Black sexuality: A test of two theories
Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of sex research 1988-05, Vol.25 (2), p.197-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | The Journal of sex research |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Weinberg, Martin S. Williams, Colin J. |
description | Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00224498809551455 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60984577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3812991</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3812991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_QPCwIOhpNZ-bRLy0xS8oeNFzSLMJbt1uapKl9t-bsuJB8b3MYZ4ZXgaAUwSvEBTwGkKMKZVCQMkYooztgRFiTJaCIbkPRju_zIA8BEcxLmE-xOUIXE5bbd6LaD973TZpe1NMimRjKrwr0sYX6c360Nh4DA6cbqM9-dYxeL2_e5k9lvPnh6fZZF4aLEkq61qwRW0og9IRnZVxITHhlaQWWSMcwZC4Ba8ZrVFlIal0ZTS1kBu7MM6QMbgYetfBf_T5EbVqorFtqzvr-6gqKAVlnGfw_Be49H3o8m8KYYlRxQUTmUIDZYKPMVin1qFZ6bBVCKrdcOrPcDlzNmSWMfnwEyAi90qU7dvBbjrnw0pvfGhrlfS29cEF3ZkmKvJ_-xcf1XpR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292167858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Weinberg, Martin S. ; Williams, Colin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Martin S. ; Williams, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-8519</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00224498809551455</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSXRAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Black people ; black sexuality ; Black White Differences ; Black white relations ; Blacks ; Coitus ; gender differences ; Human sexual behavior ; Kinsey ; Men ; Orgasm ; Premarital sex ; racial differences ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual self stimulation ; Sexuality ; White people</subject><ispartof>The Journal of sex research, 1988-05, Vol.25 (2), p.197-218</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1988</rights><rights>Copyright 1988 The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3812991$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3812991$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27850,27905,27906,33756,57998,58231,59626,60415</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</title><title>The Journal of sex research</title><description>Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>black sexuality</subject><subject>Black White Differences</subject><subject>Black white relations</subject><subject>Blacks</subject><subject>Coitus</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>Human sexual behavior</subject><subject>Kinsey</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Orgasm</subject><subject>Premarital sex</subject><subject>racial differences</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual self stimulation</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>0022-4499</issn><issn>1559-8519</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_QPCwIOhpNZ-bRLy0xS8oeNFzSLMJbt1uapKl9t-bsuJB8b3MYZ4ZXgaAUwSvEBTwGkKMKZVCQMkYooztgRFiTJaCIbkPRju_zIA8BEcxLmE-xOUIXE5bbd6LaD973TZpe1NMimRjKrwr0sYX6c360Nh4DA6cbqM9-dYxeL2_e5k9lvPnh6fZZF4aLEkq61qwRW0og9IRnZVxITHhlaQWWSMcwZC4Ba8ZrVFlIal0ZTS1kBu7MM6QMbgYetfBf_T5EbVqorFtqzvr-6gqKAVlnGfw_Be49H3o8m8KYYlRxQUTmUIDZYKPMVin1qFZ6bBVCKrdcOrPcDlzNmSWMfnwEyAi90qU7dvBbjrnw0pvfGhrlfS29cEF3ZkmKvJ_-xcf1XpR</recordid><startdate>19880501</startdate><enddate>19880501</enddate><creator>Weinberg, Martin S.</creator><creator>Williams, Colin J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Society for the Scientific Study of Sex</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880501</creationdate><title>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</title><author>Weinberg, Martin S. ; Williams, Colin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>black sexuality</topic><topic>Black White Differences</topic><topic>Black white relations</topic><topic>Blacks</topic><topic>Coitus</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>Human sexual behavior</topic><topic>Kinsey</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Orgasm</topic><topic>Premarital sex</topic><topic>racial differences</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual self stimulation</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinberg, Martin S.</au><au>Williams, Colin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle><date>1988-05-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>197-218</pages><issn>0022-4499</issn><eissn>1559-8519</eissn><coden>JSXRAJ</coden><abstract>Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00224498809551455</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4499 |
ispartof | The Journal of sex research, 1988-05, Vol.25 (2), p.197-218 |
issn | 0022-4499 1559-8519 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60984577 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | African Americans Black people black sexuality Black White Differences Black white relations Blacks Coitus gender differences Human sexual behavior Kinsey Men Orgasm Premarital sex racial differences Sexual Behavior Sexual self stimulation Sexuality White people |
title | Black sexuality: A test of two theories |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Black%20sexuality:%20A%20test%20of%20two%20theories&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20sex%20research&rft.au=Weinberg,%20Martin%20S.&rft.date=1988-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=197-218&rft.issn=0022-4499&rft.eissn=1559-8519&rft.coden=JSXRAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00224498809551455&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3812991%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292167858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3812991&rfr_iscdi=true |