Technology and Political Decision in Soviet Armaments Policy

This paper seeks to examine the processes of technological innovation in Soviet arms policy in the context of the current discussions about arms race dynamics: how are arms policies to be explained — in terms of interaction between nation-states or of an Eigendynamik? It is commonly asserted both in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of peace research 1974-01, Vol.11 (4), p.257-279
1. Verfasser: Holloway, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 279
container_issue 4
container_start_page 257
container_title Journal of peace research
container_volume 11
creator Holloway, David
description This paper seeks to examine the processes of technological innovation in Soviet arms policy in the context of the current discussions about arms race dynamics: how are arms policies to be explained — in terms of interaction between nation-states or of an Eigendynamik? It is commonly asserted both in the Soviet Union and outside that technological change is subordinated in the Soviet Union to close political control. The paper examines this proposition by looking at the institutional framework of the armaments complex and at the processes of innovation themselves. It emerges that innovation in military technology has been relatively successful because of the high priority given to it by the political leadership in terms of organisational arrangements, resources and attention. In spite of recent efforts to create roles and institutions with an interest in innovation, this is still the case. In this sense innovation does depend upon political decision. The paper suggests, however, that this position is inadequate inasmuch as it ignores both the forces which guide the formation of political decision and the structural basis of the existing priorities.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/002234337401100401
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60848140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>423283</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_002234337401100401</sage_id><sourcerecordid>423283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-605eab2a7a6969f762c5031386b58f74f9cbb969ee55c1f20979f20302dc916e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gG4CgrvYO-8MuCmtLygoWNdhMp3UKUmmzqRC_72pEREF3Zy7uN85l3sQOsVwibGUIwBCKKNUMsAYoNM9NMBMQEq5zPbRYAekO-IQHcW4AgChAAboam7NS-Mrv9wmulkkj75yrTO6SqbWuOh8k7gmefJvzrbJONS6tk0bPzCzPUYHpa6iPfmcQ_R8cz2f3KWzh9v7yXiWGqpkmwrgVhdESy2UUKUUxHCgmGai4FkpWalMUXQbazk3uCSgpOqUAlkYhYWlQ3TR566Df93Y2Oa1i8ZWlW6s38RcQMYyzOBfkCuBlWS8A89_gCu_CU33RI6JIooTJmhHkZ4ywccYbJmvg6t12OYY8l3v-e_eO9OoN0W9tN9i_3Kc9Y5VbH34usEIJRml7xtziNs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292952463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technology and Political Decision in Soviet Armaments Policy</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Holloway, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Holloway, David</creatorcontrib><description>This paper seeks to examine the processes of technological innovation in Soviet arms policy in the context of the current discussions about arms race dynamics: how are arms policies to be explained — in terms of interaction between nation-states or of an Eigendynamik? It is commonly asserted both in the Soviet Union and outside that technological change is subordinated in the Soviet Union to close political control. The paper examines this proposition by looking at the institutional framework of the armaments complex and at the processes of innovation themselves. It emerges that innovation in military technology has been relatively successful because of the high priority given to it by the political leadership in terms of organisational arrangements, resources and attention. In spite of recent efforts to create roles and institutions with an interest in innovation, this is still the case. In this sense innovation does depend upon political decision. The paper suggests, however, that this position is inadequate inasmuch as it ignores both the forces which guide the formation of political decision and the structural basis of the existing priorities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002234337401100401</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPERB6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Universitetsforlaget</publisher><subject>Armament/Armaments ; Armaments ; Commercial production ; Decision/Decisional/Decisions ; Defense industries ; Defenses ; Economic reform ; Economic systems ; Military planning ; Military technology ; Policy/Policies ; Political/Politically/ Politicalization (see also Politics) ; Procurement ; Russia ; Soviet/Soviets (see also USSR) ; Technological innovation ; Technology ; Technology/Technological/ Technologically ; Weapons ; Weapons development</subject><ispartof>Journal of peace research, 1974-01, Vol.11 (4), p.257-279</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1974 International Peace Research Institute, Oslo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-605eab2a7a6969f762c5031386b58f74f9cbb969ee55c1f20979f20302dc916e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-605eab2a7a6969f762c5031386b58f74f9cbb969ee55c1f20979f20302dc916e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/423283$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/423283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27842,27846,27901,27902,33752,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holloway, David</creatorcontrib><title>Technology and Political Decision in Soviet Armaments Policy</title><title>Journal of peace research</title><description>This paper seeks to examine the processes of technological innovation in Soviet arms policy in the context of the current discussions about arms race dynamics: how are arms policies to be explained — in terms of interaction between nation-states or of an Eigendynamik? It is commonly asserted both in the Soviet Union and outside that technological change is subordinated in the Soviet Union to close political control. The paper examines this proposition by looking at the institutional framework of the armaments complex and at the processes of innovation themselves. It emerges that innovation in military technology has been relatively successful because of the high priority given to it by the political leadership in terms of organisational arrangements, resources and attention. In spite of recent efforts to create roles and institutions with an interest in innovation, this is still the case. In this sense innovation does depend upon political decision. The paper suggests, however, that this position is inadequate inasmuch as it ignores both the forces which guide the formation of political decision and the structural basis of the existing priorities.</description><subject>Armament/Armaments</subject><subject>Armaments</subject><subject>Commercial production</subject><subject>Decision/Decisional/Decisions</subject><subject>Defense industries</subject><subject>Defenses</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Military planning</subject><subject>Military technology</subject><subject>Policy/Policies</subject><subject>Political/Politically/ Politicalization (see also Politics)</subject><subject>Procurement</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Soviet/Soviets (see also USSR)</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology/Technological/ Technologically</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><subject>Weapons development</subject><issn>0022-3433</issn><issn>1460-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gG4CgrvYO-8MuCmtLygoWNdhMp3UKUmmzqRC_72pEREF3Zy7uN85l3sQOsVwibGUIwBCKKNUMsAYoNM9NMBMQEq5zPbRYAekO-IQHcW4AgChAAboam7NS-Mrv9wmulkkj75yrTO6SqbWuOh8k7gmefJvzrbJONS6tk0bPzCzPUYHpa6iPfmcQ_R8cz2f3KWzh9v7yXiWGqpkmwrgVhdESy2UUKUUxHCgmGai4FkpWalMUXQbazk3uCSgpOqUAlkYhYWlQ3TR566Df93Y2Oa1i8ZWlW6s38RcQMYyzOBfkCuBlWS8A89_gCu_CU33RI6JIooTJmhHkZ4ywccYbJmvg6t12OYY8l3v-e_eO9OoN0W9tN9i_3Kc9Y5VbH34usEIJRml7xtziNs</recordid><startdate>19740101</startdate><enddate>19740101</enddate><creator>Holloway, David</creator><general>Universitetsforlaget</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHW</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19740101</creationdate><title>Technology and Political Decision in Soviet Armaments Policy</title><author>Holloway, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-605eab2a7a6969f762c5031386b58f74f9cbb969ee55c1f20979f20302dc916e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Armament/Armaments</topic><topic>Armaments</topic><topic>Commercial production</topic><topic>Decision/Decisional/Decisions</topic><topic>Defense industries</topic><topic>Defenses</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Military planning</topic><topic>Military technology</topic><topic>Policy/Policies</topic><topic>Political/Politically/ Politicalization (see also Politics)</topic><topic>Procurement</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Soviet/Soviets (see also USSR)</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology/Technological/ Technologically</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><topic>Weapons development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holloway, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holloway, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technology and Political Decision in Soviet Armaments Policy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle><date>1974-01-01</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>257-279</pages><issn>0022-3433</issn><eissn>1460-3578</eissn><coden>JPERB6</coden><abstract>This paper seeks to examine the processes of technological innovation in Soviet arms policy in the context of the current discussions about arms race dynamics: how are arms policies to be explained — in terms of interaction between nation-states or of an Eigendynamik? It is commonly asserted both in the Soviet Union and outside that technological change is subordinated in the Soviet Union to close political control. The paper examines this proposition by looking at the institutional framework of the armaments complex and at the processes of innovation themselves. It emerges that innovation in military technology has been relatively successful because of the high priority given to it by the political leadership in terms of organisational arrangements, resources and attention. In spite of recent efforts to create roles and institutions with an interest in innovation, this is still the case. In this sense innovation does depend upon political decision. The paper suggests, however, that this position is inadequate inasmuch as it ignores both the forces which guide the formation of political decision and the structural basis of the existing priorities.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Universitetsforlaget</pub><doi>10.1177/002234337401100401</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3433
ispartof Journal of peace research, 1974-01, Vol.11 (4), p.257-279
issn 0022-3433
1460-3578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60848140
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Armament/Armaments
Armaments
Commercial production
Decision/Decisional/Decisions
Defense industries
Defenses
Economic reform
Economic systems
Military planning
Military technology
Policy/Policies
Political/Politically/ Politicalization (see also Politics)
Procurement
Russia
Soviet/Soviets (see also USSR)
Technological innovation
Technology
Technology/Technological/ Technologically
Weapons
Weapons development
title Technology and Political Decision in Soviet Armaments Policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technology%20and%20Political%20Decision%20in%20Soviet%20Armaments%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20peace%20research&rft.au=Holloway,%20David&rft.date=1974-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=257-279&rft.issn=0022-3433&rft.eissn=1460-3578&rft.coden=JPERB6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002234337401100401&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E423283%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292952463&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=423283&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002234337401100401&rfr_iscdi=true