Environmental factor weighting at the federal energy regulatory commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is required to assess the environmental impact of any project under its jurisdiction (e.g. pipeline construction and hydroelectric projects). Normally, this assessment involves preparing a written report that covers the entire project and identifying alternat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Socio-economic planning sciences 1991, Vol.25 (2), p.123-132
Hauptverfasser: Stewart, William R., Horowitz, Evan R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 2
container_start_page 123
container_title Socio-economic planning sciences
container_volume 25
creator Stewart, William R.
Horowitz, Evan R.
description The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is required to assess the environmental impact of any project under its jurisdiction (e.g. pipeline construction and hydroelectric projects). Normally, this assessment involves preparing a written report that covers the entire project and identifying alternatives that have a lower environmental impact when such alternatives exist. This paper presents an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for measuring environmental impacts on a common scale so that an overall impact index of a project or group of projects can be reported.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0038-0121(91)90010-O
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60774383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>003801219190010O</els_id><sourcerecordid>37209051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-8816b73d1ef03d0e663161747d477ba9a52faf434531216e5852c92c0d7722763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFr3DAQhUVpoJu0_6AHn0p7cDojyZJ9KZSQtgmBvaRnocjjXRXbciXtlv33ldmSYwoaCUbfezweY-8RrhFQfQYQbQ3I8WOHnzoAhHr7im2w1aJWIPE12zwjb9hlSr8AgEvebNj97Xz0McwTzdmO1WBdDrH6Q363z37eVTZXeU_VQD3F8k8zxd2pirQ7jLaQp8qFafIp-TC_ZReDHRO9-_desZ_fbh9vftQP2-93N18faieFyHXbonrSokcaQPRASglUqKXupdZPtrMNH-wghWxEiauoaRvuOu6g15pzrcQV-3D2XWL4faCUTQngaBztTOGQjAKtpWjFf0GhOXTQYAHlGXQxpBRpMEv0k40ng2DWhs1an1nrM105a8NmW2T3Z1mkhdyzhohScLQkczTC8qZcpzLYFamwft2VWdYVFwYFN_s8FbMvZzMq1R09RZOcp9lR7yO5bPrgX07zFzKpmqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37209051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental factor weighting at the federal energy regulatory commission</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Stewart, William R. ; Horowitz, Evan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stewart, William R. ; Horowitz, Evan R.</creatorcontrib><description>The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is required to assess the environmental impact of any project under its jurisdiction (e.g. pipeline construction and hydroelectric projects). Normally, this assessment involves preparing a written report that covers the entire project and identifying alternatives that have a lower environmental impact when such alternatives exist. This paper presents an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for measuring environmental impacts on a common scale so that an overall impact index of a project or group of projects can be reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(91)90010-O</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Energy policy ; Environmental Policy ; Environmental protection ; Federal Government ; United States</subject><ispartof>Socio-economic planning sciences, 1991, Vol.25 (2), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-8816b73d1ef03d0e663161747d477ba9a52faf434531216e5852c92c0d7722763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(91)90010-O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4006,4022,27921,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesoceps/v_3a25_3ay_3a1991_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a123-132.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stewart, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Evan R.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental factor weighting at the federal energy regulatory commission</title><title>Socio-economic planning sciences</title><description>The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is required to assess the environmental impact of any project under its jurisdiction (e.g. pipeline construction and hydroelectric projects). Normally, this assessment involves preparing a written report that covers the entire project and identifying alternatives that have a lower environmental impact when such alternatives exist. This paper presents an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for measuring environmental impacts on a common scale so that an overall impact index of a project or group of projects can be reported.</description><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0038-0121</issn><issn>1873-6041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFr3DAQhUVpoJu0_6AHn0p7cDojyZJ9KZSQtgmBvaRnocjjXRXbciXtlv33ldmSYwoaCUbfezweY-8RrhFQfQYQbQ3I8WOHnzoAhHr7im2w1aJWIPE12zwjb9hlSr8AgEvebNj97Xz0McwTzdmO1WBdDrH6Q363z37eVTZXeU_VQD3F8k8zxd2pirQ7jLaQp8qFafIp-TC_ZReDHRO9-_desZ_fbh9vftQP2-93N18faieFyHXbonrSokcaQPRASglUqKXupdZPtrMNH-wghWxEiauoaRvuOu6g15pzrcQV-3D2XWL4faCUTQngaBztTOGQjAKtpWjFf0GhOXTQYAHlGXQxpBRpMEv0k40ng2DWhs1an1nrM105a8NmW2T3Z1mkhdyzhohScLQkczTC8qZcpzLYFamwft2VWdYVFwYFN_s8FbMvZzMq1R09RZOcp9lR7yO5bPrgX07zFzKpmqE</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Stewart, William R.</creator><creator>Horowitz, Evan R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Environmental factor weighting at the federal energy regulatory commission</title><author>Stewart, William R. ; Horowitz, Evan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-8816b73d1ef03d0e663161747d477ba9a52faf434531216e5852c92c0d7722763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewart, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Evan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewart, William R.</au><au>Horowitz, Evan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental factor weighting at the federal energy regulatory commission</atitle><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>0038-0121</issn><eissn>1873-6041</eissn><abstract>The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is required to assess the environmental impact of any project under its jurisdiction (e.g. pipeline construction and hydroelectric projects). Normally, this assessment involves preparing a written report that covers the entire project and identifying alternatives that have a lower environmental impact when such alternatives exist. This paper presents an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for measuring environmental impacts on a common scale so that an overall impact index of a project or group of projects can be reported.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0038-0121(91)90010-O</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0121
ispartof Socio-economic planning sciences, 1991, Vol.25 (2), p.123-132
issn 0038-0121
1873-6041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60774383
source RePEc; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Energy policy
Environmental Policy
Environmental protection
Federal Government
United States
title Environmental factor weighting at the federal energy regulatory commission
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20factor%20weighting%20at%20the%20federal%20energy%20regulatory%20commission&rft.jtitle=Socio-economic%20planning%20sciences&rft.au=Stewart,%20William%20R.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=0038-0121&rft.eissn=1873-6041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0038-0121(91)90010-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37209051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37209051&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=003801219190010O&rfr_iscdi=true