On the Concept of Face
The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sociology 1976-01, Vol.81 (4), p.867-884 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 884 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 867 |
container_title | The American journal of sociology |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Ho, David Yau-fai |
description | The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/226145 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60871073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2777600</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2777600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-7b9f41f18a4828127a1af068b566c70e0c530bbf809f3af04fcb89bb953bdbef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjz1PwzAURS0EEqHAyMSQiS3wnh1_jSiigFSpC8yWbWzRKo2DnQ78e4pSwXR1dY-udAi5RrhHUOKBUoEtPyEVciYbzjSckgoAaKMF0HNyUcr2UAGBVuRmPdTTZ6i7NPgwTnWK9dL6cEnOou1LuDrmgrwvn966l2a1fn7tHleNp8CnRjodW4yobKuoQiot2ghCOS6ElxDAcwbORQU6ssPSRu-Udk5z5j5ciGxB7ubfMaevfSiT2W2KD31vh5D2xQhQEkGyf9DnVEoO0Yx5s7P52yCYX20zax_A2xnclinlP4pKKQUA-wFXtk_6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60871073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Concept of Face</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ho, David Yau-fai</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, David Yau-fai</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/226145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSOAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Behavior/Behavioral ; Dictionaries ; Formal authority ; Guilt ; Judgment ; Liens ; Prestige ; Respect ; Shame ; Social interaction ; Social sciences ; Status/Statuses</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sociology, 1976-01, Vol.81 (4), p.867-884</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1976 The University of Chicago</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-7b9f41f18a4828127a1af068b566c70e0c530bbf809f3af04fcb89bb953bdbef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2777600$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2777600$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, David Yau-fai</creatorcontrib><title>On the Concept of Face</title><title>The American journal of sociology</title><description>The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.</description><subject>Behavior/Behavioral</subject><subject>Dictionaries</subject><subject>Formal authority</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Liens</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Respect</subject><subject>Shame</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Status/Statuses</subject><issn>0002-9602</issn><issn>1537-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFjz1PwzAURS0EEqHAyMSQiS3wnh1_jSiigFSpC8yWbWzRKo2DnQ78e4pSwXR1dY-udAi5RrhHUOKBUoEtPyEVciYbzjSckgoAaKMF0HNyUcr2UAGBVuRmPdTTZ6i7NPgwTnWK9dL6cEnOou1LuDrmgrwvn966l2a1fn7tHleNp8CnRjodW4yobKuoQiot2ghCOS6ElxDAcwbORQU6ssPSRu-Udk5z5j5ciGxB7ubfMaevfSiT2W2KD31vh5D2xQhQEkGyf9DnVEoO0Yx5s7P52yCYX20zax_A2xnclinlP4pKKQUA-wFXtk_6</recordid><startdate>19760101</startdate><enddate>19760101</enddate><creator>Ho, David Yau-fai</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760101</creationdate><title>On the Concept of Face</title><author>Ho, David Yau-fai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-7b9f41f18a4828127a1af068b566c70e0c530bbf809f3af04fcb89bb953bdbef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Behavior/Behavioral</topic><topic>Dictionaries</topic><topic>Formal authority</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Liens</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Respect</topic><topic>Shame</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Status/Statuses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, David Yau-fai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, David Yau-fai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Concept of Face</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle><date>1976-01-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>884</epage><pages>867-884</pages><issn>0002-9602</issn><eissn>1537-5390</eissn><coden>AJSOAR</coden><abstract>The concept of face is clarified and distinguihed from other closely related constructs: authority, standards of behavior, personality, status, dignity, honor, and prestige. The claim to face may rest on the basis of status, whether ascribed or achieved, and on personal or nonpersonal factors; it may also vary according to the group with which a person is interacting. Basic differences are found between the processes involved in gaining versus losing face. While it is not a necessity for one to strive to gain face, losing face is a serious matter which will, in varying degrees, affect one's ability to function effectively in society. Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies. In contrast to the ideology of individualism, the question of face frequently arises beyond the realm of individual responsibility and subjective volition. Reciprocity is inherent in face behavior, wherein a mutually restrictive, even coercive, power is exerted upon each member of the social network. It is argued that face behavior is universal and that face should be utilized as a construct of central importance in the social sciences.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/226145</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9602 |
ispartof | The American journal of sociology, 1976-01, Vol.81 (4), p.867-884 |
issn | 0002-9602 1537-5390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60871073 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Behavior/Behavioral Dictionaries Formal authority Guilt Judgment Liens Prestige Respect Shame Social interaction Social sciences Status/Statuses |
title | On the Concept of Face |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Concept%20of%20Face&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Ho,%20David%20Yau-fai&rft.date=1976-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=884&rft.pages=867-884&rft.issn=0002-9602&rft.eissn=1537-5390&rft.coden=AJSOAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/226145&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2777600%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60871073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2777600&rfr_iscdi=true |