Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change
When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied behavioral science 1986-01, Vol.22 (2), p.95-112 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 112 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | The Journal of applied behavioral science |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Gray, Barbara Hay, Tina M. |
description | When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (NCPP), a collaborative change effort by representatives of environmental groups andfirms mining and using coal, to achieve a consensus on national coal policy in a nonadversarial, nontraditional setting. The authors 'study of the NCPPexplores three political issues: the role of power in the selection of participants in the NCPP negotiations, the role of power in each stakeholder's decision as to whether or not to participate in the project, and the power of the NCPP participants to have the project recommendations implemented. The authors conclude that successful implementation depends upon the perceived legitimacy of the project and those selecting its participants, and on the ability to include all key stakeholders. This study has implicationsfor planned change in both interorganizational and intraorganizational settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/002188638602200204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61026615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_002188638602200204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1155985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9d2afad53743df27bc955276633745bcd37ffa3213c8a73aebf472d704c63bc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQAOAgCtbqH_C0qHhbm8cm2QUvsviCgh70vEyzSU3ZJjXZPeivN6VFRCmeQpJvZpIZhE4JviJEygnGlJSlYKXAlKYNLvbQiHBOc1HKah-N1iBfi0N0FOMCY1wwJkbo-tl3trcKumxql7aPWe-zR9fr4MMcnP2E3nqXbmvvonZxiBm4NqvfwM31MTow0EV9sl3H6PXu9qV-yKdP94_1zTRXqUifVy0FAy1nsmCtoXKmqvQyKQRLJ3ymWiaNAUYJUyVIBnpmCklbiQslWMJsjC43eVfBvw869s3SRqW7Dpz2Q2wEwVQIwv-FlFBJpaQJnv2CCz-E9M9kWGpjVXGS0PkuRGjFMWOciKToRqngYwzaNKtglxA-GoKb9XCav8NJQRfb1BBT700Ap2z8jixTRJHyj9FkwyLM9Y_quxN_AeyTmPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295033516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Gray, Barbara ; Hay, Tina M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Barbara ; Hay, Tina M.</creatorcontrib><description>When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (NCPP), a collaborative change effort by representatives of environmental groups andfirms mining and using coal, to achieve a consensus on national coal policy in a nonadversarial, nontraditional setting. The authors 'study of the NCPPexplores three political issues: the role of power in the selection of participants in the NCPP negotiations, the role of power in each stakeholder's decision as to whether or not to participate in the project, and the power of the NCPP participants to have the project recommendations implemented. The authors conclude that successful implementation depends upon the perceived legitimacy of the project and those selecting its participants, and on the ability to include all key stakeholders. This study has implicationsfor planned change in both interorganizational and intraorganizational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002188638602200204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JABHAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>36 Sherwood Place P.O. Box-1678 Greenwich, Connecticut 06836-1678: JAI PRESS INC</publisher><subject>Afghanistan ; Biological and medical sciences ; Change ; Coal ; Consensus ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Organization development ; Organization theory ; Political attitudes ; Political power ; Politics ; Power ; Problem solving ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Public policy ; Social psychology ; Studies ; USSR</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied behavioral science, 1986-01, Vol.22 (2), p.95-112</ispartof><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9d2afad53743df27bc955276633745bcd37ffa3213c8a73aebf472d704c63bc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9d2afad53743df27bc955276633745bcd37ffa3213c8a73aebf472d704c63bc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002188638602200204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002188638602200204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27869,27924,27925,30999,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8021403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Tina M.</creatorcontrib><title>Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change</title><title>The Journal of applied behavioral science</title><description>When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (NCPP), a collaborative change effort by representatives of environmental groups andfirms mining and using coal, to achieve a consensus on national coal policy in a nonadversarial, nontraditional setting. The authors 'study of the NCPPexplores three political issues: the role of power in the selection of participants in the NCPP negotiations, the role of power in each stakeholder's decision as to whether or not to participate in the project, and the power of the NCPP participants to have the project recommendations implemented. The authors conclude that successful implementation depends upon the perceived legitimacy of the project and those selecting its participants, and on the ability to include all key stakeholders. This study has implicationsfor planned change in both interorganizational and intraorganizational settings.</description><subject>Afghanistan</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Change</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Organization development</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>USSR</subject><issn>0021-8863</issn><issn>1552-6879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQAOAgCtbqH_C0qHhbm8cm2QUvsviCgh70vEyzSU3ZJjXZPeivN6VFRCmeQpJvZpIZhE4JviJEygnGlJSlYKXAlKYNLvbQiHBOc1HKah-N1iBfi0N0FOMCY1wwJkbo-tl3trcKumxql7aPWe-zR9fr4MMcnP2E3nqXbmvvonZxiBm4NqvfwM31MTow0EV9sl3H6PXu9qV-yKdP94_1zTRXqUifVy0FAy1nsmCtoXKmqvQyKQRLJ3ymWiaNAUYJUyVIBnpmCklbiQslWMJsjC43eVfBvw869s3SRqW7Dpz2Q2wEwVQIwv-FlFBJpaQJnv2CCz-E9M9kWGpjVXGS0PkuRGjFMWOciKToRqngYwzaNKtglxA-GoKb9XCav8NJQRfb1BBT700Ap2z8jixTRJHyj9FkwyLM9Y_quxN_AeyTmPg</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Gray, Barbara</creator><creator>Hay, Tina M.</creator><general>JAI PRESS INC</general><general>JAI Press</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change</title><author>Gray, Barbara ; Hay, Tina M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9d2afad53743df27bc955276633745bcd37ffa3213c8a73aebf472d704c63bc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Afghanistan</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Change</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Organization development</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>USSR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Tina M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Barbara</au><au>Hay, Tina M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied behavioral science</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>95-112</pages><issn>0021-8863</issn><eissn>1552-6879</eissn><coden>JABHAP</coden><abstract>When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (NCPP), a collaborative change effort by representatives of environmental groups andfirms mining and using coal, to achieve a consensus on national coal policy in a nonadversarial, nontraditional setting. The authors 'study of the NCPPexplores three political issues: the role of power in the selection of participants in the NCPP negotiations, the role of power in each stakeholder's decision as to whether or not to participate in the project, and the power of the NCPP participants to have the project recommendations implemented. The authors conclude that successful implementation depends upon the perceived legitimacy of the project and those selecting its participants, and on the ability to include all key stakeholders. This study has implicationsfor planned change in both interorganizational and intraorganizational settings.</abstract><cop>36 Sherwood Place P.O. Box-1678 Greenwich, Connecticut 06836-1678</cop><pub>JAI PRESS INC</pub><doi>10.1177/002188638602200204</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8863 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied behavioral science, 1986-01, Vol.22 (2), p.95-112 |
issn | 0021-8863 1552-6879 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61026615 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Afghanistan Biological and medical sciences Change Coal Consensus Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Organization development Organization theory Political attitudes Political power Politics Power Problem solving Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Public policy Social psychology Studies USSR |
title | Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A49%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20Limits%20to%20Interorganizational%20Consensus%20and%20Change&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Gray,%20Barbara&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=95-112&rft.issn=0021-8863&rft.eissn=1552-6879&rft.coden=JABHAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002188638602200204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1155985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295033516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002188638602200204&rfr_iscdi=true |