Black sexuality: A test of two theories

Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of sex research 1988-05, Vol.25 (2), p.197-218
Hauptverfasser: Weinberg, Martin S., Williams, Colin J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title The Journal of sex research
container_volume 25
creator Weinberg, Martin S.
Williams, Colin J.
description Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00224498809551455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60984577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3812991</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3812991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_QPCwIOhpNZ-bRLy0xS8oeNFzSLMJbt1uapKl9t-bsuJB8b3MYZ4ZXgaAUwSvEBTwGkKMKZVCQMkYooztgRFiTJaCIbkPRju_zIA8BEcxLmE-xOUIXE5bbd6LaD973TZpe1NMimRjKrwr0sYX6c360Nh4DA6cbqM9-dYxeL2_e5k9lvPnh6fZZF4aLEkq61qwRW0og9IRnZVxITHhlaQWWSMcwZC4Ba8ZrVFlIal0ZTS1kBu7MM6QMbgYetfBf_T5EbVqorFtqzvr-6gqKAVlnGfw_Be49H3o8m8KYYlRxQUTmUIDZYKPMVin1qFZ6bBVCKrdcOrPcDlzNmSWMfnwEyAi90qU7dvBbjrnw0pvfGhrlfS29cEF3ZkmKvJ_-xcf1XpR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292167858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Weinberg, Martin S. ; Williams, Colin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Martin S. ; Williams, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, &amp; Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-8519</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00224498809551455</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSXRAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Black people ; black sexuality ; Black White Differences ; Black white relations ; Blacks ; Coitus ; gender differences ; Human sexual behavior ; Kinsey ; Men ; Orgasm ; Premarital sex ; racial differences ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual self stimulation ; Sexuality ; White people</subject><ispartof>The Journal of sex research, 1988-05, Vol.25 (2), p.197-218</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1988</rights><rights>Copyright 1988 The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3812991$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3812991$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27850,27905,27906,33756,57998,58231,59626,60415</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</title><title>The Journal of sex research</title><description>Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, &amp; Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>black sexuality</subject><subject>Black White Differences</subject><subject>Black white relations</subject><subject>Blacks</subject><subject>Coitus</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>Human sexual behavior</subject><subject>Kinsey</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Orgasm</subject><subject>Premarital sex</subject><subject>racial differences</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual self stimulation</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>0022-4499</issn><issn>1559-8519</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_QPCwIOhpNZ-bRLy0xS8oeNFzSLMJbt1uapKl9t-bsuJB8b3MYZ4ZXgaAUwSvEBTwGkKMKZVCQMkYooztgRFiTJaCIbkPRju_zIA8BEcxLmE-xOUIXE5bbd6LaD973TZpe1NMimRjKrwr0sYX6c360Nh4DA6cbqM9-dYxeL2_e5k9lvPnh6fZZF4aLEkq61qwRW0og9IRnZVxITHhlaQWWSMcwZC4Ba8ZrVFlIal0ZTS1kBu7MM6QMbgYetfBf_T5EbVqorFtqzvr-6gqKAVlnGfw_Be49H3o8m8KYYlRxQUTmUIDZYKPMVin1qFZ6bBVCKrdcOrPcDlzNmSWMfnwEyAi90qU7dvBbjrnw0pvfGhrlfS29cEF3ZkmKvJ_-xcf1XpR</recordid><startdate>19880501</startdate><enddate>19880501</enddate><creator>Weinberg, Martin S.</creator><creator>Williams, Colin J.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Society for the Scientific Study of Sex</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880501</creationdate><title>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</title><author>Weinberg, Martin S. ; Williams, Colin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-dd85bdc4509f3ac455789237694e1ec8f3203fb7d54d16e036a6ca4e07cebcfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>black sexuality</topic><topic>Black White Differences</topic><topic>Black white relations</topic><topic>Blacks</topic><topic>Coitus</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>Human sexual behavior</topic><topic>Kinsey</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Orgasm</topic><topic>Premarital sex</topic><topic>racial differences</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual self stimulation</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinberg, Martin S.</au><au>Williams, Colin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Black sexuality: A test of two theories</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle><date>1988-05-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>197-218</pages><issn>0022-4499</issn><eissn>1559-8519</eissn><coden>JSXRAJ</coden><abstract>Testing the theoretical statements of Alfred Kinsey and James Coleman regarding racial differences in sexual experience (Coleman, 1966; Kinsey, Pomeroy, &amp; Martin, 1948), data from three samples, covering the period 1938-70, are brought to bear on the following hypotheses: (a) Black men and women are more sexually permissive than white men and women, but such differences are more a function of social class than race (Kinsey); and (b) differences in sexual permissiveness between black men and women are less than for white men and women because of the power of the black woman in determining family status (Coleman). Results show that blacks were more likely than whites to engage in premarital sex earlier and more frequently (men and women), and with more partners (men only). They were also more likely to engage in extramarital sex (men and women), and with a greater number of partners (men only). Additionally, blacks were more liberal and accepting of sex, pursued it more, were more open about it, and reported fewer problems with it. However, no support was found for the Kinsey hypothesis that these differences are explained by social class. Furthermore, the Coleman hypothesis was also not supported, since we did not find a greater similarity between the sexual patterns of black men and women in comparison to their white counterparts. Various explanations are offered for these results.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00224498809551455</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4499
ispartof The Journal of sex research, 1988-05, Vol.25 (2), p.197-218
issn 0022-4499
1559-8519
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60984577
source Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects African Americans
Black people
black sexuality
Black White Differences
Black white relations
Blacks
Coitus
gender differences
Human sexual behavior
Kinsey
Men
Orgasm
Premarital sex
racial differences
Sexual Behavior
Sexual self stimulation
Sexuality
White people
title Black sexuality: A test of two theories
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Black%20sexuality:%20A%20test%20of%20two%20theories&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20sex%20research&rft.au=Weinberg,%20Martin%20S.&rft.date=1988-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=197-218&rft.issn=0022-4499&rft.eissn=1559-8519&rft.coden=JSXRAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00224498809551455&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3812991%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292167858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3812991&rfr_iscdi=true