How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach

The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of politics 1989-05, Vol.51 (2), p.347-370
1. Verfasser: Entman, Robert M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 370
container_issue 2
container_start_page 347
container_title The Journal of politics
container_volume 51
creator Entman, Robert M.
description The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2131346
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60841861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2131346</cupid><jstor_id>2131346</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2131346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AMeFgXFQ3S_u_EWitpKxR4qHsNmM2lT22zcTRH_vZEWlYI4lznMwzsMg9AxJVeMk941o5xyoXZQhwqlIyaJ3kUdQhiLuKZqHx2EMCdtqVh00MPAveNmBvgR8tLgpCjANvhlZho8BlcvAE9mZfV6g5MKD6vC-aVpSlfhsXcWQiirKU7q2jtjZ4dorzCLAEeb3kXPd7eT_iAaPd0P-8koskLxJjLcAgGmZC6VLKyGPFPc6oJLJnKwxnCZAQgibNGzcS_vcaWpBZlRQXVOc95F5-vcdu3bCkKTLstgYbEwFbhVSBXRrVT0XyhjSbiSqoWnW3DuVr5qj0gZFbFisWYtOvsLURYTGVNNeKsu1sp6F4KHIq19uTT-I6Uk_fpPuvlPK0_Wch4a57_Zz_hyE2SWmS_zKfzatxX1CRLglZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290591803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Entman, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Entman, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2131346</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive models ; Conservatism ; Editorials ; Information ; Liberalism ; Mass Media ; Modeling ; Political attitudes ; Political freedom ; Political news ; Political psychology ; Political science ; Public opinion ; United States ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 1989-05, Vol.51 (2), p.347-370</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 1989</rights><rights>Copyright 1989 University of Texas Press</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. May 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2131346$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2131346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27844,27848,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Entman, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><description>The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.</description><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political freedom</subject><subject>Political news</subject><subject>Political psychology</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AMeFgXFQ3S_u_EWitpKxR4qHsNmM2lT22zcTRH_vZEWlYI4lznMwzsMg9AxJVeMk941o5xyoXZQhwqlIyaJ3kUdQhiLuKZqHx2EMCdtqVh00MPAveNmBvgR8tLgpCjANvhlZho8BlcvAE9mZfV6g5MKD6vC-aVpSlfhsXcWQiirKU7q2jtjZ4dorzCLAEeb3kXPd7eT_iAaPd0P-8koskLxJjLcAgGmZC6VLKyGPFPc6oJLJnKwxnCZAQgibNGzcS_vcaWpBZlRQXVOc95F5-vcdu3bCkKTLstgYbEwFbhVSBXRrVT0XyhjSbiSqoWnW3DuVr5qj0gZFbFisWYtOvsLURYTGVNNeKsu1sp6F4KHIq19uTT-I6Uk_fpPuvlPK0_Wch4a57_Zz_hyE2SWmS_zKfzatxX1CRLglZY</recordid><startdate>19890501</startdate><enddate>19890501</enddate><creator>Entman, Robert M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Texas Press</general><general>University of Texas Press in association with the Southern Political Science Association, etc</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890501</creationdate><title>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</title><author>Entman, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a3ce0e265d565fc8edb63c8f3524decaa35bee404cf7c97d73681ce5b1418d1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political freedom</topic><topic>Political news</topic><topic>Political psychology</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Entman, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Entman, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><date>1989-05-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>347-370</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>The political messages of newspapers are significantly associated with the substantive political attitudes of a national sample of their readers. Diversity of news perspectives and editorial liberalism show significant relationships to readers' support of interest groups, public policies, and politicians. The relationships vary among self-identified liberals, conservatives, and moderates in accordance with the predictions of information-processing theory. The standard assertion in most recent empirical studies is that “media affect what people think about, not what they think.” The findings here indicate the media make a significant contribution to what people think—to their political preferences and evaluations—precisely by affecting what they think about.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2131346</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3816
ispartof The Journal of politics, 1989-05, Vol.51 (2), p.347-370
issn 0022-3816
1468-2508
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60841861
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete
subjects Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive models
Conservatism
Editorials
Information
Liberalism
Mass Media
Modeling
Political attitudes
Political freedom
Political news
Political psychology
Political science
Public opinion
United States
Voting
title How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A13%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20the%20Media%20Affect%20What%20People%20Think:%20An%20Information%20Processing%20Approach&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=Entman,%20Robert%20M.&rft.date=1989-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=347-370&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2131346&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2131346%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290591803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_2131346&rft_jstor_id=2131346&rfr_iscdi=true