A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage
A two-stage budgeting approach can often be taken when analyzing consumer choice situations. In this paper we examine the particular situation where a consumer makes purchases of a discrete commodity of which there are a number of brands. In the first stage, the consumer decides how many purchases t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public economics 1995, Vol.56 (1), p.1-30 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 30 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Journal of public economics |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Hausman, Jerry A. Leonard, Gregory K. McFadden, Daniel |
| description | A two-stage budgeting approach can often be taken when analyzing consumer choice situations. In this paper we examine the particular situation where a consumer makes purchases of a discrete commodity of which there are a number of brands. In the first stage, the consumer decides how many purchases to make; in the second stage, the consumer decides how to allocate these purchases across brands. Our econometric approach to this type of situation uses a utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model. The second stage, which is specified as a multinomial choice model, produces a price index for the commodity which is used to estimate the first stage, which is specified as a count data model. We apply the model to recreational demand behavior in Alaska in order to estimate the welfare losses suffered by recreational users due to the
Exxon Valdez oil spill. These results may provide useful input to government agencies attempting to estimate the appropriate level of taxes, fines, or regulations for deterring damage to the environment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0047-2727(93)01415-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60735062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0047272793014157</els_id><sourcerecordid>60735062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-68fc693559f365509d63e7105fc8b910e70dbfd5b816286b4dd07b689987c99b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFjEQxhdR8LX6DTwED6LQtcnmzb-L8FK0Fgpe6jlkk9k2ZTdZk2zhvfeDN-uWHjzoYTKB-c3DzDxN857gLwQTfobxXrSd6MQnRT9jsiesFS-aHZFCtR0l_GWze0ZeN29yvsMYE6rkrnk4oKX40Zdja2PIPhcI5RTZOPU-gEPOZ5ugALK30VtAJrhaXEJBzhSDpuhgRIecIWcfblCCSpviYzAjWjKgMa415BZAJaJgypJqJUGOS6pyzkzmBt42rwYzZnj3lE-aX9-_XZ__aK9-XlyeH65ay6QoLZeD5YoypgbKGcPKcQqCYDZY2SuCQWDXD471kvBO8n7vHBY9l0pJYZXq6UnzcdOdU_y9QC56quvBOJoAccmaY0EZ5t1_QSp5xxQhFfzwF3hXF6vLZ91hWmfqOlmh_QbZVK-RYNBz8pNJR02wXg3Uqzt6dUcrqv8YqEVtu9jaEsxgn3sAYF56sFHfa2oYr8-xBlGK1eTXb415y1jflqkqfd2UoB733kPS2XoIFpyvhhXtov_3KI-2drtd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203910228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hausman, Jerry A. ; Leonard, Gregory K. ; McFadden, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hausman, Jerry A. ; Leonard, Gregory K. ; McFadden, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>A two-stage budgeting approach can often be taken when analyzing consumer choice situations. In this paper we examine the particular situation where a consumer makes purchases of a discrete commodity of which there are a number of brands. In the first stage, the consumer decides how many purchases to make; in the second stage, the consumer decides how to allocate these purchases across brands. Our econometric approach to this type of situation uses a utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model. The second stage, which is specified as a multinomial choice model, produces a price index for the commodity which is used to estimate the first stage, which is specified as a count data model. We apply the model to recreational demand behavior in Alaska in order to estimate the welfare losses suffered by recreational users due to the
Exxon Valdez oil spill. These results may provide useful input to government agencies attempting to estimate the appropriate level of taxes, fines, or regulations for deterring damage to the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2316</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(93)01415-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPBEBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alaska ; CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT ; Choices ; Consumer behaviour ; Count data model ; Data models ; Decision models ; Demand ; Discrete choice model ; Econometrics ; Economic models ; ENVIRONMENT ; Environmental degradation ; NATURAL RESOURCES ; Pollution ; Public economics ; Public policy ; Recreation ; Recreational demand ; REGULATION & REGULATORY POLICY ; TAXING, TAXATION ; Two-stage budgeting ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of public economics, 1995, Vol.56 (1), p.1-30</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jan 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-68fc693559f365509d63e7105fc8b910e70dbfd5b816286b4dd07b689987c99b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-68fc693559f365509d63e7105fc8b910e70dbfd5b816286b4dd07b689987c99b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)01415-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,4009,4025,27928,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeepubeco/v_3a56_3ay_3a1995_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a1-30.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hausman, Jerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Gregory K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage</title><title>Journal of public economics</title><description>A two-stage budgeting approach can often be taken when analyzing consumer choice situations. In this paper we examine the particular situation where a consumer makes purchases of a discrete commodity of which there are a number of brands. In the first stage, the consumer decides how many purchases to make; in the second stage, the consumer decides how to allocate these purchases across brands. Our econometric approach to this type of situation uses a utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model. The second stage, which is specified as a multinomial choice model, produces a price index for the commodity which is used to estimate the first stage, which is specified as a count data model. We apply the model to recreational demand behavior in Alaska in order to estimate the welfare losses suffered by recreational users due to the
