdotal and hypothetical evidence suggests that the discount rate is instead hyperbolic. Likewise, animal studies have also supported the hyperbolic discount rate. Very little empirical evidence exists using human subjects making salient choices. Using experimental economic methodology, support is found for the stationarity component of the discount rate assumption but not for the linearity component.</description><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>1043-4631</issn><issn>1461-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsH78Ai8BwVt09js5llK1UNBDPYfNZlZT02zdTUT_vVvqQUS8zAwzzzvMvIRcULimVOsbCoILxWnJAARAiuqATKhQNNdcFoepTkS-Q47JSYxrAJCCyQnR094PLxiy-ccWQ7vBfjBdtvT-NTNDtuib9r1txtRapVn2GNBhwN7iGTlypot4_p1PydPtfDW7z5cPd4vZdJlbzmHInZACNavRNqXkNRhZcupqxwrKQIEtwDWIgpcOmBbMqaI0rlbaaqElcM1PydV-7zb4txHjUG3aaLHrTI9-jJWirJQMWAIvf4FrP4Y-3VZRniyhpZA8UXxP2eBjTN9U2_S0CZ8VhWpnZfWHlUkFe1U0z_hj7z-SL7wbcTI</recordid><startdate>199204</startdate><enddate>199204</enddate><creator>HOLCOMB, JAMES H.</creator><creator>NELSON, PAUL S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199204</creationdate><title>Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference</title><author>HOLCOMB, JAMES H. ; NELSON, PAUL S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f454e72becd953b0a5931fbf2812060c80fdee439f02742f689afb67c74750373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOLCOMB, JAMES H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NELSON, PAUL S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rationality and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOLCOMB, JAMES H.</au><au>NELSON, PAUL S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference</atitle><jtitle>Rationality and society</jtitle><date>1992-04</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>199-220</pages><issn>1043-4631</issn><eissn>1461-7358</eissn><coden>RTSOEG</coden><abstract>The axiomatic models of intertemporal choice assume that an individual's rate of time discount is constant. Yet a great deal of anecdotal and hypothetical evidence suggests that the discount rate is instead hyperbolic. Likewise, animal studies have also supported the hyperbolic discount rate. Very little empirical evidence exists using human subjects making salient choices. Using experimental economic methodology, support is found for the stationarity component of the discount rate assumption but not for the linearity component.</abstract><cop>Newbury Park, Calif</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1043463192004002006</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-4631 |
ispartof | Rationality and society, 1992-04, Vol.4 (2), p.199-220 |
issn | 1043-4631 1461-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61295202 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | College Students Preferences United States of America |
title | Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A56%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Another%20Experimental%20Look%20at%20Individual%20Time%20Preference&rft.jtitle=Rationality%20and%20society&rft.au=HOLCOMB,%20JAMES%20H.&rft.date=1992-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=199-220&rft.issn=1043-4631&rft.eissn=1461-7358&rft.coden=RTSOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1043463192004002006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300219453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300219453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1043463192004002006&rfr_iscdi=true |