Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform

Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European review of agricultural economics 1989, Vol.16 (3), p.359-374
1. Verfasser: Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 3
container_start_page 359
container_title European review of agricultural economics
container_volume 16
creator Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)
description Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/erae/16.3.359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61001042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1306632946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3c8b461c4118301d2d2dce1738344c1a3646063eedfdba9fc12a85c885b3b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpods0x1x6EhRy867GI8l2b0losoXNF0kg5CJkWW6Ueu2tJENyyd9eLQ5pCHMYHvPjMTOPkD1gc2AVLqzXdgFyjnMU1QcyAy55hhLKj2TGQIoMRFl8Jl9CeGBJoyhm5Pngt3dm7OLodUfN0Ifo4mh742ygum-ofjt30zi6xCVB472lN72LtqFXUUcbflC33nTO6AnZGgx1iNp0ya4dPNW0t7ZJvLdJrr-ST63ugt196Tvk5vjn9dEyW52f_Do6WGUGcx6zFk1ZcwmGA5TIoMlTGQsFlsi5AY2SSyYxWbdNravWQK5LYcpS1FgD4A7Zn3w3fvg72hDV2gVju073dhiDkpA-wniewO_vwIdh9H3aTQEyKTGvuExUNlHGDyGkU9TGu7X2TwqY2mahtlkokApVyuI_70K0j6-w9n-ULLAQanl7pw7P7i5PryqhLhL_beJbPahtAkGdraq0IqLAfwr4lto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306632946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/erae/16.3.359</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERAEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>ADMINISTRACION ; ADMINISTRATION ; Agriculture ; ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA ; ETATS-UNIS ; Extension Services ; Government Agencies ; Reform ; Social Institutions ; SUBSIDIES ; SUBSIDIOS ; SUBVENTION ; United States of America ; USA</subject><ispartof>European review of agricultural economics, 1989, Vol.16 (3), p.359-374</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3c8b461c4118301d2d2dce1738344c1a3646063eedfdba9fc12a85c885b3b113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</title><title>European review of agricultural economics</title><description>Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.</description><subject>ADMINISTRACION</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATION</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</subject><subject>ETATS-UNIS</subject><subject>Extension Services</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Social Institutions</subject><subject>SUBSIDIES</subject><subject>SUBSIDIOS</subject><subject>SUBVENTION</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0165-1587</issn><issn>1464-3618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpods0x1x6EhRy867GI8l2b0losoXNF0kg5CJkWW6Ueu2tJENyyd9eLQ5pCHMYHvPjMTOPkD1gc2AVLqzXdgFyjnMU1QcyAy55hhLKj2TGQIoMRFl8Jl9CeGBJoyhm5Pngt3dm7OLodUfN0Ifo4mh742ygum-ofjt30zi6xCVB472lN72LtqFXUUcbflC33nTO6AnZGgx1iNp0ya4dPNW0t7ZJvLdJrr-ST63ugt196Tvk5vjn9dEyW52f_Do6WGUGcx6zFk1ZcwmGA5TIoMlTGQsFlsi5AY2SSyYxWbdNravWQK5LYcpS1FgD4A7Zn3w3fvg72hDV2gVju073dhiDkpA-wniewO_vwIdh9H3aTQEyKTGvuExUNlHGDyGkU9TGu7X2TwqY2mahtlkokApVyuI_70K0j6-w9n-ULLAQanl7pw7P7i5PryqhLhL_beJbPahtAkGdraq0IqLAfwr4lto</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>de Gruyter</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</title><author>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3c8b461c4118301d2d2dce1738344c1a3646063eedfdba9fc12a85c885b3b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>ADMINISTRACION</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATION</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</topic><topic>ETATS-UNIS</topic><topic>Extension Services</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Social Institutions</topic><topic>SUBSIDIES</topic><topic>SUBSIDIOS</topic><topic>SUBVENTION</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</atitle><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>359-374</pages><issn>0165-1587</issn><eissn>1464-3618</eissn><coden>ERAEDA</coden><abstract>Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/erae/16.3.359</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1587
ispartof European review of agricultural economics, 1989, Vol.16 (3), p.359-374
issn 0165-1587
1464-3618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61001042
source Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects ADMINISTRACION
ADMINISTRATION
Agriculture
ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA
ETATS-UNIS
Extension Services
Government Agencies
Reform
Social Institutions
SUBSIDIES
SUBSIDIOS
SUBVENTION
United States of America
USA
title Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20constituencies%20and%20agricultural%20institutions%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20implications%20and%20obstacles%20for%20a%20needed%20reform&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Hillman,%20J.S.%20(Arizona%20Univ.,%20Tucson,%20AZ%20(USA).%20Dept.%20of%20Agricultural%20Economics)&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=359-374&rft.issn=0165-1587&rft.eissn=1464-3618&rft.coden=ERAEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/erae/16.3.359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1306632946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306632946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true