The Dynamics of Power: Recent Trends in Mechanization on the American Farm

A brief review & analysis is presented of some of the most recent developments in agri'al machine technology in the US. Special emphasis is given to (a) the power revolution & its thrust toward larger tractors & (b) the increased use of self-propelled machinery. The roots of the pow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technology and culture 1972-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-24
1. Verfasser: Hilliard, Sam B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Technology and culture
container_volume 13
creator Hilliard, Sam B.
description A brief review & analysis is presented of some of the most recent developments in agri'al machine technology in the US. Special emphasis is given to (a) the power revolution & its thrust toward larger tractors & (b) the increased use of self-propelled machinery. The roots of the power revolution are shown to go back to the stream era when man first began to use inanimate power for traction work. A trend toward smaller tractors began in the yrs after WWI & through WWII, but the decrease in small farms in the 1950's reversed this trend then with a thrust toward higher-powered tractors. Regional variation in tractor size & type is noted. 3 major diff's are noted in the machines marketed in 1969 vs those in 1949: (1) all manufacturers produced more models in 1969 than in 1949; some offered twice as many; (2) power increased drastically; (3) there were much fewer small models in 1969. Some type of implements, eg, combines, increased, while others, eg, the corn picker, decreased. The trend toward self-propulsion of implements emerges as simply another facet of the thrust toward power. The US farmer now commands more sheer power than any other farm operator has ever done at any time. 13 Figures. M. Maxfield.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3102653
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60898125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3102653</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3102653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2035-3be66d135b4a31863042114eeb55ab85d0b31a3199251ae00602d34dc8870c1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwKKXlWTnKRNvZPp_GCi6ATvSpqesY411aRD5q83Y0NB8BA4F3nel8NDyCFnZwJYdg6ciVTBFulxlmcJZCLfJj3GJEt4qt52yV4IMxYnVWmP3I-nSK-WzjS1DbSd0Kf2E_0FfUaLrqNjj64KtHb0Ae3UuPrLdHXraHxdDF426GtrHB0a3-yTnYmZBzzY7D55HV6PB7fJ6PHmbnA5SqxgoBIoMU0rDqqUBrhOgUnBuUQslTKlVhUrgcefPBeKG4x3MlGBrKzWGbN8An1ysu599-3HAkNXNHWwOJ8bh-0iFCnTueZCRfDoDzhrF97F2woOjCvQICFSp2vK-jYEj5Pi3deN8cuCs2JltNgYjaT86Zuh7ZpFwN9KnYMUunhZWV9JzwRfWZYxdryOzULX-n_bvwH5xX-q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301538343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Dynamics of Power: Recent Trends in Mechanization on the American Farm</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hilliard, Sam B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Sam B.</creatorcontrib><description>A brief review &amp; analysis is presented of some of the most recent developments in agri'al machine technology in the US. Special emphasis is given to (a) the power revolution &amp; its thrust toward larger tractors &amp; (b) the increased use of self-propelled machinery. The roots of the power revolution are shown to go back to the stream era when man first began to use inanimate power for traction work. A trend toward smaller tractors began in the yrs after WWI &amp; through WWII, but the decrease in small farms in the 1950's reversed this trend then with a thrust toward higher-powered tractors. Regional variation in tractor size &amp; type is noted. 3 major diff's are noted in the machines marketed in 1969 vs those in 1949: (1) all manufacturers produced more models in 1969 than in 1949; some offered twice as many; (2) power increased drastically; (3) there were much fewer small models in 1969. Some type of implements, eg, combines, increased, while others, eg, the corn picker, decreased. The trend toward self-propulsion of implements emerges as simply another facet of the thrust toward power. The US farmer now commands more sheer power than any other farm operator has ever done at any time. 13 Figures. M. Maxfield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-165X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-3729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3102653</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TECUA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Detroit, Mich: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Agriculture/Agricultural ; Corn ; Crop harvesting ; Crops ; Engines ; Family farms ; Farm tractors ; Machinery ; Production automation ; Rural (see also Ru/Ur) ; Technology/Technological/ Technologically ; Tricycles ; United States/US ; Wheels</subject><ispartof>Technology and culture, 1972-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1972 The Society for the History of Technology</rights><rights>Copyright © The Society for the History of Technology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2035-3be66d135b4a31863042114eeb55ab85d0b31a3199251ae00602d34dc8870c1f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3102653$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3102653$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Sam B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Dynamics of Power: Recent Trends in Mechanization on the American Farm</title><title>Technology and culture</title><description>A brief review &amp; analysis is presented of some of the most recent developments in agri'al machine technology in the US. Special emphasis is given to (a) the power revolution &amp; its thrust toward larger tractors &amp; (b) the increased use of self-propelled machinery. The roots of the power revolution are shown to go back to the stream era when man first began to use inanimate power for traction work. A trend toward smaller tractors began in the yrs after WWI &amp; through WWII, but the decrease in small farms in the 1950's reversed this trend then with a thrust toward higher-powered tractors. Regional variation in tractor size &amp; type is noted. 