Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration
This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial & labor relations review 1988-10, Vol.42 (1), p.63-76 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 76 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 63 |
| container_title | Industrial & labor relations review |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Bemmels, Brian |
| description | This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men. Women were also 32 percent more likely than men to receive a full reinstatement rather than a partial reinstatement from male arbitrators. There is little evidence of differential treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators, and no evidence that the preferential treatment of women by male arbitrators has declined over time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001979398804200105 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60795213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2523172</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_001979398804200105</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2523172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3745-58a36a30b5a6b1e0c4469ec07440a3876bc2de39a1eecf0626abb10b27e55e743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFNR0dPaTP52j6XWVih4UfAWsulsu2W7W5Ot0G9vyooURQOTSeD33jyGkEug9wBa9ymFVKc8HQyoYPFD5RHpMFAsYRrejklnDyR74pSchbCi8QgNHXI3wWqOvjfOc3RN6BVV76EIbmn9AntDnxWNt01RV-fkJLdlwIuv3iWvj-OX0TSZPU-eRsNZ4rgWMpEDy5XlNJNWZYDUCaFSdFQLQS0faJU5NkeeWkB0OVVM2SwDmjGNUqIWvEtuW9-Nr9-3GBqzjnGwLG2F9TYYRXUqGfAIXv0AV_XWVzGbYVxxAUrpCF3_BQFLleQaUogUaynn6xA85mbji7X1OwPU7Ndrfq83iqatyOMG3beiKL31TeFK82G4FSxeu1gQpbEV-2esTSzFjVZm2ayjVb-1CnaBBwn_G37TKlahqf1hXMapNkwyDprxT2Qbmrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296537191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bemmels, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Bemmels, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men. Women were also 32 percent more likely than men to receive a full reinstatement rather than a partial reinstatement from male arbitrators. There is little evidence of differential treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators, and no evidence that the preferential treatment of women by male arbitrators has declined over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-7939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-271X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001979398804200105</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ILREAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</publisher><subject>Arbitration ; Chivalry ; Control variables ; Criminal justice ; Criminal offenses ; Differences ; Discharge ; Effects ; Favoritism ; Females ; Gender ; Gender equality ; Grievances ; Labor management relations ; Labor Relations ; Males ; Men ; Organizational behavior ; Paternalism ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Industrial & labor relations review, 1988-10, Vol.42 (1), p.63-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1988 Cornell University</rights><rights>1988 Cornell University</rights><rights>Copyright New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations Oct 1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3745-58a36a30b5a6b1e0c4469ec07440a3876bc2de39a1eecf0626abb10b27e55e743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3745-58a36a30b5a6b1e0c4469ec07440a3876bc2de39a1eecf0626abb10b27e55e743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2523172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2523172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4008,27344,27869,27924,27925,33774,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/ilrarticl/v_3a42_3ay_3a1988_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a63-76.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bemmels, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration</title><title>Industrial & labor relations review</title><description>This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men. Women were also 32 percent more likely than men to receive a full reinstatement rather than a partial reinstatement from male arbitrators. There is little evidence of differential treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators, and no evidence that the preferential treatment of women by male arbitrators has declined over time.</description><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Chivalry</subject><subject>Control variables</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal offenses</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Favoritism</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Grievances</subject><subject>Labor management relations</subject><subject>Labor Relations</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Paternalism</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0019-7939</issn><issn>2162-271X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFNR0dPaTP52j6XWVih4UfAWsulsu2W7W5Ot0G9vyooURQOTSeD33jyGkEug9wBa9ymFVKc8HQyoYPFD5RHpMFAsYRrejklnDyR74pSchbCi8QgNHXI3wWqOvjfOc3RN6BVV76EIbmn9AntDnxWNt01RV-fkJLdlwIuv3iWvj-OX0TSZPU-eRsNZ4rgWMpEDy5XlNJNWZYDUCaFSdFQLQS0faJU5NkeeWkB0OVVM2SwDmjGNUqIWvEtuW9-Nr9-3GBqzjnGwLG2F9TYYRXUqGfAIXv0AV_XWVzGbYVxxAUrpCF3_BQFLleQaUogUaynn6xA85mbji7X1OwPU7Ndrfq83iqatyOMG3beiKL31TeFK82G4FSxeu1gQpbEV-2esTSzFjVZm2ayjVb-1CnaBBwn_G37TKlahqf1hXMapNkwyDprxT2Qbmrk</recordid><startdate>198810</startdate><enddate>198810</enddate><creator>Bemmels, Brian</creator><general>New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School</general><general>Cornell University, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198810</creationdate><title>Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration</title><author>Bemmels, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3745-58a36a30b5a6b1e0c4469ec07440a3876bc2de39a1eecf0626abb10b27e55e743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Chivalry</topic><topic>Control variables</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal offenses</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Favoritism</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Grievances</topic><topic>Labor management relations</topic><topic>Labor Relations</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Paternalism</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bemmels, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Industrial & labor relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bemmels, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration</atitle><jtitle>Industrial & labor relations review</jtitle><date>1988-10</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>63-76</pages><issn>0019-7939</issn><eissn>2162-271X</eissn><coden>ILREAQ</coden><abstract>This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men. Women were also 32 percent more likely than men to receive a full reinstatement rather than a partial reinstatement from male arbitrators. There is little evidence of differential treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators, and no evidence that the preferential treatment of women by male arbitrators has declined over time.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</pub><doi>10.1177/001979398804200105</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0019-7939 |
| ispartof | Industrial & labor relations review, 1988-10, Vol.42 (1), p.63-76 |
| issn | 0019-7939 2162-271X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60795213 |
| source | RePEc; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Arbitration Chivalry Control variables Criminal justice Criminal offenses Differences Discharge Effects Favoritism Females Gender Gender equality Grievances Labor management relations Labor Relations Males Men Organizational behavior Paternalism Statistical analysis Statistical significance Studies |
| title | Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A22%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Effects%20in%20Discharge%20Arbitration&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20labor%20relations%20review&rft.au=Bemmels,%20Brian&rft.date=1988-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=63-76&rft.issn=0019-7939&rft.eissn=2162-271X&rft.coden=ILREAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001979398804200105&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2523172%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296537191&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2523172&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001979398804200105&rfr_iscdi=true |