Balanced Designs for Triad Tests: Two Examples from English
An attempt was made to assess the reliability of balanced incomplete block design for semantic studies using triads tests. These designs allow for substantial reduction in the number of triads, making possible the extension of the triads technique to larger semantic domains. The investigation is pur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science research 1976-09, Vol.5 (3), p.247-267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 267 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Social science research |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Burton, Michael L Nerlove, Sara B |
description | An attempt was made to assess the reliability of balanced incomplete block design for semantic studies using triads tests. These designs allow for substantial reduction in the number of triads, making possible the extension of the triads technique to larger semantic domains. The investigation is pursued through two experiments. In the first, the semantic organization of nine vegetable names is instigated using several different incomplete designs (balanced & unbalanced) & the complete set of triads. Balanced incomplete block designs with two or more replications per pair of words produce data with high correlations to the complete triads data, but balanced designs with only one replication per pair are not reliable. Unbalanced designs are less reliable than balanced designs. In the second experiment, the semantic organization of fifteen English kin terms is investigated using a balanced block design with three replications per pair. In this experiment the results are compared to the results for complete triads on a subset of seven M terms plus cousin. Data from balanced block designs with two or more replications are found to be reliable. A model is formulated to explain why designs with only one replication per pair are unreliable. Examples of balanced block designs are appended. 6 Tables, 3 Figures, Appendix. Modified AA. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60855282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60855282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p592-991ff8ab17f8adc7d06bfd50ee3a1d240e9645a4f991884b2cf5a15c00d8bce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj01LxDAURbNQcBznPwQEd4WXNOkkutKxfsCAmy5mV9LkZezQNjWx6M83oCs39y3u4XHuGVkBCF2A0ocLcpnSCYCxCtSK3D2YwUwWHX3E1B-nRH2ItIm9cbTB9JluafMVaP1txnnA3MYw0no6Dn16vyLn3gwJN393TZqnutm9FPu359fd_b6YpeaF1sx7ZTq2zens1kHVeScBsTTMcQGoKyGN8BlUSnTcemmYtABOdRZVuSY3v2_nGD6W7NSOfbI4ZG8MS2rzDim54hm8_geewhKnrNayMi-GSktZ_gDXrE9p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300106955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balanced Designs for Triad Tests: Two Examples from English</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Burton, Michael L ; Nerlove, Sara B</creator><creatorcontrib>Burton, Michael L ; Nerlove, Sara B</creatorcontrib><description>An attempt was made to assess the reliability of balanced incomplete block design for semantic studies using triads tests. These designs allow for substantial reduction in the number of triads, making possible the extension of the triads technique to larger semantic domains. The investigation is pursued through two experiments. In the first, the semantic organization of nine vegetable names is instigated using several different incomplete designs (balanced & unbalanced) & the complete set of triads. Balanced incomplete block designs with two or more replications per pair of words produce data with high correlations to the complete triads data, but balanced designs with only one replication per pair are not reliable. Unbalanced designs are less reliable than balanced designs. In the second experiment, the semantic organization of fifteen English kin terms is investigated using a balanced block design with three replications per pair. In this experiment the results are compared to the results for complete triads on a subset of seven M terms plus cousin. Data from balanced block designs with two or more replications are found to be reliable. A model is formulated to explain why designs with only one replication per pair are unreliable. Examples of balanced block designs are appended. 6 Tables, 3 Figures, Appendix. Modified AA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-089X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSREBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, Calif: Academic Press, Inc</publisher><subject>Semantic/Semantics ; Test/Tests (see also~Scale, Index, Score also specific tests) ; Triad/Triads/Triadic ; Word/Words/Wording</subject><ispartof>Social science research, 1976-09, Vol.5 (3), p.247-267</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burton, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nerlove, Sara B</creatorcontrib><title>Balanced Designs for Triad Tests: Two Examples from English</title><title>Social science research</title><description>An attempt was made to assess the reliability of balanced incomplete block design for semantic studies using triads tests. These designs allow for substantial reduction in the number of triads, making possible the extension of the triads technique to larger semantic domains. The investigation is pursued through two experiments. In the first, the semantic organization of nine vegetable names is instigated using several different incomplete designs (balanced & unbalanced) & the complete set of triads. Balanced incomplete block designs with two or more replications per pair of words produce data with high correlations to the complete triads data, but balanced designs with only one replication per pair are not reliable. Unbalanced designs are less reliable than balanced designs. In the second experiment, the semantic organization of fifteen English kin terms is investigated using a balanced block design with three replications per pair. In this experiment the results are compared to the results for complete triads on a subset of seven M terms plus cousin. Data from balanced block designs with two or more replications are found to be reliable. A model is formulated to explain why designs with only one replication per pair are unreliable. Examples of balanced block designs are appended. 6 Tables, 3 Figures, Appendix. Modified AA.</description><subject>Semantic/Semantics</subject><subject>Test/Tests (see also~Scale, Index, Score also specific tests)</subject><subject>Triad/Triads/Triadic</subject><subject>Word/Words/Wording</subject><issn>0049-089X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj01LxDAURbNQcBznPwQEd4WXNOkkutKxfsCAmy5mV9LkZezQNjWx6M83oCs39y3u4XHuGVkBCF2A0ocLcpnSCYCxCtSK3D2YwUwWHX3E1B-nRH2ItIm9cbTB9JluafMVaP1txnnA3MYw0no6Dn16vyLn3gwJN393TZqnutm9FPu359fd_b6YpeaF1sx7ZTq2zens1kHVeScBsTTMcQGoKyGN8BlUSnTcemmYtABOdRZVuSY3v2_nGD6W7NSOfbI4ZG8MS2rzDim54hm8_geewhKnrNayMi-GSktZ_gDXrE9p</recordid><startdate>19760901</startdate><enddate>19760901</enddate><creator>Burton, Michael L</creator><creator>Nerlove, Sara B</creator><general>Academic Press, Inc</general><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760901</creationdate><title>Balanced Designs for Triad Tests: Two Examples from English</title><author>Burton, Michael L ; Nerlove, Sara B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p592-991ff8ab17f8adc7d06bfd50ee3a1d240e9645a4f991884b2cf5a15c00d8bce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Semantic/Semantics</topic><topic>Test/Tests (see also~Scale, Index, Score also specific tests)</topic><topic>Triad/Triads/Triadic</topic><topic>Word/Words/Wording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burton, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nerlove, Sara B</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burton, Michael L</au><au>Nerlove, Sara B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balanced Designs for Triad Tests: Two Examples from English</atitle><jtitle>Social science research</jtitle><date>1976-09-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>247-267</pages><issn>0049-089X</issn><coden>SSREBG</coden><abstract>An attempt was made to assess the reliability of balanced incomplete block design for semantic studies using triads tests. These designs allow for substantial reduction in the number of triads, making possible the extension of the triads technique to larger semantic domains. The investigation is pursued through two experiments. In the first, the semantic organization of nine vegetable names is instigated using several different incomplete designs (balanced & unbalanced) & the complete set of triads. Balanced incomplete block designs with two or more replications per pair of words produce data with high correlations to the complete triads data, but balanced designs with only one replication per pair are not reliable. Unbalanced designs are less reliable than balanced designs. In the second experiment, the semantic organization of fifteen English kin terms is investigated using a balanced block design with three replications per pair. In this experiment the results are compared to the results for complete triads on a subset of seven M terms plus cousin. Data from balanced block designs with two or more replications are found to be reliable. A model is formulated to explain why designs with only one replication per pair are unreliable. Examples of balanced block designs are appended. 6 Tables, 3 Figures, Appendix. Modified AA.</abstract><cop>San Diego, Calif</cop><pub>Academic Press, Inc</pub><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-089X |
ispartof | Social science research, 1976-09, Vol.5 (3), p.247-267 |
issn | 0049-089X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60855282 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Semantic/Semantics Test/Tests (see also~Scale, Index, Score also specific tests) Triad/Triads/Triadic Word/Words/Wording |
title | Balanced Designs for Triad Tests: Two Examples from English |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A41%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balanced%20Designs%20for%20Triad%20Tests:%20Two%20Examples%20from%20English&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20research&rft.au=Burton,%20Michael%20L&rft.date=1976-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=247-267&rft.issn=0049-089X&rft.coden=SSREBG&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60855282%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300106955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |