How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach
The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of politics 1989-05, Vol.51 (2), p.347-370 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 370 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | The Journal of politics |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Entman, Robert M. |
description | The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2131346 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60841861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2131346</cupid><jstor_id>2131346</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2131346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AMeFgXFQ3S_u_EWitpKxR4qHsNmM2lT22zcTRH_vZEWlYI4lznMwzsMg9AxJVeMk941o5xyoXZQhwqlIyaJ3kUdQhiLuKZqHx2EMCdtqVh00MPAveNmBvgR8tLgpCjANvhlZho8BlcvAE9mZfV6g5MKD6vC-aVpSlfhsXcWQiirKU7q2jtjZ4dorzCLAEeb3kXPd7eT_iAaPd0P-8koskLxJjLcAgGmZC6VLKyGPFPc6oJLJnKwxnCZAQgibNGzcS_vcaWpBZlRQXVOc95F5-vcdu3bCkKTLstgYbEwFbhVSBXRrVT0XyhjSbiSqoWnW3DuVr5qj0gZFbFisWYtOvsLURYTGVNNeKsu1sp6F4KHIq19uTT-I6Uk_fpPuvlPK0_Wch4a57_Zz_hyE2SWmS_zKfzatxX1CRLglZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290591803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Entman, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Entman, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2131346</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive models ; Conservatism ; Editorials ; Information ; Liberalism ; Mass Media ; Modeling ; Political attitudes ; Political freedom ; Political news ; Political psychology ; Political science ; Public opinion ; United States ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 1989-05, Vol.51 (2), p.347-370</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 1989</rights><rights>Copyright 1989 University of Texas Press</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. May 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2131346$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2131346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27844,27848,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Entman, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><description>The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political freedom</subject><subject>Political news</subject><subject>Political psychology</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AMeFgXFQ3S_u_EWitpKxR4qHsNmM2lT22zcTRH_vZEWlYI4lznMwzsMg9AxJVeMk941o5xyoXZQhwqlIyaJ3kUdQhiLuKZqHx2EMCdtqVh00MPAveNmBvgR8tLgpCjANvhlZho8BlcvAE9mZfV6g5MKD6vC-aVpSlfhsXcWQiirKU7q2jtjZ4dorzCLAEeb3kXPd7eT_iAaPd0P-8koskLxJjLcAgGmZC6VLKyGPFPc6oJLJnKwxnCZAQgibNGzcS_vcaWpBZlRQXVOc95F5-vcdu3bCkKTLstgYbEwFbhVSBXRrVT0XyhjSbiSqoWnW3DuVr5qj0gZFbFisWYtOvsLURYTGVNNeKsu1sp6F4KHIq19uTT-I6Uk_fpPuvlPK0_Wch4a57_Zz_hyE2SWmS_zKfzatxX1CRLglZY</recordid><startdate>19890501</startdate><enddate>19890501</enddate><creator>Entman, Robert M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Texas Press</general><general>University of Texas Press in association with the Southern Political Science Association, etc</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890501</creationdate><title>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</title><author>Entman, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political freedom</topic><topic>Political news</topic><topic>Political psychology</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Entman, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Entman, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><date>1989-05-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>347-370</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2131346</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3816 |
ispartof | The Journal of politics, 1989-05, Vol.51 (2), p.347-370 |
issn | 0022-3816 1468-2508 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60841861 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Cognition & reasoning Cognitive models Conservatism Editorials Information Liberalism Mass Media Modeling Political attitudes Political freedom Political news Political psychology Political science Public opinion United States Voting |
title | How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A13%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20the%20Media%20Affect%20What%20People%20Think:%20An%20Information%20Processing%20Approach&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=Entman,%20Robert%20M.&rft.date=1989-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=347-370&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2131346&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2131346%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290591803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_2131346&rft_jstor_id=2131346&rfr_iscdi=true |