3 major diff's are noted in the machines marketed in 1969 vs those in 1949: (1) all manufacturers produced more models in 1969 than in 1949; some offered twice as many; (2) power increased drastically; (3) there were much fewer small models in 1969. Some type of implements, eg, combines, increased, while others, eg, the corn picker, decreased. The trend toward self-propulsion of implements emerges as simply another facet of the thrust toward power. The US farmer now commands more sheer power than any other farm operator has ever done at any time. 13 Figures. M. Maxfield.</description><subject>Agriculture/Agricultural</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Engines</subject><subject>Family farms</subject><subject>Farm tractors</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Production automation</subject><subject>Rural (see also Ru/Ur)</subject><subject>Technology/Technological/ Technologically</subject><subject>Tricycles</subject><subject>United States/US</subject><subject>Wheels</subject><issn>0040-165X</issn><issn>1097-3729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwKKXlWTnKRNvZPp_GCi6ATvSpqesY411aRD5q83Y0NB8BA4F3nel8NDyCFnZwJYdg6ciVTBFulxlmcJZCLfJj3GJEt4qt52yV4IMxYnVWmP3I-nSK-WzjS1DbSd0Kf2E_0FfUaLrqNjj64KtHb0Ae3UuPrLdHXraHxdDF426GtrHB0a3-yTnYmZBzzY7D55HV6PB7fJ6PHmbnA5SqxgoBIoMU0rDqqUBrhOgUnBuUQslTKlVhUrgcefPBeKG4x3MlGBrKzWGbN8An1ysu599-3HAkNXNHWwOJ8bh-0iFCnTueZCRfDoDzhrF97F2woOjCvQICFSp2vK-jYEj5Pi3deN8cuCs2JltNgYjaT86Zuh7ZpFwN9KnYMUunhZWV9JzwRfWZYxdryOzULX-n_bvwH5xX-q</recordid><startdate>19720101</startdate><enddate>19720101</enddate><creator>Hilliard, Sam B.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><general>Wayne State University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>EGZRM</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JVXPA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OX</scope><scope>~OY</scope><scope>~OZ</scope><scope>~P.</scope><scope>~P0</scope><scope>~P1</scope><scope>~P~</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19720101</creationdate><title>The Dynamics of Power: Recent Trends in Mechanization on the American Farm</title><author>Hilliard, Sam B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2035-3be66d135b4a31863042114eeb55ab85d0b31a3199251ae00602d34dc8870c1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Agriculture/Agricultural</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Engines</topic><topic>Family farms</topic><topic>Farm tractors</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Production automation</topic><topic>Rural (see also Ru/Ur)</topic><topic>Technology/Technological/ Technologically</topic><topic>Tricycles</topic><topic>United States/US</topic><topic>Wheels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Sam B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.1</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 38</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.4</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (subscription only)</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase post Aug/2005)</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005+extra titles)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.3</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technology and culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilliard, Sam B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Dynamics of Power: Recent Trends in Mechanization on the American Farm</atitle><jtitle>Technology and culture</jtitle><date>1972-01-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>1-24</pages><issn>0040-165X</issn><eissn>1097-3729</eissn><coden>TECUA3</coden><abstract>A brief review &amp; analysis is presented of some of the most recent developments in agri'al machine technology in the US. Special emphasis is given to (a) the power revolution &amp; its thrust toward larger tractors &amp; (b) the increased use of self-propelled machinery. The roots of the power revolution are shown to go back to the stream era when man first began to use inanimate power for traction work. A trend toward smaller tractors began in the yrs after WWI &amp; through WWII, but the decrease in small farms in the 1950's reversed this trend then with a thrust toward higher-powered tractors. Regional variation in tractor size &amp; type is noted. 3 major diff's are noted in the machines marketed in 1969 vs those in 1949: (1) all manufacturers produced more models in 1969 than in 1949; some offered twice as many; (2) power increased drastically; (3) there were much fewer small models in 1969. Some type of implements, eg, combines, increased, while others, eg, the corn picker, decreased. The trend toward self-propulsion of implements emerges as simply another facet of the thrust toward power. The US farmer now commands more sheer power than any other farm operator has ever done at any time. 13 Figures. M. Maxfield.</abstract><cop>Detroit, Mich</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.2307/3102653</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-165X
ispartof Technology and culture, 1972-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-24
issn 0040-165X
1097-3729
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60898125
source Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agriculture/Agricultural
Corn
Crop harvesting
Crops
Engines
Family farms
Farm tractors
Machinery
Production automation
Rural (see also Ru/Ur)
Technology/Technological/ Technologically
Tricycles
United States/US
Wheels
title The Dynamics of Power: Recent Trends in Mechanization on the American Farm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T16%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Dynamics%20of%20Power:%20Recent%20Trends%20in%20Mechanization%20on%20the%20American%20Farm&rft.jtitle=Technology%20and%20culture&rft.au=Hilliard,%20Sam%20B.&rft.date=1972-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=1-24&rft.issn=0040-165X&rft.eissn=1097-3729&rft.coden=TECUA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3102653&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3102653%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301538343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3102653&rfr_iscdi=true