Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions
. This paper deals with the question of how political parties define their electoral strategies in a multiparty system within a segmented society. In trying to answer this question various concepts as developed by Sani and Sartori are discussed, especially the distinction they make between ‘expansiv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of political research 1990-01, Vol.18 (1), p.51-69 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 69 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | European journal of political research |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | KOOLE, RUUD VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP |
| description | . This paper deals with the question of how political parties define their electoral strategies in a multiparty system within a segmented society. In trying to answer this question various concepts as developed by Sani and Sartori are discussed, especially the distinction they make between ‘expansive’and ‘defensive’strategies and the exclusion from their analysis of so‐called ‘non‐relevant’parties. A brief study of electoral strategies of the Dutch political parties during the heyday of pillarization in the 1940s and 1950s supports this criticism. It also stresses the fact that party strategies are defined by the perceptions of partisan elites at a given moment and cannot be explained by post hoc constructs like the stability of the party system or the closedness of the segments in society. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00221.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60791428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60791428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4461-77a4dc5d66b283995a9682d41723cef040a5d08f359febc745713094903a40b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV2L1DAUhosoOK7-h6DgXetJ89FmLwRZxtVlUBE_wJuQSU_HjG3TTTI48-9NmWUvvBFzcy7yPu_h8BTFcwoVze_VvqK8EaVspKioUlClLUBd0-r4oFjdfz0sVsCAl5wyeFw8iXEPALRVdFW49YA2-WAGYv04Y3LJ-Ym4iRgScTfilLAj0VuH6XRJrBln43YTiSmYhDuHkZipI-knEjfOPiQzWSS-Jzi4hGTGYHFeKuPT4lFvhojP7uZF8fXt-svVu3Lz8fr91ZtNaTmXtGwawzsrOim3dcuUEkbJtu44bWpmsQcORnTQ9kyoHre24aLJVymugBkO25ZdFC_PvXPwtweMSY8uWhwGM6E_RC2hUZTX_w4yqRiFVubgi7-Ce38IUz5C59WsBiEUz6nLc8oGH2PAXs_BjSacNAW9yNJ7vRjRixG9yNJ3svQxw6_P8G834Ok_SL2--fRZ0FxQngtcTHi8LzDhV6ZYZr9_uNYbubnh35TQP9gf0ACrQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303205594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>KOOLE, RUUD ; VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</creator><creatorcontrib>KOOLE, RUUD ; VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</creatorcontrib><description>. This paper deals with the question of how political parties define their electoral strategies in a multiparty system within a segmented society. In trying to answer this question various concepts as developed by Sani and Sartori are discussed, especially the distinction they make between ‘expansive’and ‘defensive’strategies and the exclusion from their analysis of so‐called ‘non‐relevant’parties. A brief study of electoral strategies of the Dutch political parties during the heyday of pillarization in the 1940s and 1950s supports this criticism. It also stresses the fact that party strategies are defined by the perceptions of partisan elites at a given moment and cannot be explained by post hoc constructs like the stability of the party system or the closedness of the segments in society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00221.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Campaigns ; Competition ; Electoral campaigning ; Electoral Process ; NETHERLANDS ; POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS ; POLITICAL PARTY ; POWER-DOMINANT GROUPINGS OF A SOCIETY ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>European journal of political research, 1990-01, Vol.18 (1), p.51-69</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4461-77a4dc5d66b283995a9682d41723cef040a5d08f359febc745713094903a40b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4461-77a4dc5d66b283995a9682d41723cef040a5d08f359febc745713094903a40b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1475-6765.1990.tb00221.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1475-6765.1990.tb00221.