Red Militarism
Red Militarism, a term coined in the early years of Soviet Russia during the debate about the future organization of armed force in a socialist society, became a renewed charge after the USSR invasion into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. This article aims to give an overview of the debate about Red...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of peace research 1980-01, Vol.17 (2), p.135-149 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 149 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Journal of peace research |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Albrecht, Ulrich |
description | Red Militarism, a term coined in the early years of Soviet Russia during the debate about the future organization of armed force in a socialist society, became a renewed charge after the USSR invasion into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. This article aims to give an overview of the debate about Red Militarism from the beginnings up to most recent writings. In the USSR, the debate terminated when Trotsky left the country, and was briefly revived in the thirties when Stalin used the issue to denounce and purge the Red Army. The theoretical underpinnings of this debate are evaluated and used to consider more recent manifestations of Red Militarism. The ideological split between the Communist Parties of the Soviet Union and China has led, inter alia, to mutual accusations of militarism. The Soviet charges of 'Social Militarism' in China are scrutinized in order to understand how Soviet analysts of today conceptualize and measure Red Militarism. The conclusion is that definitions of this kind are also applicable to the Soviet Union itself. Leftist Juntas in a number of Third World countries are also examined by a variety of authors with respect to the question whether their proclaimed socialism fits into any attitude which ought to be labelled militarism. The conclusions suggested by more elaborated studies are that the militarism phenomenon is also in its socialist variation a more coherent development than usually imagined. In the more advanced systems of 'real socialism', notably the USSR, the explanation for the rise of the phenomenon is heavily linked with the assessment of these states being ruled by bureaucratic elites. According to the specifics of this interpretation, the question about the expansionist and imperialist nature of Red Militarism is answered in a negative way. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/002234338001700204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61103034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>423421</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_002234338001700204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>423421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7c63bf98f21f30973f8aeb1d236eaa40b4764e54e4aca85a394079b013c84a9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouFb9AXoRBMFD3Zlk2iRHWfyCFUH0HNJsKl262zXpHvz3plREFBwIQ-B5Xl6GsROEK0QppwCcCxJCAaBMH6AdNkEqIReFVLtsMgD5QOyzgxiXAFBqgAk7fvaLs8embXobmrg6ZHu1baM_-toZe729eZnd5_Onu4fZ9Tx3BNDn0pWiqrWqOdYCtBS1sr7CBRelt5agIlmSL8iTdVYVVmgCqStA4RRZ7UXGLsbcTejetz72ZtVE59vWrn23jaZEBAGpb8bOf4HLbhvWqZtBrrlGzQkTxUfKhS7G4GuzCc3Khg-DYIYDmb8HStJ0lKJ98z9i_zMuR2PdBRt6k17jWh-NTsNRclVoUsmDodLpyC5j34XvPpQyOYpP6l12_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292919241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Red Militarism</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Albrecht, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Red Militarism, a term coined in the early years of Soviet Russia during the debate about the future organization of armed force in a socialist society, became a renewed charge after the USSR invasion into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. This article aims to give an overview of the debate about Red Militarism from the beginnings up to most recent writings. In the USSR, the debate terminated when Trotsky left the country, and was briefly revived in the thirties when Stalin used the issue to denounce and purge the Red Army. The theoretical underpinnings of this debate are evaluated and used to consider more recent manifestations of Red Militarism. The ideological split between the Communist Parties of the Soviet Union and China has led, inter alia, to mutual accusations of militarism. The Soviet charges of 'Social Militarism' in China are scrutinized in order to understand how Soviet analysts of today conceptualize and measure Red Militarism. The conclusion is that definitions of this kind are also applicable to the Soviet Union itself. Leftist Juntas in a number of Third World countries are also examined by a variety of authors with respect to the question whether their proclaimed socialism fits into any attitude which ought to be labelled militarism. The conclusions suggested by more elaborated studies are that the militarism phenomenon is also in its socialist variation a more coherent development than usually imagined. In the more advanced systems of 'real socialism', notably the USSR, the explanation for the rise of the phenomenon is heavily linked with the assessment of these states being ruled by bureaucratic elites. According to the specifics of this interpretation, the question about the expansionist and imperialist nature of Red Militarism is answered in a negative way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002234338001700204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPERB6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Universitetsforlaget</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Economic systems ; Government bureaucracy ; Militarism ; Military industrial complex ; Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists ; Political debate ; Political revolutions ; Socialism ; Third World ; Union of Soviet Socialist Republics/USSR (see also Russia, Soviet) ; War</subject><ispartof>Journal of peace research, 1980-01, Vol.17 (2), p.135-149</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7c63bf98f21f30973f8aeb1d236eaa40b4764e54e4aca85a394079b013c84a9e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/423421$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/423421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21800,27848,27903,27904,33754,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Red Militarism</title><title>Journal of peace research</title><description>Red Militarism, a term coined in the early years of Soviet Russia during the debate about the future organization of armed force in a socialist society, became a renewed charge after the USSR invasion into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. This article aims to give an overview of the debate about Red Militarism from the beginnings up to most recent writings. In the USSR, the debate terminated when Trotsky left the country, and was briefly revived in the thirties when Stalin used the issue to denounce and purge the Red Army. The theoretical underpinnings of this debate are evaluated and used to consider more recent manifestations of Red Militarism. The ideological split between the Communist Parties of the Soviet Union and China has led, inter alia, to mutual accusations of militarism. The Soviet charges of 'Social Militarism' in China are scrutinized in order to understand how Soviet analysts of today conceptualize and measure Red Militarism. The conclusion is that definitions of this kind are also applicable to the Soviet Union itself. Leftist Juntas in a number of Third World countries are also examined by a variety of authors with respect to the question whether their proclaimed socialism fits into any attitude which ought to be labelled militarism. The conclusions suggested by more elaborated studies are that the militarism phenomenon is also in its socialist variation a more coherent development than usually imagined. In the more advanced systems of 'real socialism', notably the USSR, the explanation for the rise of the phenomenon is heavily linked with the assessment of these states being ruled by bureaucratic elites. According to the specifics of this interpretation, the question about the expansionist and imperialist nature of Red Militarism is answered in a negative way.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Government bureaucracy</subject><subject>Militarism</subject><subject>Military industrial complex</subject><subject>Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political revolutions</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Third World</subject><subject>Union of Soviet Socialist Republics/USSR (see also Russia, Soviet)</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0022-3433</issn><issn>1460-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouFb9AXoRBMFD3Zlk2iRHWfyCFUH0HNJsKl262zXpHvz3plREFBwIQ-B5Xl6GsROEK0QppwCcCxJCAaBMH6AdNkEqIReFVLtsMgD5QOyzgxiXAFBqgAk7fvaLs8embXobmrg6ZHu1baM_-toZe729eZnd5_Onu4fZ9Tx3BNDn0pWiqrWqOdYCtBS1sr7CBRelt5agIlmSL8iTdVYVVmgCqStA4RRZ7UXGLsbcTejetz72ZtVE59vWrn23jaZEBAGpb8bOf4HLbhvWqZtBrrlGzQkTxUfKhS7G4GuzCc3Khg-DYIYDmb8HStJ0lKJ98z9i_zMuR2PdBRt6k17jWh-NTsNRclVoUsmDodLpyC5j34XvPpQyOYpP6l12_g</recordid><startdate>19800101</startdate><enddate>19800101</enddate><creator>Albrecht, Ulrich</creator><general>Universitetsforlaget</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>3HL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800101</creationdate><title>Red Militarism</title><author>Albrecht, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7c63bf98f21f30973f8aeb1d236eaa40b4764e54e4aca85a394079b013c84a9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Government bureaucracy</topic><topic>Militarism</topic><topic>Military industrial complex</topic><topic>Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political revolutions</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Third World</topic><topic>Union of Soviet Socialist Republics/USSR (see also Russia, Soviet)</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Norart - Norske tidsskriftartikler 1980-</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albrecht, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Red Militarism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle><date>1980-01-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>135-149</pages><issn>0022-3433</issn><eissn>1460-3578</eissn><coden>JPERB6</coden><abstract>Red Militarism, a term coined in the early years of Soviet Russia during the debate about the future organization of armed force in a socialist society, became a renewed charge after the USSR invasion into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. This article aims to give an overview of the debate about Red Militarism from the beginnings up to most recent writings. In the USSR, the debate terminated when Trotsky left the country, and was briefly revived in the thirties when Stalin used the issue to denounce and purge the Red Army. The theoretical underpinnings of this debate are evaluated and used to consider more recent manifestations of Red Militarism. The ideological split between the Communist Parties of the Soviet Union and China has led, inter alia, to mutual accusations of militarism. The Soviet charges of 'Social Militarism' in China are scrutinized in order to understand how Soviet analysts of today conceptualize and measure Red Militarism. The conclusion is that definitions of this kind are also applicable to the Soviet Union itself. Leftist Juntas in a number of Third World countries are also examined by a variety of authors with respect to the question whether their proclaimed socialism fits into any attitude which ought to be labelled militarism. The conclusions suggested by more elaborated studies are that the militarism phenomenon is also in its socialist variation a more coherent development than usually imagined. In the more advanced systems of 'real socialism', notably the USSR, the explanation for the rise of the phenomenon is heavily linked with the assessment of these states being ruled by bureaucratic elites. According to the specifics of this interpretation, the question about the expansionist and imperialist nature of Red Militarism is answered in a negative way.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Universitetsforlaget</pub><doi>10.1177/002234338001700204</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3433 |
ispartof | Journal of peace research, 1980-01, Vol.17 (2), p.135-149 |
issn | 0022-3433 1460-3578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61103034 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Capitalism Economic systems Government bureaucracy Militarism Military industrial complex Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists Political debate Political revolutions Socialism Third World Union of Soviet Socialist Republics/USSR (see also Russia, Soviet) War |
title | Red Militarism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Red%20Militarism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20peace%20research&rft.au=Albrecht,%20Ulrich&rft.date=1980-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=135-149&rft.issn=0022-3433&rft.eissn=1460-3578&rft.coden=JPERB6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002234338001700204&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E423421%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292919241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=423421&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002234338001700204&rfr_iscdi=true |