Attitudes of Active Duty U.S. Air Force Personnel Toward Military Unionization
In the spring of 1976, a sixty-five-item questionnaire was distributed probing the issues related to the unionization of US military personnel. A total of 938 randomly selected US Air Force officers & enlisted personnel completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained biographic & no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Armed forces and society 1977-07, Vol.3 (4), p.557-574 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 574 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 557 |
container_title | Armed forces and society |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | MANLEY, T. ROGER McNICHOLS, CHARLES W. YOUNG, G.C. SAUL |
description | In the spring of 1976, a sixty-five-item questionnaire was distributed probing the issues related to the unionization of US military personnel. A total of 938 randomly selected US Air Force officers & enlisted personnel completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained biographic & nonbiographic questions. The majority of nonbiographic items were presented as positive or negative statements & accompanied by seven-point Likert scales. The primary analysis centers upon who is most likely to join a military union. Overall, 33% of the Rs expressed positive intent about joining a union, 31% were undecided, & 36% stated they would not join. Stepwise, multiple linear regressions were performed. Five predictor variables explained almost 70% of the variance in the responses to the criterion variable. The military member who is most likely to join a military union would: (1) believe that a military union will have no effect, or a positive effect, on the ability of the Air Force to perform its mission, (2) perceive a need for third-party representation in dealings with the Air Force, (3) believe that a military union could solve problems which an individual, on his own, could not, (4) believe that a military union could improve working conditions, & (5) believe that a military union would not impair supervisor-subordinate relations. Tabular displays are presented summarizing R replies to significant biographic & attitudinal items. Rs reported significant dissatisfaction with economic & benefits issues & they perceived that unions could effectively intercede with the Congress & military leadership on their behalf. Unionization of the US military is still a number of years in the future, if it occurs at all. A more likely development would be the formation of a highly patriotic & activist organization which aggressively pursues national-defense issues & champions the cause of military personnel. 8 Tables. Modified AA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0095327X7700300402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60878844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45346035</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0095327X7700300402</sage_id><sourcerecordid>45346035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-de38568be927b650b745e5c6bed250d43c0a719cac47886e9bbd688d55c9ad9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtrGzEURkVpIK7bP5CVICS7sa_emqVx6jSQNoE40N2g0chFZjJyJE1D--sr4yxCAunqbs757guhEwIzQpSaA9SCUfVTKQAGwIF-QBMihKxAc_0RTfZAtSeO0aeUtgBAgJIJ-rHI2eexcwmHDV7Y7H87fDHmP_h-djfDCx_xKkTr8K2LKQyD6_E6PJnY4e--99nEAg4-DP6vyaV8Rkcb0yf35blO0f3q63r5rbq-ubxaLq4ryyjNVeeYFlK3rqaqlQJaxYUTVrauowI6ziwYRWprLFdaS1e3bSe17oSwtenqDZui80PuLobH0aXcPPhkXd-bwYUxNRJ0ETn_Lyh0XSZRqoCnr8BtGONQlmgIrZVmVBJWKHqgbAwpRbdpdtE_lCs0BJr9J5q3nyjS_CAl88u9iH3PODsY25RDfNmDMlANF4xLYIL9A3wKkwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297832613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes of Active Duty U.S. Air Force Personnel Toward Military Unionization</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>MANLEY, T. ROGER ; McNICHOLS, CHARLES W. ; YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</creator><creatorcontrib>MANLEY, T. ROGER ; McNICHOLS, CHARLES W. ; YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[In the spring of 1976, a sixty-five-item questionnaire was distributed probing the issues related to the unionization of US military personnel. A total of 938 randomly selected US Air Force officers & enlisted personnel completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained biographic & nonbiographic questions. The majority of nonbiographic items were presented as positive or negative statements & accompanied by seven-point Likert scales. The primary analysis centers upon who is most likely to join a military union. Overall, 33% of the Rs expressed positive intent about joining a union, 31% were undecided, & 36% stated they would not join. Stepwise, multiple linear regressions were performed. Five predictor variables explained almost 70% of the variance in the responses to the criterion variable. The military member who is most likely to join a military union would: (1) believe that a military union will have