Marx, Lubasz, and the Asiatic Mode of Production: A comment
It is argued that Heinz Lubasz (see SA 33:3/84O9189) errs grossly in his discussion of Karl Marx's concept of the Asiatic mode of production through the use of three analytically distinct levels -- mode, relations of production, & social formation -- assuming a nonexistent functional equiva...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Economy and society 1985-08, Vol.14 (3), p.399-403 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 403 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 399 |
| container_title | Economy and society |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Currie, Kate |
| description | It is argued that Heinz Lubasz (see SA 33:3/84O9189) errs grossly in his discussion of Karl Marx's concept of the Asiatic mode of production through the use of three analytically distinct levels -- mode, relations of production, & social formation -- assuming a nonexistent functional equivalence between them based on a unity of form. Such an analysis is untenable & obscures Marx's real discussion of the characteristics of the tribute-raising state. In Reply to Kate Currie, Heinz Lubasz (U of Essex, Colchester, England) asserts that his article was not, as Currie assumed, about Asia's past economic life but about Marx's ideas about that life. Therefore, the argument against his three analytically distinct levels is ill-founded, since there never was an attempt made to produce any coherent theory. His original contention, ie, that Marx's scattered pronouncements about India & Asia do not add up to a coherent enough view to justify the formulation of a concept, is maintained & defended. K. Hyatt |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03085148500000020 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61064446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1307187215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-6b60b7e9db72e07f65ef2c5cf345b28ce4b7d08a4a78d074cf66e7284cb41cdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtA8OTqZDebpOqlFL-gRQ96DvnELbubmuyi9de7tZ4U5_Ie5nmG4UXomMA5AQEXUIAoCRUlfE8OO2hEKJtkJWdsF402-2wA-D46SGm5QQoGI3S1UPHjDM97rdLnGVatxd2rw9NUqa4yeBGsw8Hjpxhsb7oqtJd4ik1oGtd2h2jPqzq5o58co5fbm-fZfTZ_vHuYTeeZKWDSZUwz0NxNrOa5A-5Z6XxuSuMLWupcGEc1tyAUVVxY4NR4xhzPBTWaEmN1MUan27urGN56lzrZVMm4ulatC32SjACjlLIBPPkFLkMf2-E3SQrgRPCclANFtpSJIaXovFzFqlFxLQnITZnyT5mDc711qtaH2Kj3EGsrO7WuQ_RRtaZKsvhf_wJknXcC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307187215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marx, Lubasz, and the Asiatic Mode of Production: A comment</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Currie, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Currie, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>It is argued that Heinz Lubasz (see SA 33:3/84O9189) errs grossly in his discussion of Karl Marx's concept of the Asiatic mode of production through the use of three analytically distinct levels -- mode, relations of production, & social formation -- assuming a nonexistent functional equivalence between them based on a unity of form. Such an analysis is untenable & obscures Marx's real discussion of the characteristics of the tribute-raising state. In Reply to Kate Currie, Heinz Lubasz (U of Essex, Colchester, England) asserts that his article was not, as Currie assumed, about Asia's past economic life but about Marx's ideas about that life. Therefore, the argument against his three analytically distinct levels is ill-founded, since there never was an attempt made to produce any coherent theory. His original contention, ie, that Marx's scattered pronouncements about India & Asia do not add up to a coherent enough view to justify the formulation of a concept, is maintained & defended. K. Hyatt</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-5147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03085148500000020</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECSCAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd</publisher><subject>Asia ; Marx, Karl ; Modes of Production</subject><ispartof>Economy and society, 1985-08, Vol.14 (3), p.399-403</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03085148500000020$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03085148500000020$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27850,27905,27906,33756,59626,60415</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Currie, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Marx, Lubasz, and the Asiatic Mode of Production: A comment</title><title>Economy and society</title><description>It