Stratification in American Science

Although differential ranking in science is not readily visible to lay observers, American science is, in fact, sharply graded. Rewards and facilities for research are concentrated among relatively few investigators and organizations. This distinctive pattern of stratification, at odds with the egal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociological inquiry 1970-04, Vol.40 (2), p.235-257
1. Verfasser: Zuckerman, Harriet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title Sociological inquiry
container_volume 40
creator Zuckerman, Harriet
description Although differential ranking in science is not readily visible to lay observers, American science is, in fact, sharply graded. Rewards and facilities for research are concentrated among relatively few investigators and organizations. This distinctive pattern of stratification, at odds with the egalitarian ethos of science, is not solely attributable to the distribution of talent in the scientific community. There is however a high correlation between assessed contributions to science and investigators' scientific standing. The present pattern of stratification is the outcome of processes of allocation of men and resources among various sectors of science which include selective recruitment and socialization of young investigators, differential access to publication and research facilities, and differential recognition of scientists' contributions through citations to their work and honorific awards. In a time when the legitimacy of reward systems in many social institutions is routinely challenged, scientists are apt to accept their own as just and correct.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60908301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60908301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4745-e9f56b00bc414533b199ed6a3ef87c93dcfc6bf2de41e641c4fbc4c4667b53793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_Q-nBW-Js9l_Wi5SitVAq0oriZUm2u5CaJnU3xfbbuyGlZ52BGYZ57x1-CA0xxDjU3TrGVLCIp8lHjKWAuMkBh473Z6h3ep2jHgBJI0gou0RX3q8BgCUp76HhonFZU9hCh1lXg6IajDbGhbMaLHRhKm2u0YXNSm9ujruP3p4el-PnaPYymY5Hs0hTQVlkpGU8B8g1xZQRkmMpzYpnxNhUaElW2mqe22RlKDacYk1tkGrKucgZEZL00W2Xu3X19874Rm0Kr01ZZpWpd15xkJASwH8QplyAJEF43wm1q713xqqtKzaZOygMquWn1qqFpFpIquWnjvzUPpgfOvNPUZrDP5xq8TKdJ4SFhKhLKHxj9qeEzH0pLkgwv88n6vOVz9gykWpGfgEMwYaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60867093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stratification in American Science</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Zuckerman, Harriet</creator><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Harriet</creatorcontrib><description>Although differential ranking in science is not readily visible to lay observers, American science is, in fact, sharply graded. Rewards and facilities for research are concentrated among relatively few investigators and organizations. This distinctive pattern of stratification, at odds with the egalitarian ethos of science, is not solely attributable to the distribution of talent in the scientific community. There is however a high correlation between assessed contributions to science and investigators' scientific standing. The present pattern of stratification is the outcome of processes of allocation of men and resources among various sectors of science which include selective recruitment and socialization of young investigators, differential access to publication and research facilities, and differential recognition of scientists' contributions through citations to their work and honorific awards. In a time when the legitimacy of reward systems in many social institutions is routinely challenged, scientists are apt to accept their own as just and correct.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-682X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOCIBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Egalitarian/Egalitarianism ; Science/Sciences (see also Scientific) ; Social institution/Social institutions ; Stratify/Stratified/Stratification ; System/Systems ; United States/US</subject><ispartof>Sociological inquiry, 1970-04, Vol.40 (2), p.235-257</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4745-e9f56b00bc414533b199ed6a3ef87c93dcfc6bf2de41e641c4fbc4c4667b53793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4745-e9f56b00bc414533b199ed6a3ef87c93dcfc6bf2de41e641c4fbc4c4667b53793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33754,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Harriet</creatorcontrib><title>Stratification in American Science</title><title>Sociological inquiry</title><description>Although differential ranking in science is not readily visible to lay observers, American science is, in fact, sharply graded. Rewards and facilities for research are concentrated among relatively few investigators and organizations. This distinctive pattern of stratification, at odds with the egalitarian ethos of science, is not solely attributable to the distribution of talent in the scientific community. There is however a high correlation between assessed contributions to science and investigators' scientific standing. The present pattern of stratification is the outcome of processes of allocation of men and resources among various sectors of science which include selective recruitment and socialization of young investigators, differential access to publication and research facilities, and differential recognition of scientists' contributions through citations to their work and honorific awards. In a time when the legitimacy of reward systems in many social institutions is routinely challenged, scientists are apt to accept their own as just and correct.</description><subject>Egalitarian/Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Science/Sciences (see also Scientific)</subject><subject>Social institution/Social institutions</subject><subject>Stratify/Stratified/Stratification</subject><subject>System/Systems</subject><subject>United States/US</subject><issn>0038-0245</issn><issn>1475-682X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1970</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_Q-nBW-Js9l_Wi5SitVAq0oriZUm2u5CaJnU3xfbbuyGlZ52BGYZ57x1-CA0xxDjU3TrGVLCIp8lHjKWAuMkBh473Z6h3ep2jHgBJI0gou0RX3q8BgCUp76HhonFZU9hCh1lXg6IajDbGhbMaLHRhKm2u0YXNSm9ujruP3p4el-PnaPYymY5Hs0hTQVlkpGU8B8g1xZQRkmMpzYpnxNhUaElW2mqe22RlKDacYk1tkGrKucgZEZL00W2Xu3X19874Rm0Kr01ZZpWpd15xkJASwH8QplyAJEF43wm1q713xqqtKzaZOygMquWn1qqFpFpIquWnjvzUPpgfOvNPUZrDP5xq8TKdJ4SFhKhLKHxj9qeEzH0pLkgwv88n6vOVz9gykWpGfgEMwYaY</recordid><startdate>197004</startdate><enddate>197004</enddate><creator>Zuckerman, Harriet</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197004</creationdate><title>Stratification in American Science</title><author>Zuckerman, Harriet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4745-e9f56b00bc414533b199ed6a3ef87c93dcfc6bf2de41e641c4fbc4c4667b53793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1970</creationdate><topic>Egalitarian/Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Science/Sciences (see also Scientific)</topic><topic>Social institution/Social institutions</topic><topic>Stratify/Stratified/Stratification</topic><topic>System/Systems</topic><topic>United States/US</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Harriet</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zuckerman, Harriet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stratification in American Science</atitle><jtitle>Sociological inquiry</jtitle><date>1970-04</date><risdate>1970</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>235-257</pages><issn>0038-0245</issn><eissn>1475-682X</eissn><coden>SOCIBR</coden><abstract>Although differential ranking in science is not readily visible to lay observers, American science is, in fact, sharply graded. Rewards and facilities for research are concentrated among relatively few investigators and organizations. This distinctive pattern of stratification, at odds with the egalitarian ethos of science, is not solely attributable to the distribution of talent in the scientific community. There is however a high correlation between assessed contributions to science and investigators' scientific standing. The present pattern of stratification is the outcome of processes of allocation of men and resources among various sectors of science which include selective recruitment and socialization of young investigators, differential access to publication and research facilities, and differential recognition of scientists' contributions through citations to their work and honorific awards. In a time when the legitimacy of reward systems in many social institutions is routinely challenged, scientists are apt to accept their own as just and correct.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0245
ispartof Sociological inquiry, 1970-04, Vol.40 (2), p.235-257
issn 0038-0245
1475-682X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60908301
source Wiley Online Library; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Egalitarian/Egalitarianism
Science/Sciences (see also Scientific)
Social institution/Social institutions
Stratify/Stratified/Stratification
System/Systems
United States/US
title Stratification in American Science
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A57%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stratification%20in%20American%20Science&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20inquiry&rft.au=Zuckerman,%20Harriet&rft.date=1970-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=235-257&rft.issn=0038-0245&rft.eissn=1475-682X&rft.coden=SOCIBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60908301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60867093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true