An Experiment with a Confidentiality Reminder in a Telephone Survey
The effect of a confidentiality reminder was tested during a telephone survey of the general public of a metropolitan area. One-half of the sample was administered the reminder just prior to the demographic questions; the other half of the sample did not receive the treatment. The results showed no...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public opinion quarterly 1986-07, Vol.50 (2), p.267-269 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 269 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 267 |
| container_title | Public opinion quarterly |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Frey, James H. |
| description | The effect of a confidentiality reminder was tested during a telephone survey of the general public of a metropolitan area. One-half of the sample was administered the reminder just prior to the demographic questions; the other half of the sample did not receive the treatment. The results showed no significant differences on the distribution of nonsubstantive responses between the two groups. There was some evidence that the confidentiality reminder had a negative effect on data quality. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/268980 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60897139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2748889</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2748889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68de9b093de0e6e42995e3735fd92a871d7b26cf8f162505dadd9c94b21cd8d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb9BR4CgrfofiT7cSy1tUJB1CrBy5JmJ3RrmtTdRNt_b0qkgifnMjDvwzDzIHRO8DXBkt9QLpXEB6hHYibCmDFyiHoYMxYyTpNjdOL9ErdFI9pDw0EZjDZrcHYFZR182XoRpMGwKnNr2oFNC1tvgydY2dKAC2zZpjMoYL2oSgieG_cJ21N0lKeFh7Of3kcv49FsOAmnD3f3w8E0zJigdcilATXHihnAwCGiSsXABItzo2gqBTFiTnmWy5xwGuPYpMaoTEVzSjIjTcT66Krbu3bVRwO-1ivrMyiKtISq8ZpjqQRh6h8gV4K2Svro8g-4rBpXtk9oQhWXMqJU_q7LXOW9g1yvW12p22qC9U657pS34EUHLn1duT1FRSSl3J0VdrH1NWz2cereNRdMxHqSvGmZvMrx7dOjTtg3zhCJ5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296884228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Experiment with a Confidentiality Reminder in a Telephone Survey</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Frey, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Frey, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of a confidentiality reminder was tested during a telephone survey of the general public of a metropolitan area. One-half of the sample was administered the reminder just prior to the demographic questions; the other half of the sample did not receive the treatment. The results showed no significant differences on the distribution of nonsubstantive responses between the two groups. There was some evidence that the confidentiality reminder had a negative effect on data quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-362X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/268980</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POPQAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Princeton, N.J: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Confidentiality ; Control groups ; Data quality ; Marital status ; Measurement ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Patient confidentiality ; Public opinion ; Researcher Subject Relations ; Response rates ; Responses ; Surveys ; Telephone Surveys ; Telephones ; Test</subject><ispartof>Public opinion quarterly, 1986-07, Vol.50 (2), p.267-269</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 American Association for Public Opinion Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68de9b093de0e6e42995e3735fd92a871d7b26cf8f162505dadd9c94b21cd8d43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2748889$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2748889$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frey, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>An Experiment with a Confidentiality Reminder in a Telephone Survey</title><title>Public opinion quarterly</title><description>The effect of a confidentiality reminder was tested during a telephone survey of the general public of a metropolitan area. One-half of the sample was administered the reminder just prior to the demographic questions; the other half of the sample did not receive the treatment. The results showed no significant differences on the distribution of nonsubstantive responses between the two groups. There was some evidence that the confidentiality reminder had a negative effect on data quality.</description><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Patient confidentiality</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Researcher Subject Relations</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Telephone Surveys</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><subject>Test</subject><issn>0033-362X</issn><issn>1537-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb9BR4CgrfofiT7cSy1tUJB1CrBy5JmJ3RrmtTdRNt_b0qkgifnMjDvwzDzIHRO8DXBkt9QLpXEB6hHYibCmDFyiHoYMxYyTpNjdOL9ErdFI9pDw0EZjDZrcHYFZR182XoRpMGwKnNr2oFNC1tvgydY2dKAC2zZpjMoYL2oSgieG_cJ21N0lKeFh7Of3kcv49FsOAmnD3f3w8E0zJigdcilATXHihnAwCGiSsXABItzo2gqBTFiTnmWy5xwGuPYpMaoTEVzSjIjTcT66Krbu3bVRwO-1ivrMyiKtISq8ZpjqQRh6h8gV4K2Svro8g-4rBpXtk9oQhWXMqJU_q7LXOW9g1yvW12p22qC9U657pS34EUHLn1duT1FRSSl3J0VdrH1NWz2cereNRdMxHqSvGmZvMrx7dOjTtg3zhCJ5g</recordid><startdate>19860701</startdate><enddate>19860701</enddate><creator>Frey, James H.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Public Opinion Quarterly, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860701</creationdate><title>An Experiment with a Confidentiality Reminder in a Telephone Survey</title><author>Frey, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68de9b093de0e6e42995e3735fd92a871d7b26cf8f162505dadd9c94b21cd8d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Patient confidentiality</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Researcher Subject Relations</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Telephone Surveys</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><topic>Test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frey, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public opinion quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frey, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Experiment with a Confidentiality Reminder in a Telephone Survey</atitle><jtitle>Public opinion quarterly</jtitle><date>1986-07-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>267-269</pages><issn>0033-362X</issn><eissn>1537-5331</eissn><coden>POPQAE</coden><abstract>The effect of a confidentiality reminder was tested during a telephone survey of the general public of a metropolitan area. One-half of the sample was administered the reminder just prior to the demographic questions; the other half of the sample did not receive the treatment. The results showed no significant differences on the distribution of nonsubstantive responses between the two groups. There was some evidence that the confidentiality reminder had a negative effect on data quality.</abstract><cop>Princeton, N.J</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1086/268980</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-362X |
| ispartof | Public opinion quarterly, 1986-07, Vol.50 (2), p.267-269 |
| issn | 0033-362X 1537-5331 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60897139 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford University Press Archive; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Confidentiality Control groups Data quality Marital status Measurement Methodology (Data Collection) Patient confidentiality Public opinion Researcher Subject Relations Response rates Responses Surveys Telephone Surveys Telephones Test |
| title | An Experiment with a Confidentiality Reminder in a Telephone Survey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A41%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Experiment%20with%20a%20Confidentiality%20Reminder%20in%20a%20Telephone%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Public%20opinion%20quarterly&rft.au=Frey,%20James%20H.&rft.date=1986-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=267-269&rft.issn=0033-362X&rft.eissn=1537-5331&rft.coden=POPQAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/268980&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2748889%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296884228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2748889&rfr_iscdi=true |