The value of comparative analysis

Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of public administration 1989-01, Vol.12 (3), p.459-475
1. Verfasser: Caiden, Gerald E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 475
container_issue 3
container_start_page 459
container_title International journal of public administration
container_volume 12
creator Caiden, Gerald E.
description Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01900698908524634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61235282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1122747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e97baec08cf6320a0edb90d622b4b5574ff5ca8e27df3a6a20730149813249093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLvowl30zjMZcCPFFxTc1PVwM5nBlCRTZ5JK_70pdaW4uov7fYfDIeSSwi2FEu6AagClSw2lZEJxcURmVHKWC6bkMZnt__kEsFNyltIagHLJ5IxcrT5ctsV2dFnwmQ3dBiMOzdZl2GO7S006Jyce2-Qufu6cvD89rhYv-fLt-XXxsMwtl2rInS4qdBZK6xVngODqSkOtGKtEJWUhvJcWS8eK2nNUyKDgQIUuKWdCg-ZzcnPI3cTwObo0mK5J1rUt9i6MySjKpsolm8DrX-A6jHFqmwwDpajWVE0QPUA2hpSi82YTmw7jzlAw-8XMn8Um5_7gNL0PscOvENvaDLhrQ_QRe9skw__XvwEtt24O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206619916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of comparative analysis</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Caiden, Gerald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Caiden, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-0692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01900698908524634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc</publisher><subject>ADMINISTRATION THEORY ; Bureaucracy ; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ; Corruption ; CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS ; Policy making ; POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION ; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION</subject><ispartof>International journal of public administration, 1989-01, Vol.12 (3), p.459-475</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1989</rights><rights>Copyright Marcel Dekker, Inc. May 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e97baec08cf6320a0edb90d622b4b5574ff5ca8e27df3a6a20730149813249093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01900698908524634$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01900698908524634$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caiden, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><title>The value of comparative analysis</title><title>International journal of public administration</title><description>Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.</description><subject>ADMINISTRATION THEORY</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION</subject><subject>PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION</subject><issn>0190-0692</issn><issn>1532-4265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLvowl30zjMZcCPFFxTc1PVwM5nBlCRTZ5JK_70pdaW4uov7fYfDIeSSwi2FEu6AagClSw2lZEJxcURmVHKWC6bkMZnt__kEsFNyltIagHLJ5IxcrT5ctsV2dFnwmQ3dBiMOzdZl2GO7S006Jyce2-Qufu6cvD89rhYv-fLt-XXxsMwtl2rInS4qdBZK6xVngODqSkOtGKtEJWUhvJcWS8eK2nNUyKDgQIUuKWdCg-ZzcnPI3cTwObo0mK5J1rUt9i6MySjKpsolm8DrX-A6jHFqmwwDpajWVE0QPUA2hpSi82YTmw7jzlAw-8XMn8Um5_7gNL0PscOvENvaDLhrQ_QRe9skw__XvwEtt24O</recordid><startdate>19890101</startdate><enddate>19890101</enddate><creator>Caiden, Gerald E.</creator><general>Marcel Dekker, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890101</creationdate><title>The value of comparative analysis</title><author>Caiden, Gerald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e97baec08cf6320a0edb90d622b4b5574ff5ca8e27df3a6a20730149813249093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>ADMINISTRATION THEORY</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION</topic><topic>PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caiden, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of public administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caiden, Gerald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of comparative analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of public administration</jtitle><date>1989-01-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>459-475</pages><issn>0190-0692</issn><eissn>1532-4265</eissn><abstract>Critical questions in both theory and practice can only be answered through comparative analysis whose value increases with the growing internationalization of public administration. Theoretically, it has long been assumed that public administration has to be a discipline reaching beyond one country and any specific culture, but the practical benefits derived from comparative analysis, such as more effetive policy making, better administrative arrangements and enhanced development prospects need also t o be stressed. Comparative bureaucratic corruption illustrates both the benefits and t h e difficult methodological problems encountered, in this case revealing why rich and stable polities can depend on legal-rational norms while poor and unstable polities a r e more susceptible t o systemic deviant conduct by public officials.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Marcel Dekker, Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/01900698908524634</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-0692
ispartof International journal of public administration, 1989-01, Vol.12 (3), p.459-475
issn 0190-0692
1532-4265
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61235282
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
subjects ADMINISTRATION THEORY
Bureaucracy
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Corruption
CORRUPTION OF AND ILLEGAL INFLUENCE OVER DECISION-MAKERS
Policy making
POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
title The value of comparative analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A43%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20comparative%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20public%20administration&rft.au=Caiden,%20Gerald%20E.&rft.date=1989-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=459-475&rft.issn=0190-0692&rft.eissn=1532-4265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01900698908524634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1122747%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206619916&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true