Exxon Valdez oil spill. These results may provide useful input to government agencies attempting to estimate the appropriate level of taxes, fines, or regulations for deterring damage to the environment.</description><subject>Alaska</subject><subject>CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Consumer behaviour</subject><subject>Count data model</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Decision models</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Discrete choice model</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENT</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>NATURAL RESOURCES</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Public economics</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Recreational demand</subject><subject>REGULATION & REGULATORY POLICY</subject><subject>TAXING, TAXATION</subject><subject>Two-stage budgeting</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0047-2727</issn><issn>1879-2316</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFjEQxhdR8LX6DTwED6LQtcnmzb-L8FK0Fgpe6jlkk9k2ZTdZk2zhvfeDN-uWHjzoYTKB-c3DzDxN857gLwQTfobxXrSd6MQnRT9jsiesFS-aHZFCtR0l_GWze0ZeN29yvsMYE6rkrnk4oKX40Zdja2PIPhcI5RTZOPU-gEPOZ5ugALK30VtAJrhaXEJBzhSDpuhgRIecIWcfblCCSpviYzAjWjKgMa415BZAJaJgypJqJUGOS6pyzkzmBt42rwYzZnj3lE-aX9-_XZ__aK9-XlyeH65ay6QoLZeD5YoypgbKGcPKcQqCYDZY2SuCQWDXD471kvBO8n7vHBY9l0pJYZXq6UnzcdOdU_y9QC56quvBOJoAccmaY0EZ5t1_QSp5xxQhFfzwF3hXF6vLZ91hWmfqOlmh_QbZVK-RYNBz8pNJR02wXg3Uqzt6dUcrqv8YqEVtu9jaEsxgn3sAYF56sFHfa2oYr8-xBlGK1eTXb415y1jflqkqfd2UoB733kPS2XoIFpyvhhXtov_3KI-2drtd</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Hausman, Jerry A.</creator><creator>Leonard, Gregory K.</creator><creator>McFadden, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage</title><author>Hausman, Jerry A. ; Leonard, Gregory K. ; McFadden, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-68fc693559f365509d63e7105fc8b910e70dbfd5b816286b4dd07b689987c99b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Alaska</topic><topic>CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Consumer behaviour</topic><topic>Count data model</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Decision models</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Discrete choice model</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENT</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>NATURAL RESOURCES</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Public economics</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Recreational demand</topic><topic>REGULATION & REGULATORY POLICY</topic><topic>TAXING, TAXATION</topic><topic>Two-stage budgeting</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hausman, Jerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Gregory K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of public economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hausman, Jerry A.</au><au>Leonard, Gregory K.</au><au>McFadden, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public economics</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>1-30</pages><issn>0047-2727</issn><eissn>1879-2316</eissn><coden>JPBEBK</coden><abstract>A two-stage budgeting approach can often be taken when analyzing consumer choice situations. In this paper we examine the particular situation where a consumer makes purchases of a discrete commodity of which there are a number of brands. In the first stage, the consumer decides how many purchases to make; in the second stage, the consumer decides how to allocate these purchases across brands. Our econometric approach to this type of situation uses a utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model. The second stage, which is specified as a multinomial choice model, produces a price index for the commodity which is used to estimate the first stage, which is specified as a count data model. We apply the model to recreational demand behavior in Alaska in order to estimate the welfare losses suffered by recreational users due to the
Exxon Valdez oil spill. These results may provide useful input to government agencies attempting to estimate the appropriate level of taxes, fines, or regulations for deterring damage to the environment.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0047-2727(93)01415-7</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2727 |
| ispartof | Journal of public economics, 1995, Vol.56 (1), p.1-30 |
| issn | 0047-2727 1879-2316 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60735062 |
| source | RePEc; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Alaska CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT Choices Consumer behaviour Count data model Data models Decision models Demand Discrete choice model Econometrics Economic models ENVIRONMENT Environmental degradation NATURAL RESOURCES Pollution Public economics Public policy Recreation Recreational demand REGULATION & REGULATORY POLICY TAXING, TAXATION Two-stage budgeting U.S.A |
| title | A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T16%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20utility-consistent,%20combined%20discrete%20choice%20and%20count%20data%20model%20Assessing%20recreational%20use%20losses%20due%20to%20natural%20resource%20damage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20economics&rft.au=Hausman,%20Jerry%20A.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=1-30&rft.issn=0047-2727&rft.eissn=1879-2316&rft.coden=JPBEBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0047-2727(93)01415-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60735062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203910228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0047272793014157&rfr_iscdi=true |