Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion
In reaction to what is perceived as an overloading of the federal courts, both the filing fee and the minimum amount in controversy requirement have been raised, so that the courts are paid for by their users and not general taxpayers. The concepts behind this issue are examined.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | University of Pennsylvania law review 1990-04, Vol.138 (4), p.1175-1207 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1207 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1175 |
| container_title | University of Pennsylvania law review |
| container_volume | 138 |
| creator | Beier, Martin D. |
| description | In reaction to what is perceived as an overloading of the federal courts, both the filing fee and the minimum amount in controversy requirement have been raised, so that the courts are paid for by their users and not general taxpayers. The concepts behind this issue are examined. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3312247 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60762710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3312247</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3312247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-20371cfbab6ca32add5b20b0faf7f1b4225eb0e88fcd5a846851149107e237c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1KAzEUBeAgCtYqvkIQ0dXozc9MEnelWhUKbuw6ZDKJTJlOam6r9O0daVeCq7P5OBwOIZcM7rgAdS8E41yqIzJiRvJCl0IdkxGAZIUxoE7JGeISAKqSmRHRTz71adV6pJPvvHugC2z7DzrxPiDSWQhIY8p06jB0yTX0sf0KGdvUn5OT6DoMF4cck8Xs6X36Uszfnl-nk3nhOchNwUEo5mPt6so7wV3TlDWHGqKLKrJacl6GGoLW0Tel07LSJWPSMFCBC-W1GJObfe86p89twI1dtehD17k-pC3aClTFFYMBXv2By7TN_bDNMlMZKSWYAd3ukc8JMYdo17ldubyzDOzvffZw3yCv93KJm5T_ZT_0PmqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196944409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Beier, Martin D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beier, Martin D.</creatorcontrib><description>In reaction to what is perceived as an overloading of the federal courts, both the filing fee and the minimum amount in controversy requirement have been raised, so that the courts are paid for by their users and not general taxpayers. The concepts behind this issue are examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3312247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Caseloads ; Comments ; Court costs ; Courts ; Economic costs ; Economics ; Federal courts ; Fee System ; Fees ; Fees & charges ; Judges ; Judicial process ; Law ; Litigants ; Litigation ; Public goods ; State courts</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 1990-04, Vol.138 (4), p.1175-1207</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The University of Pennsylvania</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School Apr 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3312247$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3312247$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beier, Martin D.</creatorcontrib><title>Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>In reaction to what is perceived as an overloading of the federal courts, both the filing fee and the minimum amount in controversy requirement have been raised, so that the courts are paid for by their users and not general taxpayers. The concepts behind this issue are examined.</description><subject>Caseloads</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Court costs</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Federal courts</subject><subject>Fee System</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Litigants</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>State courts</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1KAzEUBeAgCtYqvkIQ0dXozc9MEnelWhUKbuw6ZDKJTJlOam6r9O0daVeCq7P5OBwOIZcM7rgAdS8E41yqIzJiRvJCl0IdkxGAZIUxoE7JGeISAKqSmRHRTz71adV6pJPvvHugC2z7DzrxPiDSWQhIY8p06jB0yTX0sf0KGdvUn5OT6DoMF4cck8Xs6X36Uszfnl-nk3nhOchNwUEo5mPt6so7wV3TlDWHGqKLKrJacl6GGoLW0Tel07LSJWPSMFCBC-W1GJObfe86p89twI1dtehD17k-pC3aClTFFYMBXv2By7TN_bDNMlMZKSWYAd3ukc8JMYdo17ldubyzDOzvffZw3yCv93KJm5T_ZT_0PmqA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Beier, Martin D.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion</title><author>Beier, Martin D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-20371cfbab6ca32add5b20b0faf7f1b4225eb0e88fcd5a846851149107e237c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Caseloads</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Court costs</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Federal courts</topic><topic>Fee System</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Litigants</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>State courts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beier, Martin D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beier, Martin D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1207</epage><pages>1175-1207</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>In reaction to what is perceived as an overloading of the federal courts, both the filing fee and the minimum amount in controversy requirement have been raised, so that the courts are paid for by their users and not general taxpayers. The concepts behind this issue are examined.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/3312247</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0041-9907 |
| ispartof | University of Pennsylvania law review, 1990-04, Vol.138 (4), p.1175-1207 |
| issn | 0041-9907 1942-8537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60762710 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Caseloads Comments Court costs Courts Economic costs Economics Federal courts Fee System Fees Fees & charges Judges Judicial process Law Litigants Litigation Public goods State courts |
| title | Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A19%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economics%20Awry:%20Using%20Access%20Fees%20for%20Caseload%20Diversion&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Beier,%20Martin%20D.&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1207&rft.pages=1175-1207&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3312247&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3312247%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196944409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3312247&rfr_iscdi=true |