THE DIVISION OF LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: CROSS-NATIONAL EVIDENCE
A review of writings by E. Durkheim, K. Marx & A. Smith suggests that the DofL & technological development lead to expanded education. Using 1960 data for 29 countries from UN publications, rank-order correlations (Kendall's Tau & Spearman's r) are examined. Age-specific school...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science quarterly 1974-09, Vol.55 (2), p.297-309 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 309 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | Social science quarterly |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | GRANDJEAN, BURKE D. |
description | A review of writings by E. Durkheim, K. Marx & A. Smith suggests that the DofL & technological development lead to expanded education. Using 1960 data for 29 countries from UN publications, rank-order correlations (Kendall's Tau & Spearman's r) are examined. Age-specific school attendance rates corresponding to primary, secondary, & advanced education are shown to correlate positively with J. P. Gibbs & W. T. Martin's measures of DofL & technological development--namely LF dispersion among industries, & annual per capita consumption of inanimate energy, respectively (see SA 11:4/63A5121). Further analysis, involving Kendall's rank-order partial correlation, indicates that the effect of technology on primary & secondary education is mediated by the DofL, & that advanced education is associated only weakly or not at all with technology & the DofL when the effects of lower educational levels are controlled. These results are therefore consistent with the position, shared by Smith, Marx & Durkheim, that primary & secondary education are fostered to meet the demands for social consensus & vocational skills imposed by economic development, & that technology is antecedent to the DofL. On the other hand, advanced education apparently bears little relationship to either technology or the DofL--a finding contrary not only to the 3 classical theorists discussed, but also to the emphasis on advanced education in most recent treatments of economic development. AA. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60864173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42859363</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42859363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j1123-22d729cd0e538a279ce0da45ee4817252937c8c685890a8ef5b0d40e625f7c283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzk1Lw0AYBOBFFKzVnyAsCJ4a2H3321tMtjYQEmjTgqcQky00tE3NNof-e4P15GkYeBjmBk2o4CSQwNQtmhDCdMANp_fowfuWEMKB6wlKioXFcbJJVkme4XyO0_A9X85wYaNFlqf5x-cMh1mMbbyOwmI0bzha5qtVkP22MMV2k8Q2i-wjuttWe--e_nKK1nNbRItgHEmiMA1aSoEFAI0CUzfECaYrUKZ2pKm4cI5rqkCAYarWtdRCG1JptxVfpOHESRBbVYNmU_R63T313ffg_Lk87Hzt9vvq6LrBl5JoyaliI3z5B9tu6I_jt5KCoVJzqc2onq-q9eeuL0_97lD1l5KDFoZJxn4ANlBX6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291684689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE DIVISION OF LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: CROSS-NATIONAL EVIDENCE</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</creator><creatorcontrib>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[A review of writings by E. Durkheim, K. Marx & A. Smith suggests that the DofL & technological development lead to expanded education. Using 1960 data for 29 countries from UN publications, rank-order correlations (Kendall's Tau & Spearman's r) are examined. Age-specific school attendance rates corresponding to primary, secondary, & advanced education are shown to correlate positively with J. P. Gibbs & W. T. Martin's measures of DofL & technological development--namely LF dispersion among industries, & annual per capita consumption of inanimate energy, respectively (see SA 11:4/63A5121). Further analysis, involving Kendall's rank-order partial correlation, indicates that the effect of technology on primary & secondary education is mediated by the DofL, & that advanced education is associated only weakly or not at all with technology & the DofL when the effects of lower educational levels are controlled. These results are therefore consistent with the position, shared by Smith, Marx & Durkheim, that primary & secondary education are fostered to meet the demands for social consensus & vocational skills imposed by economic development, & that technology is antecedent to the DofL. On the other hand, advanced education apparently bears little relationship to either technology or the DofL--a finding contrary not only to the 3 classical theorists discussed, but also to the emphasis on advanced education in most recent treatments of economic development. AA.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSQTAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, Tex: Southwestern Social Science Association and The University of Texas at Austin</publisher><subject>Appropriate technology ; Division of labor ; Economic development ; Education ; Education/Educational/Educator/ Educators/ Educationally ; Educational demand ; Higher education ; IDL lipoproteins ; Labor/Labors ; Primary education ; Secondary education ; Technology ; Technology/Technological/ Technologically</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 1974-09, Vol.55 (2), p.297-309</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1974 Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42859363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42859363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</creatorcontrib><title>THE DIVISION OF LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: CROSS-NATIONAL EVIDENCE</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><description><![CDATA[A review of writings by E. Durkheim, K. Marx & A. Smith suggests that the DofL & technological development lead to expanded education. Using 1960 data for 29 countries from UN publications, rank-order correlations (Kendall's Tau & Spearman's r) are examined. Age-specific school attendance rates corresponding to primary, secondary, & advanced education are shown to correlate positively with J. P. Gibbs & W. T. Martin's measures of DofL & technological development--namely LF dispersion among industries, & annual per capita consumption of inanimate energy, respectively (see SA 11:4/63A5121). Further analysis, involving Kendall's rank-order partial correlation, indicates that the effect of technology on primary & secondary education is mediated by the DofL, & that advanced education is associated only weakly or not at all with technology & the DofL when the effects of lower educational levels are controlled. These results are therefore consistent with the position, shared by Smith, Marx & Durkheim, that primary & secondary education are fostered to meet the demands for social consensus & vocational skills imposed by economic development, & that technology is antecedent to the DofL. On the other hand, advanced education apparently bears little relationship to either technology or the DofL--a finding contrary not only to the 3 classical theorists discussed, but also to the emphasis on advanced education in most recent treatments of economic development. AA.]]