Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement
This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.) N.J.), 1993-06, Vol.8 (2), p.157-179 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Meyer, David S. |
description | This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01115488 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61286828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>684633</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>684633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpLKwsnhiQAv7Ih8MGpQWkQpFo58hyzuAqjYPtILX8eVwVwcj03vDcnXSH0Ckll5SQ4up2QiilWSrEHhrQrOBJIXK6jwZEiDQRZUEP0ZH3S0K2nA_Q12Prgwl9MLaVjdmY9g3fGe-hDdd4_g540ZoANX4NMoCP4XoVegfYavxiGxOMkg2edZ11oY90jWVb4xAbxzEj2pbPvWpAOjxxABvAT_YTVnHBMTrQsvFw8pNDtJiM56OHZDq7fxzdTBPFszQkac0LqhUrMyayTGmtcqp0UdZcCckIo5xIyZUEyLTQQhGWSqJSXZNSsUwxPkTnu7mdsx89-FCtjFfQNLIF2_sqp0zkgol_IRdpGc9bRHixg8pZ7x3oqnNmJd26oqTaXrb6e0TEZzu89MG6X5mLNOecfwOikIW3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38491117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Meyer, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01115488</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOFOET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Eastern Sociological Society</publisher><subject>Antinuclear Movements ; Arms control ; Dissent ; Institutionalization (Social) ; Nuclear weapons ; Peace movements ; Political activism ; Political institutions ; Political movements ; Political protests ; Protest Movements ; Social movements ; U.S.A ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.), 1993-06, Vol.8 (2), p.157-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 Plenum Publishing Corporation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/684633$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/684633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,33774,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</title><title>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</title><description>This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.</description><subject>Antinuclear Movements</subject><subject>Arms control</subject><subject>Dissent</subject><subject>Institutionalization (Social)</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Peace movements</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Political movements</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Protest Movements</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0884-8971</issn><issn>1573-7861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpLKwsnhiQAv7Ih8MGpQWkQpFo58hyzuAqjYPtILX8eVwVwcj03vDcnXSH0Ckll5SQ4up2QiilWSrEHhrQrOBJIXK6jwZEiDQRZUEP0ZH3S0K2nA_Q12Prgwl9MLaVjdmY9g3fGe-hDdd4_g540ZoANX4NMoCP4XoVegfYavxiGxOMkg2edZ11oY90jWVb4xAbxzEj2pbPvWpAOjxxABvAT_YTVnHBMTrQsvFw8pNDtJiM56OHZDq7fxzdTBPFszQkac0LqhUrMyayTGmtcqp0UdZcCckIo5xIyZUEyLTQQhGWSqJSXZNSsUwxPkTnu7mdsx89-FCtjFfQNLIF2_sqp0zkgol_IRdpGc9bRHixg8pZ7x3oqnNmJd26oqTaXrb6e0TEZzu89MG6X5mLNOecfwOikIW3</recordid><startdate>19930601</startdate><enddate>19930601</enddate><creator>Meyer, David S.</creator><general>Eastern Sociological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930601</creationdate><title>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</title><author>Meyer, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4d371fc2952855cffc61cf79d3c8a202130aa3caee5f8f8c024a0c4fd09c25c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Antinuclear Movements</topic><topic>Arms control</topic><topic>Dissent</topic><topic>Institutionalization (Social)</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Peace movements</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Political movements</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Protest Movements</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement</atitle><jtitle>Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.)</jtitle><date>1993-06-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>157-179</pages><issn>0884-8971</issn><eissn>1573-7861</eissn><coden>SOFOET</coden><abstract>This article uses the recent nuclear freeze movement as a vehicle for analyzing the ways in which United States political institutions cope with dissident movements. Building on the literature on political opportunity structure, I argue that United States political institutions reflect James Madison's strategy for coping with dissent by fragmenting political power. The Madisonian structure of United States government, by providing relatively easy institutional access to some challengers and numerous venues for often ritualized participation, serves to fragment, coopt, and dissipate dissident movements. I identify three complementary components of the process of fragmentation and dissipation: marginalization, depoliticization, and institutionalization. I then examine the political implications of institutionalization in the case of the nuclear freeze movement with a discussion of the movement's influence on policy. I conclude with a call for more comparative research on the process and political impact of institutionalizing social protest movements.</abstract><pub>Eastern Sociological Society</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01115488</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8971 |
ispartof | Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.), 1993-06, Vol.8 (2), p.157-179 |
issn | 0884-8971 1573-7861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61286828 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Antinuclear Movements Arms control Dissent Institutionalization (Social) Nuclear weapons Peace movements Political activism Political institutions Political movements Political protests Protest Movements Social movements U.S.A United States of America |
title | Institutionalizing Dissent: The United States Structure of Political Opportunity and the End of the Nuclear Freeze Movement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutionalizing%20Dissent:%20The%20United%20States%20Structure%20of%20Political%20Opportunity%20and%20the%20End%20of%20the%20Nuclear%20Freeze%20Movement&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20forum%20(Randolph,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Meyer,%20David%20S.&rft.date=1993-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=157-179&rft.issn=0884-8971&rft.eissn=1573-7861&rft.coden=SOFOET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01115488&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E684633%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38491117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=684633&rfr_iscdi=true |