no effect, or a positive effect, on the ability of the Air Force to perform its mission, (2) perceive a need for third-party representation in dealings with the Air Force, (3) believe that a military union could solve problems which an individual, on his own, could not, (4) believe that a military union could improve working conditions, & (5) believe that a military union would not impair supervisor-subordinate relations. Tabular displays are presented summarizing R replies to significant biographic & attitudinal items. Rs reported significant dissatisfaction with economic & benefits issues & they perceived that unions could effectively intercede with the Congress & military leadership on their behalf. Unionization of the US military is still a number of years in the future, if it occurs at all. A more likely development would be the formation of a highly patriotic & activist organization which aggressively pursues national-defense issues & champions the cause of military personnel. 8 Tables. Modified AA.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-327X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0848</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0095327X7700300402</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFSOD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces & Society</publisher><subject>Air force ; Armed forces ; Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists ; Service men ; Trade unions ; Unionized/Unionization ; United States ; United States/US</subject><ispartof>Armed forces and society, 1977-07, Vol.3 (4), p.557-574</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1977 Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-de38568be927b650b745e5c6bed250d43c0a719cac47886e9bbd688d55c9ad9f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45346035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45346035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,21800,27846,27850,27905,27906,33756,43602,43603,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANLEY, T. ROGER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNICHOLS, CHARLES W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes of Active Duty U.S. Air Force Personnel Toward Military Unionization</title><title>Armed forces and society</title><description><![CDATA[In the spring of 1976, a sixty-five-item questionnaire was distributed probing the issues related to the unionization of US military personnel. A total of 938 randomly selected US Air Force officers & enlisted personnel completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained biographic & nonbiographic questions. The majority of nonbiographic items were presented as positive or negative statements & accompanied by seven-point Likert scales. The primary analysis centers upon who is most likely to join a military union. Overall, 33% of the Rs expressed positive intent about joining a union, 31% were undecided, & 36% stated they would not join. Stepwise, multiple linear regressions were performed. Five predictor variables explained almost 70% of the variance in the responses to the criterion variable. The military member who is most likely to join a military union would: (1) believe that a military union will have no effect, or a positive effect, on the ability of the Air Force to perform its mission, (2) perceive a need for third-party representation in dealings with the Air Force, (3) believe that a military union could solve problems which an individual, on his own, could not, (4) believe that a military union could improve working conditions, & (5) believe that a military union would not impair supervisor-subordinate relations. Tabular displays are presented summarizing R replies to significant biographic & attitudinal items. Rs reported significant dissatisfaction with economic & benefits issues & they perceived that unions could effectively intercede with the Congress & military leadership on their behalf. Unionization of the US military is still a number of years in the future, if it occurs at all. A more likely development would be the formation of a highly patriotic & activist organization which aggressively pursues national-defense issues & champions the cause of military personnel. 8 Tables. Modified AA.]]></description><subject>Air force</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists</subject><subject>Service men</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><subject>Unionized/Unionization</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States/US</subject><issn>0095-327X</issn><issn>1556-0848</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtrGzEURkVpIK7bP5CVICS7sa_emqVx6jSQNoE40N2g0chFZjJyJE1D--sr4yxCAunqbs757guhEwIzQpSaA9SCUfVTKQAGwIF-QBMihKxAc_0RTfZAtSeO0aeUtgBAgJIJ-rHI2eexcwmHDV7Y7H87fDHmP_h-djfDCx_xKkTr8K2LKQyD6_E6PJnY4e--99nEAg4-DP6vyaV8Rkcb0yf35blO0f3q63r5rbq-ubxaLq4ryyjNVeeYFlK3rqaqlQJaxYUTVrauowI6ziwYRWprLFdaS1e3bSe17oSwtenqDZui80PuLobH0aXcPPhkXd-bwYUxNRJ0ETn_Lyh0XSZRqoCnr8BtGONQlmgIrZVmVBJWKHqgbAwpRbdpdtE_lCs0BJr9J5q3nyjS_CAl88u9iH3PODsY25RDfNmDMlANF4xLYIL9A3wKkwY</recordid><startdate>197707</startdate><enddate>197707</enddate><creator>MANLEY, T. ROGER</creator><creator>McNICHOLS, CHARLES W.