The value of comparative analysis
Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of public administration 1989-01, Vol.12 (3), p.459-475 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 475 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | International journal of public administration |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Caiden, Gerald E. |
description | Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01900698908524634 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61235282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1122747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e97baec08cf6320a0edb90d622b4b5574ff5ca8e27df3a6a20730149813249093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLvowl30zjMZcCPFFxTc1PVwM5nBlCRTZ5JK_70pdaW4uov7fYfDIeSSwi2FEu6AagClSw2lZEJxcURmVHKWC6bkMZnt__kEsFNyltIagHLJ5IxcrT5ctsV2dFnwmQ3dBiMOzdZl2GO7S006Jyce2-Qufu6cvD89rhYv-fLt-XXxsMwtl2rInS4qdBZK6xVngODqSkOtGKtEJWUhvJcWS8eK2nNUyKDgQIUuKWdCg-ZzcnPI3cTwObo0mK5J1rUt9i6MySjKpsolm8DrX-A6jHFqmwwDpajWVE0QPUA2hpSi82YTmw7jzlAw-8XMn8Um5_7gNL0PscOvENvaDLhrQ_QRe9skw__XvwEtt24O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206619916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of comparative analysis</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Caiden, Gerald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Caiden, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-0692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01900698908524634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc</publisher><subject>ADMINISTRATION THEORY ; Bureaucracy ; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ; Corruption ; CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS ; Policy making ; POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION ; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION</subject><ispartof>International journal of public administration, 1989-01, Vol.12 (3), p.459-475</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1989</rights><rights>Copyright Marcel Dekker, Inc. May 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e97baec08cf6320a0edb90d622b4b5574ff5ca8e27df3a6a20730149813249093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01900698908524634$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01900698908524634$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caiden, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><title>The value of comparative analysis</title><title>International journal of public administration</title><description>Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.</description><subject>ADMINISTRATION THEORY</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION</subject><subject>PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION</subject><issn>0190-0692</issn><issn>1532-4265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLvowl30zjMZcCPFFxTc1PVwM5nBlCRTZ5JK_70pdaW4uov7fYfDIeSSwi2FEu6AagClSw2lZEJxcURmVHKWC6bkMZnt__kEsFNyltIagHLJ5IxcrT5ctsV2dFnwmQ3dBiMOzdZl2GO7S006Jyce2-Qufu6cvD89rhYv-fLt-XXxsMwtl2rInS4qdBZK6xVngODqSkOtGKtEJWUhvJcWS8eK2nNUyKDgQIUuKWdCg-ZzcnPI3cTwObo0mK5J1rUt9i6MySjKpsolm8DrX-A6jHFqmwwDpajWVE0QPUA2hpSi82YTmw7jzlAw-8XMn8Um5_7gNL0PscOvENvaDLhrQ_QRe9skw__XvwEtt24O</recordid><startdate>19890101</startdate><enddate>19890101</enddate><creator>Caiden, Gerald E.</creator><general>Marcel Dekker, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890101</creationdate><title>The value of comparative analysis</title><author>Caiden, Gerald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e97baec08cf6320a0edb90d622b4b5574ff5ca8e27df3a6a20730149813249093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>ADMINISTRATION THEORY</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION</topic><topic>PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caiden, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of public administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caiden, Gerald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of comparative analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of public administration</jtitle><date>1989-01-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>459-475</pages><issn>0190-0692</issn><eissn>1532-4265</eissn><abstract>Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Marcel Dekker, Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/01900698908524634</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-0692 |
ispartof | International journal of public administration, 1989-01, Vol.12 (3), p.459-475 |
issn | 0190-0692 1532-4265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61235282 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles) |
subjects | ADMINISTRATION THEORY Bureaucracy COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Corruption CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS Policy making POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
title | The value of comparative analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A43%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20comparative%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20public%20administration&rft.au=Caiden,%20Gerald%20E.&rft.date=1989-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=459-475&rft.issn=0190-0692&rft.eissn=1532-4265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01900698908524634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1122747%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206619916&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |