THE DIALECTIC OF CONFUCIANISM AND TAOISM IN ANCIENT CHINA
A dialectical analysis of the opposition between Confucianism & Taoism in ancient China is conducted, focusing on four levels of relationship: the philosophical, the religious, the political, & the SE. The philosophical conflict is based on Confucianism's humanism, utilitarianism, &...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dialectical anthropology 1977-08, Vol.2 (3), p.175-198, Article 175 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 198 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 175 |
| container_title | Dialectical anthropology |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Freiberg, J.W. |
| description | A dialectical analysis of the opposition between Confucianism & Taoism in ancient China is conducted, focusing on four levels of relationship: the philosophical, the religious, the political, & the SE. The philosophical conflict is based on Confucianism's humanism, utilitarianism, & ethical emphasis on order, as opposed to Taoism's naturalistic mysticism. This extends to the religious domain, where the Confucian religion was formalistic, humanistic, & oriented to this world, while Taoist religion was spiritualistic, naturalistic, & other-world oriented. Politically, the social system guaranteed that administrators & government officials were Confucians. The Taoists tended toward anarchy & refused to participate in state affairs. Thus, the Confucians were the bureaucrats, the wealthy land owners, & the upwardly mobile, while the Taoists, looking back to the classless society of prefeudal China, were antihierarchical & often associated with rebellions. 1 Table. M. Migalski. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00249484 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60856243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29789901</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29789901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2bd85f99a45d53bdcbd3c1577102e11dce99fbe317253b3690759cacc4495d1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVi3chIHgQorNfSeYYt4ldqMnB9BySzQZa2kaz7cF_75aKgqeZYR6GlyHklsITBYifX3IAJlAk4oxMqIx5CHESnZMJcBChAGSX5Mq5NQBQKqIJwWqeBTOdLjJVaRWUeaDKIl8qnRb6_S1Ii1lQpeWx1YWflM6KKlBzXaTX5KJvNs7e_NQpWeZZpebhonzVKl2EhlO2D1nbJbJHbITsJG8703bc-GQxBWYp7YxF7FvLacz8mkcIsUTTGCMEyo42fEoeTnc_xuHzYN2-3q6csZtNs7PDwdURJDJignt4_w-uh8O489lqypAiZ0wyrx5PyoyDc6Pt649xtW3Gr5pCffxh_fdDj-9OeO32w_grGcYJIlD-DbtDZSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291932252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE DIALECTIC OF CONFUCIANISM AND TAOISM IN ANCIENT CHINA</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Freiberg, J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freiberg, J.W.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[A dialectical analysis of the opposition between Confucianism & Taoism in ancient China is conducted, focusing on four levels of relationship: the philosophical, the religious, the political, & the SE. The philosophical conflict is based on Confucianism's humanism, utilitarianism, & ethical emphasis on order, as opposed to Taoism's naturalistic mysticism. This extends to the religious domain, where the Confucian religion was formalistic, humanistic, & oriented to this world, while Taoist religion was spiritualistic, naturalistic, & other-world oriented. Politically, the social system guaranteed that administrators & government officials were Confucians. The Taoists tended toward anarchy & refused to participate in state affairs. Thus, the Confucians were the bureaucrats, the wealthy land owners, & the upwardly mobile, while the Taoists, looking back to the classless society of prefeudal China, were antihierarchical & often associated with rebellions. 1 Table. M. Migalski.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00249484</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DIANDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Ancient times ; Buddhism ; China/Chinese ; Chinese culture ; Chinese history ; Confucianism ; Confucius/Confucian/ Confucianism ; Dialectic ; Emperors ; Philosophical Taoism ; Rebellion ; Religion ; Taoism</subject><ispartof>Dialectical anthropology, 1977-08, Vol.2 (3), p.175-198, Article 175</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1977 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2bd85f99a45d53bdcbd3c1577102e11dce99fbe317253b3690759cacc4495d1a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29789901$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29789901$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,33774,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freiberg, J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>THE DIALECTIC OF CONFUCIANISM AND TAOISM IN ANCIENT CHINA</title><title>Dialectical anthropology</title><description><![CDATA[A dialectical analysis of the opposition between Confucianism & Taoism in ancient China is conducted, focusing on four levels of relationship: the philosophical, the religious, the political, & the SE. The philosophical conflict is based on Confucianism's humanism, utilitarianism, & ethical emphasis on order, as opposed to Taoism's naturalistic mysticism. This extends to the religious domain, where the Confucian religion was formalistic, humanistic, & oriented to this world, while Taoist religion was spiritualistic, naturalistic, & other-world oriented. Politically, the social system guaranteed that administrators & government officials were Confucians. The Taoists tended toward anarchy & refused to participate in state affairs. Thus, the Confucians were the bureaucrats, the wealthy land owners, & the upwardly mobile, while the Taoists, looking back to the classless society of prefeudal China, were antihierarchical & often associated with rebellions. 1 Table. M. Migalski.]]></description><subject>Ancient times</subject><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>China/Chinese</subject><subject>Chinese culture</subject><subject>Chinese history</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Confucius/Confucian/ Confucianism</subject><subject>Dialectic</subject><subject>Emperors</subject><subject>Philosophical Taoism</subject><subject>Rebellion</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Taoism</subject><issn>0304-4092</issn><issn>1573-0786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVi3chIHgQorNfSeYYt4ldqMnB9BySzQZa2kaz7cF_75aKgqeZYR6GlyHklsITBYifX3IAJlAk4oxMqIx5CHESnZMJcBChAGSX5Mq5NQBQKqIJwWqeBTOdLjJVaRWUeaDKIl8qnRb6_S1Ii1lQpeWx1YWflM6KKlBzXaTX5KJvNs7e_NQpWeZZpebhonzVKl2EhlO2D1nbJbJHbITsJG8703bc-GQxBWYp7YxF7FvLacz8mkcIsUTTGCMEyo42fEoeTnc_xuHzYN2-3q6csZtNs7PDwdURJDJignt4_w-uh8O489lqypAiZ0wyrx5PyoyDc6Pt649xtW3Gr5pCffxh_fdDj-9OeO32w_grGcYJIlD-DbtDZSA</recordid><startdate>19770801</startdate><enddate>19770801</enddate><creator>Freiberg, J.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19770801</creationdate><title>THE DIALECTIC OF CONFUCIANISM AND TAOISM IN ANCIENT CHINA</title><author>Freiberg, J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2bd85f99a45d53bdcbd3c1577102e11dce99fbe317253b3690759cacc4495d1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Ancient times</topic><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>China/Chinese</topic><topic>Chinese culture</topic><topic>Chinese history</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Confucius/Confucian/ Confucianism</topic><topic>Dialectic</topic><topic>Emperors</topic><topic>Philosophical Taoism</topic><topic>Rebellion</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Taoism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freiberg, J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Dialectical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freiberg, J.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE DIALECTIC OF CONFUCIANISM AND TAOISM IN ANCIENT CHINA</atitle><jtitle>Dialectical anthropology</jtitle><date>1977-08-01</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>175-198</pages><artnum>175</artnum><issn>0304-4092</issn><eissn>1573-0786</eissn><coden>DIANDV</coden><abstract><![CDATA[A dialectical analysis of the opposition between Confucianism & Taoism in ancient China is conducted, focusing on four levels of relationship: the philosophical, the religious, the political, & the SE. The philosophical conflict is based on Confucianism's humanism, utilitarianism, & ethical emphasis on order, as opposed to Taoism's naturalistic mysticism. This extends to the religious domain, where the Confucian religion was formalistic, humanistic, & oriented to this world, while Taoist religion was spiritualistic, naturalistic, & other-world oriented. Politically, the social system guaranteed that administrators & government officials were Confucians. The Taoists tended toward anarchy & refused to participate in state affairs. Thus, the Confucians were the bureaucrats, the wealthy land owners, & the upwardly mobile, while the Taoists, looking back to the classless society of prefeudal China, were antihierarchical & often associated with rebellions. 1 Table. M. Migalski.]]></abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00249484</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0304-4092 |
| ispartof | Dialectical anthropology, 1977-08, Vol.2 (3), p.175-198, Article 175 |
| issn | 0304-4092 1573-0786 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60856243 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Ancient times Buddhism China/Chinese Chinese culture Chinese history Confucianism Confucius/Confucian/ Confucianism Dialectic Emperors Philosophical Taoism Rebellion Religion Taoism |
| title | THE DIALECTIC OF CONFUCIANISM AND TAOISM IN ANCIENT CHINA |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A30%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20DIALECTIC%20OF%20CONFUCIANISM%20AND%20TAOISM%20IN%20ANCIENT%20CHINA&rft.jtitle=Dialectical%20anthropology&rft.au=Freiberg,%20J.W.&rft.date=1977-08-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=175-198&rft.artnum=175&rft.issn=0304-4092&rft.eissn=1573-0786&rft.coden=DIANDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00249484&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E29789901%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291932252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=29789901&rfr_iscdi=true |