Reconstructing the Establishment Clause: The Case against Discretionary Accommodation of Religion
The concept of accommodation--the view that the religion clauses of the First Amendment have the unitary focus of facilitating people's religious liberty and that the government should promote such liberty in the service of constitutional values--is criticized. Although this view is one alterna...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | University of Pennsylvania law review 1991-12, Vol.140 (2), p.555-612 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 612 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 555 |
| container_title | University of Pennsylvania law review |
| container_volume | 140 |
| creator | Lupu, Ira C. |
| description | The concept of accommodation--the view that the religion clauses of the First Amendment have the unitary focus of facilitating people's religious liberty and that the government should promote such liberty in the service of constitutional values--is criticized. Although this view is one alternative to the equally narrow view that the First Amendment calls for the separation of church and state, it also has its limitations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3312351 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61142507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A11709348</galeid><jstor_id>3312351</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A11709348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b7f6365149911eeb1b413b2631c4da4fb5d62229ff33a7e24f0beb02d06d0a4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10VFrFDEQAOAgCp61-BeCiL64NpNkdxvfjrNqoSCU-hyy2ck2x25Sk-xD_705rqDIyTwkTL4Mwwwhb4B94oL1F0IAFy08IxtQkjeXreifkw1jEhqlWP-SvMp5zxjrWlAbYm7RxpBLWm3xYaLlHulVLmaYfb5fMBS6m82a8TO9qy87k5Gayfj6g37x2SYsPgaTHunW2rgscTSHBI2O3uLsp3p_TV44M2c8fzrPyM-vV3e7783Nj2_Xu-1NY4WUpRl614nak1QKAHGAQYIYeCfAytFIN7RjxzlXzglheuTSsQEHxkfWjcxIFGfk_bHuQ4q_VsxFL7VBnGcTMK5ZdwCSt6yv8O0_cB_XFGpvGlRXQ0rxB01mRu2DiyUZe6iotwA9U0JeVvTxBJowYDJzDOh8Tf_NmxO8xoiLt6f8h6O3Keac0OmH5Jc6bA1MH3atn3Zd5buj3OcS03_Zb-tYpLM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196969443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructing the Establishment Clause: The Case against Discretionary Accommodation of Religion</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Lupu, Ira C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lupu, Ira C.</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of accommodation--the view that the religion clauses of the First Amendment have the unitary focus of facilitating people's religious liberty and that the government should promote such liberty in the service of constitutional values--is criticized. Although this view is one alternative to the equally narrow view that the First Amendment calls for the separation of church and state, it also has its limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3312351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Christianity ; Church & state ; Church and state ; Coercion ; Constitutional law ; Constitutional Law (establishment clause) ; Constitutions ; Establishment clause ; Free exercise clause ; Freedom of religion ; Interpretation and construction ; Law ; Lupus ; Peyote ; Religion ; Religious freedom ; Religious laws ; Statutory law</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 1991-12, Vol.140 (2), p.555-612</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The University of Pennsylvania</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1991 University of Pennsylvania, Law School</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School Dec 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b7f6365149911eeb1b413b2631c4da4fb5d62229ff33a7e24f0beb02d06d0a4e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3312351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3312351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lupu, Ira C.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructing the Establishment Clause: The Case against Discretionary Accommodation of Religion</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>The concept of accommodation--the view that the religion clauses of the First Amendment have the unitary focus of facilitating people's religious liberty and that the government should promote such liberty in the service of constitutional values--is criticized. Although this view is one alternative to the equally narrow view that the First Amendment calls for the separation of church and state, it also has its limitations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Church & state</subject><subject>Church and state</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutional Law (establishment clause)</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Establishment clause</subject><subject>Free exercise clause</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Peyote</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious freedom</subject><subject>Religious laws</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10VFrFDEQAOAgCp61-BeCiL64NpNkdxvfjrNqoSCU-hyy2ck2x25Sk-xD_705rqDIyTwkTL4Mwwwhb4B94oL1F0IAFy08IxtQkjeXreifkw1jEhqlWP-SvMp5zxjrWlAbYm7RxpBLWm3xYaLlHulVLmaYfb5fMBS6m82a8TO9qy87k5Gayfj6g37x2SYsPgaTHunW2rgscTSHBI2O3uLsp3p_TV44M2c8fzrPyM-vV3e7783Nj2_Xu-1NY4WUpRl614nak1QKAHGAQYIYeCfAytFIN7RjxzlXzglheuTSsQEHxkfWjcxIFGfk_bHuQ4q_VsxFL7VBnGcTMK5ZdwCSt6yv8O0_cB_XFGpvGlRXQ0rxB01mRu2DiyUZe6iotwA9U0JeVvTxBJowYDJzDOh8Tf_NmxO8xoiLt6f8h6O3Keac0OmH5Jc6bA1MH3atn3Zd5buj3OcS03_Zb-tYpLM</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Lupu, Ira C.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><general>University of Pennsylvania, Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>Reconstructing the Establishment Clause: The Case against Discretionary Accommodation of Religion</title><author>Lupu, Ira C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b7f6365149911eeb1b413b2631c4da4fb5d62229ff33a7e24f0beb02d06d0a4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Church & state</topic><topic>Church and state</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutional Law (establishment clause)</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Establishment clause</topic><topic>Free exercise clause</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Peyote</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious freedom</topic><topic>Religious laws</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lupu, Ira C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lupu, Ira C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructing the Establishment Clause: The Case against Discretionary Accommodation of Religion</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>612</epage><pages>555-612</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>The concept of accommodation--the view that the religion clauses of the First Amendment have the unitary focus of facilitating people's religious liberty and that the government should promote such liberty in the service of constitutional values--is criticized. Although this view is one alternative to the equally narrow view that the First Amendment calls for the separation of church and state, it also has its limitations.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/3312351</doi><tpages>58</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0041-9907 |
| ispartof | University of Pennsylvania law review, 1991-12, Vol.140 (2), p.555-612 |
| issn | 0041-9907 1942-8537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61142507 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Analysis Christianity Church & state Church and state Coercion Constitutional law Constitutional Law (establishment clause) Constitutions Establishment clause Free exercise clause Freedom of religion Interpretation and construction Law Lupus Peyote Religion Religious freedom Religious laws Statutory law |
| title | Reconstructing the Establishment Clause: The Case against Discretionary Accommodation of Religion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A04%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructing%20the%20Establishment%20Clause:%20The%20Case%20against%20Discretionary%20Accommodation%20of%20Religion&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Lupu,%20Ira%20C.&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=612&rft.pages=555-612&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3312351&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA11709348%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196969443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A11709348&rft_jstor_id=3312351&rfr_iscdi=true |