Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties
Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made refl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of law & economics 1989-10, Vol.32 (2), p.255-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | The Journal of law & economics |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Besen, Stanley M. Kirby, Sheila Nataraj |
description | Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/467177 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61069152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>725423</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>725423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ce84136738249196002e0e911b94f03bb4753b5a50360e1741f6cdae57cbee3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFKxVX8BNUHDV6Jy5z0pK8QaFiug6TNKJTEkzcSYt5O0dqRcQPJuz-Tjn50foFPAVYCWumZAg5R4aAacy50TxfTTCmJCcgBKH6CjGFU7DNBuhm6fgtqa32cx3g2vfJtm064LvgjOla1w_TDLTLrNF17u1ab5V9uwH0_TOxmN0UJsm2pOvPUavd7cvs4d8vrh_nE3neUWV7PPKKgZUSKoI06BFimOx1QClZjWmZckkpyU3HFOBLUgGtaiWxnJZldZSQ8focnc3hXvf2NgXaxcr2zSmtX4TCwFYaOAkwfM_cOU3oU3ZivSXEcU0TejiX0QxMK601r8_q-BjDLYuUi1rE4YCcPFZdbGrOsGzHVzF3ocfJQlnhNIP1XF2RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301458999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Besen, Stanley M. ; Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creator><creatorcontrib>Besen, Stanley M. ; Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creatorcontrib><description>Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/467177</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLLEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Capital costs ; Consumer economics ; Consumers ; Copyright ; Copyrights ; Cost efficiency ; Demand curves ; Economic impact ; Economic Policy ; Historical cost ; Intellectual property ; Intellectual property law ; Law ; Marginal cost pricing ; Marginal costs ; Marginal profit ; Mathematical models ; Producer surplus ; Producers ; Reproduction ; Royalties ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law & economics, 1989-10, Vol.32 (2), p.255-280</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Oct 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ce84136738249196002e0e911b94f03bb4753b5a50360e1741f6cdae57cbee3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/725423$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/725423$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Besen, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creatorcontrib><title>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</title><title>The Journal of law & economics</title><description>Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.</description><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Copyrights</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Demand curves</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Historical cost</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Intellectual property law</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Marginal cost pricing</subject><subject>Marginal costs</subject><subject>Marginal profit</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Producer surplus</subject><subject>Producers</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Royalties</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-2186</issn><issn>1537-5285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFKxVX8BNUHDV6Jy5z0pK8QaFiug6TNKJTEkzcSYt5O0dqRcQPJuz-Tjn50foFPAVYCWumZAg5R4aAacy50TxfTTCmJCcgBKH6CjGFU7DNBuhm6fgtqa32cx3g2vfJtm064LvgjOla1w_TDLTLrNF17u1ab5V9uwH0_TOxmN0UJsm2pOvPUavd7cvs4d8vrh_nE3neUWV7PPKKgZUSKoI06BFimOx1QClZjWmZckkpyU3HFOBLUgGtaiWxnJZldZSQ8focnc3hXvf2NgXaxcr2zSmtX4TCwFYaOAkwfM_cOU3oU3ZivSXEcU0TejiX0QxMK601r8_q-BjDLYuUi1rE4YCcPFZdbGrOsGzHVzF3ocfJQlnhNIP1XF2RA</recordid><startdate>19891001</startdate><enddate>19891001</enddate><creator>Besen, Stanley M.</creator><creator>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891001</creationdate><title>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</title><author>Besen, Stanley M. ; Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ce84136738249196002e0e911b94f03bb4753b5a50360e1741f6cdae57cbee3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Copyrights</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Demand curves</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Historical cost</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Intellectual property law</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Marginal cost pricing</topic><topic>Marginal costs</topic><topic>Marginal profit</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Producer surplus</topic><topic>Producers</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Royalties</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besen, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law & economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besen, Stanley M.</au><au>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law & economics</jtitle><date>1989-10-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>255-280</pages><issn>0022-2186</issn><eissn>1537-5285</eissn><coden>JLLEA7</coden><abstract>Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/467177</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2186 |
ispartof | The Journal of law & economics, 1989-10, Vol.32 (2), p.255-280 |
issn | 0022-2186 1537-5285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61069152 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Capital costs Consumer economics Consumers Copyright Copyrights Cost efficiency Demand curves Economic impact Economic Policy Historical cost Intellectual property Intellectual property law Law Marginal cost pricing Marginal costs Marginal profit Mathematical models Producer surplus Producers Reproduction Royalties Statistical analysis Studies |
title | Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A21%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Private%20Copying,%20Appropriability,%20and%20Optimal%20Copying%20Royalties&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law%20&%20economics&rft.au=Besen,%20Stanley%20M.&rft.date=1989-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=255-280&rft.issn=0022-2186&rft.eissn=1537-5285&rft.coden=JLLEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/467177&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E725423%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301458999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=725423&rfr_iscdi=true |