Differences in the Occupational Achievement Process between Male and Female College Graduates
In the college graduating class of 1961, mean 1968 occupational achievement for men and women was similar. The standard deviation for men was greater than that for women, indicating that occupational opportunities of women were more constricted than were those of men. Basically the same pattern hold...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sociology of education 1977-07, Vol.50 (3), p.206-217 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 217 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 206 |
| container_title | Sociology of education |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Spaeth, Joe L. |
| description | In the college graduating class of 1961, mean 1968 occupational achievement for men and women was similar. The standard deviation for men was greater than that for women, indicating that occupational opportunities of women were more constricted than were those of men. Basically the same pattern holds for occupational expectations held in the freshman and senior years in college and three years after graduation. On the other hand, women's achievement of education beyond the bachelor's degree lagged behind men's. Regression analysis reveals that compared with men, women showed greater instability in occupational expectations, reaped lesser returns in occupational status from investments in advanced education, and were less likely to realize their occupational expectations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2112650 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60833329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2112650</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2112650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-11af40fcf4f63816ebed818f603954970bb326ec293982f1313b831aa62834323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKAzEQBuAgCtYqvkJA0dNqktlms8dSbRUq9aBHWbLpxG7ZbmqSVXx7U-pJcC4zh28G5ifknLMbAay4FZwLOWIHZMBLKDM1KuCQDBgDlbGcFcfkJIQ1SyWlGpC3u8Za9NgZDLTpaFwhXRjTb3VsXKdbOjarBj9xg12kz94lFmiN8Quxo0-6Raq7JZ3iZjdOXNviO9KZ18teRwyn5MjqNuDZbx-S1-n9y-Qhmy9mj5PxPDMih5hxrm3OrLG5laC4xBqXiisrGZSjvCxYXYOQaER6SAnLgUOtgGsthYIcBAzJ1f7u1ruPHkOsNk0w2La6Q9eHSjIFAGl9SC7-wLXrffozVFyULE_nFUvqeq-MdyF4tNXWNxvtvyvOql3I1W_ISV7u5TpE5_9lP3dYd4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290498280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the Occupational Achievement Process between Male and Female College Graduates</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Spaeth, Joe L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spaeth, Joe L.</creatorcontrib><description>In the college graduating class of 1961, mean 1968 occupational achievement for men and women was similar. The standard deviation for men was greater than that for women, indicating that occupational opportunities of women were more constricted than were those of men. Basically the same pattern holds for occupational expectations held in the freshman and senior years in college and three years after graduation. On the other hand, women's achievement of education beyond the bachelor's degree lagged behind men's. Regression analysis reveals that compared with men, women showed greater instability in occupational expectations, reaped lesser returns in occupational status from investments in advanced education, and were less likely to realize their occupational expectations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2112650</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCYEB7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, etc: American Sociological Association</publisher><subject>Achieve/Achiever/Achieved/ Achievement/ Achievements ; Coefficients ; College graduates ; College/Colleges/Collegians ; Grade point average ; Graduate/Graduates/Graduation ; Men ; Occupation/Occupations/Occupational ; Regression coefficients ; School enrollment ; Scope of employment ; Sex/Sexes/Sexism/Sexist/Sexists ; Variable coefficients ; Womens education ; Work/Works/Working ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Sociology of education, 1977-07, Vol.50 (3), p.206-217</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1977 American Sociological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-11af40fcf4f63816ebed818f603954970bb326ec293982f1313b831aa62834323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2112650$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2112650$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27852,27907,27908,33758,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spaeth, Joe L.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the Occupational Achievement Process between Male and Female College Graduates</title><title>Sociology of education</title><description>In the college graduating class of 1961, mean 1968 occupational achievement for men and women was similar. The standard deviation for men was greater than that for women, indicating that occupational opportunities of women were more constricted than were those of men. Basically the same pattern holds for occupational expectations held in the freshman and senior years in college and three years after graduation. On the other hand, women's achievement of education beyond the bachelor's degree lagged behind men's. Regression analysis reveals that compared with men, women showed greater instability in occupational expectations, reaped lesser returns in occupational status from investments in advanced education, and were less likely to realize their occupational expectations.</description><subject>Achieve/Achiever/Achieved/ Achievement/ Achievements</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>College graduates</subject><subject>College/Colleges/Collegians</subject><subject>Grade point average</subject><subject>Graduate/Graduates/Graduation</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Occupation/Occupations/Occupational</subject><subject>Regression coefficients</subject><subject>School enrollment</subject><subject>Scope of employment</subject><subject>Sex/Sexes/Sexism/Sexist/Sexists</subject><subject>Variable coefficients</subject><subject>Womens education</subject><subject>Work/Works/Working</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0038-0407</issn><issn>1939-8573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFKAzEQBuAgCtYqvkJA0dNqktlms8dSbRUq9aBHWbLpxG7ZbmqSVXx7U-pJcC4zh28G5ifknLMbAay4FZwLOWIHZMBLKDM1KuCQDBgDlbGcFcfkJIQ1SyWlGpC3u8Za9NgZDLTpaFwhXRjTb3VsXKdbOjarBj9xg12kz94lFmiN8Quxo0-6Raq7JZ3iZjdOXNviO9KZ18teRwyn5MjqNuDZbx-S1-n9y-Qhmy9mj5PxPDMih5hxrm3OrLG5laC4xBqXiisrGZSjvCxYXYOQaER6SAnLgUOtgGsthYIcBAzJ1f7u1ruPHkOsNk0w2La6Q9eHSjIFAGl9SC7-wLXrffozVFyULE_nFUvqeq-MdyF4tNXWNxvtvyvOql3I1W_ISV7u5TpE5_9lP3dYd4U</recordid><startdate>19770701</startdate><enddate>19770701</enddate><creator>Spaeth, Joe L.</creator><general>American Sociological Association</general><general>Payne Educational Sociology Foundation, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19770701</creationdate><title>Differences in the Occupational Achievement Process between Male and Female College Graduates</title><author>Spaeth, Joe L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-11af40fcf4f63816ebed818f603954970bb326ec293982f1313b831aa62834323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Achieve/Achiever/Achieved/ Achievement/ Achievements</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>College graduates</topic><topic>College/Colleges/Collegians</topic><topic>Grade point average</topic><topic>Graduate/Graduates/Graduation</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Occupation/Occupations/Occupational</topic><topic>Regression coefficients</topic><topic>School enrollment</topic><topic>Scope of employment</topic><topic>Sex/Sexes/Sexism/Sexist/Sexists</topic><topic>Variable coefficients</topic><topic>Womens education</topic><topic>Work/Works/Working</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spaeth, Joe L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spaeth, Joe L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the Occupational Achievement Process between Male and Female College Graduates</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of education</jtitle><date>1977-07-01</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>206-217</pages><issn>0038-0407</issn><eissn>1939-8573</eissn><coden>SCYEB7</coden><abstract>In the college graduating class of 1961, mean 1968 occupational achievement for men and women was similar. The standard deviation for men was greater than that for women, indicating that occupational opportunities of women were more constricted than were those of men. Basically the same pattern holds for occupational expectations held in the freshman and senior years in college and three years after graduation. On the other hand, women's achievement of education beyond the bachelor's degree lagged behind men's. Regression analysis reveals that compared with men, women showed greater instability in occupational expectations, reaped lesser returns in occupational status from investments in advanced education, and were less likely to realize their occupational expectations.</abstract><cop>New York, etc</cop><pub>American Sociological Association</pub><doi>10.2307/2112650</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0038-0407 |
| ispartof | Sociology of education, 1977-07, Vol.50 (3), p.206-217 |
| issn | 0038-0407 1939-8573 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60833329 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Achieve/Achiever/Achieved/ Achievement/ Achievements Coefficients College graduates College/Colleges/Collegians Grade point average Graduate/Graduates/Graduation Men Occupation/Occupations/Occupational Regression coefficients School enrollment Scope of employment Sex/Sexes/Sexism/Sexist/Sexists Variable coefficients Womens education Work/Works/Working Working women |
| title | Differences in the Occupational Achievement Process between Male and Female College Graduates |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20Occupational%20Achievement%20Process%20between%20Male%20and%20Female%20College%20Graduates&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=Spaeth,%20Joe%20L.&rft.date=1977-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=206-217&rft.issn=0038-0407&rft.eissn=1939-8573&rft.coden=SCYEB7&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2112650&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2112650%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290498280&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2112650&rfr_iscdi=true |