Hobbes without Grotius
This essay presents a critique of current views of Hugo Grotius which erroneously see him as a major theorist of natural rights and a formative influence upon the rights theory of Thomas Hobbes. Especially singled out for criticism are the misconceptions due to Richard Tuck in a number of writings t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | History of political thought 2000-04, Vol.21 (1), p.16-40 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 40 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 16 |
| container_title | History of political thought |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Zagorin, Perez |
| description | This essay presents a critique of current views of Hugo Grotius which erroneously see him as a major theorist of natural rights and a formative influence upon the rights theory of Thomas Hobbes. Especially singled out for criticism are the misconceptions due to Richard Tuck in a number of writings that discuss the political ideas of Grotius and Hobbes and the relationship between them. In an examination of Hobbes's conception of natural rights, the essay reaffirms its originality and notes its revolutionary potential contrary to the main intention of Hobbes's own political doctrine. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60835537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>imp/hpt/2000/00000021/00000001/39</ingid><jstor_id>26219726</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26219726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i385t-95cd5b623aaac2e6cc994abaf315796f211475c51f90310debbf3e61f6f6e1d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXb0JB8LaQSTbZ5ChFW6HiRcHbkN1N2pTt7rrJ-vXXu7UFQRCcy8wwj9_jzQEZMSogYVqpQzKikPIkU_B8TE5CWNNhh1SPyPm8yXMbJm8-rpo-TmZdE30fTsmRM1WwZ_s-Jk-3N4_TebJ4mN1NrxeJ50rERIuiFLlk3BhTMCuLQuvU5MZxEJmWjgGkmSgEOE050NLmueNWgpNOWig1H5OrHbftmpfehogbHwpbVaa2TR9QUsWF4Nk_hEKm25BjcvlLuG76rh5CIEjFFdcU2KC62KnWITYdtp3fmO4DmWSgMyaH-_3u7uulraP5gfgC_abFrdXwznd8ZVADMsqAKiYQhNBYWmf6KmI0HS4_MWz99F-8AbZq40CgFOl3MdgPFJBr_gVAPIc7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683839012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hobbes without Grotius</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Zagorin, Perez</creator><creatorcontrib>Zagorin, Perez</creatorcontrib><description>This essay presents a critique of current views of Hugo Grotius which erroneously see him as a major theorist of natural rights and a formative influence upon the rights theory of Thomas Hobbes. Especially singled out for criticism are the misconceptions due to Richard Tuck in a number of writings that discuss the political ideas of Grotius and Hobbes and the relationship between them. In an examination of Hobbes's conception of natural rights, the essay reaffirms its originality and notes its revolutionary potential contrary to the main intention of Hobbes's own political doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-781X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-2988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Exeter: Imprint Academic</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Grotius, Hugo ; Hobbes, Thomas ; Humans ; Liberalism ; Moral principles ; Morality ; Natural Law ; Natural Rights ; Philosophy of law ; Political Philosophy ; Political Theory ; Richard Tuck ; Rights ; Skepticism ; State of nature</subject><ispartof>History of political thought, 2000-04, Vol.21 (1), p.16-40</ispartof><rights>copyright: Imprint Academic, 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26219726$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26219726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27848,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zagorin, Perez</creatorcontrib><title>Hobbes without Grotius</title><title>History of political thought</title><description>This essay presents a critique of current views of Hugo Grotius which erroneously see him as a major theorist of natural rights and a formative influence upon the rights theory of Thomas Hobbes. Especially singled out for criticism are the misconceptions due to Richard Tuck in a number of writings that discuss the political ideas of Grotius and Hobbes and the relationship between them. In an examination of Hobbes's conception of natural rights, the essay reaffirms its originality and notes its revolutionary potential contrary to the main intention of Hobbes's own political doctrine.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Grotius, Hugo</subject><subject>Hobbes, Thomas</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Moral principles</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Natural Law</subject><subject>Natural Rights</subject><subject>Philosophy of law</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Richard Tuck</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><subject>State of nature</subject><issn>0143-781X</issn><issn>2051-2988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXb0JB8LaQSTbZ5ChFW6HiRcHbkN1N2pTt7rrJ-vXXu7UFQRCcy8wwj9_jzQEZMSogYVqpQzKikPIkU_B8TE5CWNNhh1SPyPm8yXMbJm8-rpo-TmZdE30fTsmRM1WwZ_s-Jk-3N4_TebJ4mN1NrxeJ50rERIuiFLlk3BhTMCuLQuvU5MZxEJmWjgGkmSgEOE050NLmueNWgpNOWig1H5OrHbftmpfehogbHwpbVaa2TR9QUsWF4Nk_hEKm25BjcvlLuG76rh5CIEjFFdcU2KC62KnWITYdtp3fmO4DmWSgMyaH-_3u7uulraP5gfgC_abFrdXwznd8ZVADMsqAKiYQhNBYWmf6KmI0HS4_MWz99F-8AbZq40CgFOl3MdgPFJBr_gVAPIc7</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Zagorin, Perez</creator><general>Imprint Academic</general><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Hobbes without Grotius</title><author>Zagorin, Perez</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i385t-95cd5b623aaac2e6cc994abaf315796f211475c51f90310debbf3e61f6f6e1d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Grotius, Hugo</topic><topic>Hobbes, Thomas</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Moral principles</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Natural Law</topic><topic>Natural Rights</topic><topic>Philosophy of law</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Richard Tuck</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><topic>State of nature</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zagorin, Perez</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>History of political thought</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zagorin, Perez</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hobbes without Grotius</atitle><jtitle>History of political thought</jtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>16-40</pages><issn>0143-781X</issn><eissn>2051-2988</eissn><abstract>This essay presents a critique of current views of Hugo Grotius which erroneously see him as a major theorist of natural rights and a formative influence upon the rights theory of Thomas Hobbes. Especially singled out for criticism are the misconceptions due to Richard Tuck in a number of writings that discuss the political ideas of Grotius and Hobbes and the relationship between them. In an examination of Hobbes's conception of natural rights, the essay reaffirms its originality and notes its revolutionary potential contrary to the main intention of Hobbes's own political doctrine.</abstract><cop>Exeter</cop><pub>Imprint Academic</pub><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0143-781X |
| ispartof | History of political thought, 2000-04, Vol.21 (1), p.16-40 |
| issn | 0143-781X 2051-2988 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60835537 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Ethics Grotius, Hugo Hobbes, Thomas Humans Liberalism Moral principles Morality Natural Law Natural Rights Philosophy of law Political Philosophy Political Theory Richard Tuck Rights Skepticism State of nature |
| title | Hobbes without Grotius |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A07%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hobbes%20without%20Grotius&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20political%20thought&rft.au=Zagorin,%20Perez&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=16-40&rft.issn=0143-781X&rft.eissn=2051-2988&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26219726%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683839012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=imp/hpt/2000/00000021/00000001/39&rft_jstor_id=26219726&rfr_iscdi=true |