Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform
Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European review of agricultural economics 1989, Vol.16 (3), p.359-374 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 359 |
container_title | European review of agricultural economics |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics) |
description | Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/erae/16.3.359 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61001042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1306632946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3c8b461c4118301d2d2dce1738344c1a3646063eedfdba9fc12a85c885b3b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpods0x1x6EhRy867GI8l2b0losoXNF0kg5CJkWW6Ueu2tJENyyd9eLQ5pCHMYHvPjMTOPkD1gc2AVLqzXdgFyjnMU1QcyAy55hhLKj2TGQIoMRFl8Jl9CeGBJoyhm5Pngt3dm7OLodUfN0Ifo4mh742ygum-ofjt30zi6xCVB472lN72LtqFXUUcbflC33nTO6AnZGgx1iNp0ya4dPNW0t7ZJvLdJrr-ST63ugt196Tvk5vjn9dEyW52f_Do6WGUGcx6zFk1ZcwmGA5TIoMlTGQsFlsi5AY2SSyYxWbdNravWQK5LYcpS1FgD4A7Zn3w3fvg72hDV2gVju073dhiDkpA-wniewO_vwIdh9H3aTQEyKTGvuExUNlHGDyGkU9TGu7X2TwqY2mahtlkokApVyuI_70K0j6-w9n-ULLAQanl7pw7P7i5PryqhLhL_beJbPahtAkGdraq0IqLAfwr4lto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306632946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/erae/16.3.359</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERAEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>ADMINISTRACION ; ADMINISTRATION ; Agriculture ; ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA ; ETATS-UNIS ; Extension Services ; Government Agencies ; Reform ; Social Institutions ; SUBSIDIES ; SUBSIDIOS ; SUBVENTION ; United States of America ; USA</subject><ispartof>European review of agricultural economics, 1989, Vol.16 (3), p.359-374</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3c8b461c4118301d2d2dce1738344c1a3646063eedfdba9fc12a85c885b3b113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</title><title>European review of agricultural economics</title><description>Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.</description><subject>ADMINISTRACION</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATION</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</subject><subject>ETATS-UNIS</subject><subject>Extension Services</subject><subject>Government Agencies</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Social Institutions</subject><subject>SUBSIDIES</subject><subject>SUBSIDIOS</subject><subject>SUBVENTION</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0165-1587</issn><issn>1464-3618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpods0x1x6EhRy867GI8l2b0losoXNF0kg5CJkWW6Ueu2tJENyyd9eLQ5pCHMYHvPjMTOPkD1gc2AVLqzXdgFyjnMU1QcyAy55hhLKj2TGQIoMRFl8Jl9CeGBJoyhm5Pngt3dm7OLodUfN0Ifo4mh742ygum-ofjt30zi6xCVB472lN72LtqFXUUcbflC33nTO6AnZGgx1iNp0ya4dPNW0t7ZJvLdJrr-ST63ugt196Tvk5vjn9dEyW52f_Do6WGUGcx6zFk1ZcwmGA5TIoMlTGQsFlsi5AY2SSyYxWbdNravWQK5LYcpS1FgD4A7Zn3w3fvg72hDV2gVju073dhiDkpA-wniewO_vwIdh9H3aTQEyKTGvuExUNlHGDyGkU9TGu7X2TwqY2mahtlkokApVyuI_70K0j6-w9n-ULLAQanl7pw7P7i5PryqhLhL_beJbPahtAkGdraq0IqLAfwr4lto</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>de Gruyter</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</title><author>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3c8b461c4118301d2d2dce1738344c1a3646063eedfdba9fc12a85c885b3b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>ADMINISTRACION</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATION</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</topic><topic>ETATS-UNIS</topic><topic>Extension Services</topic><topic>Government Agencies</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Social Institutions</topic><topic>SUBSIDIES</topic><topic>SUBSIDIOS</topic><topic>SUBVENTION</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillman, J.S. (Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ (USA). Dept. of Agricultural Economics)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform</atitle><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>359-374</pages><issn>0165-1587</issn><eissn>1464-3618</eissn><coden>ERAEDA</coden><abstract>Summary Agricultural institutions such as the Land Grant System of the United States are under increasing pressure to accommodate to changing economic and political realities. Unfortunately, many institutions are using most of their energies in tactics to preserve the status quo rather than to induce innovations into the System. The author contends, as do Ruttan and Hayami, that institutions, like technology, must change if development and progress are to be assured. Administrators of agricultural institutions in the United States are open to criticism for internalising the process of resource allocation and for relying too much on traditional clients, whose economic and political powers are on the wane.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/erae/16.3.359</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-1587 |
ispartof | European review of agricultural economics, 1989, Vol.16 (3), p.359-374 |
issn | 0165-1587 1464-3618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61001042 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | ADMINISTRACION ADMINISTRATION Agriculture ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA ETATS-UNIS Extension Services Government Agencies Reform Social Institutions SUBSIDIES SUBSIDIOS SUBVENTION United States of America USA |
title | Agricultural constituencies and agricultural institutions in the United States: implications and obstacles for a needed reform |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20constituencies%20and%20agricultural%20institutions%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20implications%20and%20obstacles%20for%20a%20needed%20reform&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Hillman,%20J.S.%20(Arizona%20Univ.,%20Tucson,%20AZ%20(USA).%20Dept.%20of%20Agricultural%20Economics)&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=359-374&rft.issn=0165-1587&rft.eissn=1464-3618&rft.coden=ERAEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/erae/16.3.359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1306632946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306632946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |