Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties

Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made refl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of law & economics 1989-10, Vol.32 (2), p.255-280
Hauptverfasser: Besen, Stanley M., Kirby, Sheila Nataraj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255
container_title The Journal of law & economics
container_volume 32
creator Besen, Stanley M.
Kirby, Sheila Nataraj
description Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/467177
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61069152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>725423</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>725423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ce84136738249196002e0e911b94f03bb4753b5a50360e1741f6cdae57cbee3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFKxVX8BNUHDV6Jy5z0pK8QaFiug6TNKJTEkzcSYt5O0dqRcQPJuz-Tjn50foFPAVYCWumZAg5R4aAacy50TxfTTCmJCcgBKH6CjGFU7DNBuhm6fgtqa32cx3g2vfJtm064LvgjOla1w_TDLTLrNF17u1ab5V9uwH0_TOxmN0UJsm2pOvPUavd7cvs4d8vrh_nE3neUWV7PPKKgZUSKoI06BFimOx1QClZjWmZckkpyU3HFOBLUgGtaiWxnJZldZSQ8focnc3hXvf2NgXaxcr2zSmtX4TCwFYaOAkwfM_cOU3oU3ZivSXEcU0TejiX0QxMK601r8_q-BjDLYuUi1rE4YCcPFZdbGrOsGzHVzF3ocfJQlnhNIP1XF2RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301458999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Besen, Stanley M. ; Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creator><creatorcontrib>Besen, Stanley M. ; Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creatorcontrib><description>Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/467177</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLLEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Capital costs ; Consumer economics ; Consumers ; Copyright ; Copyrights ; Cost efficiency ; Demand curves ; Economic impact ; Economic Policy ; Historical cost ; Intellectual property ; Intellectual property law ; Law ; Marginal cost pricing ; Marginal costs ; Marginal profit ; Mathematical models ; Producer surplus ; Producers ; Reproduction ; Royalties ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law &amp; economics, 1989-10, Vol.32 (2), p.255-280</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Oct 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ce84136738249196002e0e911b94f03bb4753b5a50360e1741f6cdae57cbee3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/725423$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/725423$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Besen, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creatorcontrib><title>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</title><title>The Journal of law &amp; economics</title><description>Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.</description><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Copyrights</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Demand curves</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Historical cost</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Intellectual property law</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Marginal cost pricing</subject><subject>Marginal costs</subject><subject>Marginal profit</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Producer surplus</subject><subject>Producers</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Royalties</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-2186</issn><issn>1537-5285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFKxVX8BNUHDV6Jy5z0pK8QaFiug6TNKJTEkzcSYt5O0dqRcQPJuz-Tjn50foFPAVYCWumZAg5R4aAacy50TxfTTCmJCcgBKH6CjGFU7DNBuhm6fgtqa32cx3g2vfJtm064LvgjOla1w_TDLTLrNF17u1ab5V9uwH0_TOxmN0UJsm2pOvPUavd7cvs4d8vrh_nE3neUWV7PPKKgZUSKoI06BFimOx1QClZjWmZckkpyU3HFOBLUgGtaiWxnJZldZSQ8focnc3hXvf2NgXaxcr2zSmtX4TCwFYaOAkwfM_cOU3oU3ZivSXEcU0TejiX0QxMK601r8_q-BjDLYuUi1rE4YCcPFZdbGrOsGzHVzF3ocfJQlnhNIP1XF2RA</recordid><startdate>19891001</startdate><enddate>19891001</enddate><creator>Besen, Stanley M.</creator><creator>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891001</creationdate><title>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</title><author>Besen, Stanley M. ; Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ce84136738249196002e0e911b94f03bb4753b5a50360e1741f6cdae57cbee3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Copyrights</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Demand curves</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Historical cost</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Intellectual property law</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Marginal cost pricing</topic><topic>Marginal costs</topic><topic>Marginal profit</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Producer surplus</topic><topic>Producers</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Royalties</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besen, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law &amp; economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besen, Stanley M.</au><au>Kirby, Sheila Nataraj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law &amp; economics</jtitle><date>1989-10-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>255-280</pages><issn>0022-2186</issn><eissn>1537-5285</eissn><coden>JLLEA7</coden><abstract>Although private copying of intellectual property is presently widespread and is likely to become even more so in the future, its effects are poorly understood. The economic effects depend to an important extent on whether one assumes that the demand for the originals from which copies are made reflects the values that users place on these copies. When the demand for originals reflects the demand for copies, that is, when there is indirect appropriability, the interests of producers and consumers of intellectual property are generally congruent. However, these interests are likely to diverge when it is assumed that there is only direct appropriability, that is, that the demand for originals reflects only the value placed on them by their direct purchasers. Where there is indirect appropriability, the optimal royalty may be zero if originals and copies are perfect substitutes. Where either the cost of copying is low or originals are expensive to produce, the producer may be better off not imposing a royalty.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/467177</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2186
ispartof The Journal of law & economics, 1989-10, Vol.32 (2), p.255-280
issn 0022-2186
1537-5285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61069152
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Capital costs
Consumer economics
Consumers
Copyright
Copyrights
Cost efficiency
Demand curves
Economic impact
Economic Policy
Historical cost
Intellectual property
Intellectual property law
Law
Marginal cost pricing
Marginal costs
Marginal profit
Mathematical models
Producer surplus
Producers
Reproduction
Royalties
Statistical analysis
Studies
title Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A21%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Private%20Copying,%20Appropriability,%20and%20Optimal%20Copying%20Royalties&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law%20&%20economics&rft.au=Besen,%20Stanley%20M.&rft.date=1989-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=255-280&rft.issn=0022-2186&rft.eissn=1537-5285&rft.coden=JLLEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/467177&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E725423%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301458999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=725423&rfr_iscdi=true