Knowledge, probability, and credibility
This paper concerns study of the credibility of human sources of evidence and its relation to the inferential value of testimony they provide. From a certain view of 'knowledge' in epistemology comes the suggestion that credibility assessment can be construed as a cascaded inference in whi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavioral decision making 1989-01, Vol.2 (1), p.39-62 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 62 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 39 |
| container_title | Journal of behavioral decision making |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Schum, David A. |
| description | This paper concerns study of the credibility of human sources of evidence and its relation to the inferential value of testimony they provide. From a certain view of 'knowledge' in epistemology comes the suggestion that credibility assessment can be construed as a cascaded inference in which attributes of human source credibility are identified. Scholarship from evidence law in jurisprudence suggests an evidential basis for credibility assessment in terms of these attributes. Applying Bayes' rule to this cascaded inference offers a way of expressing and combining credibility‐related beliefs in the process of assessing the inferential value of evidence. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bdm.3960020104 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61020905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61020905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2734-392aa24b08582b29041b442e434ffa6f7ab114516277f13e3a7e728d6c4982763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtPAjEQxhujiYhePXPSC4vTx7bbo4CgETQxPrg17W7XVBcWWgjy31uzRuPJ00xmvt88PoROMfQwALkwxbxHJY8pYGB7qIVBygSEwPuoBZlkCSWpOERHIbwBxB6FFjq_XdTbyhavtttZ-tpo4yq33nU7elF0cm8L1xSO0UGpq2BPvmMbPY2uHgfXyeR-fDO4nCQ5ETRukERrwgxkaUYMkcCwYYxYRllZal4KbTBmKeZEiBJTS7WwgmQFz5nMiOC0jc6aufGY1caGtZq7kNuq0gtbb4LiOL4nIY3CXiPMfR2Ct6VaejfXfqcwqC8_VPRD_foRAdkAW1fZ3T9q1R9O_7BJw7qwth8_rPbvigsqUvVyN1Z9PnyYPs9makQ_Ac-8cG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61020905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge, probability, and credibility</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Schum, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schum, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper concerns study of the credibility of human sources of evidence and its relation to the inferential value of testimony they provide. From a certain view of 'knowledge' in epistemology comes the suggestion that credibility assessment can be construed as a cascaded inference in which attributes of human source credibility are identified. Scholarship from evidence law in jurisprudence suggests an evidential basis for credibility assessment in terms of these attributes. Applying Bayes' rule to this cascaded inference offers a way of expressing and combining credibility‐related beliefs in the process of assessing the inferential value of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bdm.3960020104</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BDMAEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Credibility attributes ; Credibility-testimony issues ; Methodology (Data Analysis) ; Probability and credibility ; Reliability ; Testimony ; Validity ; Verbal Accounts</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral decision making, 1989-01, Vol.2 (1), p.39-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1989 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2734-392aa24b08582b29041b442e434ffa6f7ab114516277f13e3a7e728d6c4982763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2734-392aa24b08582b29041b442e434ffa6f7ab114516277f13e3a7e728d6c4982763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schum, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge, probability, and credibility</title><title>Journal of behavioral decision making</title><addtitle>J. Behav. Decis. Making</addtitle><description>This paper concerns study of the credibility of human sources of evidence and its relation to the inferential value of testimony they provide. From a certain view of 'knowledge' in epistemology comes the suggestion that credibility assessment can be construed as a cascaded inference in which attributes of human source credibility are identified. Scholarship from evidence law in jurisprudence suggests an evidential basis for credibility assessment in terms of these attributes. Applying Bayes' rule to this cascaded inference offers a way of expressing and combining credibility‐related beliefs in the process of assessing the inferential value of evidence.</description><subject>Credibility attributes</subject><subject>Credibility-testimony issues</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Analysis)</subject><subject>Probability and credibility</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Verbal Accounts</subject><issn>0894-3257</issn><issn>1099-0771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtPAjEQxhujiYhePXPSC4vTx7bbo4CgETQxPrg17W7XVBcWWgjy31uzRuPJ00xmvt88PoROMfQwALkwxbxHJY8pYGB7qIVBygSEwPuoBZlkCSWpOERHIbwBxB6FFjq_XdTbyhavtttZ-tpo4yq33nU7elF0cm8L1xSO0UGpq2BPvmMbPY2uHgfXyeR-fDO4nCQ5ETRukERrwgxkaUYMkcCwYYxYRllZal4KbTBmKeZEiBJTS7WwgmQFz5nMiOC0jc6aufGY1caGtZq7kNuq0gtbb4LiOL4nIY3CXiPMfR2Ct6VaejfXfqcwqC8_VPRD_foRAdkAW1fZ3T9q1R9O_7BJw7qwth8_rPbvigsqUvVyN1Z9PnyYPs9makQ_Ac-8cG0</recordid><startdate>198901</startdate><enddate>198901</enddate><creator>Schum, David A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198901</creationdate><title>Knowledge, probability, and credibility</title><author>Schum, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2734-392aa24b08582b29041b442e434ffa6f7ab114516277f13e3a7e728d6c4982763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Credibility attributes</topic><topic>Credibility-testimony issues</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Analysis)</topic><topic>Probability and credibility</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Verbal Accounts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schum, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schum, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge, probability, and credibility</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral decision making</jtitle><addtitle>J. Behav. Decis. Making</addtitle><date>1989-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>39-62</pages><issn>0894-3257</issn><eissn>1099-0771</eissn><coden>BDMAEU</coden><abstract>This paper concerns study of the credibility of human sources of evidence and its relation to the inferential value of testimony they provide. From a certain view of 'knowledge' in epistemology comes the suggestion that credibility assessment can be construed as a cascaded inference in which attributes of human source credibility are identified. Scholarship from evidence law in jurisprudence suggests an evidential basis for credibility assessment in terms of these attributes. Applying Bayes' rule to this cascaded inference offers a way of expressing and combining credibility‐related beliefs in the process of assessing the inferential value of evidence.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bdm.3960020104</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-3257 |
| ispartof | Journal of behavioral decision making, 1989-01, Vol.2 (1), p.39-62 |
| issn | 0894-3257 1099-0771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61020905 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Credibility attributes Credibility-testimony issues Methodology (Data Analysis) Probability and credibility Reliability Testimony Validity Verbal Accounts |
| title | Knowledge, probability, and credibility |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A58%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge,%20probability,%20and%20credibility&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20decision%20making&rft.au=Schum,%20David%20A.&rft.date=1989-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=39-62&rft.issn=0894-3257&rft.eissn=1099-0771&rft.coden=BDMAEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bdm.3960020104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61020905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61020905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |