Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement

This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.) N.J.), 1993-06, Vol.8 (2), p.157-179
1. Verfasser: Meyer, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)
container_volume 8
creator Meyer, David S.
description This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01115488
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61286828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>684633</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>684633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpLKwsnhiQAv7Ih8MGpQWkQpFo58hyzuAqjYPtILX8eVwVwcj03vDcnXSH0Ckll5SQ4up2QiilWSrEHhrQrOBJIXK6jwZEiDQRZUEP0ZH3S0K2nA_Q12Prgwl9MLaVjdmY9g3fGe-hDdd4_g540ZoANX4NMoCP4XoVegfYavxiGxOMkg2edZ11oY90jWVb4xAbxzEj2pbPvWpAOjxxABvAT_YTVnHBMTrQsvFw8pNDtJiM56OHZDq7fxzdTBPFszQkac0LqhUrMyayTGmtcqp0UdZcCckIo5xIyZUEyLTQQhGWSqJSXZNSsUwxPkTnu7mdsx89-FCtjFfQNLIF2_sqp0zkgol_IRdpGc9bRHixg8pZ7x3oqnNmJd26oqTaXrb6e0TEZzu89MG6X5mLNOecfwOikIW3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38491117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Meyer, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01115488</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOFOET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Eastern Sociological Society</publisher><subject>Antinuclear Movements ; Arms control ; Dissent ; Institutionalization (Social) ; Nuclear weapons ; Peace movements ; Political activism ; Political institutions ; Political movements ; Political protests ; Protest Movements ; Social movements ; U.S.A ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.), 1993-06, Vol.8 (2), p.157-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 Plenum Publishing Corporation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/684633$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/684633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,33774,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</title><title>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</title><description>This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.</description><subject>Antinuclear Movements</subject><subject>Arms control</subject><subject>Dissent</subject><subject>Institutionalization (Social)</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Peace movements</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Political movements</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Protest Movements</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0884-8971</issn><issn>1573-7861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpLKwsnhiQAv7Ih8MGpQWkQpFo58hyzuAqjYPtILX8eVwVwcj03vDcnXSH0Ckll5SQ4up2QiilWSrEHhrQrOBJIXK6jwZEiDQRZUEP0ZH3S0K2nA_Q12Prgwl9MLaVjdmY9g3fGe-hDdd4_g540ZoANX4NMoCP4XoVegfYavxiGxOMkg2edZ11oY90jWVb4xAbxzEj2pbPvWpAOjxxABvAT_YTVnHBMTrQsvFw8pNDtJiM56OHZDq7fxzdTBPFszQkac0LqhUrMyayTGmtcqp0UdZcCckIo5xIyZUEyLTQQhGWSqJSXZNSsUwxPkTnu7mdsx89-FCtjFfQNLIF2_sqp0zkgol_IRdpGc9bRHixg8pZ7x3oqnNmJd26oqTaXrb6e0TEZzu89MG6X5mLNOecfwOikIW3</recordid><startdate>19930601</startdate><enddate>19930601</enddate><creator>Meyer, David S.</creator><general>Eastern Sociological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930601</creationdate><title>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</title><author>Meyer, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Antinuclear Movements</topic><topic>Arms control</topic><topic>Dissent</topic><topic>Institutionalization (Social)</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Peace movements</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Political movements</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Protest Movements</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</atitle><jtitle>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</jtitle><date>1993-06-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>157-179</pages><issn>0884-8971</issn><eissn>1573-7861</eissn><coden>SOFOET</coden><abstract>This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.</abstract><pub>Eastern Sociological Society</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01115488</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8971
ispartof Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.), 1993-06, Vol.8 (2), p.157-179
issn 0884-8971
1573-7861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61286828
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antinuclear Movements
Arms control
Dissent
Institutionalization (Social)
Nuclear weapons
Peace movements
Political activism
Political institutions
Political movements
Political protests
Protest Movements
Social movements
U.S.A
United States of America
title Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutionalizing%20Dissent:%20The%20United%20States%20Structure%20of%20Political%20Opportunity%20and%20the%20End%20of%20the%20Nuclear%20Freeze%20Movement&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20forum%20(Randolph,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Meyer,%20David%20S.&rft.date=1993-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=157-179&rft.issn=0884-8971&rft.eissn=1573-7861&rft.coden=SOFOET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01115488&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E684633%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38491117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=684633&rfr_iscdi=true