On the Concept of Face

The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sociology 1976-01, Vol.81 (4), p.867-884
1. Verfasser: Ho, David Yau-fai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 884
container_issue 4
container_start_page 867
container_title The American journal of sociology
container_volume 81
creator Ho, David Yau-fai
description The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/226145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60871073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2777600</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2777600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-7b9f41f18a4828127a1af068b566c70e0c530bbf809f3af04fcb89bb953bdbef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjz1PwzAURS0EEqHAyMSQiS3wnh1_jSiigFSpC8yWbWzRKo2DnQ78e4pSwXR1dY-udAi5RrhHUOKBUoEtPyEVciYbzjSckgoAaKMF0HNyUcr2UAGBVuRmPdTTZ6i7NPgwTnWK9dL6cEnOou1LuDrmgrwvn966l2a1fn7tHleNp8CnRjodW4yobKuoQiot2ghCOS6ElxDAcwbORQU6ssPSRu-Udk5z5j5ciGxB7ubfMaevfSiT2W2KD31vh5D2xQhQEkGyf9DnVEoO0Yx5s7P52yCYX20zax_A2xnclinlP4pKKQUA-wFXtk_6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60871073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Concept of Face</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ho, David Yau-fai</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, David Yau-fai</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/226145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSOAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Behavior/Behavioral ; Dictionaries ; Formal authority ; Guilt ; Judgment ; Liens ; Prestige ; Respect ; Shame ; Social interaction ; Social sciences ; Status/Statuses</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sociology, 1976-01, Vol.81 (4), p.867-884</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1976 The University of Chicago</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-7b9f41f18a4828127a1af068b566c70e0c530bbf809f3af04fcb89bb953bdbef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2777600$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2777600$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, David Yau-fai</creatorcontrib><title>On the Concept of Face</title><title>The American journal of sociology</title><description>The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.</description><subject>Behavior/Behavioral</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Formal authority</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Liens</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Respect</subject><subject>Shame</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Status/Statuses</subject><issn>0002-9602</issn><issn>1537-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFjz1PwzAURS0EEqHAyMSQiS3wnh1_jSiigFSpC8yWbWzRKo2DnQ78e4pSwXR1dY-udAi5RrhHUOKBUoEtPyEVciYbzjSckgoAaKMF0HNyUcr2UAGBVuRmPdTTZ6i7NPgwTnWK9dL6cEnOou1LuDrmgrwvn966l2a1fn7tHleNp8CnRjodW4yobKuoQiot2ghCOS6ElxDAcwbORQU6ssPSRu-Udk5z5j5ciGxB7ubfMaevfSiT2W2KD31vh5D2xQhQEkGyf9DnVEoO0Yx5s7P52yCYX20zax_A2xnclinlP4pKKQUA-wFXtk_6</recordid><startdate>19760101</startdate><enddate>19760101</enddate><creator>Ho, David Yau-fai</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760101</creationdate><title>On the Concept of Face</title><author>Ho, David Yau-fai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-7b9f41f18a4828127a1af068b566c70e0c530bbf809f3af04fcb89bb953bdbef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Behavior/Behavioral</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Formal authority</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Liens</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Respect</topic><topic>Shame</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Status/Statuses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, David Yau-fai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, David Yau-fai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Concept of Face</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle><date>1976-01-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>884</epage><pages>867-884</pages><issn>0002-9602</issn><eissn>1537-5390</eissn><coden>AJSOAR</coden><abstract>The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/226145</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9602
ispartof The American journal of sociology, 1976-01, Vol.81 (4), p.867-884
issn 0002-9602
1537-5390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60871073
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Behavior/Behavioral
Dictionaries
Formal authority
Guilt
Judgment
Liens
Prestige
Respect
Shame
Social interaction
Social sciences
Status/Statuses
title On the Concept of Face
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Concept%20of%20Face&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Ho,%20David%20Yau-fai&rft.date=1976-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=884&rft.pages=867-884&rft.issn=0002-9602&rft.eissn=1537-5390&rft.coden=AJSOAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/226145&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2777600%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60871073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2777600&rfr_iscdi=true