Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections
Conventional wisdom holds that higher turnout favors Democrats. Previous studies of this hypothesis rely on presidential and House elections or on survey data, but senatorial and gubernatorial elections offer better conditions for directly testing turnout effects in U.S. politics. In a comprehensive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American political science review 1996-12, Vol.90 (4), p.780-793 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 793 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 780 |
container_title | The American political science review |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Nagel, Jack H. McNulty, John E. |
description | Conventional wisdom holds that higher turnout favors Democrats. Previous studies of this hypothesis rely on presidential and House elections or on survey data, but senatorial and gubernatorial elections offer better conditions for directly testing turnout effects in U.S. politics. In a comprehensive analysis of these statewide elections since 1928, we find that the conventional theory was true outside the South through 1964, but since 1965 the overall relationship between turnout and partisan outcomes has been insignificant. Even before the mid-1960s, the turnout effect outside the South was strongest in Republican states and insignificant or negative in heavily Democratic states. A similar but weaker pattern obtains after 1964. In the South, which we analyze only since 1966, higher turnout helped Republicans until 1990, but in 1990–94 the effect became pro-Democratic. The conventional theory cannot account for these complex patterns, but they are impressively consistent with DeNardo's (1980) theory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2945842 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60993966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2945842</cupid><galeid>A19016847</galeid><jstor_id>2945842</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A19016847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-828d2e1318144fefc267688f21154f878fb581b3b4958629de8017bc3e89fd3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0m1rFDEQAOAgFjxb8S8sKL5AV_O6ST7Wcl4PCwpWv4bs7uTIsZe0SRb03xu5Q2wpVeZDmOHJwCSD0HOC31GG5XuquVCcPkILIphshebsMVpgjFmLheBP0NOctzXFBKsF-vTFpuKzDc3SORhKbqJrvscCqbmaU4hzaXxovkKwJSZvp8aGsVnNPaQ_leVU7_kY8gk6cnbK8OxwHqNvH5dX5xft5efV-vzssh0EV6VVVI0UCCOKcO7ADbSTnVKOEiK4U1K5XijSs55roTqqR1CYyH5goLQb2ciO0at93-sUb2bIxex8HmCabIA4Z9NhrZnuun9CpnGnmWIVvrgDt7FOX4cwRAosZZW0qtO92tgJjA8ulmSHDQRIdooBnK_lM6Ix6RSXlbf38Boj7Pxwn39zy1dS4EfZ2Dlns75Y_zf9sLpFX-_pkGLOCZy5Tn5n009DsPm9MOawMFW-3Mttrj_7AHt7aGh3ffLjBv56rDv2F0t0xhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750773902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Nagel, Jack H. ; McNulty, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Jack H. ; McNulty, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional wisdom holds that higher turnout favors Democrats. Previous studies of this hypothesis rely on presidential and House elections or on survey data, but senatorial and gubernatorial elections offer better conditions for directly testing turnout effects in U.S. politics. In a comprehensive analysis of these statewide elections since 1928, we find that the conventional theory was true outside the South through 1964, but since 1965 the overall relationship between turnout and partisan outcomes has been insignificant. Even before the mid-1960s, the turnout effect outside the South was strongest in Republican states and insignificant or negative in heavily Democratic states. A similar but weaker pattern obtains after 1964. In the South, which we analyze only since 1966, higher turnout helped Republicans until 1990, but in 1990–94 the effect became pro-Democratic. The conventional theory cannot account for these complex patterns, but they are impressively consistent with DeNardo's (1980) theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2945842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; DEMOCRATIC PARTY (ALL NATIONS) ; Elections ; Elections to the upper chamber ; Governor ; Gubernatorial elections ; Incumbents ; Partisan ; Partisanship ; Political parties ; POLITICAL PARTISANSHIP ; Politics ; Presidential elections ; Regression coefficients ; REPUBLICAN PARTY (ALL NATIONS) ; Senate ; SENATE (ALL NATIONS) ; SOUTH (UNITED STATES) ; State elections ; U.S.A ; United States ; UNITED STATES PRIOR TO 1945 ; UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT ; Voter registration ; Voter turnout ; VOTING ; Voting Behavior ; Voting rights ; Voting turnout</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 1996-12, Vol.90 (4), p.780-793</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996</rights><rights>Copyright 1996 American Political Science Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-828d2e1318144fefc267688f21154f878fb581b3b4958629de8017bc3e89fd3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-828d2e1318144fefc267688f21154f878fb581b3b4958629de8017bc3e89fd3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2945842$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2945842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27852,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>Conventional wisdom holds that higher turnout favors Democrats. Previous studies of this hypothesis rely on presidential and House elections or on survey data, but senatorial and gubernatorial elections offer better conditions for directly testing turnout effects in U.S. politics. In a comprehensive analysis of these statewide elections since 1928, we find that the conventional theory was true outside the South through 1964, but since 1965 the overall relationship between turnout and partisan outcomes has been insignificant. Even before the mid-1960s, the turnout effect outside the South was strongest in Republican states and insignificant or negative in heavily Democratic states. A similar but weaker pattern obtains after 1964. In the South, which we analyze only since 1966, higher turnout helped Republicans until 1990, but in 1990–94 the effect became pro-Democratic. The conventional theory cannot account for these complex patterns, but they are impressively consistent with DeNardo's (1980) theory.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>DEMOCRATIC PARTY (ALL NATIONS)</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Elections to the upper chamber</subject><subject>Governor</subject><subject>Gubernatorial elections</subject><subject>Incumbents</subject><subject>Partisan</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>POLITICAL PARTISANSHIP</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Regression coefficients</subject><subject>REPUBLICAN PARTY (ALL NATIONS)</subject><subject>Senate</subject><subject>SENATE (ALL NATIONS)</subject><subject>SOUTH (UNITED STATES)</subject><subject>State elections</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>UNITED STATES PRIOR TO 1945</subject><subject>UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voter turnout</subject><subject>VOTING</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>Voting turnout</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0m1rFDEQAOAgFjxb8S8sKL5AV_O6ST7Wcl4PCwpWv4bs7uTIsZe0SRb03xu5Q2wpVeZDmOHJwCSD0HOC31GG5XuquVCcPkILIphshebsMVpgjFmLheBP0NOctzXFBKsF-vTFpuKzDc3SORhKbqJrvscCqbmaU4hzaXxovkKwJSZvp8aGsVnNPaQ_leVU7_kY8gk6cnbK8OxwHqNvH5dX5xft5efV-vzssh0EV6VVVI0UCCOKcO7ADbSTnVKOEiK4U1K5XijSs55roTqqR1CYyH5goLQb2ciO0at93-sUb2bIxex8HmCabIA4Z9NhrZnuun9CpnGnmWIVvrgDt7FOX4cwRAosZZW0qtO92tgJjA8ulmSHDQRIdooBnK_lM6Ix6RSXlbf38Boj7Pxwn39zy1dS4EfZ2Dlns75Y_zf9sLpFX-_pkGLOCZy5Tn5n009DsPm9MOawMFW-3Mttrj_7AHt7aGh3ffLjBv56rDv2F0t0xhw</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>Nagel, Jack H.</creator><creator>McNulty, John E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections</title><author>Nagel, Jack H. ; McNulty, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-828d2e1318144fefc267688f21154f878fb581b3b4958629de8017bc3e89fd3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>DEMOCRATIC PARTY (ALL NATIONS)</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Elections to the upper chamber</topic><topic>Governor</topic><topic>Gubernatorial elections</topic><topic>Incumbents</topic><topic>Partisan</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>POLITICAL PARTISANSHIP</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Regression coefficients</topic><topic>REPUBLICAN PARTY (ALL NATIONS)</topic><topic>Senate</topic><topic>SENATE (ALL NATIONS)</topic><topic>SOUTH (UNITED STATES)</topic><topic>State elections</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>UNITED STATES PRIOR TO 1945</topic><topic>UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voter turnout</topic><topic>VOTING</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>Voting turnout</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagel, Jack H.</au><au>McNulty, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>780</spage><epage>793</epage><pages>780-793</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>Conventional wisdom holds that higher turnout favors Democrats. Previous studies of this hypothesis rely on presidential and House elections or on survey data, but senatorial and gubernatorial elections offer better conditions for directly testing turnout effects in U.S. politics. In a comprehensive analysis of these statewide elections since 1928, we find that the conventional theory was true outside the South through 1964, but since 1965 the overall relationship between turnout and partisan outcomes has been insignificant. Even before the mid-1960s, the turnout effect outside the South was strongest in Republican states and insignificant or negative in heavily Democratic states. A similar but weaker pattern obtains after 1964. In the South, which we analyze only since 1966, higher turnout helped Republicans until 1990, but in 1990–94 the effect became pro-Democratic. The conventional theory cannot account for these complex patterns, but they are impressively consistent with DeNardo's (1980) theory.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2945842</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0554 |
ispartof | The American political science review, 1996-12, Vol.90 (4), p.780-793 |
issn | 0003-0554 1537-5943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60993966 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Analysis DEMOCRATIC PARTY (ALL NATIONS) Elections Elections to the upper chamber Governor Gubernatorial elections Incumbents Partisan Partisanship Political parties POLITICAL PARTISANSHIP Politics Presidential elections Regression coefficients REPUBLICAN PARTY (ALL NATIONS) Senate SENATE (ALL NATIONS) SOUTH (UNITED STATES) State elections U.S.A United States UNITED STATES PRIOR TO 1945 UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT Voter registration Voter turnout VOTING Voting Behavior Voting rights Voting turnout |
title | Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partisan%20Effects%20of%20Voter%20Turnout%20in%20Senatorial%20and%20Gubernatorial%20Elections&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Nagel,%20Jack%20H.&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=780&rft.epage=793&rft.pages=780-793&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2945842&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA19016847%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750773902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A19016847&rft_cupid=10_2307_2945842&rft_jstor_id=2945842&rfr_iscdi=true |