Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision
According to the opinion expressed by the US Supreme Court in the case of "Employment Division vs Smith," the argument for free exercise exemptions "contradicts both consitutional tradition and common sense." The concept of free exercise revisionism, religious exercise, is examin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The University of Chicago law review 1990-10, Vol.57 (4), p.1109-1153 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1153 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1109 |
| container_title | The University of Chicago law review |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | McConnell, Michael W. |
| description | According to the opinion expressed by the US Supreme Court in the case of "Employment Division vs Smith," the argument for free exercise exemptions "contradicts both consitutional tradition and common sense." The concept of free exercise revisionism, religious exercise, is examined in relation to the "Employment Division vs Smith" case. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1599887 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60818174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1599887</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1599887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-50e663b30910a0b8a52e70ee7a4d1e53fba260f14d75c0aa1f60c9fa6c920c7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AtBRU_RmexmP45SWxUKgh_gLWy3E5rSJHU3Ef33rrYnoac5zMPLzMvYKcJ1xkHdYG6M1mqPDdBwk-rcvO-zAYDA1AgjDtlRCEsAQGnyAYOJJ0rGX-RdFSh5ps8qVG1ThTqxzTzpFpS81FW3SO7I_W2O2UFpV4FOtnPI3ibj19FDOn26fxzdTlPHgXdpDiQln3EwCBZm2uYZKSBSVsyRcl7ObCahRDFXuQNrsZTgTGmlMxk4ZfmQXW5y17796Cl0RV0FR6uVbajtQyFBo0YlIjz7B5dt75t4W5Gh0MjjqxGd70IRYCY5oo7qaqOcb0PwVBZrX9XWfxcIxW-5xbbcKC82chm61u9kPxsCc98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301263118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>McConnell, Michael W.</creator><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><description>According to the opinion expressed by the US Supreme Court in the case of "Employment Division vs Smith," the argument for free exercise exemptions "contradicts both consitutional tradition and common sense." The concept of free exercise revisionism, religious exercise, is examined in relation to the "Employment Division vs Smith" case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9494</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-859X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1599887</identifier><identifier>CODEN: UCLRA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Law School</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Constitutional Law ; First Amendment ; Free exercise clause ; Freedom of Religion ; Historical revisionism ; Judaism ; Judicial Behavior ; Labor law ; Peyote ; Religious laws ; Religious practices ; Revisionism ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>The University of Chicago law review, 1990-10, Vol.57 (4), p.1109-1153</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Fall 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-50e663b30910a0b8a52e70ee7a4d1e53fba260f14d75c0aa1f60c9fa6c920c7a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1599887$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1599887$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><title>Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision</title><title>The University of Chicago law review</title><description>According to the opinion expressed by the US Supreme Court in the case of "Employment Division vs Smith," the argument for free exercise exemptions "contradicts both consitutional tradition and common sense." The concept of free exercise revisionism, religious exercise, is examined in relation to the "Employment Division vs Smith" case.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><subject>First Amendment</subject><subject>Free exercise clause</subject><subject>Freedom of Religion</subject><subject>Historical revisionism</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Judicial Behavior</subject><subject>Labor law</subject><subject>Peyote</subject><subject>Religious laws</subject><subject>Religious practices</subject><subject>Revisionism</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0041-9494</issn><issn>1939-859X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_AtBRU_RmexmP45SWxUKgh_gLWy3E5rSJHU3Ef33rrYnoac5zMPLzMvYKcJ1xkHdYG6M1mqPDdBwk-rcvO-zAYDA1AgjDtlRCEsAQGnyAYOJJ0rGX-RdFSh5ps8qVG1ThTqxzTzpFpS81FW3SO7I_W2O2UFpV4FOtnPI3ibj19FDOn26fxzdTlPHgXdpDiQln3EwCBZm2uYZKSBSVsyRcl7ObCahRDFXuQNrsZTgTGmlMxk4ZfmQXW5y17796Cl0RV0FR6uVbajtQyFBo0YlIjz7B5dt75t4W5Gh0MjjqxGd70IRYCY5oo7qaqOcb0PwVBZrX9XWfxcIxW-5xbbcKC82chm61u9kPxsCc98</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>McConnell, Michael W.</creator><general>University of Chicago Law School</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision</title><author>McConnell, Michael W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-50e663b30910a0b8a52e70ee7a4d1e53fba260f14d75c0aa1f60c9fa6c920c7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><topic>First Amendment</topic><topic>Free exercise clause</topic><topic>Freedom of Religion</topic><topic>Historical revisionism</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Judicial Behavior</topic><topic>Labor law</topic><topic>Peyote</topic><topic>Religious laws</topic><topic>Religious practices</topic><topic>Revisionism</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The University of Chicago law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McConnell, Michael W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision</atitle><jtitle>The University of Chicago law review</jtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1153</epage><pages>1109-1153</pages><issn>0041-9494</issn><eissn>1939-859X</eissn><coden>UCLRA2</coden><abstract>According to the opinion expressed by the US Supreme Court in the case of "Employment Division vs Smith," the argument for free exercise exemptions "contradicts both consitutional tradition and common sense." The concept of free exercise revisionism, religious exercise, is examined in relation to the "Employment Division vs Smith" case.</abstract><cop>Chicago, Ill</cop><pub>University of Chicago Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/1599887</doi><tpages>45</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0041-9494 |
| ispartof | The University of Chicago law review, 1990-10, Vol.57 (4), p.1109-1153 |
| issn | 0041-9494 1939-859X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60818174 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Christianity Constitutional Law First Amendment Free exercise clause Freedom of Religion Historical revisionism Judaism Judicial Behavior Labor law Peyote Religious laws Religious practices Revisionism Supreme Court decisions |
| title | Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Free%20Exercise%20Revisionism%20and%20the%20Smith%20Decision&rft.jtitle=The%20University%20of%20Chicago%20law%20review&rft.au=McConnell,%20Michael%20W.&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1153&rft.pages=1109-1153&rft.issn=0041-9494&rft.eissn=1939-859X&rft.coden=UCLRA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1599887&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1599887%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301263118&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1599887&rfr_iscdi=true |