</creator><creator>YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</creator><general>Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces & Society</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197707</creationdate><title>Attitudes of Active Duty U.S. Air Force Personnel Toward Military Unionization</title><author>MANLEY, T. ROGER ; McNICHOLS, CHARLES W. ; YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-de38568be927b650b745e5c6bed250d43c0a719cac47886e9bbd688d55c9ad9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Air force</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists</topic><topic>Service men</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><topic>Unionized/Unionization</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States/US</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANLEY, T. ROGER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNICHOLS, CHARLES W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Armed forces and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANLEY, T. ROGER</au><au>McNICHOLS, CHARLES W.</au><au>YOUNG, G.C. SAUL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes of Active Duty U.S. Air Force Personnel Toward Military Unionization</atitle><jtitle>Armed forces and society</jtitle><date>1977-07</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>574</epage><pages>557-574</pages><issn>0095-327X</issn><eissn>1556-0848</eissn><coden>AFSOD2</coden><abstract><![CDATA[In the spring of 1976, a sixty-five-item questionnaire was distributed probing the issues related to the unionization of US military personnel. A total of 938 randomly selected US Air Force officers & enlisted personnel completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained biographic & nonbiographic questions. The majority of nonbiographic items were presented as positive or negative statements & accompanied by seven-point Likert scales. The primary analysis centers upon who is most likely to join a military union. Overall, 33% of the Rs expressed positive intent about joining a union, 31% were undecided, & 36% stated they would not join. Stepwise, multiple linear regressions were performed. Five predictor variables explained almost 70% of the variance in the responses to the criterion variable. The military member who is most likely to join a military union would: (1) believe that a military union will have no effect, or a positive effect, on the ability of the Air Force to perform its mission, (2) perceive a need for third-party representation in dealings with the Air Force, (3) believe that a military union could solve problems which an individual, on his own, could not, (4) believe that a military union could improve working conditions, & (5) believe that a military union would not impair supervisor-subordinate relations. Tabular displays are presented summarizing R replies to significant biographic & attitudinal items. Rs reported significant dissatisfaction with economic & benefits issues & they perceived that unions could effectively intercede with the Congress & military leadership on their behalf. Unionization of the US military is still a number of years in the future, if it occurs at all. A more likely development would be the formation of a highly patriotic & activist organization which aggressively pursues national-defense issues & champions the cause of military personnel. 8 Tables. Modified AA.]]></abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces & Society</pub><doi>10.1177/0095327X7700300402</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-327X |
ispartof | Armed forces and society, 1977-07, Vol.3 (4), p.557-574 |
issn | 0095-327X 1556-0848 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60878844 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Air force Armed forces Military/Militarism/Militarization/ Militarist/ Militarists Service men Trade unions Unionized/Unionization United States United States/US |
title | Attitudes of Active Duty U.S. Air Force Personnel Toward Military Unionization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A19%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20of%20Active%20Duty%20U.S.%20Air%20Force%20Personnel%20Toward%20Military%20Unionization&rft.jtitle=Armed%20forces%20and%20society&rft.au=MANLEY,%20T.%20ROGER&rft.date=1977-07&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=574&rft.pages=557-574&rft.issn=0095-327X&rft.eissn=1556-0848&rft.coden=AFSOD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0095327X7700300402&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45346035%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297832613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45346035&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0095327X7700300402&rfr_iscdi=true |