is argued that Heinz Lubasz (see SA 33:3/84O9189) errs grossly in his discussion of Karl Marx's concept of the Asiatic mode of production through the use of three analytically distinct levels -- mode, relations of production, & social formation -- assuming a nonexistent functional equivalence between them based on a unity of form. Such an analysis is untenable & obscures Marx's real discussion of the characteristics of the tribute-raising state. In Reply to Kate Currie, Heinz Lubasz (U of Essex, Colchester, England) asserts that his article was not, as Currie assumed, about Asia's past economic life but about Marx's ideas about that life. Therefore, the argument against his three analytically distinct levels is ill-founded, since there never was an attempt made to produce any coherent theory. His original contention, ie, that Marx's scattered pronouncements about India & Asia do not add up to a coherent enough view to justify the formulation of a concept, is maintained & defended. K. Hyatt</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Marx, Karl</subject><subject>Modes of Production</subject><issn>0308-5147</issn><issn>1469-5766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtA8OTqZDebpOqlFL-gRQ96DvnELbubmuyi9de7tZ4U5_Ie5nmG4UXomMA5AQEXUIAoCRUlfE8OO2hEKJtkJWdsF402-2wA-D46SGm5QQoGI3S1UPHjDM97rdLnGVatxd2rw9NUqa4yeBGsw8Hjpxhsb7oqtJd4ik1oGtd2h2jPqzq5o58co5fbm-fZfTZ_vHuYTeeZKWDSZUwz0NxNrOa5A-5Z6XxuSuMLWupcGEc1tyAUVVxY4NR4xhzPBTWaEmN1MUan27urGN56lzrZVMm4ulatC32SjACjlLIBPPkFLkMf2-E3SQrgRPCclANFtpSJIaXovFzFqlFxLQnITZnyT5mDc711qtaH2Kj3EGsrO7WuQ_RRtaZKsvhf_wJknXcC</recordid><startdate>19850801</startdate><enddate>19850801</enddate><creator>Currie, Kate</creator><general>Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850801</creationdate><title>Marx, Lubasz, and the Asiatic Mode of Production: A comment</title><author>Currie, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-6b60b7e9db72e07f65ef2c5cf345b28ce4b7d08a4a78d074cf66e7284cb41cdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Marx, Karl</topic><topic>Modes of Production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Currie, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Economy and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Currie, Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marx, Lubasz, and the Asiatic Mode of Production: A comment</atitle><jtitle>Economy and society</jtitle><date>1985-08-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>399-403</pages><issn>0308-5147</issn><eissn>1469-5766</eissn><coden>ECSCAK</coden><abstract>It is argued that Heinz Lubasz (see SA 33:3/84O9189) errs grossly in his discussion of Karl Marx's concept of the Asiatic mode of production through the use of three analytically distinct levels -- mode, relations of production, & social formation -- assuming a nonexistent functional equivalence between them based on a unity of form. Such an analysis is untenable & obscures Marx's real discussion of the characteristics of the tribute-raising state. In Reply to Kate Currie, Heinz Lubasz (U of Essex, Colchester, England) asserts that his article was not, as Currie assumed, about Asia's past economic life but about Marx's ideas about that life. Therefore, the argument against his three analytically distinct levels is ill-founded, since there never was an attempt made to produce any coherent theory. His original contention, ie, that Marx's scattered pronouncements about India & Asia do not add up to a coherent enough view to justify the formulation of a concept, is maintained & defended. K. Hyatt</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/03085148500000020</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0308-5147 |
| ispartof | Economy and society, 1985-08, Vol.14 (3), p.399-403 |
| issn | 0308-5147 1469-5766 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61064446 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| subjects | Asia Marx, Karl Modes of Production |
| title | Marx, Lubasz, and the Asiatic Mode of Production: A comment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marx,%20Lubasz,%20and%20the%20Asiatic%20Mode%20of%20Production:%20A%20comment&rft.jtitle=Economy%20and%20society&rft.au=Currie,%20Kate&rft.date=1985-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=399-403&rft.issn=0308-5147&rft.eissn=1469-5766&rft.coden=ECSCAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03085148500000020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1307187215%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307187215&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |