Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation
The usefulness of legislative history has been brought into question concerning how judges interpret the intent of legislation. The structure of the legislative process is examined in order to identify how legislators solve the problem of instability of majority rule.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Law and contemporary problems 1994-01, Vol.57 (1), p.3-37 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 37 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Law and contemporary problems |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | McNollgast Bates, Robert H Jorgensen, Miriam R Shepsle, Kenneth A Schwartz, Edward P Spiller, Pablo T Urbiztondo, Santiago Eskridge, William N Munger, Michael Lupia, Arthur McCubbins, Mathew D Asimow, Michael Bawn, Kathleen |
| description | The usefulness of legislative history has been brought into question concerning how judges interpret the intent of legislation. The structure of the legislative process is examined in order to identify how legislators solve the problem of instability of majority rule. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1191982 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60904220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1191982</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1191982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5b5f246bfc914c86fe4629a4b6bb791c411a400a7a5a234ac2e78877d59deeda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0VtLwzAUAOAgCs4p_oWiok_V5OTW-CbDy2DgwO25pF2qHV0zk1TYvzd1exLG8pLL-XLgnIPQJcH3QLF8IEQRlcERGhDFeAoU4BgNMAaaKpKJU3Tm_RLHJSUeoNnEfNa-0aH-Mcm4DaYNj8nsyyRzbxJbJVPr67_Y1DbxUOqmj1q3Seo2-Qg6dKG_9D_d2pn4UNv2HJ1UuvHmYrcP0fzleTZ6Syfvr-PR0yQtqaAh5QWvgImiKhVhZSYqwwQozQpRFFKRkhGiGcZaaq6BMl2CkVkm5YKrhTELTYfodpt37ex3Z3zIV7UvTdPo1tjO5wIrzADwQcilEEQqeRDSTHBJhIjw6h9c2s61sdocSBbzUQERXe9DBJTgCoDzqO62qnTWe2eqfO3qlXabnOC8H2m-G2mUN1u59LHre9kvLE-cYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296592255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Duke Law Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>McNollgast ; Bates, Robert H ; Jorgensen, Miriam R ; Shepsle, Kenneth A ; Schwartz, Edward P ; Spiller, Pablo T ; Urbiztondo, Santiago ; Eskridge, William N ; Munger, Michael ; Lupia, Arthur ; McCubbins, Mathew D ; Asimow, Michael ; Bawn, Kathleen</creator><creatorcontrib>McNollgast ; Bates, Robert H ; Jorgensen, Miriam R ; Shepsle, Kenneth A ; Schwartz, Edward P ; Spiller, Pablo T ; Urbiztondo, Santiago ; Eskridge, William N ; Munger, Michael ; Lupia, Arthur ; McCubbins, Mathew D ; Asimow, Michael ; Bawn, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>The usefulness of legislative history has been brought into question concerning how judges interpret the intent of legislation. The structure of the legislative process is examined in order to identify how legislators solve the problem of instability of majority rule.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1191982</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LCTPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham, N.C: Duke University School of Law</publisher><subject>Administrative law ; Coalition bargaining ; Committees ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Government bureaucracy ; Interpretation ; Law ; Legislation ; Legislators ; National Environmental Policy Act ; Political Economy ; Political parties ; Political philosophy ; Political Theory ; Positive political theory ; Positivism ; Regulation ; Role ; Statutes ; Statutory interpretation ; Statutory law ; United States ; USA</subject><ispartof>Law and contemporary problems, 1994-01, Vol.57 (1), p.3-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Law and Contemporary Problems</rights><rights>Copyright Duke University School of Law Winter 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5b5f246bfc914c86fe4629a4b6bb791c411a400a7a5a234ac2e78877d59deeda3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1191982$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1191982$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27869,27924,27925,31000,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNollgast</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, Miriam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepsle, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Edward P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiller, Pablo T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbiztondo, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskridge, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupia, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCubbins, Mathew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asimow, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bawn, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><title>Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation</title><title>Law and contemporary problems</title><description>The usefulness of legislative history has been brought into question concerning how judges interpret the intent of legislation. The structure of the legislative process is examined in order to identify how legislators solve the problem of instability of majority rule.</description><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Coalition bargaining</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Government bureaucracy</subject><subject>Interpretation</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>National Environmental Policy Act</subject><subject>Political Economy</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Positive political theory</subject><subject>Positivism</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Statutes</subject><subject>Statutory interpretation</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0023-9186</issn><issn>1945-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0VtLwzAUAOAgCs4p_oWiok_V5OTW-CbDy2DgwO25pF2qHV0zk1TYvzd1exLG8pLL-XLgnIPQJcH3QLF8IEQRlcERGhDFeAoU4BgNMAaaKpKJU3Tm_RLHJSUeoNnEfNa-0aH-Mcm4DaYNj8nsyyRzbxJbJVPr67_Y1DbxUOqmj1q3Seo2-Qg6dKG_9D_d2pn4UNv2HJ1UuvHmYrcP0fzleTZ6Syfvr-PR0yQtqaAh5QWvgImiKhVhZSYqwwQozQpRFFKRkhGiGcZaaq6BMl2CkVkm5YKrhTELTYfodpt37ex3Z3zIV7UvTdPo1tjO5wIrzADwQcilEEQqeRDSTHBJhIjw6h9c2s61sdocSBbzUQERXe9DBJTgCoDzqO62qnTWe2eqfO3qlXabnOC8H2m-G2mUN1u59LHre9kvLE-cYA</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>McNollgast</creator><creator>Bates, Robert H</creator><creator>Jorgensen, Miriam R</creator><creator>Shepsle, Kenneth A</creator><creator>Schwartz, Edward P</creator><creator>Spiller, Pablo T</creator><creator>Urbiztondo, Santiago</creator><creator>Eskridge, William N</creator><creator>Munger, Michael</creator><creator>Lupia, Arthur</creator><creator>McCubbins, Mathew D</creator><creator>Asimow, Michael</creator><creator>Bawn, Kathleen</creator><general>Duke University School of Law</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation</title><author>McNollgast ; Bates, Robert H ; Jorgensen, Miriam R ; Shepsle, Kenneth A ; Schwartz, Edward P ; Spiller, Pablo T ; Urbiztondo, Santiago ; Eskridge, William N ; Munger, Michael ; Lupia, Arthur ; McCubbins, Mathew D ; Asimow, Michael ; Bawn, Kathleen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5b5f246bfc914c86fe4629a4b6bb791c411a400a7a5a234ac2e78877d59deeda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Coalition bargaining</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Government bureaucracy</topic><topic>Interpretation</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>National Environmental Policy Act</topic><topic>Political Economy</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Positive political theory</topic><topic>Positivism</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Statutes</topic><topic>Statutory interpretation</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNollgast</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgensen, Miriam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepsle, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Edward P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiller, Pablo T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbiztondo, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskridge, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupia, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCubbins, Mathew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asimow, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bawn, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Law and contemporary problems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNollgast</au><au>Bates, Robert H</au><au>Jorgensen, Miriam R</au><au>Shepsle, Kenneth A</au><au>Schwartz, Edward P</au><au>Spiller, Pablo T</au><au>Urbiztondo, Santiago</au><au>Eskridge, William N</au><au>Munger, Michael</au><au>Lupia, Arthur</au><au>McCubbins, Mathew D</au><au>Asimow, Michael</au><au>Bawn, Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation</atitle><jtitle>Law and contemporary problems</jtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>3-37</pages><issn>0023-9186</issn><eissn>1945-2322</eissn><coden>LCTPA5</coden><abstract>The usefulness of legislative history has been brought into question concerning how judges interpret the intent of legislation. The structure of the legislative process is examined in order to identify how legislators solve the problem of instability of majority rule.</abstract><cop>Durham, N.C</cop><pub>Duke University School of Law</pub><doi>10.2307/1191982</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-9186 |
| ispartof | Law and contemporary problems, 1994-01, Vol.57 (1), p.3-37 |
| issn | 0023-9186 1945-2322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60904220 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Duke Law Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Administrative law Coalition bargaining Committees Court hearings & proceedings Government bureaucracy Interpretation Law Legislation Legislators National Environmental Policy Act Political Economy Political parties Political philosophy Political Theory Positive political theory Positivism Regulation Role Statutes Statutory interpretation Statutory law United States USA |
| title | Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legislative%20Intent:%20The%20Use%20of%20Positive%20Political%20Theory%20in%20Statutory%20Interpretation&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20contemporary%20problems&rft.au=McNollgast&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=3-37&rft.issn=0023-9186&rft.eissn=1945-2322&rft.coden=LCTPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1191982&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1191982%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296592255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1191982&rfr_iscdi=true |