Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections
Analyzed the findings of over 700 criterion-related validity studies concerning (a) the relationship between the magnitude of the standard deviation (SD) of the predictor and the magnitude of the predictive validity, (b) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming explicit selection wa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 1981-12, Vol.66 (6), p.655-663 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 663 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 655 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Linn, Robert L Harnisch, Delwyn L Dunbar, Stephen B |
| description | Analyzed the findings of over 700 criterion-related validity studies concerning (a) the relationship between the magnitude of the standard deviation (SD) of the predictor and the magnitude of the predictive validity, (b) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming explicit selection was based solely on the single predictor, and (c) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming selection was based on an unknown 3rd variable that had plausible correlations with the predictor and the criterion. As expected, a strong positive relationship was found in (a). Assumption of explicit selection, as in (b), reduced but did not eliminate the positive relationship between the SD and the corrected predictive validity. This relationship was reduced by corrections, as in (c). It is concluded that the usual correction for range restriction is better than the uncorrected coefficient but is still apt to provide a conservative estimate. More frequent use of corrections is encouraged. (11 ref) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.655 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60749467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614276782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-94fef8ad20b6ea095934ed9c39a130ebd21359d7832520a9bdfeea8a2e39b8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVJoZuPP5CTaUovxam-LFu5hSVtA4Fc0rOYtceLgldyJHsh_77jbghtacscxMw8r_Sil7FzwS8FV_VnzqUoLafWmEuqqnrDVsIqW4qm0kds9Qq8Y8c5P3IutLJ8xZ7WMSVsJx9DLvqYigRhi0XCPCX_c3xVXIcCd6OnHobChz3t_BaWXRH7oo2h8wc9qeZh8mFL1DLPmPbE7ZGa11dO2dsehoxnL-cJ-_7l5mH9rby7_3q7vr4rQUs1lVb32DfQSb4xCNxWVmnsbKssCMVx00mhKtvVjZKV5GA3XY8IDUhUdtOIRp2wj4d7xxSfZvLsdj63OAwQMM7ZGV5rq01N4Ps_wMc4p0DenBFa1qZu5P8gMmJVI7Qm6OJfkJCWcpJcCKLkgWpTzDlh78bkd5CeneBuSdMtYbklLGeMo6oqEn06iGAEN-bnFtLk2wFzO9PPhsnBOPxKf_g7_Tv2Azvwr3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614276782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Linn, Robert L ; Harnisch, Delwyn L ; Dunbar, Stephen B</creator><contributor>Campbell, John A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Linn, Robert L ; Harnisch, Delwyn L ; Dunbar, Stephen B ; Campbell, John A</creatorcontrib><description>Analyzed the findings of over 700 criterion-related validity studies concerning (a) the relationship between the magnitude of the standard deviation (SD) of the predictor and the magnitude of the predictive validity, (b) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming explicit selection was based solely on the single predictor, and (c) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming selection was based on an unknown 3rd variable that had plausible correlations with the predictor and the criterion. As expected, a strong positive relationship was found in (a). Assumption of explicit selection, as in (b), reduced but did not eliminate the positive relationship between the SD and the corrected predictive validity. This relationship was reduced by corrections, as in (c). It is concluded that the usual correction for range restriction is better than the uncorrected coefficient but is still apt to provide a conservative estimate. More frequent use of corrections is encouraged. (11 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.655</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>CORRECTIONS ; Empirical Methods ; HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY ; Human ; MEASUREMENT ; Methodology ; Predictive Validity ; PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY ; Range ; Restrictions ; Standard Deviation ; Statistical Analysis ; Statistical methods ; Statistical Validity ; STATISTICS ; Studies ; Validation ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1981-12, Vol.66 (6), p.655-663</ispartof><rights>1981 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 1981</rights><rights>1981, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-94fef8ad20b6ea095934ed9c39a130ebd21359d7832520a9bdfeea8a2e39b8183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27850,27905,27906,30980</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Campbell, John A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Linn, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnisch, Delwyn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, Stephen B</creatorcontrib><title>Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><description>Analyzed the findings of over 700 criterion-related validity studies concerning (a) the relationship between the magnitude of the standard deviation (SD) of the predictor and the magnitude of the predictive validity, (b) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming explicit