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27846,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOOLE, RUUD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</creatorcontrib><title>Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions</title><title>European journal of political research</title><description>. This paper deals with the question of how political parties define their electoral strategies in a multiparty system within a segmented society. In trying to answer this question various concepts as developed by Sani and Sartori are discussed, especially the distinction they make between ‘expansive’and ‘defensive’strategies and the exclusion from their analysis of so‐called ‘non‐relevant’parties. A brief study of electoral strategies of the Dutch political parties during the heyday of pillarization in the 1940s and 1950s supports this criticism. It also stresses the fact that party strategies are defined by the perceptions of partisan elites at a given moment and cannot be explained by post hoc constructs like the stability of the party system or the closedness of the segments in society.</description><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Electoral campaigning</subject><subject>Electoral Process</subject><subject>NETHERLANDS</subject><subject>POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS</subject><subject>POLITICAL PARTY</subject><subject>POWER-DOMINANT GROUPINGS OF A SOCIETY</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0304-4130</issn><issn>1475-6765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV2L1DAUhosoOK7-h6DgXetJ89FmLwRZxtVlUBE_wJuQSU_HjG3TTTI48-9NmWUvvBFzcy7yPu_h8BTFcwoVze_VvqK8EaVspKioUlClLUBd0-r4oFjdfz0sVsCAl5wyeFw8iXEPALRVdFW49YA2-WAGYv04Y3LJ-Ym4iRgScTfilLAj0VuH6XRJrBln43YTiSmYhDuHkZipI-knEjfOPiQzWSS-Jzi4hGTGYHFeKuPT4lFvhojP7uZF8fXt-svVu3Lz8fr91ZtNaTmXtGwawzsrOim3dcuUEkbJtu44bWpmsQcORnTQ9kyoHre24aLJVymugBkO25ZdFC_PvXPwtweMSY8uWhwGM6E_RC2hUZTX_w4yqRiFVubgi7-Ce38IUz5C59WsBiEUz6nLc8oGH2PAXs_BjSacNAW9yNJ7vRjRixG9yNJ3svQxw6_P8G834Ok_SL2--fRZ0FxQngtcTHi8LzDhV6ZYZr9_uNYbubnh35TQP9gf0ACrQQ</recordid><startdate>199001</startdate><enddate>199001</enddate><creator>KOOLE, RUUD</creator><creator>VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Kluwer</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199001</creationdate><title>Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions</title><author>KOOLE, RUUD ; VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4461-77a4dc5d66b283995a9682d41723cef040a5d08f359febc745713094903a40b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Electoral campaigning</topic><topic>Electoral Process</topic><topic>NETHERLANDS</topic><topic>POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS</topic><topic>POLITICAL PARTY</topic><topic>POWER-DOMINANT GROUPINGS OF A SOCIETY</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOOLE, RUUD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of political research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOOLE, RUUD</au><au>VAN PRAAG JR, PHILIP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions</atitle><jtitle>European journal of political research</jtitle><date>1990-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>51-69</pages><issn>0304-4130</issn><eissn>1475-6765</eissn><abstract>. This paper deals with the question of how political parties define their electoral strategies in a multiparty system within a segmented society. In trying to answer this question various concepts as developed by Sani and Sartori are discussed, especially the distinction they make between ‘expansive’and ‘defensive’strategies and the exclusion from their analysis of so‐called ‘non‐relevant’parties. A brief study of electoral strategies of the Dutch political parties during the heyday of pillarization in the 1940s and 1950s supports this criticism. It also stresses the fact that party strategies are defined by the perceptions of partisan elites at a given moment and cannot be explained by post hoc constructs like the stability of the party system or the closedness of the segments in society.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00221.x</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0304-4130 |
| ispartof | European journal of political research, 1990-01, Vol.18 (1), p.51-69 |
| issn | 0304-4130 1475-6765 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60791428 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Campaigns Competition Electoral campaigning Electoral Process NETHERLANDS POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS POLITICAL PARTY POWER-DOMINANT GROUPINGS OF A SOCIETY Strategy |
| title | Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electoral%20competition%20in%20a%20segmented%20society:%20campaign%20strategies%20and%20the%20importance%20of%20elite%20perceptions&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20political%20research&rft.au=KOOLE,%20RUUD&rft.date=1990-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=51-69&rft.issn=0304-4130&rft.eissn=1475-6765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00221.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60791428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303205594&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |