Ethical issues in analyzing FBI surreptitious tapes

Ten ethical principles developed by the American Psychological Assoc (APA) to guide research involving human Ss are examined in the context of legal & ethical issues raised by covert tape recordings obtained by the FBI & other law enforcement agencies. The FBI's guidelines for such mate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of the sociology of language 1986, Vol.1986 (62), p.119-128
1. Verfasser: SHUY, ROGER W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 62
container_start_page 119
container_title International journal of the sociology of language
container_volume 1986
creator SHUY, ROGER W.
description Ten ethical principles developed by the American Psychological Assoc (APA) to guide research involving human Ss are examined in the context of legal & ethical issues raised by covert tape recordings obtained by the FBI & other law enforcement agencies. The FBI's guidelines for such material are compared with APA guidelines & found to be less comprehensive. Issues raised relating to the involvement of linguists or psychologists with such material are addressed. It is argued that guidelines for publication of material drawn from FBI recordings may differ from the standard APA principles; & that publication of analyses of such recordings is ethical so long as appropriate ethical principles are followed from the point at which the researcher enters the investigation. 2 References. B. Annesser Murray
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ijsl.1986.62.119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60969817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60969817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a39ff6ba8f63d0dfdc78f4b2721332e1a1672062b1e45882b0f52bb25cf64b543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwM2ZiS_Cz42dnhEKhaiWEVGbLTm1wSdNgpxLl15OqiOmW706nj5BroAUIELdhnZoCKoUFsgKgOiEjQOA5R1SnZEQBRc4E4Dm5SGlNKQhRViPCH_uPUJsmCyntXMpCm5nWNPuf0L5n0_tZlnYxuq4PfdjuUtabzqVLcuZNk9zVX47J2_RxOXnOFy9Ps8ndIq8Zij43vPIerVEe-Yqu_KqWypeWSQacMwcGUDKKzIIrhVLMUi-YtUzUHksrSj4mN8fdLm6_hnO93oRUu6YxrRvOaKQVVgrkANIjWMdtStF53cWwMXGvgeqDHX2wow92NDI92Bkq-bESUu--_3kTPzVKLoV-XZZ6Pp9PH0CiXvBfby9ncQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60969817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethical issues in analyzing FBI surreptitious tapes</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>SHUY, ROGER W.</creator><creatorcontrib>SHUY, ROGER W.</creatorcontrib><description>Ten ethical principles developed by the American Psychological Assoc (APA) to guide research involving human Ss are examined in the context of legal &amp; ethical issues raised by covert tape recordings obtained by the FBI &amp; other law enforcement agencies. The FBI's guidelines for such material are compared with APA guidelines &amp; found to be less comprehensive. Issues raised relating to the involvement of linguists or psychologists with such material are addressed. It is argued that guidelines for publication of material drawn from FBI recordings may differ from the standard APA principles; &amp; that publication of analyses of such recordings is ethical so long as appropriate ethical principles are followed from the point at which the researcher enters the investigation. 2 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-3668</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1986.62.119</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ISLGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, Berlin / New York</publisher><subject>Methodology (Data Analysis) ; Recordings ; Research Ethics</subject><ispartof>International journal of the sociology of language, 1986, Vol.1986 (62), p.119-128</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHUY, ROGER W.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethical issues in analyzing FBI surreptitious tapes</title><title>International journal of the sociology of language</title><addtitle>International Journal of the Sociology of Language</addtitle><description>Ten ethical principles developed by the American Psychological Assoc (APA) to guide research involving human Ss are examined in the context of legal &amp; ethical issues raised by covert tape recordings obtained by the FBI &amp; other law enforcement agencies. The FBI's guidelines for such material are compared with APA guidelines &amp; found to be less comprehensive. Issues raised relating to the involvement of linguists or psychologists with such material are addressed. It is argued that guidelines for publication of material drawn from FBI recordings may differ from the standard APA principles; &amp; that publication of analyses of such recordings is ethical so long as appropriate ethical principles are followed from the point at which the researcher enters the investigation. 2 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><subject>Methodology (Data Analysis)</subject><subject>Recordings</subject><subject>Research Ethics</subject><issn>0165-2516</issn><issn>1613-3668</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwM2ZiS_Cz42dnhEKhaiWEVGbLTm1wSdNgpxLl15OqiOmW706nj5BroAUIELdhnZoCKoUFsgKgOiEjQOA5R1SnZEQBRc4E4Dm5SGlNKQhRViPCH_uPUJsmCyntXMpCm5nWNPuf0L5n0_tZlnYxuq4PfdjuUtabzqVLcuZNk9zVX47J2_RxOXnOFy9Ps8ndIq8Zij43vPIerVEe-Yqu_KqWypeWSQacMwcGUDKKzIIrhVLMUi-YtUzUHksrSj4mN8fdLm6_hnO93oRUu6YxrRvOaKQVVgrkANIjWMdtStF53cWwMXGvgeqDHX2wow92NDI92Bkq-bESUu--_3kTPzVKLoV-XZZ6Pp9PH0CiXvBfby9ncQ</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>SHUY, ROGER W.</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter, Berlin / New York</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Ethical issues in analyzing FBI surreptitious tapes</title><author>SHUY, ROGER W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a39ff6ba8f63d0dfdc78f4b2721332e1a1672062b1e45882b0f52bb25cf64b543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Methodology (Data Analysis)</topic><topic>Recordings</topic><topic>Research Ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHUY, ROGER W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of the sociology of language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHUY, ROGER W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethical issues in analyzing FBI surreptitious tapes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of the sociology of language</jtitle><addtitle>International Journal of the Sociology of Language</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>1986</volume><issue>62</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>119-128</pages><issn>0165-2516</issn><eissn>1613-3668</eissn><coden>ISLGAH</coden><abstract>Ten ethical principles developed by the American Psychological Assoc (APA) to guide research involving human Ss are examined in the context of legal &amp; ethical issues raised by covert tape recordings obtained by the FBI &amp; other law enforcement agencies. The FBI's guidelines for such material are compared with APA guidelines &amp; found to be less comprehensive. Issues raised relating to the involvement of linguists or psychologists with such material are addressed. It is argued that guidelines for publication of material drawn from FBI recordings may differ from the standard APA principles; &amp; that publication of analyses of such recordings is ethical so long as appropriate ethical principles are followed from the point at which the researcher enters the investigation. 2 References. B. Annesser Murray</abstract><cop>Berlin, New York</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter, Berlin / New York</pub><doi>10.1515/ijsl.1986.62.119</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-2516
ispartof International journal of the sociology of language, 1986, Vol.1986 (62), p.119-128
issn 0165-2516
1613-3668
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60969817
source Sociological Abstracts; De Gruyter journals
subjects Methodology (Data Analysis)
Recordings
Research Ethics
title Ethical issues in analyzing FBI surreptitious tapes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T06%3A13%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical%20issues%20in%20analyzing%20FBI%20surreptitious%20tapes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20the%20sociology%20of%20language&rft.au=SHUY,%20ROGER%20W.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=1986&rft.issue=62&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=119-128&rft.issn=0165-2516&rft.eissn=1613-3668&rft.coden=ISLGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ijsl.1986.62.119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60969817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60969817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true