selection was based solely on the single predictor, and (c) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming selection was based on an unknown 3rd variable that had plausible correlations with the predictor and the criterion. As expected, a strong positive relationship was found in (a). Assumption of explicit selection, as in (b), reduced but did not eliminate the positive relationship between the SD and the corrected predictive validity. This relationship was reduced by corrections, as in (c). It is concluded that the usual correction for range restriction is better than the uncorrected coefficient but is still apt to provide a conservative estimate. More frequent use of corrections is encouraged. (11 ref)</description><subject>CORRECTIONS</subject><subject>Empirical Methods</subject><subject>HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>MEASUREMENT</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</subject><subject>Range</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Standard Deviation</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistical Validity</subject><subject>STATISTICS</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Validation</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVJoZuPP5CTaUovxam-LFu5hSVtA4Fc0rOYtceLgldyJHsh_77jbghtacscxMw8r_Sil7FzwS8FV_VnzqUoLafWmEuqqnrDVsIqW4qm0kds9Qq8Y8c5P3IutLJ8xZ7WMSVsJx9DLvqYigRhi0XCPCX_c3xVXIcCd6OnHobChz3t_BaWXRH7oo2h8wc9qeZh8mFL1DLPmPbE7ZGa11dO2dsehoxnL-cJ-_7l5mH9rby7_3q7vr4rQUs1lVb32DfQSb4xCNxWVmnsbKssCMVx00mhKtvVjZKV5GA3XY8IDUhUdtOIRp2wj4d7xxSfZvLsdj63OAwQMM7ZGV5rq01N4Ps_wMc4p0DenBFa1qZu5P8gMmJVI7Qm6OJfkJCWcpJcCKLkgWpTzDlh78bkd5CeneBuSdMtYbklLGeMo6oqEn06iGAEN-bnFtLk2wFzO9PPhsnBOPxKf_g7_Tv2Azvwr3s</recordid><startdate>198112</startdate><enddate>198112</enddate><creator>Linn, Robert L</creator><creator>Harnisch, Delwyn L</creator><creator>Dunbar, Stephen B</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198112</creationdate><title>Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections</title><author>Linn, Robert L ; Harnisch, Delwyn L ; Dunbar, Stephen B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-94fef8ad20b6ea095934ed9c39a130ebd21359d7832520a9bdfeea8a2e39b8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>CORRECTIONS</topic><topic>Empirical Methods</topic><topic>HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>MEASUREMENT</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</topic><topic>Range</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Standard Deviation</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistical Validity</topic><topic>STATISTICS</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Validation</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linn, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnisch, Delwyn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, Stephen B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linn, Robert L</au><au>Harnisch, Delwyn L</au><au>Dunbar, Stephen B</au><au>Campbell, John A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><date>1981-12</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>655-663</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>Analyzed the findings of over 700 criterion-related validity studies concerning (a) the relationship between the magnitude of the standard deviation (SD) of the predictor and the magnitude of the predictive validity, (b) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming explicit selection was based solely on the single predictor, and (c) the effect of corrections for range restriction, assuming selection was based on an unknown 3rd variable that had plausible correlations with the predictor and the criterion. As expected, a strong positive relationship was found in (a). Assumption of explicit selection, as in (b), reduced but did not eliminate the positive relationship between the SD and the corrected predictive validity. This relationship was reduced by corrections, as in (c). It is concluded that the usual correction for range restriction is better than the uncorrected coefficient but is still apt to provide a conservative estimate. More frequent use of corrections is encouraged. (11 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.655</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 1981-12, Vol.66 (6), p.655-663 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60749467 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | CORRECTIONS Empirical Methods HEAVILY EMPHASIZES METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE OF STUDY Human MEASUREMENT Methodology Predictive Validity PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY Range Restrictions Standard Deviation Statistical Analysis Statistical methods Statistical Validity STATISTICS Studies Validation Validity |
| title | Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corrections%20for%20range%20restriction:%20An%20empirical%20investigation%20of%20conditions%20resulting%20in%20conservative%20corrections&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Linn,%20Robert%20L&rft.date=1981-12&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=655-663&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614276782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614276782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |