History and Democracy Revisited

Robert Dahl has argued that democracy is more likely to endure in countries where political competition precedes the expansion of political participation and where democracy is inaugurated by evolutionary rather than disruptive means. I test these propositions against the experience of seventy-one d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative politics 1994-10, Vol.27 (1), p.91-105
1. Verfasser: Dix, Robert H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Comparative politics
container_volume 27
creator Dix, Robert H.
description Robert Dahl has argued that democracy is more likely to endure in countries where political competition precedes the expansion of political participation and where democracy is inaugurated by evolutionary rather than disruptive means. I test these propositions against the experience of seventy-one democratic regimes between 1848 and 1991. The correlations largely confirm Dahl's propositions. However, they prove to be almost entirely a product of the "first wave" of democracy from 1848 to 1931. The evidence shows not only numerous exceptions, but also a pronounced decrease over time in the association of the proposed more favorable evolutionary routes to democracy with long-term democratic success.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/422219
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60811120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>422219</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>422219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-94f182955ee7e4b382773289efc4dd1acfdacf1c0cceff98b45d8b4e7c23a31f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKf-CxYF36q5a9o0j7KpEwaC6HPI0gu0bO1MWqH_vRkTBsIe7o6DH9999zF2DfwBMy4fBSKCOmEThBzSAlGesgnnwFMBuTpnFyE0cRWFKCfsZlGHvvNjYtoqmdOms97YMfmgnzrUPVWX7MyZdaCrvzllXy_Pn7NFunx_fZs9LVOLhexTJRyUqPKcSJJYZSVKmWGpyFlRVWCsq2KB5daSc6pcibyKjaTFzGTgsim73-tuffc9UOj1pg6W1mvTUjcEXfASAJBH8PYf2HSDb6M3Hf_lXMaK0N0xCFBFZ0W0erhpfReCJ6e3vt4YP2rgehel3kd5kGt2WR2jfgGjgG3D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297326955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>History and Democracy Revisited</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Dix, Robert H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dix, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><description>Robert Dahl has argued that democracy is more likely to endure in countries where political competition precedes the expansion of political participation and where democracy is inaugurated by evolutionary rather than disruptive means. I test these propositions against the experience of seventy-one democratic regimes between 1848 and 1991. The correlations largely confirm Dahl's propositions. However, they prove to be almost entirely a product of the "first wave" of democracy from 1848 to 1931. The evidence shows not only numerous exceptions, but also a pronounced decrease over time in the association of the proposed more favorable evolutionary routes to democracy with long-term democratic success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-6227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/422219</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPPLAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, etc: City University of New York</publisher><subject>Comparative Study ; Democracy ; DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS ; Encyclopedias ; Evolution ; Freedom ; Hegemony ; History ; Inaugurations ; Incumbents ; Political science ; POLITICAL STABILITY, INSTABILITY, &amp; CHANGE ; Polyarchy ; Research Note ; STUDY OF HISTORY AS SUBJECT MATTER ; Voting rights ; World wars</subject><ispartof>Comparative politics, 1994-10, Vol.27 (1), p.91-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 City University of New York</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Oct 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-94f182955ee7e4b382773289efc4dd1acfdacf1c0cceff98b45d8b4e7c23a31f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/422219$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/422219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dix, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><title>History and Democracy Revisited</title><title>Comparative politics</title><description>Robert Dahl has argued that democracy is more likely to endure in countries where political competition precedes the expansion of political participation and where democracy is inaugurated by evolutionary rather than disruptive means. I test these propositions against the experience of seventy-one democratic regimes between 1848 and 1991. The correlations largely confirm Dahl's propositions. However, they prove to be almost entirely a product of the "first wave" of democracy from 1848 to 1931. The evidence shows not only numerous exceptions, but also a pronounced decrease over time in the association of the proposed more favorable evolutionary routes to democracy with long-term democratic success.</description><subject>Comparative Study</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS</subject><subject>Encyclopedias</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Inaugurations</subject><subject>Incumbents</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>POLITICAL STABILITY, INSTABILITY, &amp; CHANGE</subject><subject>Polyarchy</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>STUDY OF HISTORY AS SUBJECT MATTER</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>World wars</subject><issn>0010-4159</issn><issn>2151-6227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKf-CxYF36q5a9o0j7KpEwaC6HPI0gu0bO1MWqH_vRkTBsIe7o6DH9999zF2DfwBMy4fBSKCOmEThBzSAlGesgnnwFMBuTpnFyE0cRWFKCfsZlGHvvNjYtoqmdOms97YMfmgnzrUPVWX7MyZdaCrvzllXy_Pn7NFunx_fZs9LVOLhexTJRyUqPKcSJJYZSVKmWGpyFlRVWCsq2KB5daSc6pcibyKjaTFzGTgsim73-tuffc9UOj1pg6W1mvTUjcEXfASAJBH8PYf2HSDb6M3Hf_lXMaK0N0xCFBFZ0W0erhpfReCJ6e3vt4YP2rgehel3kd5kGt2WR2jfgGjgG3D</recordid><startdate>19941001</startdate><enddate>19941001</enddate><creator>Dix, Robert H.</creator><general>City University of New York</general><general>City University of New York, Political Science Program, etc</general><general>Transaction Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941001</creationdate><title>History and Democracy Revisited</title><author>Dix, Robert H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-94f182955ee7e4b382773289efc4dd1acfdacf1c0cceff98b45d8b4e7c23a31f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Comparative Study</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS</topic><topic>Encyclopedias</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Inaugurations</topic><topic>Incumbents</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>POLITICAL STABILITY, INSTABILITY, &amp; CHANGE</topic><topic>Polyarchy</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>STUDY OF HISTORY AS SUBJECT MATTER</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>World wars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dix, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dix, Robert H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>History and Democracy Revisited</atitle><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle><date>1994-10-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>91-105</pages><issn>0010-4159</issn><eissn>2151-6227</eissn><coden>CPPLAX</coden><abstract>Robert Dahl has argued that democracy is more likely to endure in countries where political competition precedes the expansion of political participation and where democracy is inaugurated by evolutionary rather than disruptive means. I test these propositions against the experience of seventy-one democratic regimes between 1848 and 1991. The correlations largely confirm Dahl's propositions. However, they prove to be almost entirely a product of the "first wave" of democracy from 1848 to 1931. The evidence shows not only numerous exceptions, but also a pronounced decrease over time in the association of the proposed more favorable evolutionary routes to democracy with long-term democratic success.</abstract><cop>New York, etc</cop><pub>City University of New York</pub><doi>10.2307/422219</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4159
ispartof Comparative politics, 1994-10, Vol.27 (1), p.91-105
issn 0010-4159
2151-6227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60811120
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Comparative Study
Democracy
DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS
Encyclopedias
Evolution
Freedom
Hegemony
History
Inaugurations
Incumbents
Political science
POLITICAL STABILITY, INSTABILITY, & CHANGE
Polyarchy
Research Note
STUDY OF HISTORY AS SUBJECT MATTER
Voting rights
World wars
title History and Democracy Revisited
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A00%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=History%20and%20Democracy%20Revisited&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20politics&rft.au=Dix,%20Robert%20H.&rft.date=1994-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=91-105&rft.issn=0010-4159&rft.eissn=2151-6227&rft.coden=CPPLAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/422219&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E422219%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297326955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=422219&rfr_iscdi=true