></description><subject>Appropriate technology</subject><subject>Division of labor</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education/Educational/Educator/ Educators/ Educationally</subject><subject>Educational demand</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>IDL lipoproteins</subject><subject>Labor/Labors</subject><subject>Primary education</subject><subject>Secondary education</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology/Technological/ Technologically</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzk1Lw0AYBOBFFKzVnyAsCJ4a2H3321tMtjYQEmjTgqcQky00tE3NNof-e4P15GkYeBjmBk2o4CSQwNQtmhDCdMANp_fowfuWEMKB6wlKioXFcbJJVkme4XyO0_A9X85wYaNFlqf5x-cMh1mMbbyOwmI0bzha5qtVkP22MMV2k8Q2i-wjuttWe--e_nKK1nNbRItgHEmiMA1aSoEFAI0CUzfECaYrUKZ2pKm4cI5rqkCAYarWtdRCG1JptxVfpOHESRBbVYNmU_R63T313ffg_Lk87Hzt9vvq6LrBl5JoyaliI3z5B9tu6I_jt5KCoVJzqc2onq-q9eeuL0_97lD1l5KDFoZJxn4ANlBX6w</recordid><startdate>19740901</startdate><enddate>19740901</enddate><creator>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</creator><general>Southwestern Social Science Association and The University of Texas at Austin</general><general>University of Texas Press, in cooperation with the Southwestern Social Science Association</general><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PN</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19740901</creationdate><title>THE DIVISION OF LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: CROSS-NATIONAL EVIDENCE</title><author>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j1123-22d729cd0e538a279ce0da45ee4817252937c8c685890a8ef5b0d40e625f7c283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Appropriate technology</topic><topic>Division of labor</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education/Educational/Educator/ Educators/ Educationally</topic><topic>Educational demand</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>IDL lipoproteins</topic><topic>Labor/Labors</topic><topic>Primary education</topic><topic>Secondary education</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology/Technological/ Technologically</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GRANDJEAN, BURKE D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE DIVISION OF LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: CROSS-NATIONAL EVIDENCE</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><date>1974-09-01</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>297-309</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><coden>SSQTAL</coden><abstract><![CDATA[A review of writings by E. Durkheim, K. Marx & A. Smith suggests that the DofL & technological development lead to expanded education. Using 1960 data for 29 countries from UN publications, rank-order correlations (Kendall's Tau & Spearman's r) are examined. Age-specific school attendance rates corresponding to primary, secondary, & advanced education are shown to correlate positively with J. P. Gibbs & W. T. Martin's measures of DofL & technological development--namely LF dispersion among industries, & annual per capita consumption of inanimate energy, respectively (see SA 11:4/63A5121). Further analysis, involving Kendall's rank-order partial correlation, indicates that the effect of technology on primary & secondary education is mediated by the DofL, & that advanced education is associated only weakly or not at all with technology & the DofL when the effects of lower educational levels are controlled. These results are therefore consistent with the position, shared by Smith, Marx & Durkheim, that primary & secondary education are fostered to meet the demands for social consensus & vocational skills imposed by economic development, & that technology is antecedent to the DofL. On the other hand, advanced education apparently bears little relationship to either technology or the DofL--a finding contrary not only to the 3 classical theorists discussed, but also to the emphasis on advanced education in most recent treatments of economic development. AA.]]></abstract><cop>Austin, Tex</cop><pub>Southwestern Social Science Association and The University of Texas at Austin</pub><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-4941 |
ispartof | Social science quarterly, 1974-09, Vol.55 (2), p.297-309 |
issn | 0038-4941 1540-6237 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60864173 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Appropriate technology Division of labor Economic development Education Education/Educational/Educator/ Educators/ Educationally Educational demand Higher education IDL lipoproteins Labor/Labors Primary education Secondary education Technology Technology/Technological/ Technologically |
title | THE DIVISION OF LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: CROSS-NATIONAL EVIDENCE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A22%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20DIVISION%20OF%20LABOR,%20TECHNOLOGY,%20AND%20EDUCATION:%20CROSS-NATIONAL%20EVIDENCE&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=GRANDJEAN,%20BURKE%20D.&rft.date=1974-09-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=297-309&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft.coden=SSQTAL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42859363%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291684689&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42859363&rfr_iscdi=true |